Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction: New Ways of Working, Organizations and Organizing in the Digital Age Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

7. Do Coworking Spaces Promise a Revolution or Spark Revenge? A Foucauldian Spatio-Material Approach to the Re-spatialization of Remote Work in Coworking Spaces

verfasst von : Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte

Erschienen in: New Ways of Working

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Work hybridation and re-spatialization in new workspaces have been poorly theorized, failing to address the meaning and implications of such re-spatialization of work and its consequent re-regulation. This study focuses on the re-regulation of remote work in coworking spaces, increasingly used by companies to re-materialize their remote employees’ activities. It proposes a symbolic/narrative, material, and experienced tryptic, based on Michel Foucault’s thought, and applies this framework to a real company. The case shows how the re-spatialization produces a specific disciplinarization of managerial norms and suggests the need to rethink the relations among organizational space, materiality, and management control in a hybridation context. In particular, it challenges the conventional contrast of corporate and coworking values, by showing that coworking spaces sometimes implicitly materialize business values.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel The Role of Digital Materiality for Organizing a Living Lab
Nächstes Kapitel More than Perks and a Shared Office: How Coworking Spaces Participate in Entrepreneurs’ Resource Acquisition
Literatur
Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 383–400.CrossRef
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
Bauman, Z., & Lyon, D. (2013). Liquid surveillance: A conversation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Bernstein, E., Bunch, J., Canner, N., & Lee, M. (2016). Beyond the holacracy hype. Harvard Business Review, 94(7), 38–49.
Blakstad, S. H. (2015). Work isn’t where it used to be. In A. Ropo, P. Salovaara, E. Sauer, & D. De Paoli (Eds.), Leadership in spaces and places. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Brocklehurst, M. (2001). Power identity and new technology homework: Implications for ‘new forms’ of organizing. Organization Studies, 22(3), 445–466.CrossRef
Burrell, G. (1998). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: The contribution of Michel Foucault. In A. McKinlay & K. Starkey (Eds.), Foucault, management and organizational theory (chapter 2). London: Sage.
Carney, B. M., & Getz, I. (2009). Freedom, Inc.: Free your employees and let them lead your business to higher productivity, profits, and growth. New York: Crown Business.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society, vol. 1 (The information age: Economy, society and culture). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Clegg, S., & Kornberger, M. (Eds.). (2006). Space, organization and management theory. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
Cooper, C. D., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). Telecommuting, professional isolation, and employee development in public and private organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 511–532.CrossRef
Dale, K. (2005). Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control. Organization, 12(5), 649–678.CrossRef
Dale, K., & Burrell, G. (2008). The spaces of organisation and the organisation of space: Power, identity and materiality at work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Davidow, W., & Malone, M. (1992). The virtual corporation. London: Harper Collins.
de Paoli, D., Sauer, E., & Ropo, A. (2019). The spatial context of organizations: A critique of ‘creative workspaces’. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(2), 331–352.CrossRef
de Peuter, G., Cohen, N. S., & Saraco, F. (2017). The ambivalence of coworking: On the politics of an emerging work practice. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 20(6), 687–706.CrossRef
De Vaujany, F. X., Dandoy, A., Grandazzi, A., & Faure, S. (2018). Experiencing a new place as an atmosphere: A focus on tours of collaborative spaces. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35(2), 101030.CrossRef
de Vaujany, F.-X., & Mitev, N. (2013). Materiality and space. Organizations, artifacts and practices. London: Palgrave.
de Vaujany, F. X., & Vaast, E. (2014). If these walls could talk: The mutual construction of organizational space and legitimacy. Organization Science, 25(3), 713–731.CrossRef
Drucker, P. (1988). The coming of the new organization. Harvard Business Review, 66(1), 45–53.
Edwards, P., Geary, J., & Sisson, K. (2002). New forms of work organisation in the workplace: Transformative, exploitative, or limited and controlled? In G. Murray, J. Bélanger, A. Giles, & P.-A. Lapointe (Eds.), Work and employment relations in the high-performance workplace. London: Continuum.
Errichiello, L., & Pianese, T. (2016). Organizational control in the context of remote work arrangements: A conceptual framework. In S. Widener, M. Epstein, & F. Verbeeten (Eds.), Performance measurement and management control: Contemporary issues (Vol. 31, pp. 273–305). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.CrossRef
Fabbri, J., & Charue-Duboc, F. (2013). The role of physical space in collaborative workspaces hosting entrepreneurs: The case of the beehive in Paris. In F. de Vaujany & N. Mitev (Eds.), Materiality and space. Organizations, artefacts and practices (pp. 117–134). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Felstead, A., Jewson, N., & Walters, S. (2003). Managerial control of employees working at home. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(2), 241–264.CrossRef
Felstead, A., Jewson, N., & Walters, S. (2005). Changing places of work. London: Palgrave.
Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2004). You can check out any time you want, but you can never leave: Spatial boundaries in a high commitment organization. Human Relations, 57(1), 75–94.CrossRef
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Tavistock.
Foucault, M. (1973). The birth of the clinic. London: Tavistock.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Random House.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Foucault, M. (1984). Space, knowledge and power. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1985a). The use of pleasure: The history of sexuality, volume 2. New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1985b). The care of the self: The history of sexuality, volume 3. New York: Pantheon.
Gandini, A. (2015). The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review. Ephemera – Theory and Politics in Organization, 15(1), 193–205.
Garrett, L. E., Spreitzer, G. M., & Bacevice, P. A. (2017). Co-constructing a sense of community at work: The emergence of community in coworking spaces. Organization Studies, 38(6), 821–842.CrossRef
Goudreau, J (2013). Back to the Stone Age? New Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer bans working from home. Forbes, 6.
Halford, S. (2005). Hybrid workspace: Re-spatialisations of work, organisation and management. New Technology, Work and Employment, 20(1), 19–33.CrossRef
Hislop, D., & Axtell, C. (2009). To infinity and beyond? Workspace and the multi-location worker. New Technology, Work and Employment, 24(1), 60–75.CrossRef
Huber, K. (2017). Does the future of work mean returning to the office? CGTN News Channel, 7 July.
Illegems, V., & Verbeke, A. (2004). Telework: What does it mean for management? Long Range Planning, 37(4), 319–334.CrossRef
Johns, T., & Gratton, L. (2013). The third wave of virtual work. Harvard Business Review, 91(1), 66–73.
Jones, D., Sundsted, T., & Bacigalupo, T. (2009). I’m outta here! How coworking is making the office obsolete. Austin, TX: Not an MBA Press.
Kingma, S. (2016). The constitution of ‘third workspaces’ in between the home and the corporate office. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31(2), 176–193.CrossRef
Kingma, S. (2018). New Ways of Working (NWW): Work space and cultural change in virtualizing organizations. Culture and Organization, 25(5), 1–24.
Kornberger, M., & Clegg, S. (2005). Bringing space back in organizing the generative building. Organization Studies, 25(7), 1095–1114.CrossRef
Kurland, N. B., & Cooper, C. D. (2002). Manager control and employee isolation in telecommuting environments. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13(1), 107–126.CrossRef
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lyons, D. (2016). Disrupted, my misadventure in the start-up bubble. Verlag: Hachette Books.
Mark, G., & Su, N. M. (2010). Making infrastructure visible for nomadic work. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 6(3), 312–323.CrossRef
Martin, S., Liao, H., & Campbell, E. (2013). Directive versus empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1372–1395.CrossRef
Maznevski, M., & Chudoba, K. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11(5), 473–492.CrossRef
Mello, J. (2007). Managing telework programs effectively. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 19(4), 247–261.CrossRef
Morris, J., Farrell, C., & Reed, M. (2016). The indeterminacy of ‘temporariness’: Control and power in neo-bureaucratic organizations and work in UK television. Human Relations, 69(12), 2274–2297.CrossRef
Oldenburg, R. (1989). The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day. New York: Paragon House.
Orlikowski, W. J. (1991). Integrated information environment or matrix of control? The contradictory implications of information technology. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 1(1), 9–42.CrossRef
Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474.CrossRef
Peters, P., Tijdens, K., & Wetzels, C. (2004). Employees’ opportunities, preferences, and practices in telecommuting adoption. Information & Management, 41(4), 469–482.CrossRef
Ramadier, M. (2017). Bienvenue dans le nouveau monde, comment j’ai survécu à la coolitude des startups. Paris: Premier Parallèle.
Robertson, B. (2015). Holacracy: The new management system for a rapidly changing world. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Ropo, A., Salovaara, P., Sauer, E., & de Paoli, D. (2015). Leadership in spaces and places. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRef
Salovaara, P. (2015). What can the coworking movement tell us about the future of workplaces? In A. Ropo, P. Salovaara, E. Sauer, & D. De Paoli (Eds.), Leadership in spaces and places (pp. 27–48). Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRef
Sassen, S. (2000). Excavating power. Theory, Culture and Society, 17(1), 163–170.CrossRef
Seibert, S., Silver, S., & Randolph, W. (2004). Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 332–349.CrossRef
Sewell, G., & Taskin, L. (2015). Out of sight, out of mind in a new world of work? Autonomy, control, and spatiotemporal scaling in telework. Organization Studies, 36(11), 1507–1529.CrossRef
Spinuzzi, C. (2007). Guest editor’s introduction: Technical communication in the age of distributed work. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(3), 265–277.CrossRef
Spinuzzi, C. (2012a). Working alone together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4), 399–441.CrossRef
Spinuzzi, C. (2015). All edge: Inside the new workplace networks. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
Strelitz, Z. (2011). Why place still matters in the digital age. Third place working in easy reach of home. Business Report, ZZA Responsive User Environments.
Taskin, L. (2006). Télétravail: Les enjeux de la déspatialisation pour le management humain (online). Revue Interventions économiques, 34(2), 73–94.
Taskin, L. (2010). Déspatialisation: Un enjeu de gestion. Revue Française de Gestion, 36(202), 61–76.CrossRef
Taskin, L., & Edwards, P. K. (2007). The possibilities and limits of telework in a bureaucratic environment: Lessons from the public sector. New Technology, Work and Employment, 22(3), 195–207.CrossRef
Taylor, S., & Spicer, A. (2007). Time for space: A narrative review of research on organizational spaces. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 325–346.CrossRef
Tietze, S., & Musson, G. (2005). Recasting the home–work relationship: A case of mutual adjustment? Organization Studies, 26, 1331–1352.
Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Van Marrewijk, A. V., & Yanow, D. (2010). Organizational spaces. Rematerializing the workaday world. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Vidaillet, B., & Bousalham, Y. (2020). Coworking spaces as places where economic diversity can be articulated: Towards a theory of syntopia. Organization, 27(1), 60–87.
Waber, B., Magnolfi, J., & Lindsay, G. (2014). Workspaces that move people. Harvard Business Review, 92(10), 69–77.
Metadaten
Titel
Do Coworking Spaces Promise a Revolution or Spark Revenge? A Foucauldian Spatio-Material Approach to the Re-spatialization of Remote Work in Coworking Spaces
verfasst von
Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Buch
New Ways of Working

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61686-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-61687-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61687-8_7

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise