nach oben

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change

Erschienen in:

04.01.2020 | Original Article

Evaluation of cooperative mitigation: captured carbon dioxide for enhanced oil recovery

verfasst von: Lei Zhu, Xing Yao, Xian Zhang

Erschienen in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change | Ausgabe 7/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Robust mitigation options will play significant role in achieving the target of limiting global change to below 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels by 2100. To support cooperation for mitigation development, we establish a real options-based model to evaluate the rational decisions of exercising the abandon option for carbon capture and storage-enhanced oil recovery (CCS-EOR) projects under oil market and geological uncertainties. Three possible cooperative mechanisms (fixed carbon dioxide (CO₂) price, oil-indexed CO₂ price, and joint venture contracts) among CO₂-EOR stakeholders are evaluated. The results show that the conflicts in profit maximization targets for different stakeholders in cooperative mitigation are to a great extent unable to be avoided. A joint venture business model is preferred in cooperative mitigation as it can effectively weaken such conflicts. And it is more reasonable to provide incentives to the downstream of the CO₂-EOR chain than compensating the adoption cost of carbon capture technologies in the upstream. From a global perspective, the inefficient cooperation can be a main barrier that hinders the development of deep-cutting options. Global mitigation strategies should not only focus on promoting technology progress but also the design of innovative business models to balance the benefits among stakeholders. A joint venture business model is recommended in both the developed and developing countries for seizing the early mitigation opportunities.

Vorheriger Artikel Green innovation efficiency across China’s 30 provinces: estimate, comparison, and convergence

Nächster Artikel The impact of climate damage function on the social cost of carbon and economic growth rate

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

We first take expectation to oil price during the lifetime of the EOR project according to its geometric Brown motion, which is used as the mean value of the oil price in our simulation.\( {\mathrm{Po}}^{\mathrm{benchmark}}=E\left(\mathrm{Po}\right)=\frac{\sum \limits_{t=1}^TE\left(\mathrm{Po}(t)\right)}{T} \) and \( E\left(\mathrm{Po}(t)\right)=\frac{\sum \limits_{i=1}^ME\left(\mathrm{Po}{(t)}_i\right)}{M} \) where M is the total simulated paths. Then, Pco₂^benchmark is set to be 100, 200, and 300 yuan/ton. As the dynamics of the CO₂ settlement price are entirely influenced by the oil price, through this method, the expected CO₂ commodity price is therefore 100, 200, and 300 yuan/ton.

Refers to: http://www.curc.net/webfiles/45Q%20Press%20Release/45Q%20Background%20-%20February%202018.pdf

Agarwal, A (2014) Risk sharing in CO₂ delivery contracts for the CCS-EOR Value chain

Agarwal A, Parsons J (2011) Commercial structures for integrated CCS-EOR projects. Energy Procedia 4(22):5786–5793

Bednyagin D, Gnansounou E (2011) Real options valuation of fusion energy R&D programme. Energy Policy 39(1):116–130

British Petroleum (BP) (2017) BP statistical review of world energy 2017. British Petroleum, London

Caldara D, Cavallo M, Iacoviello M (2019) Oil price elasticities and oil price fluctuations. J Monet Econ 103:1–20

Chen SY, Zhang Q, Wang G, Zhu L, Li Y (2018) Investment strategy for underground gas storage facilities based on real option model considering gas market reform in China. Energy Econ 70:132–142

Compernolle T, Welkenhuysen K, Huisman K, Piessens K, Kort P (2017) Off-shore enhanced oil recovery in the North Sea: the impact of price uncertainty on the investment decisions. Energy Policy 101:123–137

Davis GA, Owens B (2003) Optimizing the level of renewable electric R&D expenditures using real options analysis. Energy Policy 31(15):1589–1608

Duan H, Zhang G, Wang S (2019) Robust climate change research: a review on multi-model analysis. Environ Res Lett 14(3)

Esposito RA, Monroe LS, Friedman JS (2011) Deployment models for commercialized carbon capture and storage. Environ Sci Technol 45(1):139–146

Ettehadtavakkol A, Lake LW, Bryant SL (2014) CO₂-EOR and storage design optimization. Int J Greenh Gas Control 25(6):79–92

Fan Y, Mo JL, Zhu L (2013) Evaluating coal bed methane investment in China based on a real options model. Res Policy 38(1):50–59

Fan JL, Wei SJ, Yang L, Wang H, Zhong P, Zhang X (2019a) Comparison of the LCOE between coal-fired power plants with CCS and main low-carbon generation technologies: evidence from China. Energy 176:143–155

Fan JL, Xu M, Yang L, Zhang X (2019b) Benefit evaluation of investment in CCS retrofitting of coal-fired power plants and PV power plants in China based on real options. Renew Sust Energ Rev 115:109350

Fan JL, Xu M, Yang L, Zhang X, Li F (2019c) How can carbon capture utilization and storage be incentivized in China? A perspective based on the 45Q tax credit provisions. Energy Policy 132:1229–1240

Fleten SE, Linnerud K, Molnár P, Nygaard MT (2016) Green electricity investment timing in practice: real options or net present value? Energy 116:498–506

Flude S, Györe D, Stuart FM, Zurakowska M, Boyce AJ, Haszeldine RS, Chalaturnyk R, Gilfillan SMV (2017) The inherent tracer fingerprint of captured CO₂. Int J Greenh Gas Control 65:40–54

Guedes J, Santos P (2016) Valuing an offshore oil exploration and production project through real options analysis. Energy Econ 60:377–386

Hammond GP, Akwe SSO, Williams S (2011) Techno-economic appraisal of fossil-fuelled power generation systems with carbon dioxide capture and storage. Energy 36(2):975–984

Heddle G, Herzog H, Klett M (2003) The economics of CO2 storage. The economics of CO2 storage p. 1–115. Available from: http://sequestration.mit.edu/pdf/LFEE_2003-003_RP.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2018

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2018) Summary for policymakers. In: Global warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. In press

International Energy Agency (IEA) (2012) Joint IEA-OPEC workshop on CO2-enhanced oil recovery with CCS

International Energy Agency (IEA) (2017a) Energy technologies perspectives—catalysing energy technology transformations. International Energy Agency, Paris

International Energy Agency (IEA) (2017b) World energy outlook 2017. International Energy Agency, Paris

Kapetaki Z, Scowcroft J (2017) Overview of carbon capture and storage (CCS) demonstration project business models: risks and enablers on the two sides of the Atlantic. Energy Procedia 114:6623–6630

Khan S, Khulief YA, Al-Shuhail A (2019) Mitigating climate change via CO2 sequestration into Biyadh reservoir: geomechanical modeling and caprock integrity. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 24:23–52

Kheshgi H, Crookshank S, Cunha P, Lee A, Bernstein L, Siveter R (2009) Carbon capture and storage business models. Energy Procedia 1(1):4481–4486

Kim KT, Lee DJ, Park SJ (2014) Evaluation of R&D investments in wind power in Korea using real option. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 40(40):335–347

Kim K, Park H, Kim H (2017) Real options analysis for renewable energy investment decisions in developing countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 75:918–926

Kobari L, Jaimungal S, Lawryshyn Y (2014) A real options model to evaluate the effect of environmental policies on the oil sands rate of expansion. Energy Econ 45:155–165

Kwak DH, Kim JK (2017) Techno-economic evaluation of CO₂, enhanced oil recovery (EOR) with the optimization of CO₂ supply. Int J Greenh Gas Control 58:169–184

Lambrecht BM (2017) Real options in finance. J Bank Financ 81:166–171

Lee H, Park T, Kim B, Kim K, Kim H (2013) A real option-based model for promoting sustainable energy projects under the clean development mechanism. Energy Policy 54(3):360–368

Li S, Zhang X, Gao L, Jin H (2012) Learning rates and future cost curves for fossil fuel energy systems with CO2, capture: methodology and case studies. Appl Energy 93(5):348–356

Liang D, Wu W (2009) Barriers and incentives of CCS deployment in China: results from semi-structured interviews. Energy Policy 37(6):2421–2432

Longstaff FA, Schwartz ES (2001) Valuing American options by simulation: a simple least-squares approach. Rev Financ Stud 14(1):113–147

Mo JL, Schleich J, Zhu L, Fan Y (2015) Delaying the introduction of emissions trading systems—implications for power plant investment and operation from a multi-stage decision model. Energy Econ 52(1):255–264

National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) (2010) An assessment of gate-to-gate environmental life cycle performance of water-alternating-gas CO₂-enhanced oil recovery in the Permian Basin. Pittsburgh: National Energy Technology Laboratory

Pan F, Mcpherson BJ, Dai Z, Jia W, Lee SY, Ampomah W, Viswanathan H, Esser R (2016) Uncertainty analysis of carbon sequestration in an active CO₂-EOR field. Int J Greenh Gas Control 51:18–28

Pershad H, Durusut E, Cretat A, et al (2012) Economic impacts of CO₂-enhanced oil recovery for Scotland. Final report for Scottish Enterprise, led by Element Energy with Dundas Consultants and the Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Heriot Watt University

Ravagnani ATFSG, Ligero EL, Suslick SB (2009) CO2, sequestration through enhanced oil recovery in a mature oil field. J Pet Sci Eng 65(3):129–138

Rubin ES, Chen C, Rao AB (2007) Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO₂, capture and storage. Energy Policy 35(9):4444–4454

Russell S, Markusson N, Scott V (2012) What will CCS demonstrations demonstrate? Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 17(6):651–668

Shi X, Sun S (2017) Energy price, regulatory price distortion and economic growth: a case study of China. Energy Econ 63:261–271

Spek MVD, Fernandez ES, Eldrup NH, Skagestad R, Ramirez A, Faaij A (2017) Unravelling uncertainty and variability in early stage techno-economic assessments of carbon capture technologies. Int J Greenh Gas Control 56:221–236

Stigson P, Hansson A, Lind M (2012) Obstacles for CCS deployment: an analysis of discrepancies of perceptions. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 17(6):601–619

Sun YP, Xue JJ, Shi XP, Wang KY, Qi SZ, Wang L, Wang C (2019) A dynamic and continuous allowances allocation methodology for the prevention of carbon leakage: emission control coefficients. Appl Energy 236:220–230

Trigeorgis L (1993) The nature of option interactions and the valuation of investments with multiple real options. J Financ Quant Anal 28(1):1–20

Wei N, Li X, Dahowski RT, Davidson CL, Liu S, Zha Y (2015) Economic evaluation on CO2-EOR of onshore oil fields in China. Int J Greenh Gas Control 37:170–181

Yao X, Zhong P, Zhang X, Zhu L (2018) Business model design for the carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) project in China. Energy Policy 121:519–533

Zhang X, Wang X, Chen J, Xie X, Wang K, Wei Y (2014) A novel modeling based real option approach for CCS investment evaluation under multiple uncertainties. Appl Energy 113:1059–1067

Zhang MM, Zhou P, Zhou DQ (2016) A real options model for renewable energy investment with application to solar photovoltaic power generation in China. Energy Econ 59:213–226

Zhu L (2012) A simulation based real options approach for the investment evaluation of nuclear power. Comput Ind Eng 63(3):585–593

Zhu L, Fan Y (2011) A real options-based CCS investment evaluation model: case study of China’s power generation sector. Appl Energy 88(12):4320–4333

Zhu L, Liu X (2015) Promoting the carbon removal in coal utilization—a benefit-risk analysis among full-chain carbon capture and utilization project. Energy Environ 26(6-7):1035–1054

Zhu L, Zhang ZX, Fan Y (2015) Overseas oil investment projects under uncertainty: how to make informed decisions? J Policy Model 37(5):742–762

Titel: Evaluation of cooperative mitigation: captured carbon dioxide for enhanced oil recovery
verfasst von: Lei Zhu
Xing Yao
Xian Zhang
Publikationsdatum: 04.01.2020
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change / Ausgabe 7/2020
Print ISSN: 1381-2386
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1596
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09906-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2020

Uncovering impact factors of carbon emissions from transportation sector: evidence from China’s Yangtze River Delta Area

Green innovation efficiency across China’s 30 provinces: estimate, comparison, and convergence

Heterogeneity in the relationship between carbon emission performance and urbanization: evidence from China

Carbon emission efficiency of thermal power in different regions of China and spatial correlations

Multi-round auctions in an emissions trading system considering firm bidding strategies and government regulations

Indicator system to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of China clean power systems