Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Software and Systems Modeling
Erschienen in: Software and Systems Modeling 1/2016

01.03.2014 | Regular Paper

Evaluating the appropriateness of the BPMN 2.0 standard for modeling service choreographies: using an extended quality framework

verfasst von: Mario Cortes-Cornax, Sophie Dupuy-Chessa, Dominique Rieu, Nadine Mandran

Erschienen in: Software and Systems Modeling | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The concept of choreography has emerged over the past years as a foundational concept for capturing and managing collaborative business processes. The latest version of the Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN 2.0) adopts choreography as a first-class citizen. However, it remains an open question whether BPMN 2.0 is actually appropriate for capturing this concept. In this paper, we extend an existing language evaluation framework in order to evaluate the support for choreographies in BPMN 2.0. The framework provides a means of identifying the strengths and weaknesses of BPMN 2.0 for choreographies. We also give potential solutions that may be taken into account in future extensions or improvements to BPMN 2.0.
Vorheriger Artikel An executable formal semantics for UML-RT
Nächster Artikel Goal-oriented modeling and verification of feature-oriented product lines

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
Literatur
1.
Ambler, S.: The Elements of UML 2.0 Style. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)CrossRef
2.
Barker, A., Walton, C., Robertson, D.: Choreographing web services. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2(2), 152–166 (2009)CrossRef
3.
Barros, A., Decker, G., Dumas, M.: Multi-staged and multi-viewpoint service choreography modelling. In: Proceedings Workshop on Software Engineering Methods for Service Oriented Architecture (SEMSOA), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 244 (2007)
4.
Barros, A., Decker, G., Dumas, M., Weber, F.: Correlation patterns in service-oriented architectures. In: Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, pp. 245–259 (2007)
5.
Barros, A., Dumas, M., Hofstede, A.: Service interaction patterns. In: Aalst W., Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Curbera, F. (eds.) Business Process Management, 3rd International Conference, BPM 2005,. Lecture Notes in COmputer Science, vol. 3649, pp. 302–318. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.​1007/​1153839420
6.
7.
Barros, A., Hettel, T., Flender, C.: Process choreography modeling. In: Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management 1, International Handbooks on Information Systems. pp. 257–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-00416-212
8.
Biron, P., Malhotra, A., Consortium, W.W.W., et al.: Xml Schema Part 2: Datatypes. World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation REC-xmlschema-2-20041028 (2004)
9.
Cook, T., Reichardt, C.: UML, vol. 1. Sage publications, London (1979)
10.
Cortes-Cornax, M.: Service choreographies through a graphical notation based on abstraction layers and viewpoints. In: 2011 Fifth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), IEEE, pp. 1–12 (2011)
11.
Cortes-Cornax, M., Dupuy-Chessa, S., Rieu, D.: Bridging the gap between business processes and service composition through service choreographies. In: Engineering Methods in the Service-Oriented Context, pp. 190–203 (2011)
12.
Cortes-Cornax, M., Dupuy-Chessa, S., Rieu, D.: Choreographies in BPMN 2.0: new challenges and open questions. In: Schönberger, A., Kopp, O., Lohmann, N. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th Central-European Workshop on Services and their Composition, vol. 847, pp. 50–57. CEUR (2012). http://​ceur-ws.​org/​Vol-847/​paper7.​pdf
13.
Cortes-Cornax, M., Dupuy-Chessa, S., Rieu, D., Dumas, M.: Evaluating choreographies in bpmn 2.0 using an extended quality framework. In: Dijkman, R., Hofstetter, J., Koehler, J. (eds.) Business Process Model and Notation - Third International Workshop, BPMN 2011, Lucerne, Switzerland. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 95, pp. 103–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-25160-38
14.
D’Ambrogio, A., Bocciarelli, P.: A model-driven approach to describe and predict the performance of composite services. In: Cortellessa, V., Uchitel, S., Yankelevich, D. (eds.) WOOSP 2007 Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Software and Performance, pp. 78 -89. ACM (2007)
15.
Decker, G., Kopp, O., Barros, A.: An introduction to service choreographies. Inf. Technol. 50(2), 122–127 (2008)
16.
Decker, G., Kopp, O., Leymann, F., Pfitzner, K., Weske, M.: Modeling service choreographies using bpmn and bpel4chor. In: Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 79–93. Springer, Berlin (2008)
17.
Decker, G., Kopp, O., Leymann, F., Weske, M.: Interacting services: from specification to execution. Data & Knowl. Eng. 68(10), 946–972 (2009)
18.
Decker, G., Puhlmann, F.: Extending BPMN for modeling complex choreographies. In: Proceedings of the 2007 OTM Confederated international conference on On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: CoopIS, DOA, ODBASE, GADA, and IS-Volume Part I, pp. 24–40. Springer, Berlin (2007)
19.
20.
Dijkman, R., Dumas, M.: Service-oriented design: a multi-viewpoint approach. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. 13, 337–368 (2004)CrossRef
21.
DIS, I.: 9241–210: 2009. Ergonomics of human system interaction-part 210: human-centred design for interactive systems. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Switzerland (2010)
22.
Dobson, G., Lock, R., Sommerville, I.: QoSont: a QoS ontology for service-centric systems. In: 31st EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, 2005, pp. 80–87. IEEE (2005)
23.
Dubray, J., Amand, S., Martin, M.: ebxml Business process specification schema technical specification v2. 0.4. Committee specification, UN/CEFACT (2006)
24.
Dupuy-Chessa, S.: Quality in ubiquitous information system design. In: Third International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, 2009, RCIS 2009. pp. 343–352. IEEE (2009)
25.
Evitts, P.: A UML Pattern Language. New Riders Publishing, Thousand Oaks (2000)
26.
Genero, M., Piattini, M., Calero, C.: A survey of metrics for uml class diagrams. J. Object Technol. 4(9), 59–92 (2005)CrossRef
27.
Genon, N., Heymans, P., Amyot, D.: Analysing the Cognitive Effectiveness of the BPMN 2.0 Visual Notation. Software Language, Engineering, pp. 377–396 (2011)
28.
Hafner, M., Breu, R.: Realizing Model Driven Security for Inter-organizational Workflows with WS-CDL and UML 2.0. Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, pp. 39–53 (2005)
29.
Harel, D., Thiagarajan, P.: Message Sequence Charts, UML for Real. Springer, Berlin (2004)
30.
ISO/IEC: 9126–1:2001: Software Engineering—Product Quality. International Organization for Standardization (2001)
31.
Koliadis, G., Ghose, A.: Relating business process models to goal-oriented requirements models in KAOS. In: Advances in Knowledge Acquisition and Management, pp. 25–39 (2006)
32.
Kopp, O., Leymann, F., Wagner, S.: Modeling Choreographies: BPMN 2.0 Versus BPEL-based approaches. In: Nüttgens, M., Oliver, T., Weber, B. (eds.) Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures, EMISA 2011, pp. 225–230. GI LNI (2011)
33.
Krogstie, J.: Evaluating UML using a generic quality framework. In: UML and the Unified Process (2003)
34.
Krogstie, J., de Flon Arnesen, S.: Assessing enterprise modeling languages using a generic quality framework. In: Krogstie, J., Halpin, T.A., Siau, K. (eds.) Information modeling methods and methodologies (1537–9299), pp. 63–79. Idea Group Publishing (2005)
35.
Krogstie, J., Sindre, G., Jørgensen, H.: Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15(1), 91–102 (2006)CrossRef
36.
Le Pallec, X., Dupuy-Chessa, S., Dupuy, S.: Support for quality metrics in metamodelling. In: GMLD (Graphical Modeling Language Definition) Workshop@ ECFMA 2013 (2013)
37.
Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G., Solvberg, A.: Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Softw. 11(2), 42–49 (1994)CrossRef
38.
Mancioppi, M., Perepletchikov, M., Ryan, C., van den Heuvel, W.J., Papazoglou, M.P.: Towards a quality model for choreography. In: Service-Oriented Computing. ICSOC/ServiceWave 2009 Workshops, pp. 435–444. Springer, Berlin (2010)
39.
Mandran, N., Dupuy-Chessa, S., Rieu, D., et al.: Démarche centrée utilisateur pour une ingénierie des langages de modélisation de qualité. Ingénierie des systèmes d’information 18(3) (2013)
40.
Moody, D.: The physics of notations: toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 35, 756–779 (2009)CrossRef
41.
Nelson, H., Poels, G., Genero, M., Piattini, M.: A conceptual modeling quality framework. Softw. Qual. J. 20(1), 201–228 (2012)
42.
Nysetvold, A.G., Krogstie, J.: Assessing business process modeling languages using a generic quality framework. In: Proceedings of the CAiSE’05 Workshops, pp. 545–556. Idea, Group (2005)
43.
44.
45.
46.
Peltz, C.: Web services orchestration and choreography. Computer pp. 46–52 (2003)
47.
Recker, J., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Do process modelling techniques get better? A comparative ontological analysis of BPMN. In: Proceedings of the 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney, Australia. Citeseer (2005)
48.
Recker, J.C., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: How good is BPMN really? Insights from theory and practice. In: Ljungberg, J., Andersson, M. (eds.) 14th European Conference on Information Systems. Goeteborg, Sweden (2006). http://​eprints.​qut.​edu.​au/​4636/​
49.
Rossi, M., Brinkkemper, S.: Complexity metrics for systems development methods and techniques. Inf. Syst. 21(2), 209–227 (1996)CrossRef
50.
Runeson, P., Höst, M.: Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empir. Softw. Eng. 14(2), 131–164 (2009)CrossRef
51.
Schönberger, A.: Visualizing B2Bi choreographies. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA’11), Irvine, California, USA. IEEE (2011)
52.
Schönberger, A., Wilms, C., Wirtz, G.: A requirements analysis of integration business to business integration. Technical Report, Otto-Friedrich-Universitt Bamberg, Bamberger Beitrge zur Wirtschaftsinformatik und Angewandten Informatik (2009)
53.
Siau, K., Cao, Q.: Unified modeling language: a complexity analysis. J. Database Manag. (JDM) 12(1), 26–34 (2001)CrossRef
54.
Silver, B.: BPMN Method and Style: A Levels-Based Methodology for BPM Process Modeling and Improvement Using BPMN 2.0. Cody-Cassidy Press, US (2009)
55.
van der Aalst, W., Ter Hofstede, A., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.: Workflow patterns. Distrib. Parallel Databases 14(1), 5–51 (2003)CrossRef
56.
57.
Wahl, T., Sindre, G.: An analytical evaluation of BPMN using a semiotic quality framework. In: Advanced Topics in Database Research, vol. 5 (2006)
58.
Weidlich, M., Barros, A., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: Vertical alignment of process models - how can we get there? In: Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Ukor, R. (eds.) Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. 10th International Workshop, BPMDS 2009, and 14th International Conference, EMMSAD 2009, and 14th International Conference, EMMSAD 2009, CAiSE 2009. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 29, pp. 71–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
59.
Wetzstein, B., Karastoyanova, D., Kopp, O., Leymann, F., Zwink, D.: Cross-organizational process monitoring based on service choreographies. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 2485–2490. ACM (2010)
60.
Wohed, P., Aalst,W., Dumas, M., Hofstede, A., Russell, N.: On the suitability of BPMN for business process modelling. In: Dustdar, S. Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) Business Process Management, 4th International Conference, BPM 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4102, pp 161–176, Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi:10.​1007/​11841760_​12
61.
Zaha, J., Barros, A., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.: Lets dance: a language for service behavior modeling. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: CoopIS, DOA, GADA, and ODBASE, pp. 145–162 (2006)
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluating the appropriateness of the BPMN 2.0 standard for modeling service choreographies: using an extended quality framework
verfasst von
Mario Cortes-Cornax
Sophie Dupuy-Chessa
Dominique Rieu
Nadine Mandran
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Software and Systems Modeling / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1619-1366
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-1374
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-014-0398-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Software and Systems Modeling 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Regular Paper

An executable formal semantics for UML-RT

Industry Voice

Cyber-physical systems challenges: a needs analysis for collaborating embedded software systems

Regular Paper

A profile and tool for modelling safety information with design information in SysML

Regular Paper

Systematic literature review of the objectives, techniques, kinds, and architectures of models at runtime

Regular Paper

SAMM: an architecture modeling methodology for ship command and control systems

Regular Paper

Goal-oriented modeling and verification of feature-oriented product lines

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise