Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Telecommunication Systems
Erschienen in: Telecommunication Systems 2/2019

22.02.2019

Energy-efficient Nature-Inspired techniques in Cloud computing datacenters

verfasst von: Mohammed Joda Usman, Abdul Samad Ismail, Gaddafi Abdul-Salaam, Hassan Chizari, Omprakash Kaiwartya, Abdulsalam Yau Gital, Muhammed Abdullahi, Ahmed Aliyu, Salihu Idi Dishing

Erschienen in: Telecommunication Systems | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Cloud computing is a systematic delivery of computing resources as services to the consumers via the Internet. Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) is the capability provided to the consumer by enabling smarter access to the processing, storage, networks, and other fundamental computing resources, where the consumer can deploy and run arbitrary software including operating systems and applications. The resources are sometimes available in the form of Virtual Machines (VMs). Cloud services are provided to the consumers based on the demand, and are billed accordingly. Usually, the VMs run on various datacenters, which comprise of several computing resources consuming lots of energy resulting in hazardous level of carbon emissions into the atmosphere. Several researchers have proposed various energy-efficient methods for reducing the energy consumption in datacenters. One such solutions are the Nature-Inspired algorithms. Towards this end, this paper presents a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art Nature-Inspired algorithms suggested for solving the energy issues in the Cloud datacenters. A taxonomy is followed focusing on three key dimension in the literature including virtualization, consolidation, and energy-awareness. A qualitative review of each techniques is carried out considering key goal, method, advantages, and limitations. The Nature-Inspired algorithms are compared based on their features to indicate their utilization of resources and their level of energy-efficiency. Finally, potential research directions are identified in energy optimization in data centers. This review enable the researchers and professionals in Cloud computing datacenters in understanding literature evolution towards to exploring better energy-efficient methods for Cloud computing datacenters.
Vorheriger Artikel A survey on low-power wide area networks for IoT applications
Nächster Artikel On the fundamental limit to the use of cognitive radio in underwater acoustic sensor networks

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Foster, I., et al. (2008). Cloud computing and grid computing 360-degree compared. In 2008 Grid computing environments workshop. 2008. IEEE.
2.
Beloglazov, A., Abawajy, J., & Buyya, R. (2012). Energy-aware resource allocation heuristics for efficient management of data centers for cloud computing. Future Generation Computer Systems, 28(5), 755–768.CrossRef
3.
Jiang, D., Xu, Z., & Lv, Z. (2016). A multicast delivery approach with minimum energy consumption for wireless multi-hop networks. Telecommunication Systems, 62(4), 771–782.CrossRef
4.
Jiang, D., et al. (2016). Energy-efficient multi-constraint routing algorithm with load balancing for smart city applications. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(6), 1437–1447.CrossRef
5.
Buyya, R., Yeo, C. S., & Venugopal, S. (2008). Market-oriented cloud computing: Vision, hype, and reality for delivering it services as computing utilities. In High performance computing and communications, 2008. HPCC’08. 10th IEEE international conference on. 2008. IEEE.
6.
Beloglazov, A., & Buyya, R. (2010). Energy efficient resource management in virtualized cloud data centers. In Proceedings of the 2010 10th IEEE/ACM international conference on cluster, cloud and grid computing. 2010. IEEE Computer Society.
7.
Yeluri, R., & Castro-Leon, E. (2014). Cloud computing basics. In Building the infrastructure for cloud security. 2014, Springer, pp. 1–17.
8.
Prasanth, A., et al. (2015). Cloud computing: A survey of associated services. Book Chapter of Cloud Computing: Reviews, Surveys, Tools, Techniques and Applications-An Open-Access eBook published by HCTL Open, 2015.
9.
Energy, S. (2007). Report to congress on server and data center energy efficiency public law 109-431. Public Law, 109, 431.
10.
Dou, H., et al. (2016). A two-time-scale load balancing framework for minimizing electricity bills of internet data centers. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 20(5), 681–693.CrossRef
11.
12.
Mishra, K., Tiwari, S., Misra. A. (2011). A bio inspired algorithm for solving optimization problems. In Computer and communication technology (ICCCT), 2011 2nd international conference on. 2011. IEEE.
13.
Usman, M. J., Ismail, A. S., & Chizari, H. (2017). Recent advances in Nature-Inspired energy efficiency techniques: Cloud datacenter perspective. The Colloquium, 8(2017), 9–13.
14.
Beloglazov, A., et al. (2011). A taxonomy and survey of energy-efficient data centers and cloud computing systems. Advances in Computers, 82(2), 47–111.CrossRef
15.
Jing, S.-Y., et al. (2013). State-of-the-art research study for green cloud computing. The Journal of Supercomputing, 65(1), 445–468.CrossRef
16.
Kaur, T., & Chana, I. (2015). Energy efficiency techniques in cloud computing: A survey and taxonomy. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 48(2), 22.CrossRef
17.
Madni, S. H. H., Latiff, M. S. A., & Coulibaly, Y. (2016). An appraisal of meta-heuristic resource allocation techniques for IaaS cloud. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(4), 1–14.CrossRef
18.
Madni, S. H. H., Latiff, M. S. A., & Coulibaly, Y. (2016). Resource scheduling for infrastructure as a service (IaaS) in cloud computing: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 68, 173–200.CrossRef
19.
Kalra, M., & Singh, S. (2015). A review of metaheuristic scheduling techniques in cloud computing. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 16(3), 275–295.CrossRef
20.
Hameed, A., et al. (2014). A survey and taxonomy on energy efficient resource allocation techniques for cloud computing systems. Computing, 98(7), 751–774.CrossRef
21.
Kołodziej, J., Khan, S. U., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2012). A taxonomy of evolutionary inspired solutions for energy management in green computing: problems and resolution methods. In Advances in intelligent modelling and simulation. 2012, Springer, pp. 215–233.
22.
Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning Reading: Addison-Wesley.
23.
Engelbrecht, A. P. (2006). Fundamentals of computational swarm intelligence. New York: Wiley.
24.
Knauth, T. (2014). Energy efficient cloud computing: Techniques and tools. Saechsische Landesbibliothek-Staats-und Universitaetsbibliothek Dresden.
25.
26.
Koomey, J. G. (2008). Worldwide electricity used in data centers. Environmental Research Letters, 3(3), 034008.CrossRef
27.
Jiang, D., et al. (2016). QoS constraints-based energy-efficient model in cloud computing networks for multimedia clinical issues. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 75(22), 14307–14328.CrossRef
28.
29.
Kessaci, Y., et al. (2011). Parallel evolutionary algorithms for energy aware scheduling. In Intelligent decision systems in large-scale distributed environments. Springer, pp. 75–100.
30.
Kliazovich, D., Bouvry, P., & Khan, S. U. (2013). DENS: data center energy-efficient network-aware scheduling. Cluster computing, 16(1), 65–75.CrossRef
31.
Meisner, D., Gold, B. T., & Wenisch, T. F. (2009) PowerNap: Eliminating server idle power. In ACM sigplan notices. ACM.
32.
Deng, Q., et al. (2011). Memscale: Active low-power modes for main memory. ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News, 39(1), 225–238.CrossRef
33.
Sardashti, S., & Wood, D. A. (2012) UniFI: leveraging non-volatile memories for a unified fault tolerance and idle power management technique. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM international conference on supercomputing. ACM.
34.
Shojafar, M., et al., Adaptive computing-plus-communication optimization framework for multimedia processing in cloud systems. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 2016.
35.
Jiang, D., et al. (2016). An optimization-based robust routing algorithm to energy-efficient networks for cloud computing.
36.
Kim, K. H., Beloglazov, A., & Buyya, R. (2011). Power-aware provisioning of virtual machines for real-time Cloud services. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 23(13), 1491–1505.CrossRef
37.
Sharma, N. K., & Reddy, G. R. M. (2015). Novel energy efficient virtual machine allocation at data center using Genetic algorithm. In Signal processing, communication and Networking (ICSCN), 2015 3rd international conference on. 2015. IEEE.
38.
Yassa, S., et al. (2013). Multi-objective approach for energy-aware workflow scheduling in cloud computing environments. The Scientific World Journal, 2013.
39.
40.
Snowdon, D. C., et al. (2009). Koala: A platform for OS-level power management. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM European conference on computer systems. ACM.
41.
Ousterhout, J., et al. (2010). The case for RAMClouds: scalable high-performance storage entirely in DRAM. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 43(4), 92–105.CrossRef
42.
Koomey, J. (2012). The economics of green DRAM in servers. New York: Analytics Press.
43.
Hähnel, M., et al. (2013). eBond: Energy saving in heterogeneous RAIN. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Future energy systems. ACM.
44.
Eom, H., et al. (2013). Evaluation of DRAM power consumption in server platforms. In Ubiquitous information technologies and applications. Springer, pp. 799–805.
45.
Jiang, D., et al. (2016). An optimization-based robust routing algorithm to energy-efficient networks for cloud computing. Telecommunication Systems, 63(1), 89–98.CrossRef
46.
Blanquicet, F., & Christensen, K. (2008). Managing energy use in a network with a new SNMP power state MIB. In Local computer networks, 2008. LCN 2008. 33rd IEEE conference on. 2008. IEEE.
47.
Michael, A. M., & Krieger, K. (2010). Server power measurement. Google Patents.
48.
Bianzino, A. P., et al. (2012). A survey of green networking research. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 14(1), 3–20.CrossRef
49.
Nie, L., et al. (2016). Traffic matrix prediction and estimation based on deep learning for data center networks. In Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), 2016 IEEE. IEEE.
50.
Power, E. N. (2008). Energy logic: reducing data center energy consumption by creating savings that cascade across systems. A White Paper from the Experts in Business-Critical Continuity. 2008.
51.
Cho, J.-K., & Shin, S.-H. (2012). Power and heat load of it equipment projections for new data center’s HVAC system design. Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering, 24(3), 212–217.CrossRef
52.
Rivoire, S., et al. (2007). Models and metrics to enable energy-efficiency optimizations.
53.
Gough, C., Steiner, I., Saunders, W. (2015). Why data center efficiency matters. In Energy efficient servers. Springer, pp. 1–20.
54.
Liu, L., et al. (2009). GreenCloud: A new architecture for green data center. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference industry session on Autonomic computing and communications industry session. ACM.
55.
Belady, C., et al. (2008). Green grid data center power efficiency metrics: PUE and DCIE. 2008, Technical report, Green Grid.
56.
Belady, C., et al. (2010). Carbon usage effectiveness (CUE): A green grid data center sustainability metric. White paper, 32.
57.
Haas, J., et al. (2009). Proxy proposals for measuring data center productivity. The Green Grid.
58.
Zomaya, A. Y., & Lee, Y. C. (2012). Energy efficient distributed computing systems (Vol. 88). New York: Wiley.
59.
VanGeet, O., Lintner, W., & Tschudi, B. (2011). FEMP best practices guide for energy-efficient data center design. National Renewable Energy Laboratory
60.
Newcombe, L. (2009). Data centre energy efficiency metrics. Data Centre Specialist Group.
61.
Lee, Y. C., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2012). Energy efficient utilization of resources in cloud computing systems. The Journal of Supercomputing, 60(2), 268–280.CrossRef
62.
Babukarthik, R., Raju, R., & Dhavachelvan, P. (2012). Energy-aware scheduling using hybrid algorithm for cloud computing. In Computing communication & networking technologies (ICCCNT), 2012 third international conference on. 2012. IEEE.
63.
Quang-Hung, N., et al. (2013). A genetic algorithm for power-aware virtual machine allocation in private cloud. In Information and communication technology-EurAsia conference. Springer.
64.
Wu, G., et al. (2012). Energy-efficient virtual machine placement in data centers by genetic algorithm. In International conference on neural information processing. Springer.
65.
Wu, Y., Tang, M., & Fraser, W. (2012). A simulated annealing algorithm for energy efficient virtual machine placement. In 2012 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC). IEEE.
66.
Luo, H., et al. (2015). The dynamic migration model for cloud service resource balancing energy consumption and QoS. In Control and decision conference (CCDC), 2015 27th Chinese. IEEE.
67.
Mezmaz, M., et al. (2011). A parallel bi-objective hybrid metaheuristic for energy-aware scheduling for cloud computing systems. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 71(11), 1497–1508.CrossRef
68.
Malakooti, B., et al. (2013). Multi-objective energy aware multiprocessor scheduling using bat intelligence. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(4), 805–819.CrossRef
69.
Raju, R., et al. (2014). A bio inspired Energy-Aware Multi objective Chiropteran Algorithm (EAMOCA) for hybrid cloud computing environment. In Green computing communication and electrical engineering (ICGCCEE), 2014 international conference on. 2014. IEEE.
70.
Feller, E., Rilling, L., & Morin, C. (2011). Energy-aware ant colony based workload placement in clouds. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/ACM 12th international conference on grid computing. IEEE Computer Society.
71.
Liu, X.-F., et al. (2014). Energy aware virtual machine placement scheduling in cloud computing based on ant colony optimization approach. In Proceedings of the 2014 annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM.
72.
Liu, X.-F., et al. (2014). Energy aware virtual machine placement scheduling in cloud computing based on ant colony optimization approach. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM.
73.
Kansal, N. J., & Chana, I. (2016). Energy-aware virtual machine migration for cloud computing—A firefly optimization approach. Journal of Grid Computing, 14(2), 327–345.CrossRef
74.
Duan, H., et al. (2016). Energy-aware scheduling of virtual machines in heterogeneous cloud computing systems. Future Generation Computer Systems, 74(2017), 142–150.
75.
A Vouk, M. (2008). Cloud computing–issues, research and implementations. CIT. Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 16(4), 235–246.
76.
Xu, L., Zeng, Z., & Ye, X. (2012). Multi-objective optimization based virtual resource allocation strategy for cloud computing. In Computer and Information Science (ICIS), 2012 IEEE/ACIS 11th International Conference on. IEEE.
77.
Song, A., et al. (2012). Multi-objective virtual machine selection for migrating in virtualized data centers. In Joint international conference on pervasive computing and the networked world. Springer.
78.
Shigeta, S., et al. (2012). Design and implementation of a multi-objective optimization mechanism for virtual machine placement in cloud computing data center. In International conference on cloud computing. Springer.
79.
Gao, Y., et al. (2013). A multi-objective ant colony system algorithm for virtual machine placement in cloud computing. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 79(8), 1230–1242.CrossRef
80.
81.
Wang, X., Wang, Y., & Cui, Y. (2014). A new multi-objective bi-level programming model for energy and locality aware multi-job scheduling in cloud computing. Future Generation Computer Systems, 36, 91–101.CrossRef
82.
Ramezani, F., et al. (2015). Evolutionary algorithm-based multi-objective task scheduling optimization model in cloud environments. World Wide Web, 18(6), 1737–1757.CrossRef
83.
Yao, G., et al. (2016). Endocrine-based coevolutionary multi-swarm for multi-objective workflow scheduling in a cloud system. Soft Computing, 1–14.
84.
Usman, M. J., et al. (2017). Energy-Efficient virtual machine allocation technique using interior search algorithm for cloud datacenter. In Student project conference (ICT-ISPC), 2017 6th ICT international. IEEE.
85.
Phan, D. H., et al. (2012). Evolutionary multiobjective optimization for green clouds. in Proceedings of the 14th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM.
86.
Shu, W., Wang, W., & Wang, Y. (2014). A novel energy-efficient resource allocation algorithm based on immune clonal optimization for green cloud computing. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2014(1), 1.CrossRef
87.
Pascual, J. A., et al. (2015). Towards a greener cloud infrastructure management using optimized placement policies. Journal of Grid Computing, 13(3), 375–389.CrossRef
88.
Lei, H., et al. (2016). A multi-objective co-evolutionary algorithm for energy-efficient scheduling on a green data center. Computers & Operations Research, 75, 103–117.CrossRef
89.
Rocha, L. A., & Cardozo, E. (2014). A hybrid optimization model for green cloud computing. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE/ACM 7th international conference on utility and cloud computing. IEEE Computer Society.
90.
Javanmardi, S., et al. (2014). Hybrid job scheduling algorithm for cloud computing environment. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on innovations in bio-inspired computing and applications IBICA 2014. Springer.
91.
Shojafar, M., et al. (2015). FUGE: A joint meta-heuristic approach to cloud job scheduling algorithm using fuzzy theory and a genetic method. Cluster Computing, 18(2), 829–844.CrossRef
92.
Moganarangan, N., et al. (2016). A novel algorithm for reducing energy-consumption in cloud computing environment: Web service computing approach. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 28(1), 55–67.CrossRef
93.
Saber, T., et al. (2014). Genepi: A multi-objective machine reassignment algorithm for data centres. In International workshop on hybrid metaheuristics. Springer.
94.
Farahnakian, F., et al. (2015). Using ant colony system to consolidate vms for green cloud computing. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 8(2), 187–198.CrossRef
95.
Sait, S. M., Bala, A., & El-Maleh, A. H. (2016). Cuckoo search based resource optimization of datacenters. Applied Intelligence, 44(3), 489–506.CrossRef
96.
Marotta, A., & Avallone, S. (2015). A Simulated Annealing Based Approach for Power Efficient Virtual Machines Consolidation. In 2015 IEEE 8th international conference on cloud computing. IEEE.
97.
Ferdaus, M. H., et al. (2014). Virtual machine consolidation in cloud data centers using ACO metaheuristic. In European conference on parallel processing. Springer.
98.
Li, H., et al. (2016). Energy-efficient migration and consolidation algorithm of virtual machines in data centers for cloud computing. Computing, 98(3), 303–317.CrossRef
99.
Gabaldon, E., et al. (2016). Particle Swarm Optimization Scheduling for Energy Saving in Cluster Computing Heterogeneous Environments. In Future internet of things and cloud workshops (FiCloudW), IEEE international conference on. 2016. IEEE.
100.
Khoshkholghi, M. A., et al. (2017). Energy-efficient algorithms for dynamic virtual machine consolidation in cloud data centers. IEEE Access, 5, 10709–10722.CrossRef
101.
Kamboj, M., & Rana, S. (2017). Cloud security and energy efficiency. Advances in Computational Sciences and Technology, 10(5), 1245–1255.
102.
Singh, S., et al. (2017). EH-GC: An efficient and secure architecture of energy harvesting Green cloud infrastructure. Sustainability, 9(4), 673.CrossRef
103.
Faruk, N., et al. (2016). Energy savings through self-backhauling for future heterogeneous networks. Energy, 115, 711–721.CrossRef
104.
Masip-Bruin, X., et al. (2016). Foggy clouds and cloudy fogs: a real need for coordinated management of fog-to-cloud computing systems. IEEE Wireless Communications, 23(5), 120–128.CrossRef
105.
Stojmenovic, I. (2014). Fog computing: A cloud to the ground support for smart things and machine-to-machine networks. in Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ATNAC), 2014 Australasian. IEEE.
106.
Tang, B., et al. (2015). A hierarchical distributed fog computing architecture for big data analysis in smart cities. In Proceedings of the ASE BigData & SocialInformatics 2015. ACM.
Metadaten
Titel
Energy-efficient Nature-Inspired techniques in Cloud computing datacenters
verfasst von
Mohammed Joda Usman
Abdul Samad Ismail
Gaddafi Abdul-Salaam
Hassan Chizari
Omprakash Kaiwartya
Abdulsalam Yau Gital
Muhammed Abdullahi
Ahmed Aliyu
Salihu Idi Dishing
Publikationsdatum
22.02.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Telecommunication Systems / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1018-4864
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-019-00549-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Telecommunication Systems 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

RSRP difference elimination and motion state classification for fingerprint-based cellular network positioning system

Letter to the Editor

On the fundamental limit to the use of cognitive radio in underwater acoustic sensor networks

OriginalPaper

Throughput analysis and optimization of cognitive radio networks using incremental relaying

OriginalPaper

On solving the 1 + 1 routing, wavelength and network coding assignment problem with a bi-objective integer linear programming model

OriginalPaper

Overhead minimization of online codes

OriginalPaper

New evolution in two-way relay networks based on physical layer network coding

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise