Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Evaluation of Existing Fragility Curves

verfasst von : Tiziana Rossetto, Dina D’Ayala, Ioanna Ioannou, Abdelghani Meslem

Erschienen in: SYNER-G: Typology Definition and Fragility Functions for Physical Elements at Seismic Risk

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

There is a wealth of existing fragility curves for buildings and infrastructure. The main challenge in using these curves for future applications is how to identify and, if necessary, combine suitable fragility curves from a pool of curves with different characteristics and, often unknown, reliability. The present chapter aims to address this challenge by developing a procedure which identifies suitable fragility curves by firstly assessing their representativeness to the needs of the future application and then assessing the reliability of the most relevant relationships. The latter is based on a novel procedure which involves the assessment of the most significant factors affecting the robustness and quality for each fragility assessment methodology, also presented here. In addition, a decision-tree approach is adopted in order to combine more than one suitable fragility curves. The proposed selection and combination procedures are illustrated here with a simple case study which appraises the impact of different weighting schemes and highlights the importance of a deep understanding of the existing fragility curves and their limitations.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Modeling and Propagation of Uncertainties
Nächstes Kapitel Epistemic Uncertainty in Fragility Functions for European RC Buildings
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
ALA (2001) Seismic fragility formulations for water systems: Part 1 – Guidelines. American Lifelines Alliance, ASCE-FEMA
Amiri GG, Jalalian M, Amrei SAR (2007) Derivation of vulnerability functions based on observational data for Iran. In: Proceedings of international symposium on innovation and sustainability of structures in civil engineering, Tongji University, China
Anagnos T (1999) Development of an electrical substation equipment performance database for evaluation of equipment fragilities. PG&E/PEER report, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA, USA
Antonio S, Pinho R (2004) Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure. J Earthq Eng 8(5):643–661
Applied Technology Council (1985) ATC-13, Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Redwood City, CA, 492 pp
Applied Technology Council (ATC) (2007) Recommended methodology for quantification of building system performance and response parameters. ATC-63 90% Draft, Redwood City, CA
Applied Technology Council (ATC) (2012) Seismic performance assessment of buildings, vol 1 – Methodology. ATC-58, Redwood City, CA
Argyroudis S, Pitilakis K (2012) Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 35:1–12CrossRef
Aslani H, Miranda E (2004) Component-level and system-level sensitivity study for earthquake loss estimation. In: Proceedings of the thirteenth world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Aspinall W, Cooke RM (1998) Expert judgement and the Montserrat volcano eruption. In: Mosleh A, Bari RA (eds) Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management PSAM4, New York, USA, 13–18 Sept 1998
Baker J (2011) Fitting fragility functions to structural analysis data using maximum likelihood estimation, Working paper –PEER
Baker JW, Cornell CA (2003) Uncertainty specification and propagation for loss estimation using FOSM methods. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering (ICASP9), San Francisco, CA, pp 1–8
Baker JW, Cornell CA (2008) Uncertainty propagation in probabilistic seismic loss estimation. Struct Saf 30(3):236–252CrossRef
Bakhshi A, Karimi K (2006) Method of developing fragility curves a case study for seismic assessment of masonry buildings in Iran. In: 7th international Congress in civil engineering, Tehran, Iran
Basoz NI, Kiremidjian AS, King SA, Law KH (1999) Statistical analysis of bridge damage data from the 1994 Northridge, CA, earthquake. Earthq Spectra 15(1):25–54CrossRef
Bensi M, Der Kiureghian A, Straub D (2011) A Bayesian network methodology for infrastructure seismic risk assessment and decision support, PEER report 2011/2, March 2011
Bhuiyan AR, Alamb MS (2012) Seismic vulnerability assessment of a multi-span continuous highway bridge fitted with shape memory alloy bars and laminated rubber bearings. Earthq Spectra 28(4):1379–1404CrossRef
Bojórquez E, Iervolino I, Reyes-Salazar A, Ruiz SE (2009) Comparing vector-valued intensity measures for fragility analysis of steel frames in the case of narrow-band ground motions. Eng Struct 45:472–480CrossRef
Borzi B, Crowley H, Pinho R (2008) Simplified pushover-based earthquake loss assessment (SP-BELA) method for masonry buildings. Int J Archit Herit 2(4):353–376CrossRef
Braga F, Dolce M, Liberatore D (1982) Southern Italy November 23, 1980 earthquake: a statistical study of damaged buildings and an ensuing review of the M.S.K.-76 scale, Report, Rome, Italy
Clemen RT, Winkler RL (1999) Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis. Risk Anal 19(2):187–203
Coburn AW, Spence RJS (2002) Earthquake protection. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef
Colombi M, Borzi B, Crowley H, Onida M, Meroni F, Pinho R (2008) Deriving vulnerability curves using Italian earthquake damage data. Bull Earthq Eng 6(3):485–504CrossRef
Cooke M (1991) Experts in uncertainty: opinion and subjective probability in science. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Corigliano M, Scandella L, Lai CG, Paolucci R (2011) Seismic analysis of deep tunnels in near fault conditions: a case study in southern Italy. Bull Earthq Eng 9(4):975–995CrossRef
Cornell CA, Krawinkler H (2000) Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. PEER Center News 3(2): Spring
D’Ayala D (2005) Force and displacement based vulnerability assessment for traditional buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 3(3):235–265CrossRef
D’Ayala D (2013) Assessing the seismic vulnerability of masonry buildings. In: Tesfamariam S, Goda K (eds) Handbook of seismic risk analysis and management of civil infrastructure systems. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 334–365CrossRef
D’Ayala D, Meslem A (2013) Guide for Selection of existing analytical fragility curves and compilation of the database. GEM technical report 2013-X, GEM Foundation, Pavia, Italy
D’Ayala D, Jaiswal K, Wald DJ, Porter K, Greene M (2010) Collaborative effort to estimate collapse fragility for buildings worldwide: the WHE-PAGER project. In: Proceedings of the 9th US National and 10th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering structure: reaching beyond borders
Dalkey N (1969) The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion. A report prepared for United States Air Force Project Rand RM-5888-PR, 79 pp
Demircioglu MB, Erdik M, Hancilar U, Sesetyan K, Tuzun C, Yenidogan C, Zulfikar AC (2010) Technical manual– earthquake loss estimation routine ELER-v3.0, Department of Earthquake Engineering Structure, Bogazici University, Istanbul, 133 pp
Ellingwood B (2009) Quantifying and communicating uncertainty in seismic risk assessment. Struct Saf 31(2):179–187CrossRef
Elnashai AS, Borzi B, Vlachos S (2004) Deformation-based vulnerability functions for RC bridges. Struct Eng 17(2):215–244
European Committee of Standardization (CEN) (2005) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings, ENV 1998-3, Brussels, Belgium
Fajfar P (2000) A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthq Spectra 16(3):573–591CrossRef
FEMA (2003) HAZUS-MH technical manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC
FEMA 356 (2000) Pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Report no 356, Federal Emergency Management Agency, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston Virginia, USA
Giovinazzi S, King A (2009) Estimating seismic impacts on lifelines: an international review for RiskScape. In: Proceedings of the 2009 NZSEE conference, Christchurch, New Zealand
Grunthal G (ed) (1998) European macroseismic scale 1998 (EMS-98). Cahier du Centre Europeen de Geodynamique et de Seismologie, vol 15. Luxemburg
Gűlkan P, Sucuoğlu H, Ergűnay O (1992) Earthquake vulnerability, loss and risk assessment in Turkey. In: Proceedings of 11th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Madrid, Spain
Hancilar U, Taucer F, Corbane C (2011) Empirical fragility assessment after the January 12, 2010 Haiti earthquake, risk analysis VIII, B. C.A. WIT Press, Southampton
Hwang H, Liu JB, Chiu Y-H (2001) Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges, MAEC report: project MAEC RR-4. Mid-America Earthquake Center, Urbana-Champaign
Ioannou I, Rossetto T (2013) Sensitivity of empirical fragility assessment of buildings to the misclassification error of damage. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on structural safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR 2013), Columbia University, New York, USA, 16–20 June 2013
Ioannou I, Rossetto T, Damian GN (2012) Use of regression analysis for the construction of empirical fragility curves. In: Proceedings of 15th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Lisbon, Portugal, 24–28 September
Jaiswal K, Wald D, D’Ayala D (2011) Developing empirical collapse fragility functions for global building types. Earthq Spectra 27(3):775–795CrossRef
Jaiswal KS, Aspinall WP, Perkins D, Wald D, Porter KA (2012) Use of expert judgement elicitation to estimate seismic vulnerability of selected building types. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Lisbon, Portugal, 24–28 Sept 2012
Jiang H, Lu H, Chen L (2012) Seismic fragility assessment of RC moment-resisting frames designed according to the current Chinese seismic design code. J Asian Archit Build 11(1):153–160
Kappos AJ, Panagopoulos G (2010) Fragility curves for R/C buildings in Greece. Struct Infrastruct Eng 6(1):39–53CrossRef
Kappos AJ, Panagopoulos G, Penelis G (2006) A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 4(4):391–413CrossRef
Karababa FS, Pomonis A (2010) Damage data analysis and vulnerability estimation following the August 14, 2003 Lefkada Island, Greece, earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 9:1015–1046CrossRef
Kaynia AM (ed) (2013) Guidelines for deriving seismic fragility functions of elements at risk: Buildings, lifelines, transportation networks and critical facilities. SYNER-G reference report 4. JRC scientific and policy report. Joint Research Centre, European Commission, pp 250. doi:10.​2788/​19605
Klügel J-U (2005) On the use of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis as an input for seismic PSA. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on structural mechanics in reactor technology (SMiRT18), Beijing, China, 7–12 Aug 2005. PaperKM02_2
Klügel J-U (2011) Uncertainty analysis and expert judgement in seismic hazard analysis. Pure Appl Geophys 168(1–2):27–53CrossRef
Liel A, Lynch K (2012) Vulnerability of reinforced-concrete-frame buildings and their occupants in the 2009 L’Aquila, Italy, earthquake. Nat Hazard Rev 13(1):11–23CrossRef
Maruyama Y, Yamazaki F, Mizuno K, Tsuchiya Y, Yogai H (2010) Fragility curves for expressway embankments based on damage datasets after recent earthquakes in Japan. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:1158–1167CrossRef
Moehle J, Deierlein G (2004) A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering structure. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Vancouver, BC, Paper No. 679
Molina S, Lang DH, Lindholm CD (2009) User and technical manual, SELENA v4.0, NORSAR, Kjeller, Norway, 85 pp
Morris PA (1977) Combining expert judgements: a Bayesian approach. Manage Sci 23(7):679–693CrossRef
Nielson BG, DesRoches R (2007) Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthq Eng Struct 36(6):823–839CrossRef
O’Rourke MJ, So P (2000) Seismic fragility curves for on-grade steel tanks. Earthq Spectra 16(4):801–815CrossRef
Orsini G (1999) A model for buildings’ vulnerability assessment using the parameterless scale of seismic intensity (PSI). Earthq Spectra 15(3):463–483CrossRef
Ouchi F (2004) A literature review on the use of expert opinion in probabilistic risk analysis. World Bank policy research working paper 3201, February 2004
Pagnini L, Vicente R, Lagomarsimo S, Varum H (2008) A mechanical method for the vulnerability assessment of masonry buildings. In: Proceedings of 14th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Beijing, China
Park YJ, Ang AHS (1985) Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. J Struct Eng 111(4):722–739CrossRef
Rajeev P, Tesfamariam S (2011) Effect of construction quality variability on seismic fragility of reinforced concrete building. In: Proceedings of the ninth pacific conference on earthquake engineering structure building and Earthquake-Resilient Society, Auckland, New Zealand, 14–16 April
Rossetto T (2004) Vulnerability curves for the seismic assessment of reinforced concrete structure populations. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College, London, UK
Rossetto T, Elnashai AS (2003) Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Eng Struct 25:1241–1263CrossRef
Rossetto T, Elnashai AS (2005) A new analytical procedure for the derivation of displacement-based vulnerability curves for populations of RC structures. Eng Struct 27:397–409CrossRef
Rossetto T, Ioannou I, Grant DN (2013a) Existing empirical fragility and vulnerability relationships: compendium and guide for selection. GEM technical report 2013-X, GEM Foundation, Pavia, Italy, April 2013, pp 62
Rossetto T, Ioannou I, Grant DN (2013b) Guidelines for the construction of empirical fragility and vulnerability relationships. GEM technical report 2013-X, GEM Foundation, Pavia, Italy
Rota M, Penna A, Strobbia CL (2008) Processing Italian damage data to derive typological fragility curves. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28(10):933–947CrossRef
Sarabandi P, Pachakis D, King S, Kiremidjian A (2004) Empirical fragility functions from recent earthquakes In: Proceedings of 13th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Vancouver, Canada
Scheibe M, Skutsch M, Schofer J (1975) Experiments in Delphi methodology. In: Linestone H, Turoff M (eds) The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley, London
Scherbaum F, Kuehn NM (2011) Logic tree branch weights and probabilities: summing up to one is not enough. Earthq Spectra 27(4):1237–1251CrossRef
Shahzada K, Gencturk B, Khan AN, Naseer A, Javed M, Fahad M (2011) Vulnerability assessment of typical buildings in Pakistan. Int J Earth Sci Eng 4:208–211
Shinozuka M, Feng MQ, Lee J, Naganuma T (2000) Statistical analysis of fragility curves. J Eng Mech-ASCE 126(12):1459–1467
Singhal A, Kiremidjian AS (1997) A method for earthquake motion damage relationships with application to reinforced concrete frames. State University of New York at Buffalo: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Structure Research Report NCEER-97-0008
Solberg KM, Dhakal RP, Mander JB, Bradley BA (2008) Computational and rapid expected annual loss estimation methodologies for structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37(1):81–101CrossRef
Song J, Kang W (2009) System reliability and sensitivity under statistical dependence by matrix-based system reliability method. Struct Saf 31(2):148–156CrossRef
Spence RJS, Coburn AW, Pomonis A (1992) Correlation of ground motion with building damage: The definition of a new damage-based seismic intensity scale. In: Proceedings of 10th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Balkema, Rotterdam
Stafford PJ (2013) Uncertainties in ground motion prediction in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) of civil infrastructure. In: Tasfamarian S, Goda K (eds) Handbook of seismic risk analysis and management of civil infrastructure systems. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 29–56CrossRef
Syner-G (2011) Fragility functions for common masonry building types in Europe. D3.2, University of Pavia, 177 pp
Uma SR, Ryu H, Luco N, Liel AB, Raghunandan M (2011) Comparison of main-shock and aftershock fragility curves developed for New Zealand and US buildings. In: Proceedings of the ninth pacific conference on earthquake engineering structure building and Earthquake-Resilient Society, Auckland, New Zealand, 14–16 April
Vacareanu R, Chesca AB, Georgescu B, Seki M (2007) Case study on the expected seismic losses of soft and weak ground floor buildings. International symposium on strong vrancea earthquake and risk mitigation, Bucharest, Romania, October
Wen YK, Ellinwood BR, Bracci J (2004) Vulnerability function framework for consequence-based engineering, Mid-America Earthquake Center, CD Release 04-04
Yang TY (2013) Assessing seismic risks for new and existing buildings using performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) methodology. In: Tasfamarian S, Goda K (eds) Handbook of seismic risk analysis and management of civil infrastructure systems. Woodhead Publishing, London, pp 307–333CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation of Existing Fragility Curves
verfasst von
Tiziana Rossetto
Dina D’Ayala
Ioanna Ioannou
Abdelghani Meslem
Copyright-Jahr
2014
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Buch
SYNER-G: Typology Definition and Fragility Functions for Physical Elements at Seismic Risk

Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7871-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-94-007-7872-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2014

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7872-6_3