Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Connecting Families: An Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Designing for Collocated Couples

verfasst von : Stacy Branham, Assoc. Prof. Steve Harrison

Erschienen in: Connecting Families

Verlag: Springer London

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Though the design of technologies for couples has been thriving for well over a decade now, the products made for and the needs of couples examined in HCI research are surprisingly narrow. Overwhelmingly they are for partners at a distance and lightweight interactions that can best be described as abstracted presence. Towards moving couples technologies into broader waters and guiding exploration of the many other facets of couplehood, we propose an expanded couples design space that includes technologies for local partners and deep interpersonal sharing—hitherto underexplored design concerns. We then show that the creation of these new spaces can be motivated by the needs of couples as characterized by couples experts and present an example of a new technology that embodies these. Finally, we draw from experience with couples in the field to identify research and design considerations regarding gender, power, values, and ethics.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Connecting Families: An Introduction
Nächstes Kapitel Shared Living, Experiences, and Intimacy over Video Chat in Long Distance Relationships
Fußnoten
1
Note that couple-centered design is not confined to delivering constructive experiences and avoiding destructive ones, as these terms may be variously defined. It is instead about understanding how technology can interact with couplehood and designing accordingly.
 
2
Three technology designers did not specify their target user group in reference to distance.
 
3
Four technology designs did not restrict communication to abstracted presence.
 
4
Throughout the rest of the chapter, I use the terms deep interpersonal sharing and mutual reflection interchangeably, although the former need not imply the latter.
 
Literatur
Allen, K. R. (2000). A conscious and inclusive family studies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(1), 4–17.[1]CrossRef
Anon. Duofone. gajitz.com. http://gajitz.com/share-the-love-matching-connectable-phones-for-couples/. Accessed 25 Oct 2011.[4]
Anon. (2005b). Tok Tok & Tug Tug. we-make-money-not-art.com. http://​www.​we-make-money-not-art.​com/​archives/​2005/​01/​tok-tok-and-tug.​php.​ Accessed 25 Oct 2011.[9]
Anon. (2009). Daily temperature reading. fatherhoodchannel.com. http://fatherhoodchannel.com/q2009/12/19/daily-temperature-reading/. Accessed 25 Oct 2011.[11]
Anon. (2010). Fix a fight. itunes.apple.com. http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/fix-a-fight/id376117430?mt= 8. Accessed 25 Oct 2011.[12]
Bales, E., Li, K. A., Griwsold, W. (2011). CoupleVIBE: mobile implicit communication to improve awareness for (long-distance) couples. Proceedings of the CSCW’11 (pp. 65–74). New York: ACM.[14]
Brave, S., Dahley, A. (1997). inTouch: a medium for haptic interpersonal communication. Proceedings of the CHI ’97 Extended Abstracts (pp. 363–364). New York: ACM.[16]
Chang, A., Resner, B., Koerner, B., Wang, X. C., Ishii, H. (2001). LumiTouch: an emotional communication device. Proceedings of the CHI ’01 Extended Abstracts (pp. 313–314). New York: ACM.[17]
Chen, C.-Y., Forlizzi, J., Jennings, P. (2006). ComSlipper: an expressive design to support awareness and availability. Proceedings of the CHI ’06 Extended Abstracts (pp. 369–374). New York: ACM.[18]
Chung, H., Lee, C.-H. J., Selker, T. (2006). Lover’s cups: drinking interfaces as new communication channels. Proceedings of the CHI ’06 Extended Abstracts (pp. 313–314). New York: ACM.[19]
Clark, H. H., Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.[20]
Clawson, J., Patel, N., Starner, T. (2010). Digital kick in the shin: on-body communication tools for couples trapped in face-to-face group conversations. Workshop on Ensembles of On-Body Devices, MobileHCI ’10.[21]
Davis, H., Skov, M. B., Stougaard, M., Vetere, F. (2007). Virtual box: supporting mediated family intimacy through virtual and physical play. Proceedings of the OZCHI ’07 (pp. 151–159). New York: ACM.[23]
Design-based Research Collective . (2003). Design-based research: an emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 5–8.[24]
Dodge, C. (1997). The bed: a medium for intimate communication. Proceedings of the CHI ’07 Extended Abstracts (pp. 371–372). New York: ACM.[25]
Goodman, E., Misilim, M. (2003). The sensing beds. Workshop on Intimate Computing, UbiComp ’03.[26]
Grivas, K. (2006). Digital selves: devices for intimate communications between homes. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 10(2–3), 66–76.[27]CrossRef
Hallnäs, L., Redström, J. (2001). Slow technology—designing for reflection. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 5(3), 201–212.[28]CrossRef
Hayashi, T., Agamanolis, S., Karau, M. (2008). Mutsugoto: a body-drawing communicator for distant partners. In Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH ’08 posters (pp. 91:1–91:1). New York: ACM.[29]
Hoadley, C. M. (2004). Methodological alignment in design-based research. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 203–212.[30]CrossRef
Ito, M. (2005). Intimate visual co-presence. Workshop on Pervasive Image Capture and Sharing, UbiComp ’05.[31]
Kaye, J.' J.' (2004). Making scents: aromatic output for HCI. Interactions, 11, 48–61.[32]CrossRef
Kaye, J.' J.' (2006). I just clicked to say I love you: rich evaluations of minimal communication. Proceedings of the CHI ’06 (pp. 363–368). New York: ACM.[33]
Kaye, J.' J.', Goulding, L. (2004). Intimate objects. Proceedings of the DIS ’04 (pp. 341–344). New York: ACM.[34]
King, J., Forlizzi, J. (2007). Slow messaging: intimate communication for couples living at a distance. Proceedings of the Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces ’07 (pp. 451–454). New York: ACM.[35]
Li, I., Forlizzi, J., Dey, A. (2010). Know thyself: monitoring and reflecting on facets of one’s life. Proceedings of the CHI ’10 (pp. 4489–4492). New York, ACM.[36]
Lindley, S. E., Harper, R., Sellen, A. (2009). Desiring to be in touch in a changing communications landscape: attitudes of older adults. Proceedings of the CHI ’09 (pp. 1693–1702). New York: ACM.[37]
Lottridge, D., Masson, N., Mackay, W. (2009). Sharing empty moments: design for remote couples. Proceedings of the CHI ’09 (pp. 2329–2338). New York: ACM.[38]
Mallon, T. (1987). A book of one’s own: people and their diaries. New York: Penguin Books.[39]
Mueller, F.' F.', Vetere, F., Gibbs, M. R., Kjeldskov, J., Pedell, S., Howard, S. (2005). Hug over a distance. Proceedings of the CHI ’05 Extended Abstracts (pp. 1673–1676). New York: ACM.[40]
Ogawa, H., Ando, N., Ondera, S. (2005). SmallConnection: designing of tangible communication media over networks. Proceedings. of the MM ’05 (pp. 1073–1074). New York: ACM.[41]
Patel, D., Agamanolis, S. (2003). Habitat: awareness of life rhythms over a distance using networked furniture. Adjunct Proceedings of the UbiComp ’03.[42]
Piercy, F. P. (2002). Communication questions for couples: a structure to engage the less articulate, less emotionally available partner. Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy, 2(1), 61–65.[43]CrossRef
Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.[44]
Rubin, Z., Mitchell, C. (1976). Couples research as couples counseling: some unintended effects of studying close relationships. American Psychologist, 31(1), 17.[45]CrossRef
Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., Kaye, J.’ J.’ (2005). Reflective design. Proceedings of the Critical Computing ’05 (pp. 49–58). New York: ACM.[46]
Strong, R., Gaver, B. (1996). Feather, scent and Shaker: supporting simple intimacy. Proceedings of the CSCW ’96 (pp. 29–30). New York: ACM.[47]
Tannen, D. (2001). You just don’t understand: women and men in conversation. New York: Harper Paperbacks.[48]
Tsujita, H., Siio, I., Tsukada, K. (2007). SyncDecor: appliances for sharing mutual awareness between lovers separated by distance. Proceedings of the CHI ’07 Extended Abstracts (pp. 2699–2704). New York: ACM.[49]
Vetere, F., Gibbs, M. R., Kjeldskov, J., Howard, S., Mueller, F.’ F., Pedell, S., Mecoles, K., Bunyan, M. (2005). Mediating intimacy: designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships. Proceedings of the CHI ’05 (pp. 471–480). New York: ACM.[50]
Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136.[52]
Zinn, M. B. (2000). Feminism and family studies for a new century. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 571(1), 42.[53]CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Designing for Collocated Couples
verfasst von
Stacy Branham
Assoc. Prof. Steve Harrison
Copyright-Jahr
2013
Verlag
Springer London
Buch
Connecting Families

Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4191-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4471-4192-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2013

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4192-1_2

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise