Skip to main content

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Decision-Making Under Conditions of Multiple Values and Variation in Conditions of Risk and Uncertainty

verfasst von : Ewa Roszkowska, Tom R. Burns

Erschienen in: Human-Centric Decision-Making Models for Social Sciences

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Empirical research shows that humans face many kinds of uncertainties, responding in different ways to the variations in situational knowledge. The standard approach to risk, based largely on rational choice conceptualization, fails to sufficiently take into account the diverse social and psychological contexts of uncertainty and risk. The article addresses this challenge, drawing on sociological game theory (SGT) in describing and analyzing risk and uncertainty and relating the theory’s conceptualization of judgment and choice to a particular procedure of multi-criteria decision-making uncertainty, namely the TOPSIS approach. Part I of the article addresses complex risk decision-making, considering the universal features of an actor’s or decision-maker’s perspective: a model or belief structure, value complex, action repertoire, and judgment complex (with its algorithms for making judgments and choices). Although these features are universal, they are particularized in any given institutional or sociocultural context. This part of the article utilizes SGT to consider decision-making under conditions of risk and uncertainty, taking into account social and psychological contextual factors. Part II of the article takes up an established method, TOPSIS with Belief Structure (BS), for dealing with multi-criteria decision-making under conditions of uncertainty. One aim of this exercise is to identify correspondences between the SGT universal architecture and the operative components of the TOPSIS method. We expose, for instance, the different value components or diverse judgment algorithms in the TOPSIS procedure. One of the benefits of such an exercise is to suggest ways to link different decision methods and procedures in a comparative light. It deepens our empirical base and understanding of values, models, action repertoires, and judgment structures (and their algorithms). The effort here is, of course, a limited one.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
In decision theory, lack of knowledge is divided into the two major categories ‘risk’ and ‘uncertainty’ [31], p.20 Chap. 7 where “risk” refers to situations where the decision-maker can assign mathematical probabilities to the randomness which he is faced with, where and “uncertainty” refers to situations when this randomness “cannot” be expressed in terms of specific mathematical probabilities.
 
2
Rules and rule systems are key concepts in the new institutionalism [6, 24, 3335, 38, 42], evolutionary sociology [5, 41], and ethnomethodology [20] and are closely related to important work in philosophy on “language games” [47] and linguistics [16, 17, 37] as well as work in mathematics and computer science [7, 8, 21, 22] among others.
 
3
Risk is a concept with multiple definitions and differences of approach, ranging from “an unwanted event which may or may not occur to “the statistical expected value of undesirable or unwanted events which may or may not occur” [14].
 
4
This derives from the concept of “satisficing” introduced by [43]. Elsewhere [10], we formulate a satisficing algorithm which compares the characteristics of an option to a vector of values specifying standards and determined “sufficient similarity” and, therefore satisfied.
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Burns, T.R.: Models of social and market exchange: toward a sociological theory of games and human interaction. In: Calhoun, C., Meyer, M.W., Scott, W.R. (eds.) Structures of Power and Constraint: Essays in Honor of Peter M. Blau. Cambridge University Press, New York (1990) Burns, T.R.: Models of social and market exchange: toward a sociological theory of games and human interaction. In: Calhoun, C., Meyer, M.W., Scott, W.R. (eds.) Structures of Power and Constraint: Essays in Honor of Peter M. Blau. Cambridge University Press, New York (1990)
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Burns, T.R.: Two conceptions of human agency: rational choice theory and the social theory of action. In: Sztompka, P. (ed.) Human Agency and the Reorientation of Social Theory. Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam (1994) Burns, T.R.: Two conceptions of human agency: rational choice theory and the social theory of action. In: Sztompka, P. (ed.) Human Agency and the Reorientation of Social Theory. Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam (1994)
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Burns, T.R., Baumgartner, T., DeVille, P.: Man, Decision and Society. Gordon and Breach, London (1985) Burns, T.R., Baumgartner, T., DeVille, P.: Man, Decision and Society. Gordon and Breach, London (1985)
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Burns, T.R., Caldas, J.C., Roszkowska, E.: Generalized game theory’s contribution to multi-agent modelling: addressing problems of social regulation, social order, and effective security. In: Dunin-Keplicz, B., Jankowski, A., Skowron, A., Szczuka, M. (eds.) Monitoring, Security and Rescue Techniques in Multiagent Systems, pp. 363–384. Springer Verlag, Berlin/London (2005) Burns, T.R., Caldas, J.C., Roszkowska, E.: Generalized game theory’s contribution to multi-agent modelling: addressing problems of social regulation, social order, and effective security. In: Dunin-Keplicz, B., Jankowski, A., Skowron, A., Szczuka, M. (eds.) Monitoring, Security and Rescue Techniques in Multiagent Systems, pp. 363–384. Springer Verlag, Berlin/London (2005)
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Burns, T.R., Dietz T.: Revolution: an evolutionary perspective. Int. Soc. 16(4), 531–555 (2001) Burns, T.R., Dietz T.: Revolution: an evolutionary perspective. Int. Soc. 16(4), 531–555 (2001)
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Burns, T.R., Flam H.: The Shaping of Social Organization: Social Rule System Theory with Applications. Sage Publications, London (1987, reprinted 1990) Burns, T.R., Flam H.: The Shaping of Social Organization: Social Rule System Theory with Applications. Sage Publications, London (1987, reprinted 1990)
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Burns, T.R., Gomolińska, A.: Modeling social game systems by rule complexes. In: Polkowski, L., Skowron, A. (eds.) Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg (1998) Burns, T.R., Gomolińska, A.: Modeling social game systems by rule complexes. In: Polkowski, L., Skowron, A. (eds.) Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg (1998)
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Burns, T.R., Gomolińska, A.: The theory of socially embedded games: the mathematics of social relationships, rule complexes, and action modalities. Qual. Quant. Int. J. Methodol. 34(4), 379–406 (2000) Burns, T.R., Gomolińska, A.: The theory of socially embedded games: the mathematics of social relationships, rule complexes, and action modalities. Qual. Quant. Int. J. Methodol. 34(4), 379–406 (2000)
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Burns, T.R., Gomolińska, A., Meeker, L.D.: The theory of socially embedded games: applications and extensions to open and closed games. Qual. Quant. Int. J. Methodol. 35(1), 1–32 (2001)CrossRef Burns, T.R., Gomolińska, A., Meeker, L.D.: The theory of socially embedded games: applications and extensions to open and closed games. Qual. Quant. Int. J. Methodol. 35(1), 1–32 (2001)CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Burns, T.R., Roszkowska, E.: Fuzzy games and equilibria: the perspective of the general theory of games on Nash and normative equilibria. In: Pal S.K., Polkowski L., Skowron A. (eds.) Rough-Neural Computing. Techniques for Computing with Words, pp. 435–470. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2004) Burns, T.R., Roszkowska, E.: Fuzzy games and equilibria: the perspective of the general theory of games on Nash and normative equilibria. In: Pal S.K., Polkowski L., Skowron A. (eds.) Rough-Neural Computing. Techniques for Computing with Words, pp. 435–470. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2004)
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Burns, T.R., Roszkowska E.: Multi-value decision-making and games: the perspective of generalized game theory on social and psychological complexity, contradiction, and equilibrium. In Shi Y. (ed.) Advances in Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Human Systems Management, pp. 75–107. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2007) Burns, T.R., Roszkowska E.: Multi-value decision-making and games: the perspective of generalized game theory on social and psychological complexity, contradiction, and equilibrium. In Shi Y. (ed.) Advances in Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Human Systems Management, pp. 75–107. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2007)
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Burns, T.R., Roszkowska, E.: The social theory of choice: from Simon and Kahneman-Tversky to GGT modelling of socially contextualized decision situations. Optimum-Studia Ekonomiczne. 3(39), 3–44 (2008) Burns, T.R., Roszkowska, E.: The social theory of choice: from Simon and Kahneman-Tversky to GGT modelling of socially contextualized decision situations. Optimum-Studia Ekonomiczne. 3(39), 3–44 (2008)
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cassidy, J.: Economics: Which Way for Obama? Review of R.H. Thaler and C.R. Sunstein. New York Review of Books June 12, pp. 30–34 (2008) Cassidy, J.: Economics: Which Way for Obama? Review of R.H. Thaler and C.R. Sunstein. New York Review of Books June 12, pp. 30–34 (2008)
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chapman, A.: Democratizing Technology. Risk, Responsibility and Regulation of Chemicals. Earthscan, London (2007) Chapman, A.: Democratizing Technology. Risk, Responsibility and Regulation of Chemicals. Earthscan, London (2007)
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, C.T.: Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114(1), 1–9 (2000)CrossRefMATH Chen, C.T.: Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114(1), 1–9 (2000)CrossRefMATH
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chomsky, N.: Rules and Representation. Columbia University Press, New York (1980) Chomsky, N.: Rules and Representation. Columbia University Press, New York (1980)
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chomsky, N.: Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origins, and Use. Praeger, New York (1986) Chomsky, N.: Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origins, and Use. Praeger, New York (1986)
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dawes, R.M., Thaler, R.: Cooperation. J. or Econ. Perspect. 2, 187–197 (1988)CrossRef Dawes, R.M., Thaler, R.: Cooperation. J. or Econ. Perspect. 2, 187–197 (1988)CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Espeland, W., Stevens, M.: Commensuration as a social process. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24, 313–343 (1998)CrossRef Espeland, W., Stevens, M.: Commensuration as a social process. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24, 313–343 (1998)CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Garfinkel, H.: Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1967) Garfinkel, H.: Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1967)
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomolińska, A.: Rule complexes for representing social actors and interactions. Studies Logic Gramm. Rhetor. 3(16), 95–108 (1999) Gomolińska, A.: Rule complexes for representing social actors and interactions. Studies Logic Gramm. Rhetor. 3(16), 95–108 (1999)
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomolińska, A.: Fundamental mathematical notions of the theory of socially embedded games: a granular computing perspective. In: Pal, S.K., Polkowski, L., Skowron, A. (eds.) Rough-Neuro Computing: Techniques for Computing with Words, pp. 411–434. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/London (2004)CrossRef Gomolińska, A.: Fundamental mathematical notions of the theory of socially embedded games: a granular computing perspective. In: Pal, S.K., Polkowski, L., Skowron, A. (eds.) Rough-Neuro Computing: Techniques for Computing with Words, pp. 411–434. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/London (2004)CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo, M., Yang, J.B., Chin, K.S., Wang, H.W.: Evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under both fuzzy and interval uncertainty. IEEE Tran. Fuzzy Syst. 17(3), 683–697 (2009)CrossRef Guo, M., Yang, J.B., Chin, K.S., Wang, H.W.: Evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under both fuzzy and interval uncertainty. IEEE Tran. Fuzzy Syst. 17(3), 683–697 (2009)CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodgson, G.M.: The evolution of institutions: an agenda for future theoretical research. Const. Polit. Econ. 13(2), 111–127 (2002) Hodgson, G.M.: The evolution of institutions: an agenda for future theoretical research. Const. Polit. Econ. 13(2), 111–127 (2002)
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple attribute decision making. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1981)CrossRefMATH Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple attribute decision making. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1981)CrossRefMATH
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Jahanshahloo, G.R., Lotfi, F.H., Izadikhah, M.: An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data. Appl. Math. Comput. 175(2), 1375–1384 (2006a)CrossRefMATH Jahanshahloo, G.R., Lotfi, F.H., Izadikhah, M.: An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data. Appl. Math. Comput. 175(2), 1375–1384 (2006a)CrossRefMATH
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Jahanshahloo, G.R., Lotfi, F.H., Izadikhah, M.: Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data. Appl. Math. Comput. 181(2), 1544–1551 (2006b)CrossRefMATH Jahanshahloo, G.R., Lotfi, F.H., Izadikhah, M.: Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data. Appl. Math. Comput. 181(2), 1544–1551 (2006b)CrossRefMATH
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang, J., Chen, Y., Wu Tang, D.W., Chen, Y.W.: TOPSIS with belief structure for group belief multiple criteria decision making. Int. J. Autom. Comput. Jiang, J., Chen, Y., Wu Tang, D.W., Chen, Y.W.: TOPSIS with belief structure for group belief multiple criteria decision making. Int. J. Autom. Comput.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang, J., Chen, Y., Chen, Y., Yang, K.: TOPSIS with fuzzy belief structure for group belief multiple criteria decision making. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 9400–9406 (2011)CrossRef Jiang, J., Chen, Y., Chen, Y., Yang, K.: TOPSIS with fuzzy belief structure for group belief multiple criteria decision making. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 9400–9406 (2011)CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk source. Econometrica. 47(2), 263–291 (1979) Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk source. Econometrica. 47(2), 263–291 (1979)
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Knight, F.H.: Risk Uncertainty and Profit. Houghton Mifflin Company, Chicago (1921) Knight, F.H.: Risk Uncertainty and Profit. Houghton Mifflin Company, Chicago (1921)
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Linkov, I., Satterstrom, F.K., Kiker, G., Batchelor, C., Bridges, T., Ferguson, E.: From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications. Environ. Int. 32, 1072–1093 (2006)CrossRef Linkov, I., Satterstrom, F.K., Kiker, G., Batchelor, C., Bridges, T., Ferguson, E.: From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications. Environ. Int. 32, 1072–1093 (2006)CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat March, J.G., Olsen, J.P.: Rediscovering Institutions. Free Press, New York (1989) March, J.G., Olsen, J.P.: Rediscovering Institutions. Free Press, New York (1989)
34.
Zurück zum Zitat North, N.C.: Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)CrossRef North, N.C.: Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Ostrom, E.: Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)CrossRef Ostrom, E.: Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J.: Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1994) Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J.: Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1994)
37.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Powell, W.W., DiMaggio, P.J. (eds.): The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University Press, Chicago (1991) Powell, W.W., DiMaggio, P.J. (eds.): The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University Press, Chicago (1991)
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P., Peterson, M. (eds.): Handbook of Risk Theory Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics, and Social Implications of Risk. Springer, Dordrecht (2012) Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P., Peterson, M. (eds.): Handbook of Risk Theory Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics, and Social Implications of Risk. Springer, Dordrecht (2012)
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Scharpf, F.W.: Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Westview Press, Boulder (1997) Scharpf, F.W.: Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Westview Press, Boulder (1997)
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmid, M., Wuketits, F.M. (eds.): Evolutionary Theory in the Social Sciences. Reidel, Dordrecht (1987) Schmid, M., Wuketits, F.M. (eds.): Evolutionary Theory in the Social Sciences. Reidel, Dordrecht (1987)
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott, W.R.: Institutions and Organizations. Sage Publications, London (1995) Scott, W.R.: Institutions and Organizations. Sage Publications, London (1995)
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Simon, H.A.: A behavioral model of rational choice. Q. J. Econ. 59, 99–118 (1955)CrossRef Simon, H.A.: A behavioral model of rational choice. Q. J. Econ. 59, 99–118 (1955)CrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Thaler, R.H., Sunstein C.R.: Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven (2008) Thaler, R.H., Sunstein C.R.: Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven (2008)
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124–1131 (1974)CrossRef Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124–1131 (1974)CrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Wittgenstein, L.: Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell, Oxford (1953) Wittgenstein, L.: Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell, Oxford (1953)
48.
Zurück zum Zitat von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 3rd edn. Princeston University Press, Princeton (1953) von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 3rd edn. Princeston University Press, Princeton (1953)
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang, J.B., Sen, P.: A general multi-level evaluation process for hybrid MADM with uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A: Syst. Humans 24(10), 1458–1473 (1994)CrossRef Yang, J.B., Sen, P.: A general multi-level evaluation process for hybrid MADM with uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A: Syst. Humans 24(10), 1458–1473 (1994)CrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang, J.B., Singh, M.G.: An evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision making with uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A: Syst. Humans 24(1), 1–18 (1994)CrossRef Yang, J.B., Singh, M.G.: An evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision making with uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A: Syst. Humans 24(1), 1–18 (1994)CrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang, J.B., Xu, D.L.: On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A: Syst. Humans 32(3), 289–304 (2002)CrossRef Yang, J.B., Xu, D.L.: On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A: Syst. Humans 32(3), 289–304 (2002)CrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang, J.B., Wang, Y.M., Chin, K.S., Xu, D.L.: The evidential reasoning approach for MCDA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 171(1), 309–343 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Yang, J.B., Wang, Y.M., Chin, K.S., Xu, D.L.: The evidential reasoning approach for MCDA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 171(1), 309–343 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Metadaten
Titel
Decision-Making Under Conditions of Multiple Values and Variation in Conditions of Risk and Uncertainty
verfasst von
Ewa Roszkowska
Tom R. Burns
Copyright-Jahr
2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39307-5_13

Premium Partner