Skip to main content

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

EParticipation in Friedrichshafen: Identification of Target Groups and Analysis of Their Behaviour

verfasst von : David Hafner, Alexander Moutchnik

Erschienen in: Digital Transformation and Global Society

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

‘eParticipation’ means the involvement of citizens in the political process via information and communication technologies. This paper analyses the identification of target groups in eParticipation and the elaboration of their behaviour. Research and analysis was conducted on a target population in Germany. Second and third generational citizens were the focus of the analysis. The city of Friedrichshafen was chosen due to its inherent electronic and network infrastructural advantage. It is assumed that this city’s mode of connectivity will be established in the whole country in the years to come. The research methodology was quantitative; a survey was conducted to collect statistical data. Questions for the survey were derived from literature-based research in adjacent areas. Topics in the survey include ‘eGovernment’, ‘technology-acceptance’ and ‘target group behaviour’. Survey locations were chosen close to administrative institutions, aiming to elicit responses from long-term citizens of Friedrichshafen. In total 249 people were surveyed. This represents a confidence level of 94%. Four distinctive target groups of adults were identified and categorized according to experience: “First-time Voters”, “Amateur Voters”, “Professional Voters” and “Expert Voters”. Research results showed a strong tendency of the respondents towards eParticipation provided its direct political impact was being limited. Moreover, the strongest concerns about an online election were voter-manipulation and vote-buying. Local administrations and politicians can use findings from this research to implement technologies and to encourage their target audience to participate electronically in the political discourse.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
[H1]: eElection: I think it is good to perform elections online; eVoting: I think it is good to perform votes online; eParticipation: I think it is good to carry out local council meetings online; eDiscussion: I think it is good to conduct political surveys online; eGovernment Portal: I think it is good if information exchange with the community council takes place online. [H2]: Community level: I think it is good to elect the mayor online; Community level: I think it is good to elect the Chancellor online. [H3]: I think it is good to build a playground; I think it is good to elect the mayor online. [H4]: Safeguards from vote buying: I am afraid that votes are bought; Secrecy of the votes cast: I am afraid that someone can find out for whom I vote; Identification: I am afraid that someone can find out who I am; Manipulation: I am afraid that the election gets manipulated; Auditability: I am afraid that there is no physical proof of vote as ballot papers disappear; Misinformation: I am afraid that electors are misinformed. [H5]: Gender, age, education. [H6]: Technology Knowledge: I find it easy to operate a computer.
 
2
In the first step, for each respondent the fit of demographic markers with the target group characteristics is examined. For every fit, the weighting factor is increased by one. For instance, respondent one fits to the target group with two demographic markers representing age and education. Therefore, the weight of 2 is noted in the weight column. In the calculation step, the respondent’s rating of a question is multiplied by the weight. It results in weighted ratings for each respondent and each factor in the right-hand columns. Referring to the given example, the previously determined weight of 2 is multiplied with the respondent’s rating (2) of the question. A weighted rating of 4 is noted. Step one and two are repeated for all questions and respondents. The third step sums all of the weighted ratings of one target group. The fourth step calculates the group’s weighted rating for each factor. Divide the sum of the weighted ratings by the sum of the weights. These steps are repeated for each group. By this procedure, unique profiles of group behaviour are statistically determined. It is possible that there is no correlation between markers and target groups. This occurred with the second respondent. In his case the weight 0 is allocated, which means answers given by the respondent do not influence the group behaviour profile of the examined target group.
 
3
“Wir sind eigentlich dazu bereit politisch aktiv zu sein, aber von den Politikern weiß doch keiner wie er dann mit unseren vielen unterschiedlichen Wünschen und Bedürfnissen dann umgehen soll.” – Johannes Fauth, Friedrichshafen 22.12. 2016.
 
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat United Nations E-Government Survey 2016. E-Government in Support of Sustainable Development, United Nations Department of Economic & Social Affairs, New York (2016) United Nations E-Government Survey 2016. E-Government in Support of Sustainable Development, United Nations Department of Economic & Social Affairs, New York (2016)
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Promise and Problems of E-Democracy: Challenges of Online Citizen Engagement. OECD Publications Service, Paris (2003) Promise and Problems of E-Democracy: Challenges of Online Citizen Engagement. OECD Publications Service, Paris (2003)
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Groupe Speciale Mobile Association GSMA 2016. The Mobile Economy, London (2016) Groupe Speciale Mobile Association GSMA 2016. The Mobile Economy, London (2016)
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Dobnikar, A., Nemec, A.Ž.: eGovernment in slovenia. Informatica 31, 357–365 (2007) Dobnikar, A., Nemec, A.Ž.: eGovernment in slovenia. Informatica 31, 357–365 (2007)
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pederson, K.: e-Government in local government: challenges and capabilities. Electro. J. e-Government 14(1), 99–116 (2016)MathSciNet Pederson, K.: e-Government in local government: challenges and capabilities. Electro. J. e-Government 14(1), 99–116 (2016)MathSciNet
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bolgov, R., Karachay, V.: E-participation projects development in the e-governance institutional structure of the Eurasian economic union’s countries: comparative overview. In: Chugunov, A.V., Bolgov, R., Kabanov, Y., Kampis, G., Wimmer, M. (eds.) DTGS 2016. CCIS, vol. 674, pp. 205–218. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49700-6_20CrossRef Bolgov, R., Karachay, V.: E-participation projects development in the e-governance institutional structure of the Eurasian economic union’s countries: comparative overview. In: Chugunov, A.V., Bolgov, R., Kabanov, Y., Kampis, G., Wimmer, M. (eds.) DTGS 2016. CCIS, vol. 674, pp. 205–218. Springer, Cham (2016). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-49700-6_​20CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat EU eGovernment Action Plan 2016–2020. Accelerating the digital transformation of government. European Commission, Brussels (2016) EU eGovernment Action Plan 2016–2020. Accelerating the digital transformation of government. European Commission, Brussels (2016)
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Yusuf, M., Adams, C., Dingley, K.: A review of e-government research as a mature discipline: trends, themes, philosophies, methodologies, and methods. Electr. J. e-Government 14(1), 18–35 (2016) Yusuf, M., Adams, C., Dingley, K.: A review of e-government research as a mature discipline: trends, themes, philosophies, methodologies, and methods. Electr. J. e-Government 14(1), 18–35 (2016)
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Prosser, A.: Transparency in eVoting. Transform. Government: People, Process. Policy 8(2), 171–184 (2014)CrossRef Prosser, A.: Transparency in eVoting. Transform. Government: People, Process. Policy 8(2), 171–184 (2014)CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Axelsson, K., Lindblad-Gidlund, K.: eGovernment in Sweden: new directions. Int. J. Public Inf. Sys. 2, 31–35 (2009) Axelsson, K., Lindblad-Gidlund, K.: eGovernment in Sweden: new directions. Int. J. Public Inf. Sys. 2, 31–35 (2009)
24.
Metadaten
Titel
EParticipation in Friedrichshafen: Identification of Target Groups and Analysis of Their Behaviour
verfasst von
David Hafner
Alexander Moutchnik
Copyright-Jahr
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_4

Premium Partner