Skip to main content

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Emerging Innovation Ecosystems: The Critical Role of Distributed Innovation Agency

verfasst von : Thomas Hurni, Jens Dibbern, Thomas L. Huber

Erschienen in: Information Systems Outsourcing

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Innovation ecosystems are becoming increasingly important for the co-creation and modification of digital innovation by different and often competing organizational actors. However, how innovation ecosystems emerge between such organizational actors is yet unknown. This article addresses this gap by exploring how central organizational actors create innovation ecosystems, and how and why these innovation ecosystems emerge over time and through the interplay of all involved organizational actors that pursue both common (i.e., cooperate) and own goals (i.e., compete). To answer these questions, we opted for a single-case study of a large software development project, initiated by a major logistics company and implemented in collaboration with its independent IT department, six software vendors, and some field experts. This unique constellation with different coopeting (i.e., simultaneously cooperating and competing) organizational actors is particularly well suited to answer our research questions. Our results show that central organizational actors can create the basic structure and procedures of an innovation ecosystem. However, for an innovation ecosystem to progress in its emergence, central organizational actors need to stabilize the basic structure, while all other organizational actors need to help refine the basic procedures. The better adapted the structure and the procedures, the better organizational actors can exploit them to materialize coherent and customer-oriented digital innovation. We present our findings as a three-phase process model of innovation ecosystem emergence, in which innovation agency is distributed and redistributed among the organizational actors. Our findings have important implications for the literature on innovation ecosystems, the coopetition paradox, and digital innovation.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
The project manager was interviewed twice.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821.CrossRef Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​smj.​821.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Autio, E., & Thomas, L. (2014). Innovation ecosystems: implications for innovation management. In M. Dodgson, D. M. Gann, & N. Phillips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation management (Vol. 1, pp. 204–228). Oxford UK: Oxford University Press. Autio, E., & Thomas, L. (2014). Innovation ecosystems: implications for innovation management. In M. Dodgson, D. M. Gann, & N. Phillips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation management (Vol. 1, pp. 204–228). Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Boudreau, K. J., & Haigu, A. (2009). Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 163–191). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Boudreau, K. J., & Haigu, A. (2009). Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 163–191). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2002). Platform leadership: How intel, microsoft, and cisco drive industry innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2002). Platform leadership: How intel, microsoft, and cisco drive industry innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed., Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed., Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, NY: The Free Press. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Metadaten
Titel
Emerging Innovation Ecosystems: The Critical Role of Distributed Innovation Agency
verfasst von
Thomas Hurni
Jens Dibbern
Thomas L. Huber
Copyright-Jahr
2020
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45819-5_6

Premium Partner