Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
The Impact of Universities on Economic Development Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. Evaluation and Expectations at the Adaptable University

verfasst von : Edward Crawley, John Hegarty, Kristina Edström, Juan Cristobal Garcia Sanchez

Erschienen in: Universities as Engines of Economic Development

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

How do we know that universities are delivering what society needs?
As universities become more important to the development of regions and nations, stakeholders expect them to evaluate their impact.
The main task of this evaluation is to validate the university’s impact in education, research, and catalyzing innovation, and in knowledge exchange.
University should evaluate their outcomes in both quantitative and qualitative terms of their own choosing. This is in contrast with quantitative key performance indicators (KPIs) and standardized third party university rankings.
Evaluation will identify success at the university and how it can improve. This will build confidence and support among stakeholders.
A university should also establish commonly held and domain-specific expectations for faculty members. These provide a basis for recognition of success. They should be aligned with the norms and mission of the university.
These two practices add to the adaptable framework:
  • Program Evaluation: Collecting evidence that reflects the university goals, and evaluating the success of programs or units, demonstrating the contributions of the university.
  • Faculty Expectations and Recognition: Setting expectations and recognizing accomplishments of individuals in education, research, innovation, and knowledge exchange; this will help align the actions of the faculty with the university goals.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Supporting the Academic Mission of the Adaptable University
Nächstes Kapitel Alignment by Partners with the Adaptable University
Literatur
1.
Patil AS, Gray PJ (2009) Engineering education quality assurance: a global perspective. Springer
2.
Valero A, Van Reenen J (2019) The economic impact of universities: evidence from across the globe. Econ Educ Rev 68:53–67CrossRef
3.
Leydesdorff L, Etzkowitz H (1997) Universities and the global knowledge economy: a triple helix of university-industry-government relations (science, technology, and the international political economy series). Thomson Learning, Boston
4.
Cortese AD (2003) The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future. Plan High Educ 31:15–22
5.
United Nations Evaluation Group (2017) Principles for stakeholder engagement by United Nations Evaluation Group. www.​uneval.​org › document › download. Accessed 3 Dec 2019
6.
Bryson JM, Patton MQ, Bowman RA (2011) Working with evaluation stakeholders: a rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit. Eval Program Plann 34:1–12CrossRef
7.
8.
Tavenas F (2004) Quality assurance: a reference system for indicators and evaluation procedures. European University Association, Brussels, Belgium
9.
Astin AW, Antonio AL (2012) Assessment for excellence: the philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education (the ACE series on higher education), 2nd edn. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, MD
10.
Brodeur DR, Crawley E (2009) CDIO and quality assurance: using the standards for Continuous program improvement. In: Patil AS, Gray PJ (eds) Engineering education quality assurance: a global perspective. Springer, pp 211–222
11.
Goddard J, Hazelkorn E, Kempton L, Vallance P (2016) The civic university: the policy and leadership challenges. Edward Elgar Pub, CheltenhamCrossRef
12.
Altbach PG, Reisberg L, Rumbley L (2009) Quality assurance, accountability, and qualification frameworks. UNESCO, Paris
13.
UNESCO (2005) Accreditation and the global higher education market, Paris, France
14.
Stensaker B, Harvey L (2010) Accountability in higher education: global perspectives on trust and power (international studies in higher education). Routledge
15.
Etzkowitz H (2014) The entrepreneurial university wave: from ivory tower to global economic engine. Ind High Educ 28:223–232CrossRef
16.
Ahmad NH, Halim HA, Ramayah T, Rahman SA (2013) Revealing an open secret: internal challenges in creating an entrepreneurial university from the lens of the academics. Int J Concept Manage Soc Sci 1:2357–2787
17.
Council For Higher Education Accreditation (2003) Statement of mutual responsibilities for student learning outcomes: accreditation. Institutions and Programs, Washington DC
18.
Banta T, Palomba C (2014) Assessment essentials: planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass
19.
Clark B (1998) Creating entrepreneurial universities: organizational pathways of transformation. Emerald Group Pub Ltd
20.
21.
Shin JC, Toutkoushian RK (2011) The past, present, and future of university rankings. In: University rankings: theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–16CrossRef
22.
Locke W, Verbik L, Richardson JTE, King R (2008) Counting what is measured or measuring what counts? League Tables and Their Impact on Higher Education Institutions in England, Report to HEFCE. Bristol, UK
23.
Hazelkorn E (2011) Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: the Battle for world-class excellence. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NYCrossRef
24.
van Raan AFJ (2006) Challenges in the ranking of universities. In: Sadlak J, Cai LN (eds) The world-class university and ranking: aiming beyond status. UNESCO-CEPES, Institute of Higher Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China and the Cluj University Press, Bucharest, pp 81–123
25.
Goglio V (2016) One size fits all? A different perspective on university rankings. J High Educ Policy Manag 38:212–226CrossRef
26.
Vernon MM, Balas EA, Momani S (2018) Are university rankings useful to improve research? A systematic review. PLoS One 13:1–15
27.
Fung D, Gordon C (2016) Rewarding educators and education leaders in research-intensive universities. Higher Education Academy, York
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation and Expectations at the Adaptable University
verfasst von
Edward Crawley
John Hegarty
Kristina Edström
Juan Cristobal Garcia Sanchez
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Buch
Universities as Engines of Economic Development

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47548-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-47549-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47549-9_8

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise