Skip to main content

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

7. Evaluation Support System for Open Challenges on Earth Observation Topics

verfasst von : António J. Falcão, Rita A. Ribeiro, Javad Jassbi, Samantha Lavender, Enguerran Boissier, Fabrice Brito

Erschienen in: Real-World Decision Support Systems

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter presents a model-driven evaluation support system (ESS) for open competitions within Earth Observation (EO) topics, which was part of a project financed by ESA (European Space Agency). One objective of the project was to deliver a collaborative platform that, through Data Challenges (i.e. open competitions), could improve the adoption and outreach of new applications and methods to process EO data. A second objective was to develop a common environment (web portal) where the challenges could be developed, deployed and executed; and thirdly, to easily publish results in a visualisation platform providing a user friendly interface for validation, evaluation and transparent peer comparisons. In general, the developed tool is an evaluation support system with four main requirements: support initiators/evaluators to define a general challenge in the EO domain; enable easy interaction with the candidates/contestants to submit their entries; provide criteria ratings and candidate evaluation score; and transparent peer comparison. Further, the ESS should be adaptable to several different topics within the EO domain and robust enough to deal with qualitative and quantitative data. In this work the focus is on the conceptual evaluation model of ESS, which is based on multi-criteria concepts and a data fusion algorithm capable of standardizing all criteria and providing a sophisticated aggregation process to rank the candidates. The proposed ESS model includes a tree representation of the criteria and their relationships, and then a bottom-up hierarchical process to aggregate the results from the leaf nodes to the top final score. To better explain the evaluation model and the bottom-up synthetizing process we used a step-by-step example and then an experimental case.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Calvo, T., Mayor, G., Mesiar, R.: Aggregation Operators: New Trends and Applications, vol. 97. Physica, Heidelberg (2012)MATH Calvo, T., Mayor, G., Mesiar, R.: Aggregation Operators: New Trends and Applications, vol. 97. Physica, Heidelberg (2012)MATH
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang, Y.H., Yeh, C.H., Chang, Y.W.: A new method selection approach for fuzzy group multicriteria decision making. Appl. Soft Comput. 13 (4), 2179–2187 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRef Chang, Y.H., Yeh, C.H., Chang, Y.W.: A new method selection approach for fuzzy group multicriteria decision making. Appl. Soft Comput. 13 (4), 2179–2187 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Danielson, M., Ekenberg, L.: Rank ordering methods for multi-criteria decisions. In: Group Decision and Negotiation. A Process-Oriented View, pp. 128–135. Springer, Berlin (2014) Danielson, M., Ekenberg, L.: Rank ordering methods for multi-criteria decisions. In: Group Decision and Negotiation. A Process-Oriented View, pp. 128–135. Springer, Berlin (2014)
4.
Zurück zum Zitat de Almeida, A.T.: Multicriteria decision model for outsourcing contracts selection based on utility function and electre method. Comput. Oper. Res. 34 (12), 3569–3574 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH de Almeida, A.T.: Multicriteria decision model for outsourcing contracts selection based on utility function and electre method. Comput. Oper. Res. 34 (12), 3569–3574 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Espinilla, M., Lu, J., Ma, J., Martínez, L.: An extended version of the fuzzy multicriteria group decision-making method in evaluation processes. In: Advances on Computational Intelligence, pp. 191–200. Springer, Berlin (2012) Espinilla, M., Lu, J., Ma, J., Martínez, L.: An extended version of the fuzzy multicriteria group decision-making method in evaluation processes. In: Advances on Computational Intelligence, pp. 191–200. Springer, Berlin (2012)
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hobbs, B.F., Chankong, V., Hamadeh, W.: Does choice of multicriteria method matter? An experiment in water resources planning. Water Resour. Res. 28 (7), 1767–1779 (1992)CrossRef Hobbs, B.F., Chankong, V., Hamadeh, W.: Does choice of multicriteria method matter? An experiment in water resources planning. Water Resour. Res. 28 (7), 1767–1779 (1992)CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kou, G., Peng, Y., Lu, C.: MCDM approach to evaluating bank loan default models. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 20 (2), 292–311 (2014)CrossRef Kou, G., Peng, Y., Lu, C.: MCDM approach to evaluating bank loan default models. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 20 (2), 292–311 (2014)CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar, D.N.: Multicriterion Analysis in Engineering and Management. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi (2010) Kumar, D.N.: Multicriterion Analysis in Engineering and Management. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi (2010)
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lavender, S., Brito, F., Aas, C., Casu, F., Ribeiro, R., Farres, J.: E-Collaboration for Earth Observation (E-CEO) with the example of contest# 3 that focuses on the atmospheric correction of ocean colour data. In: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, vol. 16, p. 4503 (2014) Lavender, S., Brito, F., Aas, C., Casu, F., Ribeiro, R., Farres, J.: E-Collaboration for Earth Observation (E-CEO) with the example of contest# 3 that focuses on the atmospheric correction of ocean colour data. In: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, vol. 16, p. 4503 (2014)
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Linkov, I., Satterstrom, F., Kiker, G., Batchelor, C., Bridges, T., Ferguson, E.: From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications. Environ. Int. 32 (8), 1072–1093 (2006)CrossRef Linkov, I., Satterstrom, F., Kiker, G., Batchelor, C., Bridges, T., Ferguson, E.: From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications. Environ. Int. 32 (8), 1072–1093 (2006)CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pereira, R.A.M., Ribeiro, R.A.: Aggregation with generalized mixture operators using weighting functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 137 (1), 43–58 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Pereira, R.A.M., Ribeiro, R.A.: Aggregation with generalized mixture operators using weighting functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 137 (1), 43–58 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ribeiro, R.A.: Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: a review and new preference elicitation techniques. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 78 (2), 155–181 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Ribeiro, R.A.: Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: a review and new preference elicitation techniques. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 78 (2), 155–181 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ribeiro, R.A., Pereira, R.A.M.: Generalized mixture operators using weighting functions: a comparative study with WA and OWA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 145 (2), 329–342 (2003)CrossRefMATH Ribeiro, R.A., Pereira, R.A.M.: Generalized mixture operators using weighting functions: a comparative study with WA and OWA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 145 (2), 329–342 (2003)CrossRefMATH
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ribeiro, R.A., Moreira, A.M., Van den Broek, P., Pimentel, A.: Hybrid assessment method for software engineering decisions. Decis. Support. Syst. 51 (1), 208–219 (2011)CrossRef Ribeiro, R.A., Moreira, A.M., Van den Broek, P., Pimentel, A.: Hybrid assessment method for software engineering decisions. Decis. Support. Syst. 51 (1), 208–219 (2011)CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ribeiro, R.A., Falcão, A., Mora, A., Fonseca, J.M.: FIF: a fuzzy information fusion algorithm based on multi-criteria decision making. Knowl.-Based Syst. 58, 23–32 (2014)CrossRef Ribeiro, R.A., Falcão, A., Mora, A., Fonseca, J.M.: FIF: a fuzzy information fusion algorithm based on multi-criteria decision making. Knowl.-Based Syst. 58, 23–32 (2014)CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ross, T.J.: Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications. Wiley, New York (2009) Ross, T.J.: Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications. Wiley, New York (2009)
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Triantaphyllou, E.: Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study, vol. 44. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin (2013)MATH Triantaphyllou, E.: Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study, vol. 44. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin (2013)MATH
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Turban, E., Aronson, J., Liang, T.P.: Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems, 7th edn. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2005) Turban, E., Aronson, J., Liang, T.P.: Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems, 7th edn. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2005)
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tzeng, G.H., Huang, J.J.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. CRC, Boca Raton, FL (2011)MATH Tzeng, G.H., Huang, J.J.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. CRC, Boca Raton, FL (2011)MATH
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon, K.P., Hwang, C.L.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction, vol. 104. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (1995)CrossRef Yoon, K.P., Hwang, C.L.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction, vol. 104. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (1995)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation Support System for Open Challenges on Earth Observation Topics
verfasst von
António J. Falcão
Rita A. Ribeiro
Javad Jassbi
Samantha Lavender
Enguerran Boissier
Fabrice Brito
Copyright-Jahr
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43916-7_7

Premium Partner