nach oben

Social Indicators Research

Erschienen in:

30.11.2019 | Original Research

Constructing Composite Indicators with Individual Judgements and Best–Worst Method: An Illustration of Value Measure

Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In practice, a variety of composite indicators are created using the arithmetic average of different sub-indicators. However, this scheme is typically criticized of the possibility of compensation. For this reason, this paper re-constructs these composite indicators by means of a new methodology. Comprehensive individual judgements among the sub-indicators have been considered to determine the maximum total utilities. Then the best–worst method is introduced to determine the preference associated with various individual judgements. An illustration of Value Measure of health systems is presented to demonstrate the validity and usefulness of our methodology.

Nächster Artikel Examining Multidimensional Poverty in Sri Lanka: Transitioning Through Post War Conflict

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

https://www.futurehealthindex.com/value-measure/.

Areal, F. J., & Riesgo, L. (2015). Probability functions to build composite indicators: A methodology to measure environmental impacts of genetically modified crops. Ecological Indicators, 52, 498–516.CrossRef

Badea, A. C., Claudio, M. R. S., Tarantola, S., & Bolado, R. (2011). Composite indicators for security of energy supply using ordered weighted averaging. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96(6), 651–662.CrossRef

Barron, F. H., & Barrett, B. E. (1996). Decision quality using ranked attribute weights. Management Science, 42(11), 1515–1523.CrossRef

Becker, W., Saisana, M., Paruolo, P., & Vandecasteele, I. (2017). Weights and importance in composite indicators: Closing the gap. Ecological Indicators, 80, 12–22.CrossRef

Bordley, R. F. (1982). A multiplicative formula for aggregating probability assessments. Management Science, 28(10), 1137–1148.CrossRef

Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., & Van Puyenbroeck, T. (2007). An introduction to ‘benefit of the doubt’ composite indicators. Social Indicators Research, 82(1), 111–145.CrossRef

Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., Van Puyenbroeck, T., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., et al. (2008). Creating composite indicators with DEA and robustness analysis: The case of the Technology Achievement Index. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(2), 239–251.CrossRef

Claveria, O., Monte, E., & Torra, S. (2018). A data-driven approach to construct survey-based indicators by means of evolutionary algorithms. Social Indicators Research, 135(1), 1–14.CrossRef

Ding, Y., Fu, Y., Lai, K. K., & Leung, W. J. (2018). Using ranked weights and acceptability analysis to construct composite indicators: A case study of regional sustainable society index. Social Indicators Research, 139(3), 871–885.CrossRef

Ebert, U., & Welsch, H. (2004). Meaningful environmental indices: A social choice approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47(2), 270–283.CrossRef

Fusco, E. (2015). Enhancing non-compensatory composite indicators: A directional proposal. European Journal of Operational Research, 242(2), 620–630.CrossRef

Gnaldi, M., & Del Sarto, S. (2018). Variable weighting via multidimensional IRT models in composite indicators construction. Social Indicators Research, 136(3), 1139–1156.CrossRef

Hatefi, S., & Torabi, S. (2010). A common weight MCDA-DEA approach to construct composite indicators. Ecological Economics, 70(1), 114–120.CrossRef

Hochbaum, D. S., & Levin, A. (2006). Methodologies and algorithms for group-rankings decision. Management Science, 52(9), 1394–1408.CrossRef

Karagiannis, G. (2017). On aggregate composite indicators. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(7), 741–746.CrossRef

Lauro, N. C., Grassia, M. G., & Cataldo, R. (2018). Model based composite indicators: New developments in partial least squares-path modeling for the building of different types of composite indicators. Social Indicators Research, 135(2), 421–455.CrossRef

Lee, S., & Yu, J. (2013). Composite indicator development using utility function and fuzzy theory. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(8), 1279–1290.CrossRef

Luzzati, T., & Gucciardi, G. (2015). A non-simplistic approach to composite indicators and rankings: An illustration by comparing the sustainability of the EU countries. Ecological Economics, 113, 25–38.CrossRef

Morris, P. A. (1977). Combining expert judgments: A Bayesian approach. Management Science, 23(7), 679–693.CrossRef

Munda, G. (2012). Choosing aggregation rules for composite indicators. Social Indicators Research, 109(3), 337–354.CrossRef

Munda, G., & Nardo, M. (2009). Noncompensatory/nonlinear composite indicators for ranking countries: A defensible setting. Applied Economics, 41(12), 1513–1523.CrossRef

Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., & Giovannini, E. (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Peng, C., Wu, X., Fu, Y., & Lai, K. K. (2017). Alternative approaches to constructing composite indicators: An application to construct a sustainable energy index for APEC economies. Operational Research, 17(3), 747–759.CrossRef

Rezaei, J. (2015). Best–worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57.CrossRef

Rezaei, J. (2016). Best–worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega, 64, 126–130.CrossRef

Rogge, N. (2018). On aggregating benefit of the doubt composite indicators. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(1), 364–369.CrossRef

Rogge, N., & Van Nijverseel, I. (2018). Quality of life in the European Union: A multidimensional analysis. Social Indicators Research, 141(2), 765–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1854-y.CrossRef

Saaty, T. L. (1986). Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 32(7), 841–855.CrossRef

Saisana, M., & Tarantola, S. (2002). State-of-the-art report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development. European Commission, Joint Research Centre.

Saltelli, A. (2007). Composite indicators between analysis and advocacy. Social Indicators Research, 81(1), 65–77.CrossRef

Shen, Y., Hermans, E., Brijs, T., & Wets, G. (2013). Data envelopment analysis for composite indicators: A multiple layer model. Social Indicators Research, 114(2), 739–756.CrossRef

Song, L., & Liu, F. (2018). An improvement in DEA cross-efficiency aggregation based on the Shannon entropy. International Transactions in Operational Research, 25(2), 705–714.CrossRef

Song, L., Fu, Y., Zhou, P., & Lai, K. K. (2017). Measuring national energy performance via energy trilemma index: A stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis. Energy Economics, 66, 313–319.CrossRef

Van Puyenbroeck, T., & Rogge, N. (2017). Geometric mean quantity index numbers with Benefit-of-the-Doubt weights. European Journal of Operational Research, 256(3), 1004–1014.CrossRef

Verbunt, P., & Rogge, N. (2018). Geometric composite indicators with compromise Benefit-of-the-Doubt weights. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(1), 388–401.CrossRef

Wang, H. (2015). A generalized MCDA-DEA (multi-criterion decision analysis-data envelopment analysis) approach to construct slacks-based composite indicator. Energy, 80, 114–122.CrossRef

Wu, S., Fu, Y., Shen, H., & Liu, F. (2018). Using ranked weights and Shannon entropy to modify regional sustainable society index. Sustainable cities and society, 41, 443–448.CrossRef

Yakowitz, D., Lane, L., & Szidarovszky, F. (1993). Multi-attribute decision making: dominance with respect to an importance order of the attributes. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 54(2–3), 167–181.CrossRef

Zhang, L., & Zhou, P. (2018). A non-compensatory composite indicator approach to assessing low-carbon performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 270(1), 352–361.CrossRef

Zhou, P., Delmas, M., & Kohli, A. (2017). Constructing meaningful environmental indices: A nonparametric frontier approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 85, 21–34.CrossRef

Zhou, P., & Ang, B. (2009). Comparing MCDA aggregation methods in constructing composite indicators using the Shannon-Spearman measure. Social Indicators Research, 94(1), 83–96.CrossRef

Zhou, P., Ang, B., & Poh, K. (2006). Comparing aggregating methods for constructing the composite environmental index: An objective measure. Ecological Economics, 59(3), 305–311.CrossRef

Zhou, P., Ang, B., & Poh, K. (2007). A mathematical programming approach to constructing composite indicators. Ecological Economics, 62(2), 291–297.CrossRef

Zhou, P., Ang, B., & Zhou, D. (2010). Weighting and aggregation in composite indicator construction: A multiplicative optimization approach. Social Indicators Research, 96(1), 169–181.CrossRef

Titel: Constructing Composite Indicators with Individual Judgements and Best–Worst Method: An Illustration of Value Measure
Publikationsdatum: 30.11.2019
Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02236-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Public Policies and Equality of Opportunity for Wellbeing in Multiple Dimensions: A Theoretical Discussion and Evidence from Bolivia

Timely Indicators for Inequality and Poverty Using the Italian Labour Force Survey

Does Internet Use Affect Netizens’ Trust in Government? Empirical Evidence from China

Social Ills in Rich Countries: New Evidence on Levels, Causes, and Mediators

Examining Multidimensional Poverty in Sri Lanka: Transitioning Through Post War Conflict

The Impact of Neighboring on Changes in Sense of Community Over Time: A Latent Transition Analysis

Premium Partner