Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Multimedia Systems 6/2019

22.05.2019 | Regular Paper

Crowdsourced subjective 3D video quality assessment

verfasst von: Emil Dumic, Kresimir Sakic, Luis A. da Silva Cruz

Erschienen in: Multimedia Systems | Ausgabe 6/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This article proposes a new method for subjective 3D video quality assessment based on crowdsourced workers—Crowd3D. The limitations of traditional laboratory-based grade collection procedures are outlined, and their solution through the use of a crowd-based approach is described. Several conceptual and technical requirements of crowd-based 3D video quality assessment methods are identified and the solutions adopted described in detail. The system built takes the form of a web-based platform that supports 3D video monitors, and orchestrates the entire process of observer validation, content presentation and quality, depth, and comfort grade recording in a remote database. The crowdsourced subjective 3D quality assessment system uses as source contents a set of 3D video and grades database assembled earlier in a laboratory setting. To evaluate the validity of the crowd-based approach, the grades gathered using the crowdsourced system were analysed and compared to a set of grades obtained in laboratory settings using the same data set. Results show that it is possible to obtain Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation up to 0.95 for quality Difference Mean Opinion Score and 0.96 for quality Mean Opinion Score, when comparing with laboratory grades. Apart from the present study, the 3D video quality assessment platform proposed can be used with advantage for further related research activities, reducing the time and cost compared to the traditional laboratory-based quality assessments.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat ITU-R BT.500-13: Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. International Telecommunication Union/ITU Radiocommunication Sector (2012) ITU-R BT.500-13: Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. International Telecommunication Union/ITU Radiocommunication Sector (2012)
2.
Zurück zum Zitat ITU-R BT.2021: Subjective methods for the assessment of stereoscopic 3DTV systems. International Telecommunication Union/ITU Radiocommunication Sector (2012) ITU-R BT.2021: Subjective methods for the assessment of stereoscopic 3DTV systems. International Telecommunication Union/ITU Radiocommunication Sector (2012)
3.
Zurück zum Zitat ITU-R P.914: Display requirements for 3D video quality assessment (2016) ITU-R P.914: Display requirements for 3D video quality assessment (2016)
4.
Zurück zum Zitat ITU-R P.915: Subjective assessment methods for 3D video quality (2016) ITU-R P.915: Subjective assessment methods for 3D video quality (2016)
5.
Zurück zum Zitat ITU-R P.916: Information and guidelines for assessing and minimizing visual discomfort and visual fatigue from 3D video (2016) ITU-R P.916: Information and guidelines for assessing and minimizing visual discomfort and visual fatigue from 3D video (2016)
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Loncaric, M., et al.: Testing picture quality in HDTV systems. In: ELMAR, 2008 50th International Symposium, September 2008, pp. 5–8 Loncaric, M., et al.: Testing picture quality in HDTV systems. In: ELMAR, 2008 50th International Symposium, September 2008, pp. 5–8
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Dumic, E., Grgic, S., Sakic, K., Frank, D.: Subjective quality assessment of H.265 versus H.264 video coding for high-definition video systems. In: 13th International Conference on Telecommunications ConTEL 2015, ConTEL 2015 Proceedings, July 2015, pp. 1–7 Dumic, E., Grgic, S., Sakic, K., Frank, D.: Subjective quality assessment of H.265 versus H.264 video coding for high-definition video systems. In: 13th International Conference on Telecommunications ConTEL 2015, ConTEL 2015 Proceedings, July 2015, pp. 1–7
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghadiyaram, D., Bovik, A.C.: Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Quality. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing 25(1), 372–387 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRef Ghadiyaram, D., Bovik, A.C.: Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Quality. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing 25(1), 372–387 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghadiyaram, D., Bovik, A.C.: Crowdsourced study of subjective image quality. In: 2014 48th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, November 2014, pp. 1–5 Ghadiyaram, D., Bovik, A.C.: Crowdsourced study of subjective image quality. In: 2014 48th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, November 2014, pp. 1–5
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakic, K., Dumic, E., Grgic, S.: Crowdsourced subjective video quality assessment. In: The 21st International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing—IWSSIP, IWSSIP 2014 Proceedings, May 2014, pp. 223–226 Sakic, K., Dumic, E., Grgic, S.: Crowdsourced subjective video quality assessment. In: The 21st International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing—IWSSIP, IWSSIP 2014 Proceedings, May 2014, pp. 223–226
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dumic, E., Grgic, S., Sakic, K., Rocha, P.M.R., da Silva Cruz, L.A.: 3D video subjective quality: a new database and grade comparison study. Multimed. Tools Appl. 1380–7501, 1–23 (2016) Dumic, E., Grgic, S., Sakic, K., Rocha, P.M.R., da Silva Cruz, L.A.: 3D video subjective quality: a new database and grade comparison study. Multimed. Tools Appl. 1380–7501, 1–23 (2016)
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanhart, P., Korshunov, P., Ebrahimi, T.: Crowd-based quality assessment of multiview video plus depth coding. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Paris, France, October 2014, pp. 743–747 Hanhart, P., Korshunov, P., Ebrahimi, T.: Crowd-based quality assessment of multiview video plus depth coding. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Paris, France, October 2014, pp. 743–747
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoßfeld, T., et al.: Best practices for QoE crowdtesting: QoE assessment with crowdsourcing. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 16(2), 541–557 (2014)CrossRef Hoßfeld, T., et al.: Best practices for QoE crowdtesting: QoE assessment with crowdsourcing. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 16(2), 541–557 (2014)CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoßfeld, T., Redi, J.: Journey through the crowd: best practices and recommendations for crowdsourced QoE. In: Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) 2015, May 2015, pp. 1–2 Hoßfeld, T., Redi, J.: Journey through the crowd: best practices and recommendations for crowdsourced QoE. In: Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) 2015, May 2015, pp. 1–2
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaptein, R.G., Kuijsters, A., Lambooij, M.T.M., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Heynderickx, I.: Performance evaluation of 3D-TV systems. In: Proceedings of SPIE Image Quality and System Performance V, SPIE, vol. 6808, p. 680819 (2008) Kaptein, R.G., Kuijsters, A., Lambooij, M.T.M., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Heynderickx, I.: Performance evaluation of 3D-TV systems. In: Proceedings of SPIE Image Quality and System Performance V, SPIE, vol. 6808, p. 680819 (2008)
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lambooij, M., IJsselsteijn, W., Bouwhuis, D.G., Heynderickx, I.: Evaluation of stereoscopic images: beyond 2D quality. IEEE Trans. Broadcast. 57(2), 432–444 (2011)CrossRef Lambooij, M., IJsselsteijn, W., Bouwhuis, D.G., Heynderickx, I.: Evaluation of stereoscopic images: beyond 2D quality. IEEE Trans. Broadcast. 57(2), 432–444 (2011)CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lambooij, M.T.M., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Heynderickx, I.: Visual discomfort in stereoscopic displays: a review. In: Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems XIV, SPIE, vol. 6490, p. 64900I (2007) Lambooij, M.T.M., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Heynderickx, I.: Visual discomfort in stereoscopic displays: a review. In: Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems XIV, SPIE, vol. 6490, p. 64900I (2007)
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanhart, P., Ramzan, N., Baroncini, V., Ebrahimi, T.: Cross-lab subjective evaluation of the MVC+D and 3D-AVC 3D video coding standards. In: 6th International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), Singapore, September 2014, pp. 183–188 Hanhart, P., Ramzan, N., Baroncini, V., Ebrahimi, T.: Cross-lab subjective evaluation of the MVC+D and 3D-AVC 3D video coding standards. In: 6th International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), Singapore, September 2014, pp. 183–188
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Barkowsky, M., Li, J., Han, T., Youn, S., Ok, J., et al.: Towards standardized 3DTV QoE assessment: cross-lab study on display technology and viewing environment parameters. In: SPIE Electronic Imaging, San Franscisco, United States, February 2013, vol. 8648, pp. 864809–864809 Barkowsky, M., Li, J., Han, T., Youn, S., Ok, J., et al.: Towards standardized 3DTV QoE assessment: cross-lab study on display technology and viewing environment parameters. In: SPIE Electronic Imaging, San Franscisco, United States, February 2013, vol. 8648, pp. 864809–864809
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Urvoy, M., et al.: NAMA3DS1-COSPAD1: subjective video quality assessment database on coding conditions introducing freely available high quality 3D stereoscopic sequences. In: Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX 2012), Melbourne, Australia, July 2012, pp. 109–114 Urvoy, M., et al.: NAMA3DS1-COSPAD1: subjective video quality assessment database on coding conditions introducing freely available high quality 3D stereoscopic sequences. In: Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX 2012), Melbourne, Australia, July 2012, pp. 109–114
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lambooij, M., Murdoch, M., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Heynderickx, I.: The impact of video characteristics and subtitles on visual comfort of 3D TV. Displays 34(1), 8–16 (2013)CrossRef Lambooij, M., Murdoch, M., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Heynderickx, I.: The impact of video characteristics and subtitles on visual comfort of 3D TV. Displays 34(1), 8–16 (2013)CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Paulus, J., Michelson, G., Barkowsky, M., Hornegger, J., Eskofier, B., Schmidt, M.: Measurement of individual changes in the performance of human stereoscopic vision for disparities at the limits of the zone of comfortable viewing. In: 2013 International Conference on 3D Vision, 2013, pp. 310–317 Paulus, J., Michelson, G., Barkowsky, M., Hornegger, J., Eskofier, B., Schmidt, M.: Measurement of individual changes in the performance of human stereoscopic vision for disparities at the limits of the zone of comfortable viewing. In: 2013 International Conference on 3D Vision, 2013, pp. 310–317
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Reichl, P., Egger, S., Möller, S., Kilkki, K., Fiedler, M., Hossfeld, T., Tsiaras, C., Asrese, A.: Towards a comprehensive framework for QOE and user behavior modelling. In: 2015 Seventh International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), May 2015, pp. 1–6 Reichl, P., Egger, S., Möller, S., Kilkki, K., Fiedler, M., Hossfeld, T., Tsiaras, C., Asrese, A.: Towards a comprehensive framework for QOE and user behavior modelling. In: 2015 Seventh International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), May 2015, pp. 1–6
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Dataset Repository: ftp://ftp.ivc.polytech.univ-nantes.fr/NAMA3DS1_COSPAD1/Avi_videos/HRC_00_Reference/. Accessed: 16 November 2017 Dataset Repository: ftp://ftp.ivc.polytech.univ-nantes.fr/NAMA3DS1_COSPAD1/Avi_videos/HRC_00_Reference/. Accessed: 16 November 2017
31.
Zurück zum Zitat ITU-T: Recommendation P.910, Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications (2008) ITU-T: Recommendation P.910, Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications (2008)
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheikh, H.R.: Image quality assessment using natural scene statistics. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin (2004) Sheikh, H.R.: Image quality assessment using natural scene statistics. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin (2004)
33.
Zurück zum Zitat ITU-T J.149, “Method for specifying accuracy and crosscalibration of Video Quality Metrics (VQM),” International Telecommunication Union, March 2004 ITU-T J.149, “Method for specifying accuracy and crosscalibration of Video Quality Metrics (VQM),” International Telecommunication Union, March 2004
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanhart, P., Ebrahimi, T.: On the evaluation of 3D codecs on multiview autostereoscopic display. In: 4th IEEE International Workshop on Hot Topics in 3D (Hot3D), July 2013, pp. 1–2 Hanhart, P., Ebrahimi, T.: On the evaluation of 3D codecs on multiview autostereoscopic display. In: 4th IEEE International Workshop on Hot Topics in 3D (Hot3D), July 2013, pp. 1–2
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Brunnström, K., Ananth, I.V., Hedberg, C., Wang, K., Andrén, B., Barkowsky, M.: 36.4: Comparison between different rating scales for 3D TV. In: SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, vol. 44, no. 1, June 2013, pp. 509–512CrossRef Brunnström, K., Ananth, I.V., Hedberg, C., Wang, K., Andrén, B., Barkowsky, M.: 36.4: Comparison between different rating scales for 3D TV. In: SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, vol. 44, no. 1, June 2013, pp. 509–512CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Crowdsourced subjective 3D video quality assessment
verfasst von
Emil Dumic
Kresimir Sakic
Luis A. da Silva Cruz
Publikationsdatum
22.05.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Multimedia Systems / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0942-4962
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1882
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-019-00619-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2019

Multimedia Systems 6/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Neuer Inhalt