Effect of the Process Parameters of Continuous Casting on the Formation of As-Cast Structure and Segregation Patterns
The as-cast structures of the investigated samples consisted of fully columnar dendritic structure (Samples A and D), fully equiaxed dendritic structure (Sample C), 80 pct columnar and 20 pct equiaxed dendritic structure with macrosegregated CET (Sample B) and 30 pct columnar and 70 pct equiaxed dendritic structure with intense macrosegregated CET (Sample E). The relative size of columnar and equiaxed dendritic zones in a continuously cast slab is affected by the superheat of the liquid steel. Higher superheat increases the size of the columnar zone since the nucleation of equiaxed dendrites is delayed as described by Krauss (2003).[
14]
The slab samples cast with both high (34 °C) and low (16 °C) superheat were seen to be depleted of carbon and other alloying elements in the areas between the CET and the centerline, while there were concentrations of the alloying elements at the CET boundary and at the centerline. This is a combined result of sedimentation of solute-poor equiaxed grains and interdendritic segregation in the mushy zone according to Flemings.[
2] Positive macrosegregation at the CET boundaries is a relatively unknown phenomenon in the literature but it has been shown to occur at intermediate superheats as Pikkarainen
et al. showed in their research.[
6] The effect of interdendritic segregation can be seen as the carbon content increases gradually from the surface to the CET. Sedimentation of equiaxed grains and shrinkage induced by solidification of dendrites pushes the excess carbon and other solutes to the liquid interdendritic regions and towards the CET, where eventually a positive segregation form. Macrosegregation patterns were stronger when the superheat was 34 °C compared with 16 °C. In addition, the location of the CET was affected by the superheat: the 18 °C higher superheat shifted the CET 5 mm towards the centerline. This phenomenon derives from the local cooling rate in continuous casting, which affects the primary and secondary arm spacing of the as-cast structure of the steel, which is consistent with the results of Kobayashi and Nagai.[
15] The amplitude of the composition fluctuations in the measured local carbon concentrations grows from 0.01 percentage units near the surface to 0.04 percent by weight at the CET. Simultaneously, the spatial separation between fluctuations grows in proportion with the growth of the secondary dendrite arm spacing as El-Bealy and Thomas disclosed in their article.[
16]
Impact of As-Cast Structures and Segregation on the Hot Rolled and Quenched Microstructures
In the case of the studied laboratory rolled materials, the quenching time from the finish rolling temperature to room temperature was less than 20 seconds, which resulted in the formation of a fully martensitic structure. However, the cooling time on a production line could be 100 seconds and combined with fluctuations in the contents of the alloying elements might enable the emergence of ferritic and bainitic constituents in the negatively segregated zones, which would be detrimental to local hardness. The formation of non-martensitic constituents is more likely in the equiaxed cast structure near the centerline because of combined effects of negative macrosegregation and slower cooling rate.
From the macrographs in Figure
8 it is clear that the distance between the dark segregation bands and their intensity gradually increases with distance from the upper surface of the original slab through the rolled plates. This can also be seen from the carbon content profiles, which show increasing fluctuations as well as an increasing mean value with increasing depth. The carbon concentration fluctuations affected local hardness values, as can be clearly seen around the CET of Cast 2 for example, Figure
8(b). Finish rolling temperature did not have a significant effect on the hardness values. It is clear that the effects of segregation are inherited from the original casting through the heating and hot rolling. The effects are visible for example in hardness profiles, Charpy V separations, prior austenite images, macrographs and carbon concentration profiles.
The Charpy V fracture surfaces showed predominantly brittle features, i.e., intragranular cleavage cracks. The percentage brittle fracture only began to fall below 50 pct at room temperature and above. The observed absorbed energy values are therefore mainly controlled by the ease of cleavage crack nucleation and propagation, which are controlled by the strength of the steel, the effective grain size and the morphology and distribution of brittle inclusions affects according to Anderson.[
17] Impact tests showed that the samples that contained the CET zone, B and E, showed clearly lower absorbed energies in impact toughness testing than the CET-free samples, D and C, Figure
6.
Carbon induced separations at the center of the cleavage of the Charpy V samples (C and E), which is more detrimental at absorbed energy values than same structure at the start or end of the cleavage like in i.e., B (in Figure
7), because of the differences at the fracture growth forces and their direction, which is explained by Sencic and Leskov.[
18] Separations were more pronounced with the more pancaked 830 °C FRT and separation severity increased with decreasing test temperature until − 60 °C, where the specimen fractured in a predominantly cleavage manner.
Prior austenite grain size affects the strength of martensitic microstructures by controlling the size of lath martensite blocks as per Krauss.[
19] Furthermore, refining the equiaxed austenite grain structures during rolling at recrystallization temperatures has been seen to somewhat improve the toughness properties according to Kaijalainen
et al.[
12] Bracke
et al. have noted that hot rolling in the non-recrystallization regime increased the strength and decreased the impact toughness of direct quenched martensite when
Rtot values were between 30 and 50 pct, but increased the impact toughness to the same level as the equiaxed grain structure when
Rtot was greater than 50 pct.[
20] The two casting scenarios were hot rolled with 975 °C and 830 °C FRT’s to distinguish the effect of grain size from effect of macrosegregation and as-cast structure and as a result the PAGS was more pancaked with the lower FRT (
Rtot = 43.7 to 50.6
vs 11.2 to 22.4 pct). The lower FRT also led to slightly smaller mean effective grain sizes. These differences at the prior austenite grain sizes and at the martensite lath sizes are so small that they could not explain differences at the mechanical properties.
Visual inspection of austenite grain size in the micrographs of the Picral etched specimens,
i.e., Figure
9(b), suggests that positively segregated bands had significantly smaller austenite grain size than negatively segregated zones. This is to be expected since, for carbon contents higher than 0.17 wt pct, it has been reported by Yasumoto
et al. that higher carbon concentration decreases austenite grain growth in the cast state.[
21] Also, we have seen that the carbon-rich regions also contain high contents of all the alloying elements other than aluminum. These, too, should hinder grain growth through solute drag effects. On top of these effects, Reiter
et al. have reported that the mean as-cast austenite grain size varies across the slab thickness rising gradually with increasing distance from slab surface because of the decreasing temperature gradient, but it falling again near the centerline.[
22]