Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Argumentation 2/2008

01.05.2008

“Eat your Hamburger!”—“No, I don’t Want to!” Argumentation and Argumentative Development in the Context of Dinner Conversation in Twenty Swedish Families

verfasst von: Åsa Brumark

Erschienen in: Argumentation | Ausgabe 2/2008

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to analyse family dinners as context of argumentation and argumentative development by using a context-sensitive model of basic argumentative structures in every day conversations. The data consisted of 40 argumentative sequences in dinner conversations in twenty Swedish families with children aged 7 to 17 years. The families were divided in two groups depending on the children's ages (10–11 years with younger siblings and 10–12 years with older siblings). The model revealed characteristic structures of argumentation appearing as co-text and suggested differences between family groups depending on contextual factors such as age of the children. The groups of older children produced longer argumentative sequences, more exchanges per sequence and higher rate of turns. The older children also engaged in non-instrumental deliberations and disputations significantly more often and they performed more elaborated expansions (through a higher quantity of backing arguments). The groups of younger children on the other hand were more often involved in negotiations on topics relevant in the immediate context. Less expected was, however, the lack of more complex and varied arguments, even in the groups of older children.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Here, I refrain from discussing the problems entailed in distinguishing between co-text and context.
 
2
This circumstance would speak for the choice of speech act or proposition as components of turns but the theoretical framework from which these concepts originate does not suit the design of the present study.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bakhtin, M. 1986. Speech genres and other late essays. In Austin, eds. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Texas: University of Texas Press. Bakhtin, M. 1986. Speech genres and other late essays. In Austin, eds. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Texas: University of Texas Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Benoit, J.P. 1992. The use of argument by preschool children: The emergent production of rules for winning arguments. In Readings in argumentation 11, eds. W.L. Benoit, D. Hample, and P.J. Benoit. Berlin: Studies of argumentation in pragmatics and discourse analysis, Foris Publications. Benoit, J.P. 1992. The use of argument by preschool children: The emergent production of rules for winning arguments. In Readings in argumentation 11, eds. W.L. Benoit, D. Hample, and P.J. Benoit. Berlin: Studies of argumentation in pragmatics and discourse analysis, Foris Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Blum-Kulka, S. 1997. Dinner talk. Cultural patterns of sociability and socialization in family discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Blum-Kulka, S. 1997. Dinner talk. Cultural patterns of sociability and socialization in family discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zurück zum Zitat Brumark, Å. 1989. Blindness and the context of language acquisition. MINS 31. Diss. Stockholm University. Brumark, Å. 1989. Blindness and the context of language acquisition. MINS 31. Diss. Stockholm University.
Zurück zum Zitat Brumark, Å. 2003. Democracy starts at the dinner table. Working Papers, Södertörn University College, Huddinge. Brumark, Å. 2003. Democracy starts at the dinner table. Working Papers, Södertörn University College, Huddinge.
Zurück zum Zitat Brumark, Å. 2006. Non-observance of Gricean maxims in family dinner table conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1206–1238.CrossRef Brumark, Å. 2006. Non-observance of Gricean maxims in family dinner table conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1206–1238.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bruner, J.S. 1981. The social context of language acquisition. Language and Communication 1: 155–178.CrossRef Bruner, J.S. 1981. The social context of language acquisition. Language and Communication 1: 155–178.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Corsaro, W.A., and Rizzo, T.A. 1990, Disputes in peer culture of American and Italian nursery-school children. In Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations, ed. A.D. Grimshaw, 118–138. New York: Cambridge University Press. Corsaro, W.A., and Rizzo, T.A. 1990, Disputes in peer culture of American and Italian nursery-school children. In Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations, ed. A.D. Grimshaw, 118–138. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenberg, A., and Garvey, C. 1981. Children’s use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. Discourse Processes 4: 149–170.CrossRef Eisenberg, A., and Garvey, C. 1981. Children’s use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. Discourse Processes 4: 149–170.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Englund, T. 2000. Deliberativa samtal som värdegrund – historiska perspektiv och aktuella förutsättningar. Stockholm: Statens skolverk. Englund, T. 2000. Deliberativa samtal som värdegrund – historiska perspektiv och aktuella förutsättningar. Stockholm: Statens skolverk.
Zurück zum Zitat Felton, M., and Kuhn, D. 2001. The development of argumentative discourse skill. Discourse Processes, 32 (2&3): 135–153.CrossRef Felton, M., and Kuhn, D. 2001. The development of argumentative discourse skill. Discourse Processes, 32 (2&3): 135–153.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Garvey, C. 1979. Contingent queries and their relations in discourse. In Developmental pragmatics, eds. E. Ochs and B. Schieffelin. Academic Press: New York. Garvey, C. 1979. Contingent queries and their relations in discourse. In Developmental pragmatics, eds. E. Ochs and B. Schieffelin. Academic Press: New York.
Zurück zum Zitat Goffman, E. 1974. Frame analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Goffman, E. 1974. Frame analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodwin, M.H. 1983. Aggravated correction and disagreement in children’s conversation. Journal of Pragmatics VII (6). Goodwin, M.H. 1983. Aggravated correction and disagreement in children’s conversation. Journal of Pragmatics VII (6).
Zurück zum Zitat Grice, H.P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, eds. P. Cole and J. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. Grice, H.P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, eds. P. Cole and J. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson, S., and Jacobs, S. 1992. Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. In Readings in argumentation 11, eds. W.L. Benoit, D. Hample, and P.J. Benoit. Berlin: Studies of argumentation in pragmatics and discourse analysis, Foris Publications. Jackson, S., and Jacobs, S. 1992. Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. In Readings in argumentation 11, eds. W.L. Benoit, D. Hample, and P.J. Benoit. Berlin: Studies of argumentation in pragmatics and discourse analysis, Foris Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Linell, P. 1998. Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. Linell, P. 1998. Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Zurück zum Zitat Linell, P., and Gustavsson, L. 1987. Initiativ och respons: Om dialogens dynamic, dominans och coherens, SIC 15. Linköping: Department of Communication Studies. Linell, P., and Gustavsson, L. 1987. Initiativ och respons: Om dialogens dynamic, dominans och coherens, SIC 15. Linköping: Department of Communication Studies.
Zurück zum Zitat Mac Whinney. 1991. The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mac Whinney. 1991. The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zurück zum Zitat Maynard, D.W. 1985. How children start arguments. Language in Society 14: 1–29. Maynard, D.W. 1985. How children start arguments. Language in Society 14: 1–29.
Zurück zum Zitat Öberg, B.-M. 1995. Negotiation processes as talk and interaction. Interaction analyses of informal negotiations, Diss, Linköping University, Linköping. Öberg, B.-M. 1995. Negotiation processes as talk and interaction. Interaction analyses of informal negotiations, Diss, Linköping University, Linköping.
Zurück zum Zitat Pontecorvo, C., Fasulo, A. 1997. Learning to argue in family dinner conversation: The reconstruction of past events. In Discourse tools and reasoning, eds. L. Resnick, R. Saljo, and C. Pontecorvo. Berlin: Springer Verlag. Pontecorvo, C., Fasulo, A. 1997. Learning to argue in family dinner conversation: The reconstruction of past events. In Discourse tools and reasoning, eds. L. Resnick, R. Saljo, and C. Pontecorvo. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Zurück zum Zitat Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50: 696–735.CrossRef Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50: 696–735.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schegloff, E.A. 1990. On the organisation of sequences as a source of “coherence” in talk-in-interaction. In Conversational organization and its development, ed. B. Dorval. Norwood, NJ: Albex. Schegloff, E.A. 1990. On the organisation of sequences as a source of “coherence” in talk-in-interaction. In Conversational organization and its development, ed. B. Dorval. Norwood, NJ: Albex.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiffrin, D. 1985. Everyday argument. The organization of diversity in talk. In Handbook of discourse analysis, Vol. 3. London: Academic Press. Schiffrin, D. 1985. Everyday argument. The organization of diversity in talk. In Handbook of discourse analysis, Vol. 3. London: Academic Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Snow, C. 1978. The conversational context of language acquisition. In Recent advances in the psychology of languages, eds. R. Campbell and P. Smith. Plenum Press: New York. Snow, C. 1978. The conversational context of language acquisition. In Recent advances in the psychology of languages, eds. R. Campbell and P. Smith. Plenum Press: New York.
Zurück zum Zitat Snow, C.E., and Goldfield, B.A. 1983. Turn the page please: Situation specific language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 10: 551–569.CrossRef Snow, C.E., and Goldfield, B.A. 1983. Turn the page please: Situation specific language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 10: 551–569.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Trapp, R., 1992. Everyday argumentation from an interpretative perspective. In Readings in argumentation 11, eds. W.L. Benoit, D. Hample, and P.J. Benoit. Berlin: Studies of argumentation in pragmatics and discourse analysis, Foris Publications. Trapp, R., 1992. Everyday argumentation from an interpretative perspective. In Readings in argumentation 11, eds. W.L. Benoit, D. Hample, and P.J. Benoit. Berlin: Studies of argumentation in pragmatics and discourse analysis, Foris Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat van Eemeren, F.H. 2001. The state of the art in the argumentation theory. In Crucial concepts in argumentation theory, ed. F.H. van Eemeren. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. van Eemeren, F.H. 2001. The state of the art in the argumentation theory. In Crucial concepts in argumentation theory, ed. F.H. van Eemeren. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat van Eemeren, F., Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, F. 2002. Argumentation. Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. van Eemeren, F., Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, F. 2002. Argumentation. Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., and Jacobs, S. 1993. Reconstructing argumentative discourse. London: The University of Alabama Press. van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., and Jacobs, S. 1993. Reconstructing argumentative discourse. London: The University of Alabama Press.
Zurück zum Zitat van Rees, A. Argument interpretation and reconstruction. In Crucial concepts in argumentation theory, ed. F.H. van Eemeren. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. van Rees, A. Argument interpretation and reconstruction. In Crucial concepts in argumentation theory, ed. F.H. van Eemeren. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Vuchinich, S. 1990. The sequential organization of closing in verbal family conflict. In Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations, ed. A.D. Grimshaw. New York: Cambridge University Press, 118–138. Vuchinich, S. 1990. The sequential organization of closing in verbal family conflict. In Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations, ed. A.D. Grimshaw. New York: Cambridge University Press, 118–138.
Zurück zum Zitat Vygotskij, L.S. 1962. Thought and language. MIT Press, Cambridge. Vygotskij, L.S. 1962. Thought and language. MIT Press, Cambridge.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner, J. 1995. What makes discourse a negotiation? In The discourse of business negotiation, eds. K. Ehlich and J. Wagner. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer. Wagner, J. 1995. What makes discourse a negotiation? In The discourse of business negotiation, eds. K. Ehlich and J. Wagner. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer.
Zurück zum Zitat Wallgren Hemlin, B. 2001. Overall på, Retorikmagasinet. Wallgren Hemlin, B. 2001. Overall på, Retorikmagasinet.
Zurück zum Zitat Walton, D. 2000. Scare tactics: Arguments that appeal to fear and threats. Argumentation 18(2): 261–269. Walton, D. 2000. Scare tactics: Arguments that appeal to fear and threats. Argumentation 18(2): 261–269.
Zurück zum Zitat Weger, H. 2002. Violating pragma-dialectical rules in arguments between intimates. In Advances in pragma-dialectics, ed. F.H. van Eemeren. Amsterdam: Sic Sat. Weger, H. 2002. Violating pragma-dialectical rules in arguments between intimates. In Advances in pragma-dialectics, ed. F.H. van Eemeren. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiksten Folkeryd, J. 1998. The acquisition of genres: Some findings from an investigation in Swedish families. RUUL 33: 89–122. Wiksten Folkeryd, J. 1998. The acquisition of genres: Some findings from an investigation in Swedish families. RUUL 33: 89–122.
Zurück zum Zitat Wirdenäs, K. 2002. Ungdomars argumentation. Om argumentationstekniker i gruppsamta, Nordistica Gothenburgensia. Acta Universitatis Gothenburensis. Göteborgs Universitet. Wirdenäs, K. 2002. Ungdomars argumentation. Om argumentationstekniker i gruppsamta, Nordistica Gothenburgensia. Acta Universitatis Gothenburensis. Göteborgs Universitet.
Metadaten
Titel
“Eat your Hamburger!”—“No, I don’t Want to!” Argumentation and Argumentative Development in the Context of Dinner Conversation in Twenty Swedish Families
verfasst von
Åsa Brumark
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2008
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Argumentation / Ausgabe 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0920-427X
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8374
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9061-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2008

Argumentation 2/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner