Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Computer Games Journal 3/2018

16.12.2017

Decision Theory Based Model of Game Morality

verfasst von: Tony Rosqvist

Erschienen in: The Computer Games Journal | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A novel method for assessing moral values in computer games is presented in this paper. The method is based on Decision Analysis. It is shown that the decision model presented conforms with the ethical principle of Rule Consequentialism. The model, termed Scale of Morality, can be implemented in strategy and role-playing computer games where, to date, the ethical valuation has been assessed mainly using informal heuristics. The Scale of Morality requires the player (human player, computer agent or game master) to pre-assign value scores to selected ethical criteria prior to gaming. During the game, players make moral choices by valuating each choice with respect to these criteria. The choice corresponding to the highest value score is the most ethical one. Even in the case where the ethical principle is the same for each player during the game, the ethical valuations may differ, as the information process can be asymmetric (e.g. one player acquires more information than another). The game dynamics will be much more complex if the ethical principle of each player is different. Furthermore, the computer agent can be equipped with an expanding information base, making the agent better in judging the consequences of choices. The method Scale of Morality can be a component of the game’s Artificial Intelligence, or serve as a research tool for studying players’ moral reasoning.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Doyle, J., Green, R., & Bottomley, P. (1997). Judging relative importance: Direct rating and point allocation are not equivalent. Organizational behaviour and human decision processes, 70, 65–72.CrossRef Doyle, J., Green, R., & Bottomley, P. (1997). Judging relative importance: Direct rating and point allocation are not equivalent. Organizational behaviour and human decision processes, 70, 65–72.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harris, S. (2010). The moral landscape. London: Transworld Publishers. Harris, S. (2010). The moral landscape. London: Transworld Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Heron, M., & Belford, P. (2014). ‘It’s only a game’—Ethics, empathy and identification in game morality systems. The Computer Game Journal, 3(34), 34–53.CrossRef Heron, M., & Belford, P. (2014). ‘It’s only a game’—Ethics, empathy and identification in game morality systems. The Computer Game Journal, 3(34), 34–53.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hooker, B. (2000). Ideal code, real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hooker, B. (2000). Ideal code, real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Keeney, R. (1996). Value focused thinking—A path to creative decisionmaking. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Keeney, R. (1996). Value focused thinking—A path to creative decisionmaking. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Keeney, R., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives—Preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefMATH Keeney, R., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives—Preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Koop, G. (2013). An assessment of the temporal dynamics of moral decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 527–539. Koop, G. (2013). An assessment of the temporal dynamics of moral decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 527–539.
Metadaten
Titel
Decision Theory Based Model of Game Morality
verfasst von
Tony Rosqvist
Publikationsdatum
16.12.2017
Verlag
Springer New York
Erschienen in
The Computer Games Journal / Ausgabe 3/2018
Elektronische ISSN: 2052-773X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40869-017-0049-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

The Computer Games Journal 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe