nach oben

Empirical Economics

Erschienen in:

24.01.2021

Does national income mediate the relationship between trade and government size?

verfasst von: Kevin Williams

Erschienen in: Empirical Economics | Ausgabe 6/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper estimates a panel model in which the relationship between trade and government size is determined by countries’ per capita GDP. The panel model covers 126 countries during the 1980–2018 period. Estimates of the model show that the correlation between trade and government size is decreasing in the level of countries’ per capita GDP. For high-income countries with a per capita GDP above $12000US, the association between trade and government size is negative. For low-income countries with a per capita GDP below $1000US, the relationship between trade and government size is positive. In the year 2018, the average country had a per capita GDP of about $14228US. For this country, the estimated coefficients suggest that a 1% increase in trade had a predicted association with the long-run level of the size of government of over 0.17%. The paper also presents estimates suggesting that the relationship between trade and the composition of government spending differs depending on countries’ incomes.

Vorheriger Artikel Lack of fiscal transparency and economic growth expectations: an empirical assessment from a large emerging economy

Nächster Artikel Is it good to be bad or bad to be good? Assessing the aggregate impact of abnormal weather on consumer spending

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

I use government size and government spending interchangeably.

I thank an anonymous referee for this explanation.

Brueckner and Liderman (2018) use similar definitions from the World Bank to define low-income countries ($1000US) and high-income countries ($12000US).

These interpretations are speculative as the empirical analysis does not allow for these more refined conclusions.

The long-run computations are: Nigeria is ((0.49 + (−0.06 × 7.3)) × 1)/(1 − 0.48) = 0.10%; USA is ((0.49 + (−0.06 × 10.4)) × 1)/(1 − 0.48) = −0.257%.

See the World Bank WDI for this information.

The first observation is 1980. Subsequently, I use the observation for each of the years 1985, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, … , 2018. These non-overlapping five-year data (not the average for a five-year period) reduce serial correlation (Acemoglu et al. 2008).

The main result in Table 1 is also robust to a static model specification that excludes the lagged dependent variable and also to model specifications that use 10-year, 5-year, and 3-year average observations.

The short run is given by (0.49 + (−0.06 × 9.6)) × 1 = −0.086%; the long run is: − 0.09/(1 − 0.48) = −0.173%.

In Figs. 1–3, I do not transform the variables in logs, because logs would mask outliers and thus allow one to infer wrong decisions from the box plots (Cox 2013).

I thank an anonymous referee for suggesting this exercise.

The net inward stock of FDI is from UNCTAD.

The Polity2 index is a popular measure of democratic political institutions. See, for example, Acemoglu et al. (2008) and Williams (2017).

I thank an anonymous referee for suggesting these exercises, which highlights the robustness of the main finding.

However, I reestimate a model in which I only include lagged trade, per capita GDP, the interaction, and the control variables. I find significant estimate for lagged trade, the interaction, per capita GDP, and urbanization. I thank an anonymous referee for this suggestion.

I reestimate a mode in which I restrict the data after 2008. The sign of the estimates are similar, but not significantly different from zero. These results are not informative because of the small sample size.

Dreher et al. (2008), Rodrik (1998), and Rickard (2012) also used these dimensions of government expenditures. According to the World Bank data government expenditure on health is “public expenditure on health from domestic sources as a share of total public expenditure”; government expenditure on education is “general government expenditure on education expressed as a percentage of total general government expenditure on all sectors”; government expenditure on subsidies and transfers is expressed as a share of total public expenses as “subsidies, grants, and other social benefits include all unrequited, non-repayable transfers on current account to private and public enterprises”; Goods and services are also expressed as a share of total pubic expenses as “goods and services include all government payments in exchange for goods and services used for the production of market and non-market goods and services.”

Difference GMM and least squares fixed effects estimates are qualitatively similar to system GMM estimates.

Acemoglu D, Robinson JA (2012) Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business, New York

Acemoglu D, Robinson JA (2006) Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA, Yared P (2008) Income and democracy. Am Econ Rev 98(3):808–842

Acemoglu D, García-Jimeno C, Robinson JA (2015) State capacity and economic development: a network approach. Am Econ Rev 105(8):2364–2409

Adserá A, Boix C (2002) Trade democracy, and the size of the public sector: the political underpinnings of openness. Int Organ 56(2):229–262

Alesina A, Spalaore E (1997) On the number and size of nations. Q J Econ 112(47):1027–1056

Alesina A, Spalaore E (2005) The size of nations. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Massachusetts

Alesina A, Wacziarg R (1998) Openness, country size and government. J Public Econ 69:305–321

Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and application to employment data. Rev Econ Stud 58(2):277–297

Autor D, Dorn D, Katz LF, Patterson C, Reenen JV (2019) The fall of the labor share and the rise of superstar firms. Q J Econ 135(2):645–709

Avelino G, Brown DS, Hunter W (2005) The effects of capital mobility, trade openness, and democracy on social spending in Latin America, 1980–999. Am J Political Sci 49(3):625–641

Bates R (1981) Markets and states in tropical Africa. University of California Press, Berkeley

Bates R (2008) When things fall apart: state failure in late century Africa. Cambridge University Press, New York

Benarroch M, Pandey M (2008) Trade openness and government size. Econ Lett 101:157–159

Benarroch M, Pandey M (2012) The relationship between trade openness and government size: does disaggregating government expenditure matter? J Macroecon 34(1):239–252

Blundell R, Bond A (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel models. J Econ 87(1):115–143

Blundell R, Griffith R, Reenen JV (1999) Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Rev Econ Stud 66(3):529–554

Brueckner M, Lederman D (2018) Inequality and economic growth: the role of initial income. J Econ Growth 23:341–366

Burgoon B (2001) Globalization and welfare compensation: disentangle the ties that bind. Int Organ 55(3):509–551

Cameron DR (1978) The expansion of the public economy: a comparative analysis. Am Political Sci Rev 72(4):1243–1261

Cox N (2013) Speaking stat: creating and varying box plots. Stata J 13:398–400

Dreher A (2006) The influence of globalization on taxes and social spending: an empirical analysis for OECD countries. Eur J Political Econ 22(1):179–201

Dreher A, Sturm J, Ursprung HW (2008) The impact of globalization on the composition of government expenditures: evidence from panel data. Public Choice 134(3/4):263–292

Feenstra R (2016) Advanced international trade: theory and evidence. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

Garrett G (2001) Globalization and government spending around the world. Stud Comp Int Dev 35(4):3–29

Garrett G, Michelle D (2001) Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECD. Eur J Political Res 39:145–177

Gemmell N, Kneller R, Sanz I (2008) Foreign investment, international trade and the size and structure of public expenditures. Eur J Political Econ 24:151–171

Grossman G, Helpman E (2002) Interest group trade policy. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

Helpman E (2011) Understanding global trade. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts

Irwin D (2005) Trade and globalization. In: Weinstein M (ed) Globallization: what’s new? Colombia University Press, Massachusetts, pp 19–35

Jetter M, Parmeter CF (2015) Trade openness and bigger governments: the role of country size revisited. Eur J Political Econ 37:49–63

Kaufman RR, Segura-Ubiergo A (2001) Globalization, domestic politics, and social spending in Latin America: a time-series cross-section analysis, 1973–97. World Politics 53(4):553–587

Kourtellos A, Lenkoski A, Petrou K (2019) Measuring the strength of the theories of government size. Forthcom Empir Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01718-0CrossRef

Krieger T, Meierrieks D (2019) Population size and the size of government. Forthcoming, Eur J Political Econ. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176268019304859

Liberati P (2007) Trade openness, capital openness and government size. J Public Policy 27(2):215–247

Nickell S (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49(6):31–46

Ram R (2009) Openness, country size, and government size: additional from a large cross-country panel. J Public Econ 93(1–2):213–218

Rickard SJ (2012) Welfare versus subsidies: governmental spending decisions in an era of globalization. J Politics 74(4):1171–1183

Rodrik D (1997) Has international economic integration gone too far? Institute of International Economics, Washington DC

Rodrik D (1998) Why do more open economies have bigger governments? J. Political Econ. 106:997–1031

Roodman D (2009) Practitioners’ corner: a note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 71(1):135–158

Rudra N (2002) Globalization and the decline of the welfare state in less-developed countries. Int Organ 56(2):411–445

Shelton C (2007) The size and composition of government expenditure. J Public Econ 91:2230–2260

Stiglitz JE, Charlton A (2005) Fair trade for all: how trade can promote development. Oxford University Press, New York

Vianna AC, Mollick AV (2018) Government size and openness: evidence from commodity boom in Latin America. Resour Policy 59:318–328

Webbels E (2006) Dependency revisited: international markets, business cycles, and social spending in the developing world. Int Organ 60(2):433–468

Williams K (2017) Does democracy dampen the effect of finance on economic growth? Empir Econ 52(2):635–658

Windmeijer F (2005) A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. J Econ 126(1):25–51

Wood A (1994) North-south trade, employment and inequality. Oxford University Press, New York

Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Massachusetts

Titel: Does national income mediate the relationship between trade and government size?
verfasst von: Kevin Williams
Publikationsdatum: 24.01.2021
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Empirical Economics / Ausgabe 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0377-7332
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-8921
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-021-02017-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2021

Estimating poverty and vulnerability to monetary and non-monetary poverty: the case of Vietnam

Lack of fiscal transparency and economic growth expectations: an empirical assessment from a large emerging economy

Workload, staff composition, and sickness absence: findings from employees in child care centers

Constraints in models of production and cost via slack-based measures

Correction to: Persistent and transient inefficiency in adult education

Housing boom and non-housing consumption: evidence from urban households in China

Premium Partner