Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
A Decision Support System for Multiple Criteria Alternative Ranking Using TOPSIS and VIKOR: A Case Study on Social Sustainability in Agriculture Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Developing Innovative Tool to Enhance the Effectiveness of Decision Support System

verfasst von : Fahad Almansour, Liz Stuart

Erschienen in: Decision Support Systems VI - Addressing Sustainability and Societal Challenges

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This research centres on Usability Evaluation Methods (UEMSs) with the aim of supporting developers’ decisions in the use of learning resources in achieving efficient usable system design. The suggestion is made pertaining to a new usability evaluation model dEv (stand for Design Evaluation) with the objective to support decisions to overcome three key obstacles: firstly, the involvement of users in the preliminary stages of the development process; (2) developers’ mind set-related issues as a result of either their lack of UEMS or the provision of too many; and (3) the complete lack of understanding surrounding UEMS importance. An experimental approach was applied in addition to a survey-based questionnaire in an effort to examining the issues pertaining to UEMS. Empirical works were carried out with system developers in order to test the dEv, the results of which have been presented from the empirical study to support various considerations, such as: system developers’ decisions and their involvement in the earlier phases of the design of systems; the gathering of specifications and end-users’ feedback; and enhancing usability evaluation learning capacity.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Knowledge Sharing and Innovative Corporate Strategies in Collaborative Relationships: The Potential of Open Strategy in Business Ecosystems
Nächstes Kapitel How to Support Decision Making of Local Government in Prioritising Policy Menu Responding to Citizens’ Views: An Exploratory Study of Text Mining Approach to Attain Cognitive Map Based on Citizen Survey Data
Literatur
1.
Ramli, R.B.M., Jaafar, A.B.: e-RUE: A cheap possible solution for usability evaluation. In: 2008 International Symposium on Information Technology pp. 1–5. IEEE (2008)
2.
Han, S.H., Yun, M.H., Kwahk, J., Hong, S.W.: Usability of consumer electronic products. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 28, 143–151 (2001)CrossRef
3.
Ferre, X., Juristo, N., Windl, H., Constantine, L.: Usability basics for software developers. IEEE Softw. 18, 22–29 (2001)CrossRef
4.
Stone, D., Woodroffe, M., Minocha, S., Jarrett, C.: User Interface Design and Evaluation. Morgan Kaufmann, New York (2005)
5.
Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abwod, G.D., Beale, R.: Human Computer Interaction. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2004)
6.
Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, New York (2002)
7.
Brézillon, P., Borges, M.R.S., Pino, J.A., Pomerol, J.-C.: Lessons learned from three case studies. J. Decis. Syst. 17, 27–40 (2008)CrossRef
8.
Ardito, C., Costabile, M.F., Marsico, M.De, Lanzilotti, R., Levialdi, S., Roselli, T., Rossano, V.: An approach to usability evaluation of e-learning applications. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 4, 270–283 (2006)CrossRef
9.
Almansour, F., Stuart, L.: Promoting the use of design evaluation techniques within software development. In: BCS HCI (2014)
10.
Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)
11.
Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., Jacobs, S.: Designing the user interface: pearson new international edition: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Pearson Education Limited, New York (2013)
12.
Kujala, S.: User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behav. Inf. Technol. 22, 1–16 (2003)CrossRef
13.
Ardito, C., Buono, P., Caivano, D.: Investigating and promoting UX practice in industry: an experimental study. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 72, 542–551 (2014)CrossRef
14.
Bowler, L., Koshman, S., Oh, J.S., He, D., Callery, B., Bowker, G., Cox, R.: Issues in user-centered design in LIS. Libr. Trends. 59, 721–725 (2011)CrossRef
15.
Jokela, T., Iivari, N., Matero, J., Karukka, M.: The standard of user-centered design and the standard definition of usability: analyzing ISO 13407 against ISO. In: Proceedings of the Latin American Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 53–60. ACM (2003)
16.
Rannikko, P.: User-Centered Design in Agile Software Development (2011)
17.
Maguire, M.: Methods to support human-centred design. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 55, 587–634 (2001)CrossRef
18.
Vredenburg, K., Smith, P.W., Carey, T., Mao, J.-Y.: A survey of user-centered design practice. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Changing Our World, Changing Ourselves – CHI 2002, pp. 471–478 (2002)
19.
Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., Preece, J.: User-centered design. In: Bainbridge, W. (ed.) Encyclopedia Human-Computer Interact, 37th edn, pp. 445–456. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2004)
20.
Keinonen, T.: Protect and appreciate – notes on the justification of user-centered design. Int. J. Des. 4, 17–27 (2010)
21.
Gould, S., Powell, P.: Understanding organisational knowledge. J. Decis. Syst. 13, 183–202 (2004)CrossRef
22.
Bevan, N.: Cost-benefit framework and case studies. In: Bias, R.G., Mayhew, D.J. (eds.) Cost-Justifying Usability an Update for an Internet Age, pp. 575–600. Elsevier, New York (2005)CrossRef
23.
Humayoun, S.R., Dubinsky, Y., Catarci, T.: A Three-Fold Integration Framework to Incorporate User–Centered Design into Agile Software Development. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCD 2011. LNCS, vol. 6776, pp. 55–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRef
24.
Salah, D.: A framework for the integration of user centered design and agile software development processes. In: Proceeding of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering - ICSE 2011, p. 1132. ACM Press, New York, USA (2011)
25.
Fox, D., Sillito, J., Maurer, F.: Agile methods and user-centered design: how these two methodologies are being successfully integrated in industry. In: Agile 2008 Conference, pp. 63–72. IEEE (2008)
26.
Najafi, M., Toyoshiba, L.: Two Case Studies of User Experience Design and Agile Development. In: Agile 2008 Conference. pp. 531–536. IEEE (2008)
27.
Sharp, H., Robinson, H., Segal, J.: Integrating user-centred design and software engineering: a role for extreme programming? In: BCS-HCI group’s 7th Educators Workshop on Effective Teaching and Training in HC, pp. 1–4 (2004)
28.
29.
Rosenbaum, S., Rohn, J.A., Humburg, J.: A toolkit for strategic usability. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems – CHI 2000, pp. 337–344. ACM Press, New York, USA (2000)
30.
Howarth, J., Smith-Jackson, T., Hartson, R.: Supporting novice usability practitioners with usability engineering tools. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 67, 533–549 (2009)CrossRef
31.
Skov, M.B., Stage, J.: Supporting problem identification in usability evaluations. In: Proceedings of 17th Australia Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Citizens Online: Considerations for Today and Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group, pp. 1–9 (2005)
32.
Bruun, A., Stage, J.: Barefoot usability evaluations. Behav. Inf. Technol. 33, 1148–1167 (2014)CrossRef
33.
Skov, M., Stage, J.: Training software developers and designers to conduct usability evaluations. Behav. Inf. Technol. 31, 425–435 (2012)CrossRef
34.
Holzinger, A.: Usability engineering methods for software developers. Commun. ACM 48, 71–74 (2005)CrossRef
35.
Nielsen, J., Mack, R.L.: Usability Inspection Methods. Wiley, New York (1994)CrossRef
36.
Gould, J.D., Lewis, C.: Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think. Commun. ACM 28, 300–311 (1985)CrossRef
37.
Bargas-Avila, J.A., Lötscher, J., Orsini, S., Opwis, K.: Intranet satisfaction questionnaire: development and validationof a questionnaire to measure user satisfaction with the intranet. Comput. Human Behav. 25, 1241–1250 (2009)CrossRef
38.
39.
Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J.: Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ. Res. 33, 14–26 (2004)CrossRef
40.
Sandelowski, M.: Focus on research methods combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques. Res. Nurs. Health 23, 246–255 (2000)CrossRef
41.
Hwang, W., Salvendy, G.: Number of people required for usability evaluation: the 10 ± 2 rule. Commun. ACM 53, 130–133 (2010)CrossRef
42.
43.
Aberg, J., Shahmehri, N.: The role of human web assistants in e-commerce: an analysis and a usability study. Internet Res. 10, 114–125 (2000)CrossRef
44.
Boiano, S., Bowen, J., Gaia, G.: Usability, design and content issues of mobile apps for cultural heritage promotion: The Malta culture guide experience. arXiv Preprint (2012). arXiv1207.​3422
45.
Burrell, A., Sodan, A.C.: Web Interface Navigation Design: Which Style of Navigation-Link Menus Do Users Prefer? In: 2006 Proceedings of 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops, pp. 1–10 (2006)
46.
47.
48.
Alkhuraiji, A., Liu, S., Oderanti, F.O., Megicks, P.: New structured knowledge network for strategic decision-making in IT innovative and implementable projects. J. Bus. Res. (2015)
49.
50.
Mayer, R.E., Moreno, R.: Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educ. Psychol. 1520, 43–52 (2010)
51.
Lutz, M., Boucher, X., Roustant, O.: Methods and applications for IT capacity decisions: bringing management frameworks into practice. J. Decis. Syst. 22, 332–355 (2013)CrossRef
52.
Alkhuraiji, A., Liu, S., Oderanti, F.O., Annansingh, F., Pan, J.: Knowledge network modelling to support decision-making for strategic intervention in IT project-oriented change management. J. Decis. Syst. 23, 285–302 (2014)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Developing Innovative Tool to Enhance the Effectiveness of Decision Support System
verfasst von
Fahad Almansour
Liz Stuart
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Decision Support Systems VI - Addressing Sustainability and Societal Challenges

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32876-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-32877-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32877-5_14

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise