nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

9. Data-Driven MHD Modeling of Coronal Magnetic Evolutions and Eruptions

verfasst von : Xueshang Feng

Erschienen in: Magnetohydrodynamic Modeling of the Solar Corona and Heliosphere

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Solar corona is always in dynamical evolution as driven by the surface motions on the photosphere, which stress the coronal field by shearing, twisting and even braiding in a somewhat random way. Such processes inject continuously magnetic free energy and helicity into the corona, which, however, cannot be reserved forever. As a result, solar eruptions occur from time to time, like a volcanic eruption, which explosively releases the magnetic free energy into other forms like kinetic and thermal energies. As such dynamical process is not included in the force-free field extrapolation models, MHD model, in particular, constrained and even driven by the observed magnetograms, is required to follow the coronal dynamic evolution. Such data-driven MHD models have been recently developed and applied to study the solar active-region evolution as well as its eruption, which offers a new way for understanding sophisticatedly their underlying magnetic topology and mechanism. This chapter briefly presents data-driven CESE–MHD modeling of coronal magnetic evolutions and eruptions.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Coronal Force-Free Field Extrapolations

Nächstes Kapitel Modeling Coronal Mass Ejections by CESE MHD Model

Amari T, Aly JJ, Luciani JF, Boulmezaoud TZ, Mikić Z (1997) Reconstructing the solar coronal magnetic field as a force-free magnetic field. Sol Phys 174:129–149ADSCrossRef

Amari T, Luciani JF, Aly JJ, Mikic Z, Linker J (2003) Coronal mass ejection: initiation, magnetic helicity, and flux ropes I. Boundary motion-driven evolution. Astrophys J 585:1073–1086. https://doi.org/10.1086/345501ADSCrossRef

Amari T, Canou A, Aly JJ (2014) Characterizing and predicting the magnetic environment leading to solar eruptions. Nature 514(7523):465–469ADSCrossRef

Amari T, Canou A, Aly JJ, Delyon F, Alauzet F (2018) Magnetic cage and rope as the key for solar eruptions. Nature 554:211–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24671ADSCrossRef

Antiochos SK, DeVore CR, Klimchuk JA (1999) A model for solar coronal mass ejections. Astrophys J 510:485–493. https://doi.org/10.1086/306563ADSCrossRef

Berger MA, Field GB (1984) The topological properties of magnetic helicity. J Fluid Mech 147:133–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112084002019ADSMathSciNetCrossRef

Bobra MG, Sun X, Hoeksema JT, Turmon M, Liu Y, Hayashi K, Barnes G, Leka KD (2014) The helioseismic and magnetic imager (HMI) vector magnetic field pipeline: SHARPs - space-weather HMI active region patches. Sol Phys 289:3549–3578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-014-0529-3ADSCrossRef

Chen H, Zhang J, Ma S, Yang S, Li L, Huang X, Xiao J (2015) Confined flares in solar active region 12192 from 18 to 29 October 2014. Astrophys J Lett 808(1):L24ADSCrossRef

Cheung MCM, DeRosa ML (2012) A method for data-driven simulations of evolving solar active regions. Astrophys J 757:147. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/147ADSCrossRef

10.

Courant R, Friedrichs K, Lewy H (1967) On the partial difference equations of mathematical physics. IBM J Res Dev 11(2):215–234ADSMathSciNetMATHCrossRef

11.

Demoulin P, Henoux JC, Priest ER, Mandrini CH (1996) Quasi-separatrix layers in solar flares I. Method. Astron Astrophys 308:643–655ADS

12.

Démoulin P, Mandrini C, van Driel-Gesztelyi L, Thompson B, Plunkett S, Kővári Z, Aulanier G, Young A (2002) What is the source of the magnetic helicity shed by CMEs? The long-term helicity budget of AR 7978. Astron Astrophys 382(2):650–665ADSCrossRef

13.

DeRosa ML, Schrijver CJ, Barnes G, Leka KD, Lites BW, Aschwanden MJ, Amari T, Canou A, McTiernan JM, Régnier S, Thalmann JK, Valori G, Wheatland MS, Wiegelmann T, Cheung MCM, Conlon PA, Fuhrmann M, Inhester B, Tadesse T (2009) A critical assessment of nonlinear force-free field modeling of the solar corona for active region 10953. Astrophys J 696:1780–1791. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/1780ADSCrossRef

14.

DeRosa ML, Wheatland MS, Leka KD, Barnes G, Amari T, Canou A, Gilchrist SA, Thalmann JK, Valori G, Wiegelmann T, Schrijver CJ, Malanushenko A, Sun X, Régnier S (2015) The Influence of spatial resolution on nonlinear force-free modeling. Astrophys J 811:107. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/107ADSCrossRef

15.

Duan AY, Jiang CW, Hu Q, Zhang H, Gary GA, Wu ST, Cao JB (2017) Comparison of two coronal magnetic field models to reconstruct a sigmoidal solar active region with coronal loops. Astrophys J 842(2):119. http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/842/i=2/a=119ADSCrossRef

16.

Fan Y (2010) On the eruption of coronal flux ropes. Astrophys J 719(1):728ADSCrossRef

17.

Fan Y (2011) A magnetohydrodynamic model of the 13 December 2006 eruptive flare. Astrophys J 740:68. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/740/2/68ADSCrossRef

18.

Fan Y, Gibson SE (2007) Onset of coronal mass ejections due to loss of confinement of coronal flux ropes. Astrophys J 668:1232–1245. https://doi.org/10.1086/521335ADSCrossRef

19.

Fan YL, Wang HN, He H, Zhu XS (2011) Study of the poynting flux in active region 10930 using data-driven magnetohydrodynamic simulation. Astrophys J 737:39. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/737/1/39ADSCrossRef

20.

Gary GA (2001) Plasma beta above a solar active region: rethinking the paradigm. Sol Phys 203:71–86ADSCrossRef

21.

Gibson SE, Fan Y (2006) Coronal prominence structure and dynamics: a magnetic flux rope interpretation. J Geophys Res 111(A12):103. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA011871CrossRef

22.

Hoeksema JT, Liu Y, Hayashi K, Sun X, Schou J, Couvidat S, Norton A, Bobra M, Centeno R, Leka KD, Barnes G, Turmon M (2014) The helioseismic and magnetic imager (HMI) vector magnetic field pipeline: overview and performance. Sol Phys 289:3483–3530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-014-0516-8ADSCrossRef

23.

Hood AW, Archontis V, MacTaggart D (2012) 3D MHD flux emergence experiments: idealised models and coronal interactions. Sol Phys 278(1):3–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9745-2ADSCrossRef

24.

Hudson HS (2000) Implosions in coronal transients. Astrophys J Lett 531(1):L75. http://stacks.iop.org/1538-4357/531/i=1/a=L75ADSCrossRef

25.

Inoue S, Hayashi K, Magara T, Choe GS, Park YD (2014) Magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the X2.2 solar flare on 15 February 2011. I. Comparison with the observations. Astrophys J 788(2):182. http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/788/i=2/a=182

26.

Inoue S, Hayashi K, Magara T, Choe GS, Park YD (2015) Magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the x2.2 solar flare on 15 February 2011. II. Dynamics connecting the solar flare and the coronal mass ejection. Astrophys J 803(2):73. http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/803/i=2/a=73

27.

Inoue S, Hayashi K, Kusano K (2016) Structure and stability of magnetic fields in solar active region 12192 based on the nonlinear force-free field modeling. Astrophys J 818:168. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/818/2/168ADSCrossRef

28.

Inoue S, Shiota D, Bamba Y, Park SH (2018) Magnetohydrodynamic modeling of a solar eruption associated with an X9.3 flare observed in the active region 12673. Astrophys J 867(1):83. http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/867/i=1/a=83ADSCrossRef

29.

Jacobs C, Poedts S, van der Holst B (2006) The effect of the solar wind on CME triggering by magnetic foot point shearing. Astron Astrophys 450:793–803. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20054670ADSCrossRef

30.

Jiang CW, Feng XS (2013) Extrapolation of the solar coronal magnetic field from SDO/HMI magnetogram by a CESE-MHD-NLFFF code. Astrophys J 769:144. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/769/2/144ADSCrossRef

31.

Jiang CW, Feng XS, Zhang J, Zhong DK (2010) AMR simulations of magnetohydrodynamic problems by the CESE method in curvilinear coordinates. Sol Phys 267:463–491ADSCrossRef

32.

Jiang CW, Feng XS, Fan Y, Xiang C (2011) Reconstruction of the coronal magnetic field using the CESE-MHD method. Astrophys J 727:101. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/727/2/101ADSCrossRef

33.

Jiang CW, Feng XS, Wu ST, Hu Q (2012) Study of the three-dimensional coronal magnetic field of active region 11117 around the time of a confined flare using a data-driven CESE-MHD model. Astrophys J 759:85. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/759/2/85ADSCrossRef

34.

Jiang CW, Feng XS, Wu ST, Hu Q (2013) Magnetohydrodynamic simulation of a sigmoid eruption of active region 11283. Astrophys J Lett 771(2):L30ADSCrossRef

35.

Jiang CW, Wu ST, Feng XS, Hu Q (2016) Data-driven MHD simulation of a flux-emerging active region leading to solar eruption. Nature Comm 7(11):11522. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11522ADSCrossRef

36.

Jiang CW, Wu ST, Yurchyshyn VB, Wang H, Feng XS, Hu Q (2016) How did a major confined flare occur in super solar active region 12192. Astrophys J 828(1):62ADSCrossRef

37.

Jiang CW, Feng XS, Wu ST, Hu Q (2017) A magnetic bald-patch flare in solar active region 11117. Res Astron Astrophys 17(9):93. https://doi.org/10.1088/16744527/17/9/93ADSCrossRef

38.

Jiang CW, Yan X, Feng XS, Duan AY, Hu Q, Zuo P, Wang Y (2017) Reconstruction of a large-scale pre-flare coronal current sheet associated with a homologous X-shaped flare. Astrophys J 850(1):8. http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/850/i=1/a=8ADSCrossRef

39.

Jing J, Xu Y, Lee J, Nitta NV, Liu C, Park SH, Wiegelmann T, Wang HM (2015) Comparison between the eruptive X2.2 flare on 15 February 2011 and confined X3.1 flare on 24 October 2014. Res Astron Astrophys 15(9):1537

40.

Kawabata Y, Inoue S, Shimizu T (2017) Non-potential field formation in the X-shaped quadrupole magnetic field configuration. Astrophys J 842(2):106. http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/842/i=2/a=106ADSCrossRef

41.

Kliem B, Su YN, van Ballegooijen AA, DeLuca EE (2013) Magnetohydrodynamic modeling of the solar eruption on 8 April 2010. Astrophys J 779:129. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/129ADSCrossRef

42.

Linker JA, Mikić Z, Lionello R, Riley P, Amari T, Odstrcil D (2003) Flux cancellation and coronal mass ejections. Phys Plasmas 10:1971–1978. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1563668ADSCrossRef

43.

Liu R, Chen J, Wang Y, Liu K (2016) Investigating energetic X-shaped flares on the outskirts of a solar active region. Sci Rep 6(34):021

44.

Liu R, Kliem B, Titov VS, Chen J, Wang Y, Wang H, Liu C, Xu Y, Wiegelmann T (2016) Structure, stability, and evolution of magnetic flux ropes from the perspective of magnetic twist. Astrophys J 818:148. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/818/2/148ADSCrossRef

45.

Liu Y, Zhao J, Schuck PW (2013) Horizontal flows in the photosphere and subphotosphere of two active regions. Sol Phys 287:279–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-012-0089-3ADSCrossRef

46.

Low BC (1992) Formation of electric-current sheets in the magnetostatic atmosphere. Astron Astrophys 253:311–317ADSMATH

47.

Low BC (1996) The spontaneous formation of current-sheets in astrophysical magnetic fields. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp 109–131

48.

Low BC (2010) The Craig-Sneyd analytic solutions to the Parker problem. Sol Phys 266:277–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-010-9619-zADSCrossRef

49.

Low BC, Lou YQ (1990) Modeling solar force-free magnetic fields. Astrophys J 352:343–352. https://doi.org/10.1086/168541ADSCrossRef

50.

Low BC, Petrie GJD (2005) The internal structures and dynamics of solar quiescent prominences. Astrophys J 626(1):551–562ADSCrossRef

51.

Mackay DH, Karpen JT, Ballester JL, Schmieder B, Aulanier G (2010) Physics of solar prominences: II. Magnetic structure and dynamics. Space Sci Rev 151:333–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-010-9628-0ADSCrossRef

52.

Manchester WB, Gombosi TI, Roussev I, Ridley A, De Zeeuw DL, Sokolov IV, Powell KG, Tóth G (2004) Modeling a space weather event from the Sun to the Earth: CME generation and interplanetary propagation. J Geophys Res 109(A18):2107. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010150CrossRef

53.

Mandrini CH, Démoulin P, Schmieder B, Deng YY, Rudawy P (2002) The role of magnetic bald patches in surges and arch filament systems. Astron Astrophys 391:317–329. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20020745ADSCrossRef

54.

Mandrini CH, Schmieder B, Démoulin P, Guo Y, Cristiani GD (2014) Topological analysis of emerging bipole clusters producing violent solar events. Sol Phys 289:2041–2071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-013-0458-6ADSCrossRef

55.

Pariat E, Aulanier G, Schmieder B, Georgoulis MK, Rust DM, Bernasconi PN (2004) Resistive emergence of undulatory flux tubes. Astrophys J 614:1099–1112. https://doi.org/10.1086/423891ADSCrossRef

56.

Parker EN (1972) Topological dissipation and the small-scale fields in turbulent gases. Astrophys J 174:499ADSCrossRef

57.

Parker EN (1994) Spontaneous current sheets in magnetic fields: with applications to stellar X-rays. International series in astronomy and astrophysics, vol 1. Oxford University Press, New York

58.

Petrie GJD (2012) The abrupt changes in the photospheric magnetic and lorentz force vectors during six major neutral-line flares. Astrophys J 759:50. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/50ADSCrossRef

59.

Prasad A, Bhattacharyya R, Kumar S (2017) Magnetohydrodynamic modeling of solar coronal dynamics with an initial non-force-free magnetic field. Astrophys J 840:37. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa6c58ADSCrossRef

60.

Qiu J (2009) Observational analysis of magnetic reconnection sequence. Astrophys J 692:1110–1124. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/692/2/1110ADSCrossRef

61.

Reid HAS, Vilmer N, Aulanier G, Pariat E (2012) X-ray and ultraviolet investigation into the magnetic connectivity of a solar flare. Astron Astrophys 547:A52. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219562ADSCrossRef

62.

Saint-Hilaire P, Benz AO (2005) Thermal and non-thermal energies of solar flares. A&A 435(2):743–752. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041918ADSCrossRef

63.

Sakurai T (1989) Computational modeling of magnetic fields in solar active regions. Space Sci Rev 51:11–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226267ADSCrossRef

64.

Savcheva A, Pariat E, McKillop S, McCauley P, Hanson E, Su Y, Werner E, DeLuca EE (2015) The relation between solar eruption topologies and observed flare features I. Flare ribbons. Astrophys J 810(2):96. http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/810/i=2/a=96ADSCrossRef

65.

Schrijver CJ, De Rosa ML, Metcalf TR, Liu Y, McTiernan J, Régnier S, Valori G, Wheatland MS, Wiegelmann T (2006) Nonlinear force-free modeling of coronal magnetic fields Part I: a quantitative comparison of methods. Sol Phys 235:161–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-006-0068-7ADSCrossRef

66.

Schrijver CJ, DeRosa ML, Metcalf T, Barnes G, Lites B, Tarbell T, McTiernan J, Valori G, Wiegelmann T, Wheatland MS, Amari T, Aulanier G, Démoulin P, Fuhrmann M, Kusano K, Régnier S, Thalmann JK (2008) Nonlinear force-free field modeling of a solar active region around the time of a major flare and coronal mass ejection. Astrophys J 675:1637–1644. https://doi.org/10.1086/527413ADSCrossRef

67.

Schuck PW (2008) Tracking vector magnetograms with the magnetic induction equation. Astrophys J 683(2):1134. http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/683/i=2/a=1134ADSMathSciNetCrossRef

68.

Shibata K, Nakamura T, Matsumoto T, Otsuji K, Okamoto TJ, Nishizuka N, Kawate T, Watanabe H, Nagata S, UeNo S, Kitai R, Nozawa S, Tsuneta S, Suematsu Y, Ichimoto K, Shimizu T, Katsukawa Y, Tarbell TD, Berger TE, Lites BW, Shine RA, Title AM (2007) Chromospheric anemone jets as evidence of ubiquitous reconnection. Science 318:1591. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1146708ADSCrossRef

69.

Sun X, Hoeksema JT, Liu Y, Wiegelmann T, Hayashi K, Chen Q, Thalmann J (2012) Evolution of magnetic field and energy in a major eruptive active region based on SDO/HMI observation. Astrophys J 748:77. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/748/2/77ADSCrossRef

70.

Sun X, Bobra MG, Hoeksema JT, Liu Y, Li Y, Shen C, Couvidat S, Norton AA, Fisher GH (2015) Why is the great solar active region 12192 flare-rich but CME-poor? Astrophys J Lett 804(2):L28ADSCrossRef

71.

Tarr LA, Longcope DW, McKenzie DE, Yoshimura K (2014) Quiescent reconnection rate between emerging active regions and preexisting field, with associated heating: NOAA AR 11112. Sol Phys 289:3331–3349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-013-0462-xADSCrossRef

72.

Thalmann JK, Su Y, Temmer M, Veronig AM (2015) The confined X-class flares of solar active region 2192. Astrophys J Lett 801:L23ADSCrossRef

73.

Titov VS, Démoulin P (1999) Basic topology of twisted magnetic configurations in solar flares. Astron Astrophys 351:707–720ADS

74.

Titov VS, Priest ER, Demoulin P (1993) Conditions for the appearance of “bald patches” at the solar surface. Astron Astrophys 276:564

75.

Titov VS, Hornig G, Démoulin P (2002) Theory of magnetic connectivity in the solar corona. J Geophys Res 107:1164. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA000278CrossRef

76.

Török T, Kliem B (2005) Confined and ejective eruptions of kink-unstable flux ropes. Astrophys J Lett 630:L97–L100. https://doi.org/10.1086/462412ADSCrossRef

77.

van Ballegooijen AA (2004) Observations and modeling of a filament on the Sun. Astrophys J 612:519–529. https://doi.org/10.1086/422512ADSCrossRef

78.

van Ballegooijen AA, Deluca EE, Squires K, Mackay DH (2007) Modeling magnetic flux ropes in the solar atmosphere. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 69:24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2006.06.007ADSCrossRef

79.

Vranjes J, Poedts S, Pandey BP, de Pontieu B (2008) Energy flux of Alfvén waves in weakly ionized plasma. Astron Astrophys 478:553–558. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20078274ADSMATHCrossRef

80.

Wang AH, Wu ST, Liu Y, Hathaway D (2008) Recovering photospheric velocities from vector magnetograms by using a three-dimensional, fully magnetohydrodynamic model. Astrophys J Lett 674:L57–L60. https://doi.org/10.1086/528844ADSCrossRef

81.

Wang H (2006) Rapid changes of photospheric magnetic fields around flaring magnetic neutral lines. Astrophys J 649:490–497. https://doi.org/10.1086/506320ADSCrossRef

82.

Wang H, Liu C (2010) Observational evidence of back reaction on the solar surface associated with coronal magnetic restructuring in solar eruptions. Astrophys J Lett 716:L195–L199. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/716/2/L195ADSCrossRef

83.

Wang H, Liu C (2012) Circular ribbon flares and homologous jets. Astrophys J 760:101. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/760/2/101ADSCrossRef

84.

Wang S, Liu C, Liu R, Deng N, Liu Y, Wang H (2012) Response of the photospheric magnetic field to the X2.2 flare on (15 February 2011) Astrophys J Lett 745:L17. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/745/2/L17ADSCrossRef

85.

Welsch BT, Fisher GH, Abbett WP, Régnier S (2004) ILCT: recovering photospheric velocities from magnetograms by combining the induction equation with local correlation tracking. Astrophys J 610:1148–1156. https://doi.org/10.1086/421767ADSCrossRef

86.

Wolfson R (1989) Current sheet formation in a sheared force-free-magnetic field. Astrophys J 344:471–477. https://doi.org/10.1086/167816ADSCrossRef

87.

Wu ST, Zhang TX, Tandberg-Hanssen E, Liu Y, Feng X, Tan A (2005) Numerical magnetohydrodynamic experiments for testing the physical mechanisms of coronal mass ejections acceleration. Sol Phys 225:157–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-004-2568-7ADSCrossRef

88.

Wu ST, Wang AH, Liu Y, Hoeksema JT (2006) Data-driven magnetohydrodynamic model for active region evolution. Astrophys J 652:800–811. https://doi.org/10.1086/507864ADSCrossRef

89.

Wu ST, Wang AH, Gary GA, Kucera A, Rybak J, Liu Y, Vrśnak B, Yurchyshyn V (2009) Analyses of magnetic field structures for active region 10720 using a data-driven 3D MHD model. Adv Space Res 44:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2009.03.020ADSCrossRef

90.

Xue Z, Yan XL, Cheng X, Yang L, Su Y, Kliem B, Zhang J, Liu Z, Bi Y, Xiang Y et al (2016) Observing the release of twist by magnetic reconnection in a solar filament eruption. Nat Commun 7(11):11837ADSCrossRef

91.

Yamamoto TT, Kusano K (2012) Preprocessing magnetic fields with chromospheric longitudinal fields. Astrophys J 752:126. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/752/2/126ADSCrossRef

92.

Yan XL, Jiang CW, Xue ZK, Wang JC, Priest ER, Yang LH, Kong DF, Cao WD, Ji HS (2017) The eruption of a small-scale emerging flux rope as the driver of an M-class flare and of a coronal mass ejection. Astrophys J 845(1):18. http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/845/i=1/a=18ADSCrossRef

93.

Yashiro S, Akiyama S, Gopalswamy N, Howard RA (2006) Different power-law indices in the frequency distributions of flares with and without coronal mass ejections. Astrophys J Lett 650:L143–L146. https://doi.org/10.1086/508876ADSCrossRef

Titel: Data-Driven MHD Modeling of Coronal Magnetic Evolutions and Eruptions
verfasst von: Xueshang Feng
Verlag: Springer Singapore
Buch: Magnetohydrodynamic Modeling of the Solar Corona and Heliosphere
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9080-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-13-9081-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9081-4_9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner