nach oben

Erschienen in:

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Contaminant Transport Modeling for Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Porous Systems Using MODFLOW Models-Based Scripting Python Package

verfasst von : Abhay Guleria, Sumedha Chakma, Vijay Pratap Singh

Erschienen in: Environmental Processes and Management

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Contaminant transport modeling for soil column and heterogenous porous system poses a challenge when modeling approach involves non-linear and non-equilibrium sorption models and low permeability porous media (LPPM). Thus, in this chapter, contaminant transport modeling for soil column conditions via 1-D non-linear and non-equilibrium sorption models by means of MODFLOW models-based scripting Python package is presented. Further, contaminant plume evolution dynamics through homogeneous and heterogeneous porous systems, along with sensitivity analysis of flow and transport parameters, is conducted utilizing MT3D-USGS and MODFLOW 6 models. Results from 1-D modeling revealed sorption mass exchange rate as dominating parameter governing concentration at the outlet of soil column. Further, longitudinal dispersivity is observed to be affecting the peak value of concentration for non-equilibrium sorption model. The dominance of molecular diffusion and transverse dispersion on 2-D vertical transport through LPPM is observed from 2-D vertical transport modeling, whereas advection and mechanical dispersion are observed as governing mechanisms in the high hydraulic conductivity zone. Also, the difference in the simulation capabilities of two modeling (i.e., MT3D-USGS and MODFLOW 6) approaches is seen. Overall, this chapter highlighted the influence of sorption isotherm, LPPM, and modeling approach on the contaminant transport modeling.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Numerical Solution of Space Fractional Advection–Dispersion Equation and Application

Nächstes Kapitel Site Suitability Analysis for Identification of Riverbank Filtration (RBF) Sites: Case Study of the Alaknanda River Basin

Bakker M, Post V, Langevin CD et al (2016) Scripting MODFLOW model development using python and FloPy. Groundwater 54:733–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12413CrossRef

Bakker M, White JT, Langevin CD, et al (2018) FloPy v3.2.9: U.S. geological survey software release. pp 12

Ballarini E, Bauer S, Eberhardt C, Beyer C (2014) Evaluation of the role of heterogeneities on transverse mixing in bench-scale tank experiments by numerical modeling. Groundwater 52:368–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12066CrossRef

Bedekar V, Morway E, Langevin C, Tonkin M (2016) MT3D-USGS version 1: A U.S. geological survey release of MT3DMS updated with new and expanded transport capabilities for use with MODFLOW

Borah T, Bhattacharjya RK (2015) Development of unknown pollution source identification models using GMS ANN–based simulation optimization methodology. J Hazardous, Toxic, Radioact Waste 19:04014034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000242CrossRef

Brown GH, Brooks MC, Wood AL et al (2012) Aquitard contaminant storage and flux resulting from dense nonaqueous phase liquid source zone dissolution and remediation. Water Resour Res 48:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011141CrossRef

Brusseau ML, Russo AE, Schnaar G (2012) Nonideal transport of contaminants in heterogeneous porous media: 9—impact of contact time on desorption and elution tailing. Chemosphere 89:287–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.04.038CrossRef

Carey GR, Chapman SW, Parker BL, McGregor R (2015) Application of an adapted version of MT3DMS for modeling back-diffusion remediation timeframes. Remediat J 25:55–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21440CrossRef

Chapman SW, Parker BL (2005) Plume persistence due to aquitard back diffusion following dense nonaqueous phase liquid source removal or isolation. Water Resour Res 41:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004224CrossRef

Comunian A, Giudici M (2021) Improving the robustness of the comparison model method for the identification of hydraulic transmissivities. Comput Geosci 149:104705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104705

Elshall AS, Ye M, Finkel M (2020) Evaluating two multi-model simulation–optimization approaches for managing groundwater contaminant plumes. J Hydrol 590:125427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125427CrossRef

Gao G, Feng S, Zhan H et al (2009) Evaluation of anomalous solute transport in a large heterogeneous soil column with mobile-immobile model. J Hydrol Eng 14:966–974. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000071CrossRef

Gao G, Zhan H, Feng S et al (2010) A new mobile-immobile model for reactive solute transport with scale-dependent dispersion. Water Resour Res 46:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008707CrossRef

Guleria A, Chakma S (2022) Mathematical modeling of contaminant transport in the subsurface environment. In: Gupta PK, Yadav B, Himanshu S (eds) Advances in remediation techniques for polluted soils and groundwater. Elsevier, First, pp 141–169CrossRef

Guleria A, Swami D, Joshi N, Sharma A (2020) Application of temporal moments to interpret solute transport with time-dependent dispersion. Sādhanā 45:159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-020-01402-5CrossRef

Guleria A, Swami D, Sharma A, Sharma S (2019) Non-reactive solute transport modelling with time-dependent dispersion through stratified porous media. Sādhanā 44:81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-019-1056-6CrossRef

Guo Z, Brusseau ML (2017a) The impact of well-field configuration and permeability heterogeneity on contaminant mass removal and plume persistence. J Hazard Mater 333:109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.03.012CrossRef

Guo Z, Brusseau ML (2017b) The impact of well-field configuration on contaminant mass removal and plume persistence for homogeneous versus layered systems. Hydrol Process 31:4748–4756. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11393CrossRef

Guo Z, Brusseau ML, Fogg GE (2019) Determining the long-term operational performance of pump and treat and the possibility of closure for a large TCE plume. J Hazard Mater 365:796–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.11.057CrossRef

Hughes JD, Langevin CD, Banta E (2017) Documentation for the MODFLOW 6 framework

Kheirabadi M (2018) Groundwater model parameter estimation with simultaneous and sequential use of hydraulic head and travel time measurements

Langevin CD, Hughes JD, Banta ER, et al (2017) Documentation for The MODFLOW 6 groundwater flow model

Leichombam S, Bhattacharjya RK (2019) New hybrid optimization methodology to identify pollution sources considering the source locations and source flux as unknown. J Hazardous, Toxic, Radioact Waste 23:04018037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000431CrossRef

Mescher L (2018) Evaluating the applicability of MODFLOW2005 plus MT3D-USGS: Borden Case Study

Morway ED, Langevin CD, Hughes JD (2021) Use of the MODFLOW 6 water mover package to represent natural and managed hydrologic connections. Groundwater 59:913–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13117CrossRef

Müller S, Schüler L (2019) GeoStat-Framework/GSTools: Reverberating Red v1.1.0

Provost AM, Langevin CD, Hughes JD (2017) Documentation for the “ XT3D ” option in the node property flow (NPF) package of MODFLOW 6

Rao GT, Rao VVSG, Ranganathan K et al (2011) Assessment of groundwater contamination from a hazardous dump site in Ranipet, Tamil Nadu, India. Hydrogeol J 19:1587–1598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-011-0771-9CrossRef

Rao GT, Rao VVSG, Surinaidu L et al (2013) Application of numerical modeling for groundwater flow and contaminant transport analysis in the basaltic terrain, Bagalkot, India. Arab J Geosci 6:1819–1833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-011-0461-xCrossRef

Rasa E, Chapman SW, Bekins BA et al (2011) Role of back diffusion and biodegradation reactions in sustaining an MTBE/TBA plume in alluvial media. J Contam Hydrol 126:235–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2011.08.006CrossRef

Rezaei A, Zare M, Zhan H (2016) Aquitard horizontal dispersion on reactive solute transport in an aquifer-aquitard system. Transp Porous Media 113:695–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-016-0719-6CrossRef

Sathe SS, Mahanta C (2019) Groundwater flow and arsenic contamination transport modeling for a multi aquifer terrain: assessment and mitigation strategies. J Environ Manage 231:166–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.057CrossRef

Sbai MA (2020) Unstructured gridding for MODFLOW from prior groundwater flow models: a new paradigm. Groundwater 58:gwat.13025. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13025

Sharma PK, Shukla SK, Choudhary R, Swami D (2016) Modeling for solute transport in mobile–immobile soil column experiment. ISH J Hydraul Eng 22:204–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2016.1155181CrossRef

Singh P, Singh RM (2019) Identification of pollution sources using artificial neural network (ANN) and multilevel breakthrough curve (BTC) characterization. Environ Forensics 20:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/15275922.2019.1629548CrossRef

Singh RM, Datta B (2007) Artificial neural network modeling for identification of unknown pollution sources in groundwater with partially missing concentration observation data. Water Resour Manag 21:557–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9029-zCrossRef

Singh RM, Datta B (2006) Identification of groundwater pollution sources using GA-based linked simulation optimization model. J Hydrol Eng 11:101–109. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:2(101)CrossRef

Singh RM, Datta B, Jain A (2004) Identification of unknown groundwater pollution sources using artificial neural networks. J Water Resour Plan Manag 130:506–514. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:6(506)CrossRef

Sudicky EA (1989) The Laplace Transform Galerkin Technique: a time-continuous finite element theory and application to mass transport in groundwater. Water Resour Res 25:1833–1846. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR025i008p01833CrossRef

Swami D, Sharma PK, Ojha CSP et al (2018) Asymptotic behavior of mass transfer for solute transport through stratified porous medium. Transp Porous Media 124:699–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-018-1090-6CrossRef

Swami D, Sharma PK, Ojha CSP (2016) Behavioral study of the mass transfer coefficient of nonreactive solute with velocity, distance, and dispersion. J Environ Eng 143:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001164CrossRef

Vetrimurugan E, Senthilkumar M, Elango L (2017) Solute transport modelling for assessing the duration of river flow to improve the groundwater quality in an intensively irrigated deltaic region. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:1055–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1211-0CrossRef

White JT, Hemmings B, Fienen MN, Knowling MJ (2021) Towards improved environmental modeling outcomes: enabling low-cost access to high-dimensional, geostatistical-based decision-support analyses. Environ Model Softw 139:105022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105022CrossRef

Winston RB (2009) ModelMuse: a graphical user interface for MODFLOW-2005 and PHAST: U.S. geological survey techniques and methods 6–A29. US Geological Survey Reston, VA

Yang M, Annable MD, Jawitz JW (2017a) Forward and back diffusion through argillaceous formations. Water Resour Res 53:4514–4523. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019874CrossRef

Yang M, Annable MD, Jawitz JW (2017b) Field-scale forward and back diffusion through low-permeability zones. J Contam Hydrol 202:47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2017.05.001CrossRef

Yang M, Annable MD, Jawitz JW (2015) Back diffusion from thin low permeability zones. Environ Sci Technol 49:415–422. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5045634CrossRef

Yang M, McCurley KL, Annable MD, Jawitz JW (2019) Diffusion of solutes from depleting sources into and out of finite low-permeability zones. J Contam Hydrol 221:127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2019.01.005CrossRef

Zhan H (1998) Transport of waste leakage in stratified formations. Adv Water Resour 22:159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(98)00001-3CrossRef

Zhan H, Wen Z, Gao G (2009) An analytical solution of two-dimensional reactive solute transport in an aquifer-aquitard system. Water Resour Res 45:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007479CrossRef

Zheng C, Bianchi M, Gorelick SM (2011) Lessons learned from 25 years of research at the MADE site. Ground Water 49:649–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2010.00753.xCrossRef

Zheng C, Wang PP (1999) MT3DMS: a modular three-dimensional multispecies transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion, and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems

Titel: Contaminant Transport Modeling for Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Porous Systems Using MODFLOW Models-Based Scripting Python Package
verfasst von: Abhay Guleria
Sumedha Chakma
Vijay Pratap Singh
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Environmental Processes and Management
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20207-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-20208-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20208-7_3