nach oben

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Erschienen in:

02.11.2021 | Original Article

Cystic (including atypical) and solid breast lesion classification using the different features of quantitative ultrasound parametric images

verfasst von: A. A. Kolchev, D. V. Pasynkov, I. A. Egoshin, I. V. Kliouchkin, O. O. Pasynkova

Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

The amount of ultrasound (US) breast examinations continues to grow rapidly because of the wider endorsement of breast cancer screening programs. Cysts are the most commonly diagnosed breast lesions. Atypical breast cysts can be a serious differentiation problem in the US. Our goal was to develop noninvasive automated US grayscale image analysis for the cystic and solid breast lesion differentiation based on mathematical image post-processing.

Materials and methods

We used a set of 217 ultrasound images of proven 107 cystic (including 53 atypical) and 110 solid lesions. Empirical statistical and morphological models of the lesions were used to obtain features. The AUC indicator and Student’s t test were used to assess the quality of the individual features. The Pearson correlation matrix was used to calculate the correlation between various features. The LASSO and stepwise regression methods were used to determine the most significant features. Finally, the lesion classification was carried out by the various methods.

Results

The use of LASSO regression for the feature selection made it possible to select the most significant features for classification. The sensitivity increased from 87.1% to 89.2% and the specificity—from 92.2 to 94.8%. After the correlation matrix construction, it was found that features with a high value of the correlation coefficient (0.72; 0.75) can also be used to improve the quality of the classification.

Conclusion

The construction of the empirical model of the lesion pixels brightness behavior can provide parameters that are important for the correct classification of ultrasound images. The optimal set of features with the maximum discriminant characteristics may not be consistent with the correlation of features and the value of the AUC index. Features with a low AUC index (in our case 0.72) can also be important for improving the quality of the classification.

Nächster Artikel Quantification of pulmonary involvement in COVID-19 pneumonia by means of a cascade of two U-nets: training and assessment on multiple datasets using different annotation criteria

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2016) Cancer statistics. Cancer J Clin 66(1):7–30CrossRef

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J Clin 68:394–424CrossRef

Nelson HD, Fu R, Cantor A, Pappas M, Daeges M, Humphrey L (2016) Effectiveness of breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis to update the 2009 U.S. preventive services task force recommendation. Ann Intern Med 164(4):244–255CrossRef

Rebolj M, Assi V, Brentnall A, Parmar D, Duffy SW (2018) Addition of ultrasound to mammography in the case of dense breast tissue: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 118:1559–1570. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0080-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Brem RF, Lenihan MJ, Lieberman J, Torrente J (2015) Screening breast ultrasound: past, present, and future. Am J Roentgenol 204(2):234–240CrossRef

Houssami N., Irwig L., Owen U.N.G. (2005) Review of complex breast cyst: Implications for cancer detection and clinical practice. ANZ, Surg, 1080–1085

Gokhale S (2009) Ultrasound characterization of breast masses. Indian J Radiol Imaging 19(3):242–247. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.54878CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Chang RF, Wu WJ, Moon WK, Chen DR (2005) Automatic ultrasound segmentation and morphology based diagnosis of solid breast tumors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 89(2):179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-004-2043-zCrossRefPubMed

Karimi B., Krzyzak A. (2014) Computer-aided system for automatic classification of suspicious lesions in breast ultrasound images. In: Conference: international conference on artificial intelligence and soft computing, pp 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07176-3_12

10.

Sidiropoulos KP, Kostopoulos SA, Glotsos DT, Athanasiadis EI, Dimitropoulos ND, Stonham JT, Cavouras DA (2013) Multimodality GPU-based computer-assisted diagnosis of breast cancer using ultrasound and digital mammography images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8(4):547–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-013-0813-yCrossRefPubMed

11.

Prabhakar T, Poonguzhali S (2018) Assessment of texture feature extraction to classify the benign and malignant lesions from breast ultrasound images. Artificial intelligence and evolutionary computations in engineering systems. Adv Intell Syst Comput 668:725–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7868-2_69CrossRef

12.

Ilesanmi AE, Chaumrattanakul U, Makhanov SS (2021) Methods for the segmentation and classification of breast ultrasound images: a review. J Ultrasound. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-020-00557-5CrossRefPubMed

13.

Egoshin IA, Pasynkov DV, Kolchev AA, Kliouchkin IV, Pasynkova OO (2020) Segmentation of breast focal lesions on the ultrasound image. Biomed Eng 54(2):99–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527-020-09982-6CrossRef

14.

Garra BS, Krasner BH, Horii SC, Ascher S, Mun SK, Zeman RK (1993) Improving the distinction between benign and malignant breast lesions: the value of sonographic texture analysis. Ultrason Imaging 15(4):267–285CrossRef

15.

Sivaramakrishna R, Powell KA, Lieber ML, Chilcote WA, Shekhar R (2002) Texture analysis of lesions in breast ultrasound images. Comput Med Imaging Graph 26(5):303–307CrossRef

16.

Chen DR, Chang RF, Kuo WJ, Chen MC, Huang YL (2002) Diagnosis of breast tumors with sonographic texture analysis using wavelet transform and neural networks. Ultrasound Med Biol 28(10):1301–1310CrossRef

17.

Chen SJ, Cheng KS, Dai YC, Sun YN, Chen YT, Chang KY, Hsu WC, Chang TW (2005) The representations of sonographic image texture for breast cancer using co-occurrence matrix. J Med Biol Eng 25(4):193–199

18.

Hongjiao G, Yingtao Z, Heng-Da C, Xianglong T (2020) Bounded–abstaining classification for breast tumors in imbalanced ultrasound images. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci 30(2):325–336. https://doi.org/10.34768/amcs-2020-0025CrossRef

19.

Sadeghi-Naini A, Suraweera H, Tran WT, Hadizad F, Bruni G, Rastegar RF, Curpen B, Czarnota GJ (2017) Breast-lesion characterization using textural features of quantitative ultrasound parametric maps. Sci Rep 7(1):136–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13977-xCrossRef

20.

Yanyan Yu, Yang X, Jieyu C, Bernard C (2018) Breast lesion classification based on supersonic shear-wave elastography and automated lesion segmentation from B-mode ultrasound images. Comput Biol Med 93:31–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.12.006CrossRef

21.

Tamura H, Mori S, Yamawaki T (1978) Textural features corresponding to visual perception. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 8(6):460–473CrossRef

22.

Haralick RM, Shanugam K, Dinstein I (1973) Texture features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet SMC 3(6):610–621CrossRef

23.

Hsu SM, Kuo WH, Kuo FC, Liao YY (2019) Breast tumor classification using different features of quantitative ultrasound parametric images. Int J CARS 14:623–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-01908-8CrossRef

24.

Liao YY, Wu JC, Li CH, Yeh CK (2011) Texture feature analysis for breast ultrasound image enhancement. Ultrason Imaging 33(4):264–278CrossRef

25.

Mendelson EB, Baum JK, Berg WA, Merritt CRB, Rubin E (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system, BI-RADS: ultrasound, 1st edn. American College of Radiology, Reston

26.

Berg WA, Campassi CI, Ioffe OB (2003) Cystic lesions of the breast: sonographic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 227(1):183–191CrossRef

27.

Wei M, Yongzhao Du, Xiuming Wu, Qichen Su, Zhu J, Zheng L, Lv G, Zhuang J (2020) A benign and malignant breast tumor classification method via efficiently combining texture and morphological features on ultrasound images. Comput Math Methods Med. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5894010CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Abdel-Nasser M, Melendez J, Moreno A, Omer O, Puig D (2016) Breast tumor classification in ultrasound images using texture analysis and super-resolution methods. Eng Appl Artif Intell 59:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2016.12.019CrossRef

29.

Daoud MI, Bdair TM, Al-Najar M, Alazrai R (2016) A Fusion-based approach for breast ultrasound image classification using multiple-ROI texture and morphological analyses. Comput Math Methods Med. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6740956CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Dhanachandra N, Chanu YJ (2020) An image segmentation approach based on fuzzy c-means and dynamic particle swarm optimization algorithm. Multimedia Tools Appl 79:18839–18858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-08699-8CrossRef

31.

Choudhry M, Kapoor R (2016) Performance analysis of fuzzy C-means clustering methods for MRI image segmentation. Procedia Comput Sci 89:749–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.06.052CrossRef

32.

Yang Y, Zhang F, Zheng C, Lin P (2005) Unsupervised image segmentation using penalized fuzzy clustering algorithm. In Gallagher M, Hogan JP, Maire F Intelligent data engineering and automated learning—IDEAL 2005. Lecture notes in computer science (3578), Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/11508069_10

33.

Klimonda Z, Karwat P, Dobruch-Sobczak K, Piotrzkowska-Wróblewska H, Litniewski J (2019) Breast-lesions characterization using quantitative ultrasound features of peritumoral tissue. Sci Rep 9(1):7963. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44376-zCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Cystic (including atypical) and solid breast lesion classification using the different features of quantitative ultrasound parametric images
verfasst von: A. A. Kolchev
D. V. Pasynkov
I. A. Egoshin
I. V. Kliouchkin
O. O. Pasynkova
Publikationsdatum: 02.11.2021
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1861-6410
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-6429
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-021-02522-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

An image processing tool for the detection of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity by evaluating the myocardial metabolic activity in [18F]FDG PET/CT

Novel microscope-based visual display and nasopharyngeal registration for auditory brainstem implantation: a feasibility study in an ex vivo model

Automatic and accurate needle detection in 2D ultrasound during robot-assisted needle insertion process

Automatic detection of attachment sites for knee ligaments and tendons on CT images

Movement-level process modeling of microsurgical bimanual and unimanual tasks

A cascaded fully convolutional network framework for dilated pancreatic duct segmentation

Premium Partner