nach oben

Information Systems and e-Business Management

Erschienen in:

04.07.2019 | Original Article

Disruptive innovation of cryptocurrencies in consumer acceptance and trust

verfasst von: Julio C. Mendoza-Tello, Higinio Mora, Francisco A. Pujol-López, Miltiadis D. Lytras

Erschienen in: Information Systems and e-Business Management | Ausgabe 2-4/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Cryptocurrencies have the potential to become a disruptive innovation because they define a new paradigm: the decentralization of trust in secure electronic transactions without the need for a central control authority. Cryptocurrencies arouse interest in society because they reformulate the generation and transference of money. The aim of this paper is to investigate the role of the disruptive innovation of cryptocurrencies in the acceptance and trust perceived by users with regard to the monetary transactions generated in e-commerce. This paper defines a model using constructs from the technology acceptance model, trust and perceived risk. This model is evaluated using partial least squares analysis. The findings affirm that perceived trust, perceived risk, and perceived ease of use are not strong predictors of the intention to use cryptocurrencies and that the strength of their effects on the intention to use is determined by the perceived usefulness of adopting the mentioned disruptive innovation. This preliminary study makes a significant contribution to consumer behaviour research by analysing a cryptocurrency acceptance model for C2C e-commerce. The theoretical and practical contributions are detailed in the final section of the paper.

Nächster Artikel An empirical study on the commercial adoption of digital currencies

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Aibinu AA, Al-Lawati AM (2010) Using PLS-SEM technique to model construction organizations’ willingness to participate in e-bidding. Autom Constr 19:714–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.02.016 CrossRef

Alghamdi S, Beloff N (2015) Virtual currency concept its implementation, impacts and legislation. In: Science and information conference (SAI). IEEE, London, pp 175–183

Alhalabi WS, Bawazir A, Mohammad M, Sarirete A (2017) Matching and ranking trustworthy context-dependent universities: a case study of the King Abdullah Scholarship Program. Int J Semant Web Inf Syst 13:109–124. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSWIS.2017040107 CrossRef

Barclay D, Thompson R, Higgins C (1995) The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technol Stud 2:285–309

Baur AW, Bühler J, Bick M, Bonorden CS (2015) Cryptocurrencies as a disruption? Empirical findings on user adoption and future potential of Bitcoin and Co. In: Janssen M (ed) Open and big data management and innovation. I3E 2015. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Cham, pp 63–80

Beikverdi A, Song J (2015) Trend of centralization in Bitcoin’s distributed network. In: 16th international conference on software engineering, artificial intelligence, networking and parallel/distributed computing (SNPD). IEEE, Takamatsu, Japan, pp 1–6

Benlian A, Hess T, Buxmann P (2009) Drivers of SaaS-adoption—an empirical study of different application types. Bus Inf Syst Eng 5:357–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-009-0068-x CrossRef

Bentler PM, Bonnet DG (1980) Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 88:588–600CrossRef

BitcoinFees (2018) Bitcoin transaction fees. https://bitcoinfees.info/. Accessed 23 Dec 2018

BitInfoCharts (2018) Transaction fee chart. https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/transactionfees-btc-ltc-eth.html. Accessed 23 Dec 2018

Blockchain Luxembourg S.A. (2018) Confirmed transactions per day. https://www.blockchain.com/es/charts/n-transactions?timespan=2years. Accessed 23 Dec 2018

Bohr J, Bashir M (2014) Who uses Bitcoin? An exploration of the Bitcoin community. In: 2014 twelfth annual conference on privacy, security and trust. IEEE, Toronto, Canada, pp 94–101

Chen YH, Barnes S (2007) Initial trust and online buyer behaviour. Ind Manag Data Syst 107:21–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570710719034 CrossRef

Chin W (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides GA (ed) Modern methods for business research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 295–336

Chin W (2010) How to write up and report PLS analyses. In: Esposito Vinzi V, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H (eds) Handbook of partial least squares. Springer handbooks of computational statistics. Springer, Berlin, pp 655–690CrossRef

Christensen C (1997) The innovator’s dilemma—when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

Ciaian P, Rajcaniova M (2016) The digital agenda of virtual currencies: can BitCoin become a global currency? Inf Syst e-Bus Manag 14:883–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-016-0304-0 CrossRef

Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Nueva York

Conti M, Gangwal A, Ruj S (2018) On the economic significance of ransomware campaigns: a Bitcoin transactions perspective. Comput Secur 79:162–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2018.08.008 CrossRef

Davis F (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13:319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 CrossRef

Davis F, Davis G, Venkatesh V et al (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27:425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 CrossRef

Decker C, Guthrie J, Seidel J, Wattenhofer R (2015) Making Bitcoin exchanges transparent. In: Pernul G, Ryan P, Weippl E (eds) Computer security—ESORICS 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Cham, pp 561–576

Dwyer G (2015) The economics of Bitcoin and similar private digital currencies. J Financ Stab 17:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2014.11.006 CrossRef

Egorova N, Torzhevskiy K (2016) Bitcoin: main trends and perspectives. Br J Econ Manag Trade 12:1–11. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJEMT/2016/19763 CrossRef

Elsenpeter R, Velte T (2001) E-business: a beginner’s guide, 1st edn. Osborne Mc-Graw-Hill, Berkeley

European Central Bank (2015) Virtual currency schemes—a further analysis. European Central Bank, Frankfurt

Falk F, Miller N (1992) A primer for soft modeling, 1st edn. The University of Akron Press, Akron

Feng W, Wang Y, Zhang Z (2018) Informed trading in the Bitcoin market. Financ Res Lett 26:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.11.009 CrossRef

Folkinshteyn D, Lennon M (2016) Braving Bitcoin: a technology acceptance model analysis. J Inf Technol Case Appl Res 18:220–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2016.1275242 CrossRef

Fornell C, Larcker D (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18:39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312 CrossRef

Gautam V (2015) Cryptocurrencies: Are disruptive financial innovations here? Mod Econ 6:816–832. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2015.67077 CrossRef

Gervais A, Karame G, Capkun V, Capkun S (2014) Is Bitcoin a decentralized currency? Secur Priv 12:54–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2014.49 CrossRef

Giaglis G, Kypriotaki K (2014) Towards an agenda for information systems research on digital currencies and bitcoin. In: Abramowicz W, Kokkinaki A (eds) Business information systems workshops. BIS 2014. Lecture notes in business information processing. Springer, Cham, pp 3–13

Gil-Saura I, Ruiz-Molina M, Arteaga-Moreno F (2011) Value, supplier dependence and long-term orientation: outcomes for B2B commerce in the travel industry. Ind Manag Data Syst 111:791–808. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571111137313 CrossRef

Gjermundrød H, Dionysiou I (2014) Recirculating in lost coins in cryptocurrency systems. In: Abramowicz W, Kokkinaki A (eds) Business information systems workshops. BIS 2014. Lecture notes in business information processing. Springer, Cham, pp 229–240

Haferkorn M, Quintana-Diaz J (2015) Seasonality and interconnectivity within cryptocurrencies—an analysis on the basis of Bitcoin, Litecoin and Namecoin. In: Lugmayr A (ed) Enterprise applications and services in the finance industry. Lecture notes in business information processing. Springer, Cham, pp 106–120

Hair J, Black W, Babin B, Anderson R (2009) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Pearson Education Limited, Edinburgh Gate

Hardman S, Steinberger-Wilckens R, van der Horst D (2013) Disruptive innovations: the case for hydrogen fuel cells and battery electric vehicles. Int J Hydrogen Energy 38:15438–15451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.088 CrossRef

Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics RR (2004) The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Adv Int Mark 20:277–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014 CrossRef

Hu L, Bentler PM (1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods 3:424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.3.4.424 CrossRef

Huang J, Nicol D (2013) Trust mechanisms for cloud computing. J Cloud Comput Adv Syst Appl 2:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-113X-2-9 CrossRef

Kim M, Chung N, Lee C (2011) The effect of perceived trust on electronic commerce: shopping online for tourism products and services in South Korea. Tour Manag 32:256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.01.011 CrossRef

Krombholz K, Judmayer A, Gusenbauer M, Weippl E (2016) The other side of the coin: user experiences with Bitcoin security and privacy. In: Grossklags J, Prenee B (eds) Financial cryptography and data security. FC 2016. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 555–580

Kshetri N (2017) Blockchain’s roles in strengthening cybersecurity and protecting privacy. Telecommun Policy 41:1027–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.09.003 CrossRef

Kumar S, Al-badi AH, Madhumohan S, Al-kharusi MH (2016) Predicting motivators of cloud computing adoption: a developing country perspective. Comput Hum Behav 62:61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.073 CrossRef

Lee M (2009) Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: an integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electron Commer Res Appl 8:130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2008.11.006 CrossRef

Liou DK, Chih WH, Hsu LC, Huang CY (2016) Investigating information sharing behavior: the mediating roles of the desire to share information in virtual communities. Inf Syst E-Bus Manag 14:187–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-015-0279-2 CrossRef

Lu Y, Zhao L, Wang B (2010) From virtual community members to C2C e-commerce buyers: trust in virtual communities and its effect on consumers’ purchase intention. Electron Commer Res Appl 9:346–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2009.07.003 CrossRef

Mendoza-Tello JC, Mora H, Pujol-López FA, Miltiadis L (2018) Social commerce as a driver to enhance trust and intention to use cryptocurrencies for electronic payments. IEEE Access 6:50737–50751. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2869359 CrossRef

Möser M (2013) Anonymity of Bitcoin transactions. An analysis of mixing services. In: Münster Bitcoin conference. Münster, Germany

Nagy D, Schuessler J, Dubinsky A (2016) Defining and identifying disruptive innovations. Ind Mark Manag 57:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.017 CrossRef

Nakamoto S (2008) Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf. Accessed 2 Jan 2018

Nead N (2018) Cryptocurrency: growth trends & industry performance. In: Cryptocurrency, invest. Bank. https://investmentbank.com/crypto-growth/. Accessed 12 Jun 2018

Nian LP, Lee D, Chuen K (2015) Introduction to Bitcoin. In: Lee D (ed) Handbook of digital currency. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 5–30CrossRef

Obal M (2013) Why do incumbents sometimes succeed? Investigating the role of interorganizational trust on the adoption of disruptive technology. Ind Mark Manag 42:900–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.05.017 CrossRef

Ortega MJ, Román MV (2011) Explaining physicians’ acceptance of EHCR systems: an extension of TAM with trust and risk factors. Comput Hum Behav 27:319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.010 CrossRef

Pavlou P, Liang H, Xue Y (2007) Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: a principal-agent perspective. MIS Q 31:105–137. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148783 CrossRef

Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88:879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 CrossRef

Rajput U, Abbas F, Hussain R et al (2015) A simple yet efficient approach to combat transaction malleability in Bitcoin. In: Rhee K-H, Yi JH (eds) Information security applications. WISA 2014. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Cham, pp 27–37

Riffai MMMA, Grant K, Edgar D (2012) Big TAM in Oman: exploring the promise of on-line banking, its adoption by customers and the challenges of banking in Oman. Int J Inf Manag 32:239–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.11.007 CrossRef

Ringle CM, Wende S, Becker JM (2019) SmartPLS—statistical software for structural equation modeling. In: Boenningstedt SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com. Accessed 7 Feb 2019

Rotchanakitumnuai S, Speece M (2009) Modeling electronic service acceptance of an e-securities trading system. Ind Manag Data Syst 109:1069–1084. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570910991300 CrossRef

Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Smith D et al (2014) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): a useful tool for family business researchers. J Fam Bus Strateg 5:105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002 CrossRef

Schmidthuber L, Maresch D, Ginner M (2018) Disruptive technologies and abundance in the service sector—toward a refined technology acceptance model. Technol Forecast Soc Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.017 CrossRef

So M, Wong D, Sculli D (2005) Factors affecting intentions to purchase via the internet. Ind Manag Data Syst 105:1225–1244. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570510633275 CrossRef

Tandon U, Kiran R, Sah AN (2018) The influence of website functionality, drivers and perceived and perceived risk on customer satisfaction in online shopping: an emerging economy case. Inf Syst E-Bus Manag 16:57–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-017-0341-3 CrossRef

Venkatesh V, Thong J (2012) Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q 36:157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412 CrossRef

Wu IL, Chen JL (2005) An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: an empirical study. Int J Hum Comput Stud 62:784–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.03.003 CrossRef

Yang Y, Liu Y, Li H, Benhai Y (2015) Understanding perceived risks in mobile payment acceptance. Ind Manag Data Syst 115:253–269. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2014-0243 CrossRef

Zheng C, Yu X, Jin Q (2017) How user relationships affect user perceived value propositions of enterprises on social commerce platforms. Inf Syst Front 19:1261–1271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9766-y CrossRef

Titel: Disruptive innovation of cryptocurrencies in consumer acceptance and trust
verfasst von: Julio C. Mendoza-Tello
Higinio Mora
Francisco A. Pujol-López
Miltiadis D. Lytras
Publikationsdatum: 04.07.2019
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Information Systems and e-Business Management / Ausgabe 2-4/2019
Print ISSN: 1617-9846
Elektronische ISSN: 1617-9854
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-019-00415-w

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2-4/2019

A conceptual framework for the adoption of big data analytics by e-commerce startups: a case-based approach

The impact of mobility, risk, and cost on the users’ intention to adopt mobile payments

An empirical study on the commercial adoption of digital currencies

Analysis of book sales prediction at Amazon marketplace in India: a machine learning approach

Premium Partner