Correction to: Population and Environment
Anzeige
The published version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake.
Table 2 of this article is incorrect. Below is the updated Table 2.
Table 2
Negative binomial regression with district random efects showing the association between PE/Ecases and average district level environmental variables, Bangladesh 2016–2018
Variable | IRR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
Avg EC (per 1000 µS/cm) | 1.07** | 1.03, 1.10 |
LECZ (low/no risk) | REF | |
High risk | 1.29* | 1.00, 1.67 |
Population Density | ||
Quartile 1 (Least dense) | REF | |
Quartile 2 | 0.72** | 0.58, 0.90 |
Quartile 3 | 0.42** | 0.34, 0.52 |
Quartile 4 (most dense) | 0.14** | 0.11, 0.17 |
Rainfall (per 100 mm) | 0.95** | 0.94, 0.96 |
Year | ||
2016 | REF | |
2017 | 1.14** | 1.07, 1.22 |
2018 | 1.14** | 1.07, 1.21 |
The original article has been corrected.
Anzeige
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.