Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Education and Information Technologies
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies 4/2017

05.07.2016

Expectations and fulfillment of course engagement, gained skills, and non-academic usage of college students utilizing tablets in an undergraduate skills course

verfasst von: Stephanie A. Bluestein, Taehyun Kim

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to compare the expectations and fulfillment of undergraduate students enrolled in a skills class that utilized iPads in the classroom. Pre- and post-surveys were administered to students at the beginning and end of the semester. A series of t-tests (n = 78) showed the tablet did not meet their expectations in terms of course engagement and benefits/skills they anticipated receiving from class activities and coursework. However, their non-academic use of the iPad, for both entertainment and social media purposes, was higher than they predicted. The qualitative portion of the study resulted in three themes: acceptance of tablet technology, student excitement and engagement, and how teacher preparation and proficiency with the technology affects classroom usage. This study suggests a need for teacher training in application selection and ample in-class device usage.
Vorheriger Artikel Ontological modeling of educational resources: a proposed implementation for Greek schools
Nächster Artikel Processes of practice and identity shaping teachers’ TPACK enactment in a community of practice

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Armstrong, D. A. (2011). Students’ perceptions of online learning and instructional tools: a qualitative study of undergraduate students use of online tools. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 10(3), 222–226.
Chan-Olmsted, S., Rim, H., & Zerba, A. (2013). Mobile news adoption among young adults: examining the roles of perceptions, news consumption, and media usage. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(1), 126–147.CrossRef
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7.
Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. D., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.CrossRef
de Winter, J., Winterbottom, M., & Wilson, E. (2010). Developing a user guide to integrating new technologies in science teaching and learning: teachers’ and pupils’ perceptions of their affordances. Technology, Pedagogy & Education, 19(2), 261–267. doi:10.​1080/​1475939x.​2010.​491237.CrossRef
Efaw, J., Hampton, S., Martinez, S., & Smith, S. (2004). Miracle or menace: teaching and learning with laptop computers in the classroom. Educause Quarterly, 27(3), 10–19.
Fischer, N., Smolnik, S., & Galletta, D. (2013). Examining the potential for tablet use in a higher education context. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Feb. 21-march 1, Leipzig, Germany (pp. 9–22).
Grinols, A.B. & Rajesh, R. (2014). Multitasking with smartphones in the college classroom. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 77, 89–95.
Kothaneth, S., Robinson, A., & Amelink, C. (2012). Tablet pc support of students’ learning styles. Journal of Systemics, 10(6), 60–63.
Ludwig, L., Mayrberger, K., & Weidmann, A. (2011). Einsatz personalisierter iPads im Unterricht aus Perspektive der Schülerinnen und Schüler. In S. Friedrich, A. Kienle, & H. Rohland (Eds.), DeLFI 2011: Die 9. eLearning Fachtangung Informarik (pp. 7–17). Dreseden: TUDpress.
Meierdiercks, K. (2005). The dark side of the laptop university. Journal of Information Ethics, 14(1), 9–11.CrossRef
Melhuish, K. & Falloon, G. (2010). Looking to the future: M-learning with the iPad. Computers in New Zealand Schools: Learning, Leading, Technology, 22(3).
Miller, W. (2012). Iteaching and learning: collegiate instruction incorporating mobile tablets. Library Technology Reports, 48(8), 54.
Pearson Student Mobile Device Survey (2014). National report: college students. Rochester, NY: Harris Poll.
Pereira, F., Ramos, A., Gouvea, M., & da Costa, M. (2015). Satisfaction and continuous use intention of e-learning service in brazilian public organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 139–148.CrossRef
Porter, C., & Donthu, N. (2006). Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine internet usage: the role of perceived access barriers and demographics. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 999–1007.CrossRef
Price, F., & Kadi-Hanifi (2010). E-motivation! The role of popular technology in student motivation and retention. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 16(2), 73–87.
Rikala, J., Vesisenaho, M., & Mylläri, J. (2013). Actual and potential pedagogical use of tablets in schools. Human Technology, 9(2), 113–131.CrossRef
Rossing, J. P., Miller, W. M., Cecil, A. K., & Stamper, S. E. (2012). iLearning: the future of higher education? Student perceptions on learning with mobile tablets. Journal Of The Scholarship Of Teaching & Learning, 12(2), 1–26.
Shuler, P., Hutchins, G., & LaShell, B. (2010). Student perceptions of tablet computers in a cooperative learning environment. NACTA Journal, 54(2), 11–17.
Skiba, D. J. (2011). On the horizon mobile devices: ae they a distraction or another learning tool? Nursing Ecuation Perspectives, 32, 195–197.CrossRef
Sullivan, R. (2013). Writing instruction with the iPad. College Teaching, 61(1), 1–2.CrossRef
Tan, P. (2015). English e-learning in the virtual classroom and the factors that influence esl (english as a second language): Taiwanese citizens’ acceptance and use of the modular object-oriented dynamic learning environment. Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales, 54(2), 211–228.CrossRef
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3).
Vesisenaho, M., & Dillon, P. (2013). Localizing and contextualizing information and communication technology in education: a cultural ecological framework. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21(2), 239–259.CrossRef
Young, J. R. (2006). The fight for classroom attention: professor vs. laptop. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(39), A27–A29.
Metadaten
Titel
Expectations and fulfillment of course engagement, gained skills, and non-academic usage of college students utilizing tablets in an undergraduate skills course
verfasst von
Stephanie A. Bluestein
Taehyun Kim
Publikationsdatum
05.07.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9515-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Education and Information Technologies 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Learning density in Vanuatu high school with computer simulation: Influence of different levels of guidance

OriginalPaper

Obstacles for teachers to integrate technology with instruction

OriginalPaper

Co-regulation and knowledge construction in an online synchronous problem based learning setting

OriginalPaper

It is time to MOOC and SPOC in the Gulf Region

OriginalPaper

EDRMS for academic records management: A design study in a Malaysian university

OriginalPaper

Personalized recommender system for e-Learning environment