nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. Crowdfunding—Theories and Empirical Works

verfasst von : Bishnu Kumar Adhikary, Kenji Kutsuna, Takaaki Hoda

Erschienen in: Crowdfunding

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This Chapter provides an overview of the academic research on crowdfunding. In doing so, it first discusses several economic theories as a foundation of crowdfunding and its rapid dissemination as well. Then, it reviews the extant literature of crowdfunding. This review has been structured according to the key players in crowdfunding such as capital seekers, capital providers, and intermediaries. The review also puts some avenues for future research.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Crowdfunding—Trends and Growth

Nächstes Kapitel Crowdfunding in Japan

Akerlof GA (1970) The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ 488–500CrossRef

Allison TH, Davis BC, Short JC, Webb JW (2015) Crowdfunding in a prosocial microlending environment: examining the role of intrinsic versus extrinsic cues. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 39(1):53–73CrossRef

Belleflamme P, Lambert T, Schwienbacher A (2013) Individual crowdfunding practices. Venture Capital 15(4):313–333CrossRef

Bradford C (2012) Crowdfunding and the federal securities laws. Columbia Business Law Rev 1:1–150

Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2013a) An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowd-funded markets. Inf Syst Res 24(3):499–519CrossRef

Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2013b) Cultural differences and geography as determinants of online pro-social lending. Retrieved August 2016, from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2271298

Christensen CM (1997) The Innovators dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard University Press, USA

Cohn S (2012) The new crowdfunding registration exemption: good idea, bad execution. Retrieved 15 July 2016 from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2066016

Cumming D, Johan S (2013) Demand driven securities regulation: evidence from crowdfunding. Venture Capital 15(4):361–379CrossRef

Everett C (2010) Group membership, relationship banking and loan default risk: the case of online social lending. Retrieved 10 Apr 2017, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1114428

Freeman RE (1994) The politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions. Bus Ethics Q 4(4):409–421CrossRef

Freeman L (2004) The development of social network analysis: a study in the sociology of science. Empirical Press

Freedman S, Jin G (2014) The signaling value of online social networks: lessons from peer-to-peer lending. NBER working Paper No. 19820. Retrieved 15 May 2014, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w19820

Frydrych D, Bock A, Kinder T, Koeck B (2014) Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward-based crowdfunding. Venture Capital 16(3):247–269CrossRef

Garton L, Haythornthwaite C, Wellman B (1997) Studying online social networks. J Comput-Mediated Commun 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00062.xCrossRef

Gerber E, Hui J, Kuo P (2012) Crowdfunding: why people are motivated to post and fund projects on crowdfunding platforms. Retrieved from http://www.juliehui.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/CSCW_Crowdfunding_Final.pdf

Giudici G, Guerini M, Rossi-Lamastra C (2013) Why crowdfunding projects can succeed: the role of proponents’ individual and territorial social capital. SSRN working Paper No. 2255944. Retrieved 29 Apr 2017, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2255944

Greiner ME, Wang H (2010) Building consumer-to-consumer trust in E-Finance marketplaces: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 15(2):105–136CrossRef

Granovetter M (2005) The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. J Econ Perspect 19(1):33–50CrossRef

Griffin ZJ (2012) Crowdfunding: fleecing the American Masses. Case Western Reserve Journal of Law, Technology & the Internet. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2030001

Haas P, Blohm I, Leimeister J (2014) An empirical taxonomy of crowdfunding intermediaries. Retrieved 20 July 2017, from http://www.crowdinvesting.jura.uni-muenchen.de/dokumente/crowdfundingintermediaries.pdf

Hazen T (2012) Crowdfunding or fraudfunding? Social networks and the securities laws—why the specially tailored exemption must be conditioned on meaningful disclosure. NCL Rev 90:1735–1769

Hekman E, Brussee R (2013) Crowdfunding and online social networks. Retrieved 15 May 2017, from http://www2.mmu.ac.uk/media/mmuacuk/content/documents/carpe/2013-conference/papers/entrepreneurship/Erik-Hekman,-Rogier Brussee.pdf

Hemer J, Schneider U, Dornbusch F, Frey S (2011) A snapshot on crowdfunding. Retrieved 5 Oct 2017, from http://www.legalefiscale.it/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/StudioCrowdfundig.pdf

Heminway J, Hoffman S (2011) Proceed at your peril: crowdfunding and the securities act of 1933. Tenn L Rev 78:879–972

Herzenstein M, Dholakia UM, Andrews RL (2011) Strategic herding behavior in peer-to-peer loan auctions. J Interact Mark 25(1):27–36CrossRef

Hienerth C, Riar F (2013) The wisdom of the crowd vs. expert evaluation: a conceptualization of evaluation validity. Paper presented at 35th DRUID celebration conference, Barcelona, Spain, June 17–19. Retrieved from http://druid8.sit.aau.dk/acc_papers/im4odl75ix421p8l11ry1qg6gko8.pdf

Hildebrand T, Puri M, Rocholl J (2013) Adverse incentives in crowdfunding. SSRN working Paper No 1615483. Retrieved 10 May 2017, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1615483

Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3(4):305–360CrossRef

Kappel T (2009) Ex-ante crowdfunding and the recording industry: a model for the US. Loyola Los Angeles Entertainment Law Rev 29(3):375–385

Kim K, Viswanathan S (2013) The experts in the crowd: the role of reputable investors in a crowdfunding market. SSRN working Paper No. 2258243. Retrieved 15 July 2017, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=225824

Koning R, Model J (2013) Experimental study of crowdfunding cascades: when nothing is better than something. SSRN working Paper No. 2308161. Retrieved 30 Aug 2017, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2308161

Kuppuswamy V, Bayus BL (2013) Crowdfunding creative ideas: the dynamics of project backers in Kickstarter. UNC Kenan-Flagler research Paper No. 2013–15. Retrieved 20 June 2017, from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2234765

Lee E, Lee B (2012) Herding behavior in online P2P lending: an empirical investigation. Electron Commer Res Appl 11(5):495–503CrossRef

Lehner O (2014) The Formation and interplay of social capital in crowdfunded social ventures. Entrepreneurship Reg Dev 26(5–6):478–499CrossRef

Leland H, Pyle D (1977) Information asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation. J Financ 32:371–387CrossRef

Lin M, Viswanathan S (2013) Home bias in online investments: an empirical study of an online crowd funding market. SSRN Working Paper No. 2219546. Retrieved 10 Apr 2017, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm?abstractid=2219546

Lin Y, Boh WF, Goh KH (2014) How different are crowdfunders? SRRN working Paper No. 2397571. Retrieved August 25, 2017, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2397571

Lin M, Prabhala NR, Viswanathan S (2013) Judging borrowers by the company they keep: friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Manage Sci 59(1):17–35CrossRef

Liu D, Lu Y, Brass D (2013) Friendships in online peer-to-peer lending: pipes, prisms, and social herding. SSRN working Paper No. 2251155. Retrieved 30 July 2016, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2251155

Macht S, Weatherston J (2014) The benefits of online crowdfunding for fund seeking business ventures. Strateg Change 23(1–2):1–14CrossRef

Maeschle O (2012a) Rationing of excessive demand on crowdinvesting-platforms. Applied economic theory working Paper No. 126. Retrieved 10 Apr 2017, from http://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/74657

Maeschle O (2012b) Which information should entrepreneurs on german crowdinvesting- platforms disclose? Applied economic theory working Paper No 127. Retrieved 10 Apr 2017, from http://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/74650

Martin T (2012) The Jobs Act of 2012: balancing fundamental securities law principals with the demands of the crowd. SSRN working Paper No. 2040953. Retrieved 10 Apr 2017, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2040953

Mollick E (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding: an exploratory study. J Bus Ventur 29(1):1–16CrossRef

Mollick E, Kuppuswamy V (2014) After the Campaign: outcomes of crowdfunding. UNC Kenan-Flagler research Paper No. 2376997. Retrieved 15 May 2016, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2376997

North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, LondonCrossRef

Podolny JM, Baron JN (1997) Resources and relationships: social networks and mobility in the workplace. Am Sociol Rev 62(5):673–693CrossRef

Qiu C (2013). Issues in crowdfunding: theoretical and empirical investigation on Kickstarter. SSRN working Paper No. 2345872. Retrieved 15 May 2015, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2345872

Saxton GD, Wang L (2013) The social network effect: the determinants of giving through social media. Nonprofit Voluntary Sect Q 43(5):850–868CrossRef

Valenzuela S, Park N, Kee KK (2009) Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. J Comput-Mediated Commun 14(4):875–901CrossRef

Spence M (1973) Job market signaling. Q J Econ 87(3):355–374CrossRef

Smith S, Windmeijer F, Wright E (2013) Peer effects in charitable giving: evidence from the (running) field. Econ J. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12114CrossRef

Stemler AR (2013) The Jobs Act and crowdfunding: harnessing the power—and money—of the masses. Bus Horiz 56(3):271–275CrossRef

Ward C, Ramachandran V (2010) Crowdfunding the next hit: microfunding online experience goods. In: Workshop on computational social science and the wisdom of crowds at NIPS2010. Retrieved from http://people.cs.umass.edu/~wallach/workshops/nips2010css/papers/ward.pdf

Waldfogel J, Chen L (2006) Does information undermine brand? Information intermediary use and preference for branded web retailers. J Ind Econ 54(4):425–449

Wash R (2013) The value of completing crowdfunding projects. In: International conference on weblogs and social media (ICWSM), AAAI Press

Wash R, Solomon J (2014) Coordinating Donors on Crowdfunding Websites. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp 38–48). Retrieved from http://www.rickwash.com/papers/return-rule.pdf

Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis in the social and behavioral sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Wei W, Joseph K, Liu H, Kathleen M (2016). Exploring characteristics of suspended users and network stability on Twitter. Soc Netw Anal Min 6(51). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-016-0358-5

Wellman B (1988) Structural analysis: from method and metaphor to theory and substance, pp 19–61. In: Wellman B, Berkowitz SD (eds) Social structures: a network approach. Berkowitz. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Yum H, Lee B, Chae M (2012) From the wisdom of crowds to my own judgment in microfinance through online peer-to-peer lending platforms. Electron Commer Res Appl 11(5):469–483CrossRef

Zhang J, Liu P (2012) Rational herding in microloan markets. Manage Sci 58(5):892–912CrossRef

Zvilichovsky D, Inbar Y, Barzilay O (2013) Playing both sides of the market: success and reciprocity on crowdfunding platforms. In: International Conference on Information Systems, Milan 2013. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1031&context=icis2013

Titel: Crowdfunding—Theories and Empirical Works
verfasst von: Bishnu Kumar Adhikary
Kenji Kutsuna
Takaaki Hoda
Verlag: Springer Singapore
Buch: Crowdfunding
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1521-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-13-1522-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1522-0_4