nach oben

Neural Computing and Applications

Erschienen in:

14.05.2020 | Original Article

Extension of labeled multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy neighborhood three-way decision

verfasst von: Mingliang Suo, Yujie Cheng, Chunqing Zhuang, Yu Ding, Chen Lu, Laifa Tao

Erschienen in: Neural Computing and Applications | Ausgabe 23/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Weight assignment of attribute is considered as a key part of multiple attribute decision making (MADM), and this is also applicable to labeled multiple attribute decision making (LMADM) that is a decision theory specially proposed for the dataset with labels. However, regarding the decision making of massive data characterized by redundancy and uncertainty, more means including attribute selection and uncertainty processing should be considered to solve these problems. Based on the traditional framework of LMADM, this paper deduces a new framework to adapt to the decision making of massive data. With respect to the uncertainty generated from data and decision process, a fuzzy neighborhood three-way decision model (FN3WD) is proposed, in which the fuzzy neighborhood relationship can address the uncertainty of data and the three-way decision theory can deal with the uncertainty of decision process. Finally, the experimental results illustrate the superiority of FN3WD and verify the effectiveness of the proposed framework of the extended LMADM by using some benchmarked datasets and the Commercial Modular Aero-Propulsion System Simulation dataset.

Vorheriger Artikel A novel hybrid multi-verse optimizer with K-means for text documents clustering

Nächster Artikel Online Bayesian shrinkage regression

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Usually, the decision attribute set contains only one attribute, and our work is based on the case of single decision attribute. In addition, the decision attribute is usually denoted by label in some cases.

http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets.html.

https://sci2s.ugr.es/keel/datasets.php.

http://weka.wikispaces.com, v3.6.13.

http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Iris.

Agbodah K (2019) The determination of three-way decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets considering the loss function evaluated by multiple experts. Granul Comput 4(2):285–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-018-0099-0CrossRef

Das S, Guha D (2019) Attribute weight computation in a decision making problem by particle swarm optimization. Neural Comput Appl 31(7):2495–2505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3209-zCrossRef

Deepa N, Ganesan K (2019) Decision-making tool for crop selection for agriculture development. Neural Comput Appl 31(4):1215–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3154-xCrossRef

Deepa N, Ganesan K, Sethuramasamyraja B (2018) Predictive mathematical model for solving multi-criteria decision-making problems. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3505-2CrossRef

Diakoulaki D, Mavrotas G, Papayannakis L (1995) Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the critic method. Comput Oper Res 22(7):763–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-HCrossRefMATH

Dong Y, Liu Y, Liang H, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) Strategic weight manipulation in multiple attribute decision making. Omega 75:154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.02.008CrossRef

Fisher RA (1936) The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugen 7(2):179–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02137.xCrossRef

IT J (1986) Principle component analysis. Springer, New York

Jia X, Liao W, Tang Z, Shang L (2013) Minimum cost attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set models. Inf Sci 219(10):151–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.07.010MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

10.

Jiang F, Sui Y (2015) A novel approach for discretization of continuous attributes in rough set theory. Knowl Based Syst 73:324–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.10.014CrossRef

11.

Khelif R, Chebel-Morello B, Malinowski S, Laajili E, Fnaiech F, Zerhouni N (2017) Direct remaining useful life estimation based on support vector regression. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 64(3):2276–2285. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2016.2623260CrossRef

12.

Lang G, Miao D, Cai M (2017) Three-way decision approaches to conflict analysis using decision-theoretic rough set theory. Inf Sci 406–407:185–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.04.030CrossRefMATH

13.

Li W, Huang Z, Jia X, Cai X (2016) Neighborhood based decision-theoretic rough set models. Int J Approx Reason 69:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2015.11.005MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

14.

Liang D, Pedrycz W, Liu D, Hu P (2015) Three-way decisions based on decision-theoretic rough sets under linguistic assessment with the aid of group decision making. Appl Soft Comput 29:256–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.01.008CrossRef

15.

Liang D, Liu D, Kobina A (2016) Three-way group decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets. Inf Sci 345:46–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.01.065CrossRef

16.

Liu P, Chen S, Wang P (2018) Multiple-attribute group decision-making based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy power maclaurin symmetric mean operators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2018.2852948CrossRef

17.

Mishra AR, Rani P (2019) Shapley divergence measures with vikor method for multi-attribute decision-making problems. Neural Comput Appl 31(S1):1299–1316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3101-xCrossRef

18.

Mumtaz R, Baig S, Kazmi SSA, Ahmad F, Fatima I, Ghauri B (2018) Delineation of groundwater prospective resources by exploiting geo-spatial decision-making techniques for the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3370-zCrossRef

19.

Şahin R (2018) Normal neutrosophic multiple attribute decision making based on generalized prioritized aggregation operators. Neural Comput Appl 30(10):3095–3115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2896-9CrossRef

20.

Saxena A, Goebel K, Simon D, Eklund N (2008) Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation. In: 2008 International conference on prognostics and health management, pp 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/PHM.2008.4711414

21.

Song J, Tsang ECC, Chen D, Yang X (2017) Minimal decision cost reduct in fuzzy decision-theoretic rough set model. Knowl Based Syst 126:104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.03.013CrossRef

22.

Suo M, Zhu B, Zhang Y, An R, Li S (2018) Fuzzy bayes risk based on mahalanobis distance and gaussian kernel for weight assignment in labeled multiple attribute decision making. Knowl Based Syst 152:26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.04.002CrossRef

23.

Suo M, Zhang Z, Chen Y, An R, Li S (2019a) Knowledge acquisition and decision making based on bayes risk minimization method. Appl Intell 49(2):804–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-1272-5CrossRef

24.

Suo M, Zhu B, An R, Sun H, Xu S, Yu Z (2019b) Data-driven fault diagnosis of satellite power system using fuzzy bayes risk and svm. Aerosp Sci Technol 84:1092–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.11.049CrossRef

25.

Suo M, Zhu B, Zhou D, An R, Li S (2019c) Neighborhood grid clustering and its application in fault diagnosis of satellite power system. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 233(4):1270–1283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410017751991CrossRef

26.

van Valkenhoef G, Tervonen T (2016) Entropy-optimal weight constraint elicitation with additive multi-attribute utility models. Omega 64:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.10.014CrossRef

27.

Wang C, Shao M, He Q, Qian Y, Qi Y (2016) Feature subset selection based on fuzzy neighborhood rough sets. Knowl Based Syst 111:173–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2016.08.009CrossRef

28.

Wang C, Qi Y, Shao M, Hu Q, Chen D, Qian Y, Lin Y (2017) A fitting model for feature selection with fuzzy rough sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 25(4):741–753. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2574918CrossRef

29.

Wang C, Huang Y, Shao M, Fan X (2019) Fuzzy rough set-based attribute reduction using distance measures. Knowl Based Syst 164:205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.10.038CrossRef

30.

Wang YM, Luo Y (2010) Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Math Comput Model 51(1–2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2009.07.016MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

31.

Xu Y, Zhang W, Wang H (2015) A conflict-eliminating approach for emergency group decision of unconventional incidents. Knowl Based Syst 83:92–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.03.013CrossRef

32.

Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18(1):183–190. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.87068CrossRefMATH

33.

Yang G, Yang J, Xu D, Khoveyni M (2017) A three-stage hybrid approach for weight assignment in madm. Omega 71:93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.09.011CrossRef

34.

Yao Y (2004) A partition model of granular computing. In: LNCS transactions on rough sets, Springer, Berlin, pp 232–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27794-1_11

35.

Yao Y (2010) Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets. Inf Sci 180(3):341–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2009.09.021MathSciNetCrossRef

36.

Yao Y (2012) An outline of a theory of three-way decisions. In: Rough sets and current trends in computing, Springer, Berlin, pp 1–17

37.

Yao Y, Wong S (1992) A decision theoretic framework for approximating concepts. Int J Man Mach Stud 37(6):793–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7373(92)90069-WCrossRef

38.

Ye J (2018) Generalized dice measures for multiple attribute decision making under intuitionistic and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environments. Neural Comput Appl 30(12):3623–3632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2947-2CrossRef

39.

Yu G, Fei W, Li D (2019) A compromise-typed variable weight decision method for hybrid multiattribute decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27(5):861–872. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2880705CrossRef

40.

Zadeh L (1971) Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings. Inf Sci 3(2):177–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-0255(71)80005-1MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

41.

Zhang Q, Xia D, Liu K, Wang G (2018) A general model of decision-theoretic three-way approximations of fuzzy sets based on a heuristic algorithm. Inf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.10.051CrossRef

42.

Zhang Z (2018) Trapezoidal interval type-2 fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Neural Comput App 29(4):1039–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2488-0CrossRef

43.

Zhao X, Hu B (2018) Three-way decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets in multiset-valued information tables. Inf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.08.024CrossRef

44.

Zhou H, Huang J, Lu F (2017) Reduced kernel recursive least squares algorithm for aero-engine degradation prediction. Mech Syst Signal Process 95:446–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.03.046CrossRef

Titel: Extension of labeled multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy neighborhood three-way decision
verfasst von: Mingliang Suo
Yujie Cheng
Chunqing Zhuang
Yu Ding
Chen Lu
Laifa Tao
Publikationsdatum: 14.05.2020
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: Neural Computing and Applications / Ausgabe 23/2020
Print ISSN: 0941-0643
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3058
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04946-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 23/2020

Similarity-aware neural machine translation: reducing human translator efforts by leveraging high-potential sentences with translation memory

Robust mixed-norm constrained regression with application to face recognitions

A systematic mapping study on solving university timetabling problems using meta-heuristic algorithms

An online self-organizing algorithm for feedforward neural network

Privacy preserving distributed training of neural networks

Critical infrastructure protection based on memory-augmented meta-learning framework