Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Crimean Tatar Community in the Former Soviet Union (1944–1991): A Case in Exile Nationalism

verfasst von : Filiz Tutku Aydın

Erschienen in: Émigré, Exile, Diaspora, and Transnational Movements of the Crimean Tatars

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The Crimean Tatars initiated a collective return movement shortly after their exile in Central Asia because of their return-oriented movement frames. Their struggle for return went through mainly three phases as a response to changes in the political and discursive opportunities in the regime and international arena: alignment with the communist master frame, alignment with the democracy and human rights master frame, the emergence of a fit between Crimean Tatar frame and democratizing regime frame. How movement activists increased movement resonance among the Crimean Tatar people, and how they sustained such widespread and active participation over fifty years is studied in detail. Eventually, the Crimean Tatars did not return because the Soviet Union collapsed, but because they consistently, assertively but not violently demanded a return. Taking it in their hands to organize their collective return to their homeland before the Soviet Union collapsed, the Crimean Tatars reached their movement goals.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Explaining Long-Distance Nationalism
Nächstes Kapitel Crimean Tatar Community in Romania (1900–): From Exile to Diaspora Nationalism
Fußnoten
1
The Soviet sources argued that it was 20%, but the Crimean Tatars conducted their own census and found their numbers had reduced by 46%.
 
2
An amount close to $250 was given to each representative for expenses in Moscow.
 
3
According to Dağcı, there were limits to what representatives could buy in Moscow, i.e. a box of candy for their children. One representative who bought a sofa when he was in Moscow was publicly shamed, and this action was never repeated. Timur Dağcı, Interview by author, 28 April 2006, Simferopol.
 
4
3 were arrested (Bekirova, 2004, 110).
 
5
17 were there for longer periods.18 Tatars received two-year sentences (Bekirova, 2004, 110).
 
6
The women and children were in the front row. The authorities did not allow them to reach the Lenin statue and some were arrested after a fight. Those arrested received 6 months to three years (Bekirova, 2004, 110).
 
7
Between 30 May and 2 June 1968, the court process of Refat İsmailov, Reşat Alimov, Sadi Abhairov—the Chirchik demonstrators—was held. They were given 3, 2, and a half, and 2 years respectively, and between 18–26 June, the rest of the demonstrators were prosecuted, being accused of organizing a demonstration in Chirchik on 24 March, 7 April, and finally 21 April. In the court, Moscow “human rights advocate” lawyers defended them, giving authorities small trouble (Bekirova, 2004, 126).
 
8
Interestingly, the Uzbek authorities arrested all 130 of the representatives returning from Moscow for “organizing mass disorders and resisting authorities”, which demonstrated that the government’s attitude had not changed much, despite promises made to that effect (Fisher, 1978, 178).
 
9
Other cultural measures refer to a Crimean Tatar dance assembly which was founded in 1957. Unlike other nationalities, the Crimean Tatars were deprived of the right to study in their language at the pre-university or university level. Crimean Tatar newspapers were not permitted to publish any national content and were heavily censored (Rıza Fazıl, Interview with author, 5 May 2006, Simferopol). Maintenance of national culture through these limited cultural rights was near impossible in the Soviet Union of the 1960s and 1970s in which the society is urbanized and with an increasingly dominant Russian language in all spheres of life.
 
10
On 22 February 1974, and 1978, the regime issued further decrees named “additional measures for strengthening the passport regime in Crimea” to make the registration and resettlement of Crimean Tatars in Crimea almost impossible and to enable re-deportation of those who attempted to return by the police.
 
11
The mention of language meant the language spoken and read by the Tatars in general in the Soviet Union, not only that of the Crimean Tatars (Fisher, 1978, 180).
 
12
The court records were generally recorded by hand by Crimean Tatars who were family members and so permitted to attend the trials. Cemilev received Nansen Refugee prize (1998) and Lech Walesa Solidarity Prize (2014) for his non-violent struggle for the return of the Crimean Tatars. He was the Head of Crimean Tatar National Parliament (Mejlis) until 2013. See on Mustafa Cemilev: Bekirova, G. (2019). Mustafa. Put Lidera. Ukraine Information Politics Ministry; Musaeva, S., & Aliev, A. (2017). Mustafa Cemilev, Nezlamnıy. Harkiv; Tiefenböck, O. (2017). Mustafa Jemilev og Krims Forfulgte. Mr. East Forlag; Semena, M. (2010). Mustafa Cemilev: Lyudina, Yaka Peremogla Stalinizm…. ; Chervonnaya, S. (2003). Mustafa – Sın Krıma. Ocak; Mert, H. (2000). Mustafa Abdülcemil Kırımoğlu, Bir İnsan Hakları Savunucusu. Bilgi Yayınları; Alexeyeva, L. (1998). Mustafa Jemiloglu, His Character and Convictions. In E. A. Allworth (Ed.), The Tatars of Crimea: Return to the Homeland (pp. 206–225).Duke University Press; Seytmuratova, A. (1986). Mustafa Dzhemilev and the Crimean Tatars: Story of a Man and his People. Center for Democracy.
 
13
The department established in 1970 was meant to educate teachers for Crimean Tatar classes in primary and secondary schools, but since there were no such schools, they were compelled to teach Russian to earn their living (Allworth, 1998, 199). Five or six schools instituted optional Crimean Tatar classes, but a lack of Crimean Tatar textbooks and other materials in their native language was a significant drawback (Allworth, 1998, 199).
 
Literatur
Alexeeva, L. (1985). Soviet dissent. Wesleyan University Press.
Altan, M. (1998). Structures: The importance of family-a personal memoir. In E. Allworth (Ed.), The Crimean Tatars of Crimea: Return to the homeland (pp. 155–180). Duke University Press.
Allworth, E. (1998). Mass exile, ethnocide, group derogation: Anomaly or norm in Soviet nationality policies? In E. Allworth (Ed.), The Crimean Tatars of Crimea: Return to the homeland, (pp. 180–206). Durham: Duke University Press.
Asanin, İ. (2001). Vsya jizn kak putevodnaya zvezda [All life like a guiding star]. Golos Krima, 13, 384.
Aydın, F. T. (2000). A case in diaspora nationalism: Crimean Tatars in Turkey (MA thesis). Ankara: Bilkent University.
Badzan, O. G., Danilok, Y. Z., Kokin, S. A., & Loshidskii, O. A. (Eds.). (2004). Krimski Tatari: shliakh do povernennia. Krimskotatarskii natsiyonal’nii rykh (dryga polovina 1940-kh-pochatok 1990-kh rokiv) Ochima radianskikh spetssludzb zbirnik dokymentiv ta Mmaterialiv (Vol 1) [Crimean Tatars: Path to Return. Crimean Tatar national movement from the second half of the 1940s to the beginning of the 1990s. The collection of Documents and materials reflectng the perspective of Soviet intelligence]. NANY Institut Istoriyi Ukraiyini.
Beissinger, M. R. (2002). Nationalist mobilization and the collapse of the Soviet state. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Bekirova, G. (2004). Krimskotatarskoye problema v SSSR (1944–1991). [The Crimean Tatar problem in the USSR] Simferopol: Odja.
Biluha, I., & Vlasenko, O. (Eds.). (2004). Deportavani: Krims’ki Tatari, Bolgari, Virmeni, Greki, Nimtsi (1917–1991) Dokumenti. Fakti. Svidcheniia [The deported: Crimean Tatars, Bulgarians, Armenians, Greeks, German: Documents, Facts, Evidence]. Muz. Ukraina.
Bowring, B. (2005). The Crimean autonomy: innovation or anomaly? In M. Weller & S. Wolff (Eds.), Autonomy, self-governance and conflict resolution: innovative approaches to Institutional design in divided societies (pp. 75–98). Routledge.
Conquest, R. (1970). The nation-killers. Macmillan.
Cutler, R. M. (1980). Soviet dissent under Khrushchev. An Analytical Study. Comparative Politics, 13(1), 15–35.CrossRef
Fainsod, M. (1953). How Russia is ruled. Harvard University Press.
Fazıl, R. (2005). Mejmua boyle meydana kelgen edi [This is how the journal emerged]. In Z. Kurtnezir, Yıldız’ nin 25 yillik bibliyografyasi (1980–2004) [Yıldız’s 25 years of bibliography]. Kirimdevokuvpedneşir.
Fisher, A. (1978). The Crimean Tatars. Stanford: Hoover Press Publication.
Guboglo, M., Chervonnaya, S. (1992). Krimskotatarskoye natsiyonalnoe dvizhenie [The Crimean Tatar national movement] (Vol. 1). Tsentr po izucheniyu mejnatsiyonalnikh otnoshenii.
Horvath, R. (2005). The legacy of Soviet dissent: Dissidents, democratization and radical nationalism in Russia. Routledge Curzon.
Hosking, G. (1991). The awakening of the Soviet Union. Harvard University Press.
Jemilev [Cemilev], M. (2005). A history of the Crimean Tatar national liberation movement: A sociopolitical perspective. Ojak.
Karatay, Zafer. (2019). Kırımıoğlu: Bir Halkın Mücadelesi.
Kenez, P. (2006). A history of the Soviet Union from the beginning to the end. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Kirimli, H. (1989). Soviet educational and cultural policies toward the Crimean Tatars in exile (1944–1987). Central Asian Survey, 8(1): 69–88.
Kırımoğlu [Cemilev], M. (1993). A. Pyotr Grigorenko ve Kırım Tatar hareketi [Pyotr Grigorenko and the Crimean Tatar movement]. Emel, 194, 3–12.
Lazzerini, E. (1990). Crimean Tatars. In G. Smith (Ed.), The nationalities question in the post-Soviet states. Longman.
Malia, M. (1992). Leninist endgame. Dauedalus, 121(2), 57–75.
Özcan, K. (2002). Vatana dönüş: Kırım Türklerinin sürgünü ve milli mücadele hareketi (1944–1991) Return to homeland: The deportation of Crimean Tatars and the movement of national struggle]. Tarih ve Tabiat Yayınları-Tatav Yayınları.
Reddaway, P. (1998). The Crimean Tatar drive for repatriation: Some comparison with other movements of dissent in the Soviet Union. In E. Allworth (Ed.), The Crimean Tatars of Crimea: Return to The Homeland (pp. 226–237). Duke University Press.
Rossiiskaia Federatsia protiv Mustafi Jemileva: Omskii Protses [Russian Federation vs. Mustafa Jemilev: Omsk Case]. (2003). Simferepol’: Odjak.
Seutova, S. (1991). Creating a Crimean Tatar national movement: The role and impact of literature. In Z. Rau (Ed.), The emergence of civil society in Eastern Europe and Soviet Union (pp. 113–129). Westview Press.
Seytmuratova, A. (1997). Natsiyonalnoe dvizhenie Krymskikh Tatar: sobities, fakti, dokumenti [The National movement of Crimean Tatars: events, facts, documents]. Simferopol-Akmescit.
Seytmuratova, A. (1998). The elders of the new national movement: Recollections. In E. Allworth (Ed.), The Crimean Tatars of Crimea: Return to the homeland (pp. 155–180). Duke University Press.
Shest Dnei “Belaya Kniga” (Vol. 2). [Six Days “White Book”]. (1980). Crimea Foundation.
Swart, W. J. (1995). The League of Nations and the Irish Question: Master frames, cyles of protest and “master frame alignment”. Sociological Quarterly, 36(3), 465–481.CrossRef
Suny, R. G. (1993). The revenge of the past. Stanford University Press.
Tashkentskii Protsess: sud nad 10 predstavitelyami kirimskotatarkogo naroda (1 iyulya-5 avgusta 1969). (1976). [Tashkent Case: trial of 10 representatives of the Crimean Tatar people]. Herzen Fund.
Tucker, R. C. (1999). Stalinism as revolution from above. In R. C. Tucker (Ed.), Stalinism: Essays in historical interpretation (pp. 77–108). Transaction Publishers.
Uehling, G. (2004). Beyond memory: The Crimean Tatars’ deportation and return. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Uehling, G. (2015). Genocide’s aftermath: Neo-stalinism in contemporary Crimea. Genocide Studies and Prevention: an International Journal, 9(1), 3–17.CrossRef
Vozgrin, V. E. (1992). Istoricheskie sud’bi Krimskikh Tatar. [Historical Fate of the Crimean Tatars] Moscow: Izdatel’stvo “Misl”.
Vozgrin, V. E. (1994). Imperiia i Krym: dol’gii put’ k Imperiya i Krym — Dolgii put’ k genotsidu [Empire and the Crimea: The Long Path to Genocide]. Bakhchisarai.
Williams, B. (2001). The Crimean Tatars: The diaspora experience and the forging of a nation. Brill.
Williams, B. (2015). The Crimean Tatars: Soviet Genocide to Putin’s Conquest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, A. (1998). Politics in and around Crimea: A difficult homecoming. In E. Allworth (Ed.), Tatars of Crimea: Return to homeland (pp. 281–323). Duke University Press.
Zisserman-Brodsky, D. (2003). Constructing ethnopolitics in the Soviet Union: Samizdat, deprivation and the rise of ethnic nationalism. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Crimean Tatar Community in the Former Soviet Union (1944–1991): A Case in Exile Nationalism
verfasst von
Filiz Tutku Aydın
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Buch
Émigré, Exile, Diaspora, and Transnational Movements of the Crimean Tatars

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74123-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-74124-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74124-2_3

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise