nach oben

Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics

Erschienen in:

01.12.2022 | GENERAL SECTION

Disciplinary Structure of Scientific Research in the Post-Soviet Countries

verfasst von: A. V. Lovakov

Erschienen in: Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics | Ausgabe 6/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The disciplinary structure and dynamics of scientific research in the post-Soviet countries over the course of 30 years is analyzed. Analysis of the data from the InCites Database shows that there are significant differences between the post-Soviet countries in the degree of specialization/diversification of the disciplinary structure of scientific research. Thus, Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, and Kazakhstan have the most diversified disciplinary profile. In other countries, the structure of scientific research remains specialized, and it has decreased over time in most of them. All of the examined countries specialize in physics, but there is also an increase in the share of publications in the social sciences and humanities.

Nächster Artikel Analysis of Results of JSM Reasoning Applied to Covid-19 Testees’ Data

Nesvetailov, G.A., Center-periphery relations and transformation of post-Soviet science, Sotsiologicheskie Issled., 1995, no. 7, pp. 26–40.

Allakhverdyan, A.G., Dinamika nauchnykh kadrov v sovetskoi i rossiiskoi nauke. Sravnitel’no-istoricheskoe issledovanie (Dynamics of Scientists in Soviet and Russian Science: Comparative-Historical Study), Moskva: Kogito-Tsentr, 2014.

Piskunov, D.I. and Saltykov, B., Transforming the basic structures and operating mechanisms of Soviet science, Sci. Public Policy, 1992, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/19.2.111CrossRef

Graham, L.R. and Dezhina, I., Science in the New Russia: Crisis, Aid, Reform, Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press, 2008.

Graham, L.R., Big science in the last years of the big Soviet Union, Osiris, 1992, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 49–71.CrossRef

Garfield, E., The Russians are coming! Part 2. The top 50 Soviet papers most cited in the 1973–1988 science citation index and a look at 1988 research fronts, Curr. Contents: Phys., Chem. Earth Sci., 1990, vol. 30, no. 25, pp. 216–226.

Schubert, A., Glänzel, W., and Braun, T., Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields 1981–1985, Scientometrics, 1989, vol. 16, nos. 1-6, pp. 3–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093234CrossRef

Garfield, E., The russians are coming! Part 1. Red-hot 100 Soviet scientists, 1973–1988, Curr. Contents: Phys., Chem. Earth Sci., 1990, vol. 30, no. 24, pp. 202–215.

Karaulova, M., Gök, A., Shackleton, O., and Shapira, Ph., Science system path-dependencies and their influences: Nanotechnology research in Russia, Scientometrics, 2016, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 645–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1916-3CrossRef

10.

Klochikhin, E.A., Russia’s innovation policy: Stubborn path-dependencies and new approaches, Res. Policy, 2012, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1620–1630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.023CrossRef

11.

Radosevic, S. and Yoruk, E., Are there global shifts in the world science base? Analysing the catching up and falling behind of world regions, Scientometrics, 2014, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 1897–1924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1344-1CrossRef

12.

Lovakov, A., Chankseliani, M., and Panova, A., Universities vs. research institutes? Overcoming the Soviet legacy of higher education and research, Scientometrics, 2022, vol. 127, pp. 6293–6313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04527-yCrossRef

13.

Jonbekova, D., Educational research in Central Asia: Methodological and ethical dilemmas in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, Compare: J. Comp. Int. Educ., 2020, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 352–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2018.1511371CrossRef

14.

Yegorov, I., Post-Soviet science: Difficulties in the transformation of the R&D systems in Russia and Ukraine, Res. Policy, 2009, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 600–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.010CrossRef

15.

Dezhina, I.G., Research policy in leading Russian universities: Effects of “new managerialism”, Univ. Upr.: Prakt. Anal., 2020, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 13–26. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2020.03.023CrossRef

16.

Trubnikova, E.I., Project 5-100: A view through the prism of the theory of insitutional corruption, Mir Ross., 2020, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 72–91. https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2020-29-2-72-91CrossRef

17.

Matveeva, N., Sterligov, I., and Yudkevich, M., The effect of Russian University Excellence initiative on publications and collaboration patterns, J. Informetrics, 2021, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 101110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101110CrossRef

18.

Lovakov, A., Panova, A., Sterligov, I., and Yudkevich, M., Does government support of a few leading universities have a broader impact on the higher education system? Evaluation of the Russian University Excellence initiative, Res. Eval., 2021, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 240–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvab006CrossRef

19.

Klyucharev, G.A. and Neverov, A.V., Project 5-100: Some interim results, Vestn. Ross. Univ. Druzhby Narodov: Ser. Sotsiol., 2018, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 100–116. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2018-18-1-100-116CrossRef

20.

Guskov, A.E., Kosyakov, D.V., and Selivanova, I.V., Boosting research productivity in top russian universities: the circumstances of breakthrough, Scientometrics, 2018, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 1053–1080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2890-8CrossRef

21.

Dezhina, I.G. and Sorokin, A.N., The perception of the project 5-100 by university employees, Mir Ross., 2022, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 74–90. https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2022-31-1-74-90CrossRef

22.

Drugova, E.A., Pleshkevich, I.B., and Klimova, T.V., Transformation of the personnel policy of Russian universities participating in project 5-100: The case of National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Vysshee Obraz. Ross., 2021, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 9–26. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-6-9-26CrossRef

23.

Marina, T. and Sterligov, I., Prevalence of potentially predatory publishing in Scopus on the country level, Scientometrics, 2021, vol. 126, no. 6, pp. 5019–5077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03899-xCrossRef

24.

Chankseliani, M., Lovakov, A., and Pislyakov, V., A big picture: bibliometric study of academic publications from post-soviet countries, Scientometrics, 2021, vol. 126, no. 10, pp. 8701–8730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04124-5CrossRef

25.

Moed, H.F., Markusova, V., and Akoev, M., Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science, Scientometrics, 2018, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 1153–1180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2769-8CrossRef

26.

De Filippo, D. and Gorraiz, J., Is the Emerging Source Citation Index an aid to assess the citation impact in social science and humanities?, J. Informetrics, 2020, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 101088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101088CrossRef

27.

Aksnes, D.W., van Leeuwen, T.N., and Sivertsen, G., The effect of booming countries on changes in the relative specialization index (RSI) on country level, Scientometrics, 2014, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 1391–1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1245-3CrossRef

28.

Li, N., Evolutionary patterns of national disciplinary profiles in research: 1996–2015, Scientometrics, 2017, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 493–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2259-4CrossRef

29.

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., and Di Costa, F., Revealing the scientific comparative advantage of nations: Common and distinctive features, J. Informetrics, 2022, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 101244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101244CrossRef

30.

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., and Zhang, L., A comparison of two approaches for measuring interdisciplinary research output: The disciplinary diversity of authors vs the disciplinary diversity of the reference list, J. Informetrics, 2018, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1182–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.001CrossRef

31.

Matveeva, N., Sterligov, I., and Lovakov, A., International scientific collaboration of post-Soviet countries: A bibliometric analysis, Scientometrics, 2022, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 1583–1607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04274-0CrossRef

Titel: Disciplinary Structure of Scientific Research in the Post-Soviet Countries
verfasst von: A. V. Lovakov
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2022
Verlag: Pleiades Publishing
Erschienen in: Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics / Ausgabe 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0005-1055
Elektronische ISSN: 1934-8371
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S000510552206005X

Springer Professional

Disciplinary Structure of Scientific Research in the Post-Soviet Countries

Abstract

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2022

Outline of a Database of Symbols of Extended Cyrillic Alphabets of Modern Turkic Writing ExTL

Information Model of Quantization in a Periodic System

Mean Stopping Time of a Pairing Markov Chain with the VKF Method on a Linear Order

Functional Model and Architecture of a Single Digital Platform for Promoting the Tourism Potential of the North Caucasus Federal District in the Russian and International Markets

A Regularization-Based Method of Identification of Information Objects

Analysis of Results of JSM Reasoning Applied to Covid-19 Testees’ Data

Premium Partner