1 Introduction
2 Recapitulation of Biot Model: Partial Water Saturation Effect on Attenuation
2.1 Porosity
2.2 Permeability
2.3 Pore Size Parameter
2.4 Attenuation Curve Tendency
3 Experimental Program
3.1 Specimen Preparation
Specimen | Granite 1 | Granite 2 | Mudstone 1 | Mudstone 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Symbol | GN1 | GN2 | MS1 | MS2 |
Density (kg/m3) | ||||
Dry | 2,591 | 2,596 | 2,628 | 2,626 |
Saturation | 2,603 | 2,609 | 2,637 | 2,652 |
Porosity (%) | 1.16 | 1.26 | 0.96 | 2.61 |
Specific gravity (–) | 2.62 | 2.62 | 2.65 | 2.64 |
Rod-wave velocity (m/s)a
| 1,864 | 1,105 | 4,891 | 4,137 |
P-wave velocity (m/s)b
| 2,619 | 1,625 | 5,273 | 4,459 |
Young’s modulus (GPa)c
| 9.4 | 3.3 | 62.9 | 45 |
Poisson’s ratio (–)d
| 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.24 | 0.24 |
3.2 Saturating and Drying Processes
3.3 Free–Free Resonant Column Test
4 Results and Discussion
4.1 Attenuation Under a Dry Condition
4.2 Attenuation Under Partial Water Saturation
4.3 Attenuation Under a Fully Water-Saturated Condition
Specimen | Resonant frequency (kHz) | P-wave velocity (m/s) | Rod-wave velocity (m/s) | Attenuation (1/Q) (–) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dry | Saturated | Dry | Saturated | Dry (Min.) | Saturated (Max.) | ||
Granite 1 (GN1) | 9.5 | 2,619 | 2,794 | 1,864 | 1,906 | 0.048 | 0.210 |
Granite 2 (GN2) | 6.0 | 1,625 | 1,820 | 1,105 | 1,275 | 0.071 | 0.316 |
Mudstone 1 (MS1) | 27.5 | 5,273 | 5,318 | 4,891 | 4,966 | 0.006 | 0.014 |
Mudstone 2 (MS2) | 23.0 | 4,459 | 4,508 | 4,137 | 4,175 | 0.010 | 0.046 |
5 Conclusions
-
Biot model shows that permeability is the most influential factor on attenuation due to wave energy dissipation by fluid flow between cracks (or pores).
-
The experimental results deviate far from Biot model’s prediction, showing that the experimental attenuation results are approximately orders of magnitude greater than Biot attenuation results. This discrepancy (i.e., Biot model’s underestimation) may be due to the fact that Biot model does not take into consideration random micro-cracks which are closely related to permeability.
-
The curve of attenuation versus saturation can be convex, linear, or concave from low to high permeability. The experimental results show that the attenuation of a low porosity rock tends to be convex or linear and shows no hysterical loop during the saturating and drying process.
-
In the low saturation regime, the attenuation of low porosity rocks is dominated by the microscopic fluid flow mechanism (e.g., Squirt flow model) while in the mid-to-high saturation range, it is governed by a macroscopic mechanism (e.g., Biot model).