nach oben

Journal of Computational Neuroscience

Erschienen in:

01.10.2016

Consistent estimation of complete neuronal connectivity in large neuronal populations using sparse “shotgun” neuronal activity sampling

verfasst von: Yuriy Mishchenko

Erschienen in: Journal of Computational Neuroscience | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

We investigate the properties of recently proposed “shotgun” sampling approach for the common inputs problem in the functional estimation of neuronal connectivity. We study the asymptotic correctness, the speed of convergence, and the data size requirements of such an approach. We show that the shotgun approach can be expected to allow the inference of complete connectivity matrix in large neuronal populations under some rather general conditions. However, we find that the posterior error of the shotgun connectivity estimator grows quickly with the size of unobserved neuronal populations, the square of average connectivity strength, and the square of observation sparseness. This implies that the shotgun connectivity estimation will require significantly larger amounts of neuronal activity data whenever the number of neurons in observed neuronal populations remains small. We present a numerical approach for solving the shotgun estimation problem in general settings and use it to demonstrate the shotgun connectivity inference in the examples of simulated synfire and weakly coupled cortical neuronal networks.

Vorheriger Artikel Parallel linear dynamic models can mimic the McGurk effect in clinical populations

Nächster Artikel Axonal model for temperature stimulation

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abeles, M. (1991). Corticonics: Cambridge University Press.

Bellet, L.R. (2006). Ergodic properties of Markov processes. In Open Quantum Systems II (pp. 1–39). Berlin: Springer.

Berk, K.N. (1973). A Central Limit Theorem for m-Dependent Random Variables with Unbounded m. Annals of Probability, 1(2), 352–354.CrossRef

Boyd, S.P. (2004). Convex optimization: Cambridge University Press.

Bradley, R.C. (2005). Basic properties of strong mixing conditions. A survey and some open questions. Probability surveys, 2, 107–144.CrossRef

Braitenberg, V., & Schuz, A. (1998). Cortex: statistics and geometry of neuronal connectivity. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef

Brillinger, D. (1988). Maximum likelihood analysis of spike trains of interacting nerve cells. Biological Cyberkinetics, 59, 189–200.CrossRef

Brillinger, D. (1992). Nerve cell spike train data analysis: a progression of technique. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 260–271.CrossRef

Chornoboy, E., Schramm, L., & Karr, A. (1988). Maximum likelihood identification of neural point process systems. Biological Cybernetics, 59, 265–275.CrossRefPubMed

Cotton, R.J., Froudarakis, E., Storer, P., Saggau, P., & Tolias, A.S. (2013). Three-dimensional mapping of microcircuit correlation structure. Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 7, 151.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cossart, R., Aronov, D., & Yuste, R. (2003). Attractor dynamics of network up states in the neocortex. Nature, 423, 283–288.CrossRefPubMed

Coulon-Prieur, C., & Doukhan, P. (2000). A triangular central limit theorem under a new weak dependence condition. Stat. Probab. Lett., 27(1), 61–68.CrossRef

Davidson, J. (2006). Asymptotic methods and functional central limit theorems. In T.C. Mills, & K. Patterson (Eds.), Palgrave Handbooks of Econometrics: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Dedecker, J., & Merlevede, F. (2002). Necessary and sufficient conditions for the conditional central limit theorem. Annals of Probability, 30, 1044–1081.CrossRef

Dempster, A., Laird, N., & Rubin, D. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1–38.

Djurisic, M., Antic, S., Chen, W.R., & Zecevic, D. (2004). Voltage imaging from dendrites of mitral cells: EPSP attenuation and spike trigger zones. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(30), 6703–6714.CrossRefPubMed

Furedi, Z., & Komlos, J. (1981). The eigenvalues of random symmetric matrices. Combinatorica, 1, 233.CrossRef

Doukhan, P. (1994). Mixing: Properties and Examples: Springer. Lect. Notes. Stat. 85.

Godsill, S., Doucet, A., & West, M. (2001). Maximum a Posteriori Sequence Estimation Using Monte Carlo Particle Filters. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 53(1), 82–96.CrossRef

Gomez-Urquijo, S.M., Reblet, C., Bueno-Lopez, J.L., & Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, I. (2000). Gabaergic neurons in the rabbit visual cortex: percentage, distribution and cortical projections. Brain Research, 862, 171–9.CrossRefPubMed

Grewe, B., Langer, D., Kasper, H., Kampa, B., & Helmchen, F. (2010). High-speed in vivo calcium imaging reveals neuronal network activity with near-millisecond precision. Nature Methods, 399–405.

Guillotin-Plantard, N., & Prieur, C. (2010). Central limit theorem for sampled sums of dependent random variables. ESAIM: Probability and Statistics, 14, 299–314.CrossRef

Hairer, M. (2010). “Convergence of Markov processes.” Lecture notes.

Hall, P., & Heyde, C.C. (2014). Martingale limit theory and its applications, (p. 320): Academic Press. Chapter 3.

Iyer, V., Hoogland, T.M., & Saggau, P. (2006). Fast functional imaging of single neurons using random-access multiphoton (RAMP) microscopy. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95(1), 535– 545.CrossRefPubMed

Johnson, O. (2001). An Information-Theoretic Central Limit Theorem for Finitely Susceptible FKG Systems. Theory Probab. Appl., 50(2), 214–224.CrossRef

Kantas, N., Doucet, A., Singh, S.S., & Maciejowski, J.H. (2009). An overview of sequential Monte Carlo methods for parameter estimation in general state-space models. In 15th IFAC Symposium on System Identification (SYSID), Saint-Malo, France, 2009 Jul 6, (Vol. 102 p. 117).

Keshri, S., Pnevmatikakis, E., Pakman, A., Shababo, B., & Paninski, L. (2013). A shotgun sampling solution for the common input problem in neuronal connectivity inference. arXiv:http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.3724.

Klartag, B. (2007). A central limit theorem for convex sets. Inventiones Mathematicae, 168, 91–131.CrossRef

Koch, C. (1999). Biophysics of Computation: Oxford University Press.

Kulkarni, J., & Paninski, L. (2007). Common-input models for multiple neural spike-train data. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 18, 375–407.CrossRef

Lefort, S., Tomm, C., Floyd Sarria, J. -C., & Petersen, C.C.H. (2009). The excitatory neuronal network of the c2 barrel column in mouse primary somatosensory cortex. Neuron, 61, 301–16.CrossRefPubMed

Lehmann, E.L. (1999). Elements of large-sample theory. New York: Springer. Chapter 2.8.CrossRef

Mishchenko, Y., Vogelstein, J., & Paninski, L. (2011). A Bayesian approach for inferring neuronal connectivity from calcium fluorescent imaging data. Annals of Applied Statistics, 5, 1229– 61.CrossRef

Mishchenko, Y., & Paninski, L. (2011). Efficient methods for sampling spike trains in networks of coupled neurons. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 5(3), 1893–1919.

Newman, C. (1984). Asymptotic Independence and Limit Theorems for Positively and Negatively Dependent Random Variables. Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, 127–140.

Neumann, M.H. (2013). A central limit theorem for triangular arrays of weakly dependent random variables, with applications in statistics. ESAIM: Probability and Statistics, 17, 120–134.CrossRef

Nguyen, Q.T., Callamaras, N., Hsieh, C., & Parker, I. (2001). Construction of a two-photon microscope for video-rate Ca ²+ imaging. Cell Calcium, 30(6), 383–393.CrossRefPubMed

Nykamp, D. (2007). A mathematical framework for inferring connectivity in probabilistic neuronal networks. Mathematical Biosciences, 205, 204–251.CrossRefPubMed

Nykamp, D.Q. (2005). Revealing pairwise coupling in linear-nonlinear networks. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 65(6), 2005–2032.CrossRef

Ohki, K., Chung, S., Ch’ng, Y., Kara, P., & Reid, C. (2005). Functional imaging with cellular resolution reveals precise micro-architecture in visual cortex. Nature, 433, 597–603.CrossRefPubMed

Paninski, L. (2004). Maximum likelihood estimation of cascade point-process neural encoding models. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 15, 243–262.CrossRef

Paninski, L., Ahmadian, Y., Ferreira, D., Koyama, S., Rahnama, K., Vidne, M., Vogelstein, J., & Wu, W. (2010). A new look at state-space models for neural data. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 29, 107–126.CrossRefPubMed

Paninski, L., Fellows, M., Shoham, S., Hatsopoulos, N., & Donoghue, J. (2004). Superlinear population encoding of dynamic hand trajectory in primary motor cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 8551–8561.CrossRefPubMed

Pillow, J., & Latham, P. (2007). Neural characterization in partially observed populations of spiking neurons. NIPS.

Pillow, J., Shlens, J., Paninski, L., Sher, A., Litke, A., Chichilnisky, E., & Simoncelli, E. (2008). Spatiotemporal correlations and visual signaling in a complete neuronal population. Nature, 454, 995–999.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Plesser, H., & Gerstner, W. (2000). Noise in integrate-and-fire neurons: From stochastic input to escape rates. Neural Computation, 12, 367–384.CrossRefPubMed

Rabiner, L.R. (1989). A Tutorial on Hidden Markov Models and Selected Applications in Speech Recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 72(2), 257–286.CrossRef

Rasmussen, C.E., & Williams, C.K.I. (2006). Gaussian processes for Machinee Learning. MIT Press: Appendix B.

Reddy, G., Kelleher, K., Fink, R., & Saggau, P. (2008a). Three-dimensional random access multiphoton microscopy for functional imaging of neuronal activity. Nature neuroscience, 11, 713–720.

Reddy, G., Kelleher, K., Fink, R., & Saggau, P. (2008b). Three-dimensional random access multiphoton microscopy for functional imaging of neuronal activity. Nature Neuroscience, 11(6), 713–720.

Rigat, F., de Gunst, M., & van Pelt, J. (2006). Bayesian modelling and analysis of spatio-temporal neuronal networks. Bayesian Analysis, 1, 733–764.CrossRef

Salome, R., Kremer, Y., Dieudonne, S., Leger, J.-F., Krichevsky, O., Wyart, C., Chatenay, D., & Bourdieu, L. (2006). Ultrafast random-access scanning in two-photon microscopy using acousto-optic deflectors. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 154(1–2), 161–174.CrossRefPubMed

Sayer, R.J., Friedlander, M.J., & Redman, S.J. (1990). The time course and amplitude of epsps evoked at synapses between pairs of ca3/ca1 neurons in the hippocampal slice. Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 826–36.PubMed

Soudry, D., Keshri, S., Stinson, P., Oh, M.-H., Iyengar, G., & Paninski, L. (2015). Efficient “Shotgun” inference of neural connectivity from highly sub-sampled activity data. PLOS Computational Biology, 11, e1004464.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Stevenson, I., Rebesco, J., Hatsopoulos, N., Haga, Z., Miller, L., & Koerding, K. (2008a). Inferring network structure from spikes. Statistical Analysis of Neural Data meeting.

Stevenson, I.H., Rebesco, J.M., Hatsopoulos, N.G., Haga, Z., Miller, L.E., & Kording, K.P. (2009). Bayesian inference of functional connectivity and network structure from spikes. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation, 17, 203–13.CrossRef

Stevenson, I.H., Rebesco, J.M., Miller, L.E., & Kording, K.P. (2008b). Inferring functional connections between neurons. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18, 582–8.

Stosiek, C., Garaschuk, O., Holthoff, K., & Konnerth, A. (2003). In vivo two-photon calcium imaging of neuronal networks. Proceedings of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America, 100(12), 7319–7324.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Theis, L., Berens, P., Froudarakis, E., Reimer, J., Roman-Roson, M., Baden, T., Euler T., Tolias A.S., & Bethge, M. (2015). Supervised learning sets benchmark for robust spike detection from calcium imaging signals. bioRxiv, 010777.

Truccolo, W., Eden, U., Fellows, M., Donoghue, J., & Brown, E. (2005). A point process framework for relating neural spiking activity to spiking history, neural ensemble and extrinsic covariate effects. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 1074–1089.CrossRefPubMed

Tsien, R.Y. (1989). Fluorescent probes of cell signaling. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 12, 227–253.CrossRefPubMed

Turaga, S., Buesing, L., Packer, A., Dalgleish, H., Pettit, N., Hausser, M., & Macke, J. (2013). Inferring neural population dynamics from multiple partial recordings of the same neural circuit. NIPS.

Varadhan, S.R.S. (2001). Probability theory, volume 7 of Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics. New York: New York University Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences. Chapter 6.

Vidne, M., Ahmadian, Y., Shlens, J., Pillow, J., Kulkarni, J., Litke, A., Chilchilnisky, E., Simoncelli, E., & Paninski, L. (2012). The impact of common noise on the activity of a large network of retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 33, 97–121.CrossRefPubMed

Vidne, M., Kulkarni, J., Ahmadian, Y., Pillow, J., Shlens, J., Chichilnisky, E., Simoncelli, E., & Paninski, L. (2009). Inferring functional connectivity in an ensemble of retinal ganglion cells sharing a common input. COSYNE.

Vogelstein, J., Watson, B., Packer, A., Yuste, R., Jedynak, B., & Paninski, L. (2009). Spike inference from calcium imaging using sequential Monte Carlo methods. Biophysical Journal, 97, 636.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Vogelstein, J.T., Packer, A.M., Machado, T.A., Sippy, T., Babadi, B., Yuste, R., & Paninski, L. (2010). Fast nonnegative deconvolution for spike train inference from population calcium imaging. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104, 3691.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wallace, D., zum Alten Borgloh, S., Astori, S., Yang, Y., Bausen, M., K”ugler, S., Palmer, A., Tsien, R., Sprengel, R., Kerr, J., Denk, W., & Hasan, M. (2008). Single-spike detection in vitro and in vivo with a genetic Ca2+ sensor. Nature Methods, 5(9), 797–804.CrossRefPubMed

Yatsenko, D., Josi, K., Ecker, A.S., Froudarakis, E., Cotton, R.J., & Tolias, A.S. (2015). Improved Estimation and Interpretation of Correlations in Neural Circuits. PLoS Computational Biology, 11, e1004083.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yuste, R., Konnerth, A., Masters, B., & et al. (2006). Imaging in Neuroscience and Development, A Laboratory Manual.

Titel: Consistent estimation of complete neuronal connectivity in large neuronal populations using sparse “shotgun” neuronal activity sampling
verfasst von: Yuriy Mishchenko
Publikationsdatum: 01.10.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Computational Neuroscience / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0929-5313
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6873
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-016-0611-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Interaction between synaptic inhibition and glial-potassium dynamics leads to diverse seizure transition modes in biophysical models of human focal seizures

Ion channel noise can explain firing correlation in auditory nerves

Computational modeling of epileptiform activities in medial temporal lobe epilepsy combined with in vitro experiments

Axonal model for temperature stimulation

AMPA/NMDA cooperativity and integration during a single synaptic event

Parallel linear dynamic models can mimic the McGurk effect in clinical populations

Premium Partner