Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Effectively Using Classroom Response Systems for Improving Student Content Retention

verfasst von : Robert Collier, Jalal Kawash

Erschienen in: Computers Supported Education

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Classroom response systems are widely recognized as an effective tool for providing formative feedback and engaging students, but our research supports the hypothesis that these systems also provide opportunities for improving content retention. This is evidenced by an experiment we conducted on two distinct sections of an introductory course in computer science, wherein large collections of classroom response system questions were presented to different sections at different stages. Questions that were offered immediately after the corresponding material had the express purpose of providing an opportunity for formative feedback, while questions that were presented later were expected to improve content retention. The performance of participants on the corresponding questions of the final examination was then reviewed, and statistical analyses indicate that participants performed better on those questions that corresponded to the classroom response system questions provided for content retention.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Nächstes Kapitel Design of a Learning Space Management System for Open and Adaptable School Facilities
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Collier, R.D., Kawash, J.: Improving student content retention using a classroom response system. In: CSEDU 2017 - Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Porto, Portugal, 21–23 April 2017, vol. 1, pp. 17–24 (2017)
2.
Boscardin, C., Penuel, W.: Exploring benefits of audience-response systems on learning: a review of the literature. Acad. Psychiatry 36, 401–407 (2012)CrossRef
3.
Moss, K., Crowley, M.: Effective learning in science: the use of personal response systems with a wide range of audiences. Comput. Educ. 56, 36–43 (2011)CrossRef
4.
Kay, R.H., LeSage, A.: Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: a review of the literature. Comput. Educ. 53, 819–827 (2009)CrossRef
5.
Bruff, D.: Teaching with Classroom Response Systems: Creating Active Learning Environments. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2009)
6.
Moredich, C., Moore, E.: Engaging students through the use of classroom response systems. Nurse Educ. 32, 113–116 (2007)CrossRef
7.
Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernandez-Ortega, B., Sese, F.J.: Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Comput. Educ. 62, 102–110 (2013)CrossRef
8.
Webb, A., Carnaghan, C.: Investigating the effects of group response systems on student satisfaction, learning and engagement in accounting education. Issues Acc. Educ. 22, 391–409 (2006)
9.
Liao, S.N., Zingaro, D., Laurenzano, M.A., Griswold, W.G., Porter, L.: Lightweight, early identification of at-risk CS1 students. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, ICER 2016, pp. 123–131. ACM, New York (2016)
10.
Porter, L., Zingaro, D., Lister, R.: Predicting student success using fine grain clicker data. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference on International Computing Education Research, ICER 2014, pp. 51–58. ACM, New York (2014)
11.
Draper, S.W., Brown, I.M.: Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 20, 81–94 (2004)CrossRef
12.
Judson, E., Sawada, D.: Learning from past and present: electronic response systems in college lecture halls. J. Comput. Math. Sci. Teach. 21, 167–181 (2002)
13.
Brewer, C.A.: Near real-time assessment of student learning and understanding in biology courses. BioScience 54, 1034–1039 (2004)CrossRef
14.
Caldwell, J.E.: Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 6, 9–20 (2007)CrossRef
15.
Simon, B., Kinnunen, P., Porter, L., Zazkis, D.: Experience report: CS1 for majors with media computation. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2010, pp. 214–218. ACM, New York (2010)
16.
Porter, L., Simon, B.: Retaining nearly one-third more majors with a trio of instructional best practices in CS1. In: Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2013, pp. 165–170. ACM, New York (2013)
17.
Tew, A.E., Dorn, B.: The case for validated tools in computer science education research. Computer 46, 60–66 (2013)CrossRef
18.
Cukierman, D.: Predicting success in university first year computing science courses: the role of student participation in reflective learning activities and in i-clicker activities. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2015, pp. 248–253. ACM, New York (2015)
19.
Vinaja, R.: The use of lecture videos, ebooks, and clickers in computer courses. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 30, 23–32 (2014)
20.
Simon, B., Parris, J., Spacco, J.: How we teach impacts student learning: peer instruction vs. lecture in CS0. In: Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2013, pp. 41–46. ACM, New York (2013)
21.
Zingaro, D.: Peer instruction contributes to self-efficacy in CS1. In: Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2014, pp. 373–378. ACM, New York (2014)
22.
Zingaro, D., Porter, L.: Tracking student learning from class to exam using isomorphic questions. In: Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2015, pp. 356–361. ACM, New York (2015)
23.
Huss-Lederman, S.: The impact on student learning and satisfaction when a CS2 course became interactive (abstract only). In: Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education, SIGCSE 2016, p. 687. ACM, New York (2016)
24.
Bloom, B.S.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Longmans, Green (1956)
Metadaten
Titel
Effectively Using Classroom Response Systems for Improving Student Content Retention
verfasst von
Robert Collier
Jalal Kawash
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Computers Supported Education

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94639-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-94640-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94640-5_1

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise