Skip to main content

2020 | Buch

Crisis and Ontological Insecurity

Serbia’s Anxiety over Kosovo's Secession

insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

This book develops a novel way of thinking about crises in world politics. By building on ontological security theory, this work conceptualises critical situations as radical disjunctions that challenge the ability of collective agents to ‘go on’. These ontological crises bring into the realm of discursive consciousness four fundamental questions related to existence, finitude, relations and autobiography. In times of crisis, collective agents such as states are particularly attached to their ontic spaces, or spatial extensions of the self that cause collective identities to appear more firm and continuous. These theoretical arguments are illustrated in a case study looking at Serbia’s anxiety over the secession of Kosovo. The author argues that Serbia’s seemingly irrational and self-harming policy vis-à-vis Kosovo can be understood as a form of ontological self-help. It is a rational pursuit of biographical continuity and a healthy sense of self in the face of an ontological crisis triggered by the secession of a province that has been constructed as the ontic space of the Serbian nation since the late 19th century.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter
Chapter 1. Introduction
Abstract
Why states sometimes risk their material interests and even physical security to keep a certain identity narrative going? Think of Israel’s continued occupation of the West Bank, which generates not only constant low-intensity threats to Israeli citizens but also existential threats to the state of Israel through a constant recurrence of wars and delegitimising campaigns.
Filip Ejdus
Chapter 2. Crisis, Anxiety and Ontological Insecurity
Abstract
The central assumption within the realist canon of International Relations (IR) is that the primary goal of states is to achieve physical security, defined in terms of physical survival and power. This has been challenged by the Ontological Security Theory (OST), which is based on a premise that actors in world politics are often ready to compromise physical security and other important material gains in order to protect their sense of continuity in the world.
Filip Ejdus
Chapter 3. The Construction of Kosovo as Serbia’s Ontic Space
Abstract
To understand ontological insecurity and state of anxiety unleashed in Serbia by the secession of Kosovo, one needs to look back further into history. Kosovo neither always belonged to Serbia nor was it always considered by Serbs as their core territory. This chapter investigates why, when, how and by whom Kosovo was constructed as Serbia’s ontic space. This process accelerated in the 1870s due to a particular set of changing geopolitical circumstances in Central Europe. The process waxed and waned during the twentieth century, eventually contributing to the dissolution of Yugoslavia. The Kosovo myth has been central to the process of discursive linking of the territory of Kosovo to Serbia’s collective identity. It is a sacralised narrative that has evolved over time, about the ‘catastrophic defeat’ of Serbian forces against the Ottoman Empire at the Kosovo field on 15 June 1389 according to the old Julian calendar (28 June according to the modern Gregorian calendar).
Filip Ejdus
Chapter 4. Disintegration of Yugoslavia and Serbia’s Anxiety Over Kosovo
Abstract
Once a space is incorporated in the narrative about the national self, states’ ontological need to maintain biographical continuity adds another strong emotional component to their attachment to territorial integrity. Internal or external challenges to states’ control over their ontic spaces then do not only question their physical security, but may also undermine their ontological security.
Filip Ejdus
Chapter 5. Critical Situation: Kosovo’s Declaration of Independence
Abstract
In 2000, Slobodan Milošević was ousted and the rump Yugoslavia, including Serbia and Montenegro, was set to return to international society by embarking on a path to liberal democracy and European integration.
Filip Ejdus
Chapter 6. Dissonance and Avoidance: Serbia’s Quest for a New Normal
Abstract
In February 2008, Serbia experienced extreme political anxiety unleashed by Kosovo’s decision to unliterally declare independence. Serbia vowed never to recognise the creation of a ‘fake state’ on its sacred land. Serbia’s posture in the years ahead, however, has been anything but a consistent pursuit of its claims to ‘territorial integrity’. On the one hand, Serbia continued to relentlessly pursue its discursive commitment to never recognise Kosovo. It even stepped up its diplomatic counter-secessionist efforts by preventing Kosovo from joining international organisations, averting new recognitions and obtaining withdrawals of recognition. On the other hand, in order to make progress toward European Union (EU) membership, Belgrade engaged in EU-facilitated normalisation dialogue with Prishtina since 2011 and signed a number of agreements, most importantly the 2013 Brussels Agreement.
Filip Ejdus
Chapter 7. Conclusion
Abstract
The starting point of this book was that states, just like individuals, also have a need for predictability of social order which stems from their trust in the continuity of relationships with significant others and in the constancy of their material environments.
Filip Ejdus
Backmatter
Metadaten
Titel
Crisis and Ontological Insecurity
verfasst von
Filip Ejdus
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Electronic ISBN
978-3-030-20667-3
Print ISBN
978-3-030-20666-6
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20667-3

Premium Partner