Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Human Action Recognition Using Trajectory-Based Spatiotemporal Descriptors Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Evaluation of Machine Learning Approaches for Change-Proneness Prediction Using Code Smells

verfasst von : Kamaldeep Kaur, Shilpi Jain

Erschienen in: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Frontiers in Intelligent Computing: Theory and Applications

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the field of technology, software is an essential driver of business and industry. Software undergoes changes due to maintenance activities initiated by bug fixing, improved documentation, and new requirements of users. In software, code smells are indicators of a system which may give maintenance problem in future. This paper evaluates six types of machine learning algorithms to predict change-proneness using code smells as predictors for various versions of four Java-coded applications. Two approaches are used: method 1-random undersampling is done before Feature selection; method 2-feature selection is done prior to random undersampling. This paper concludes that gene expression programming (GEP) gives maximum AUC value, whereas cascade correlation network (CCR), treeboost, and PNN\GRNN algorithms are among top algorithms to predict F-measure, precision, recall, and accuracy. Also, GOD and L_M code smells are good predictors of software change-proneness. Results show that method 1 outperforms method 2.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel A Framework for Dynamic Malware Analysis Based on Behavior Artifacts
Nächstes Kapitel Snort Rule Detection for Countering in Network Attacks
Literatur
1.
Pigoski, T. M.: Practical software maintenance: Best practices for managing your software investment. Wiley Computer Pub., New York (1996)
2.
Khomh, F., Di Penta, M., Gueheneuc, Y. G.: An exploratory study of the impact of code smells on software change-proneness. In: 16th IEEE Working Conf. on Reverse Engineering (WCRE), pp. 75–84(2009)
3.
4.
Fowler, M.: Refactoring: improving the design of existing code. Pearson Education, India (1999)
5.
Chen, C. T., Cheng, Y. C., Hseih, C. Y., WU, I. L.: Exception handling refactorings: Directed by goals and driven by bug fixing. J.Systems and Software, vol. 82(2), pp. 333–345 (2009)
6.
Tsantalis, N., Fokaefs, M., Chatzigeorgiou, A.: JDeodorant: Identification and removal of feature envy bad smells. IEEE Int’l Conf. on Software Maintenance (ICSM), pp. 519–520(2007)
7.
8.
Kreimer, J.: Adaptive detection of design flaws. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 141 (4), pp. 117–13(2005)
9.
Yamashita, A., Counsell, S.: Code smells as system-level indicators of maintainability: An empirical study. J. Systems and Software, vol. 86 (10), pp. 2639–2653 (2013)
10.
Li, W., Shatnawi, R.: An empirical study of the bad smells and class error probability in the post-release object-oriented system evolution. J. Systems and Software, vol. 80(7), pp. 1120–1128 (2007)
11.
Mäntylä, M., Vanhanen, J., Lassenius, C.: A taxonomy and an initial empirical study of bad smells in code. IEEE Int’l Conf. on Software Maintenance (ICSM), pp. 381–384 (2003)
12.
Emden, E., Moonen, L.: Java quality assurance by detecting code smells. In: 9th IEEE Working Conf. on Reverse Engineering, pp. 97–106 (2002)
13.
Rao, A. A., Reddy, K. N.: Detecting bad smells in object oriented design using design change propagation probability matrix. Int’l MultiConf. on Engineers and Computer Scientists. vol. I, pp. 19–21, Hong Kong (2008)
14.
Olbrich, S. M.,Cruze, D. S., Sjøberg,D. IK.: Are all code smells harmful? A study of God Classes and Brain Classes in the evolution of three open source systems. IEEE Int’l. Conf. on Software Maintenance (ICSM),pp. 1–10 (2010)
15.
Ambros, M. D., Bacchelli, A., Lanza,M.: On the impact of design flaws on software defects. In: 10th IEEE Int’l. Conf. on Quality Software (QSIC), pp. 23–31 (2010)
16.
Barstad, V., Goodwin, M., Gjøsæter, T.: Predicting Source Code Quality with Static Analysis and Machine Learning.NorskInformatikkonferanse (NIK) (2014)
17.
Mekruksavanich, S.: Design Flaws Detection in Object-Oriented Software with Analytical Learning Method. Int’l. J. e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, vol. 1(3),p. 210 (2011)
18.
Gao, K., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Napolitano, A.: Combining feature subset selection and data sampling for coping with highly imbalanced software data. Proc. 27th Int’l. Conf.on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (2015)
19.
20.
Hall, M.A.: Correlation-based feature selection for machine learning. PhD Diss. The University of Waikato (1999)
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation of Machine Learning Approaches for Change-Proneness Prediction Using Code Smells
verfasst von
Kamaldeep Kaur
Shilpi Jain
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Frontiers in Intelligent Computing: Theory and Applications

Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3152-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-10-3153-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3153-3_56

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise