Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Cluster Computing
Erschienen in: Cluster Computing 1/2016

01.03.2016

Factors affecting the continuous use of cloud service: focused on security risks

verfasst von: Seong-Taek Park, Eun-Mi Park, Joung-Hae Seo, Guozhong Li

Erschienen in: Cluster Computing | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Despite its many technology maturity and significant advantages, the cloud services are still far from success in the market. In accordance with some research, security risks have been regarded as the main factors that impede activating cloud service. Accordingly, this study divides the factors of security risk into Information leakage risk, Fault recovery risk, Compliance risk, Service interruption risk and made an empirical analysis of the impact of these four factors on continuous adoption intention. The effects of security risk and adoption intention of cloud service were analyzed via the moderation effects of trust. The analytical results of China data show that bo th Information Leakage Risk and Compliance Risk have negative impact on continuous adoption intention of cloud service. Neither Fault Recovery Risk nor Service Interruption Risk is significantly related with continuous adoption intention of cloud service. The analytical results of Korea data show that Fault Recovery Risk, Compliance Risk and Service Interruption Risk significantly impact continuous adoption intention of cloud service, whereas Information Leakage Risk insignificantly impact continuous adoption intention of the cloud service.
Vorheriger Artikel High-dimentional data authentication protocol based on hash chain for Hadoop systems
Nächster Artikel Proposing and verifying a security protocol for hash function-based IoT communication system

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Cho, L.G., Park, M.C.: Technological-level evaluation using patent statistics: model and application in mobile communications. Clust. Comput. 18, 259–268 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRef
2.
Jarschel, M., Schlosser, D., Scheuring, S.: Gaming in the clouds: QoE and the users perspective. Math. Comput. Model. 57, 2883–2894 (2013)CrossRef
3.
Casas, P., Schatz, R.: Quality of experience in cloud services: survey and measurements. Comput. Netw. 68(1), 149–165 (2014)CrossRef
4.
Yang, K., Jia, X.: Data storage auditing service in cloud computing: challenges, methods and opportunities. World Wide Web. 15(4), 409–428 (2012)CrossRef
5.
6.
7.
Khajeh-Hosseini, A., Sommerville, I., Bogaerts, J., Teregowda, P.: Decision support tools for cloud migration in the enterprise. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing, pp. 541–548. IEEE (2011)
8.
9.
Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A.D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D., Rabkin, A., Stoica, I., Zaharia, M.: A view of cloud computing. Commun. ACM. 53(4), 50–58 (2010)CrossRef
10.
11.
Rafique, K., Tareen, A.W., Saeed, M., Wu, J.Z., Qureshi, S.S.: Cloud computing economics opportunities and challenges. In: 4th IEEE International Conference on Broadband Network and Multimedia Technology. Shenzhen, 28–30, pp. 401-406 (2011) http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1109/​ICBNMT.​2011.​6155965 (2011) Accessed 25 August 2015
12.
Goodburn, M.A., Hill, S.: The cloud transforms business. Financ. Exec. 26(10), 34–39 (2010)
13.
Harris, J., Grandgenett, N., Hofer, M.: Testing a TPACK-based technology integration assessment rubric. In: Maddux, C.D. (ed.) Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2010, pp. 323–331. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education (SITE), Chesapeake (2010)
14.
Jasti, H., Hanusa, B.H., Switzer, G.E., Granieri, R., Elnicki, M.: Residents’ perceptions of a night float system. BMC Med. Educ. 2009 9(52) doi:10.​1186/​1472-6920-9-52 (2009). Accessed 25 August (2015)
15.
Mladenow, A., Fuchs, E., Dohmen, P., Strauss, C.: Value creation using clouds: analysis of value drivers for start-ups and small and medium sized enterprises in the textile industry. In: 26th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops 2012, pp. 1215–1220. IEEE (2012)
16.
17.
Kang, A.N., Barolli, L., Park, J.H., Jeong, Y.S.: A strengthening plan for enterprise information security based on cloud computing. Clust. Comput. 17, 703–710 (2014)CrossRef
18.
19.
Haghighat, M., Zonouz, S., Abdel-Mottaleb, M.: CloudID: trustworthy cloud-based and cross-enterprise biometric identification. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(21), 7905–7916 (2015)CrossRef
20.
Hamadaqa, M., Tahvildari, L.: Cloud computing uncovered: a research landscape. In: Ali, H., Atif, M. (eds.) Advances in Computers, vol.86, pp. 41–85 (2012)
21.
Hussain, M., Abdulsalam, H.M.: Software quality in the clouds: a cloud-based solution. Clust. Comput. 17, 389–402 (2014)CrossRef
22.
23.
Ratansingham, P., Kumer, K.: Trading partner trust in electronic commerce participation. In: Proceeding of the 22nd International Conference on Information systems, pp. 544–552 (2000)
24.
Kim, K.K., Lee, J.W., Kim, H.S.: Impact of trust and risk on internet banking adoption. Korean Manag. Rev. 32(6), 1771–1797 (2003)
25.
Jarvenpaa, S.L., Knoll, K., Leidner, D.E.: Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 14(4), 29–64 (1998)CrossRef
26.
Lim, N.: Consumer’s Perceived Risk: Sources versus Consequences. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2(3), 216–228 (2003)CrossRef
27.
Ahn, J.H., Choi, K.C., Sung, K.M., Lee, J.H.: A study on the impact of security risk on the usage of knowledge management system: focus on parameter of trust. In: International Conference on Information systems, vol.15
28.
Hexin, Y., Ahn, J.C.: An empirical analysis on the persistent usage of personal cloud service: a cast study of China. Proc. Korean Soc. Internet Inf. Conf. 15(2), 149–150 (2014)
29.
Jun, C.J., Lee, J.H., Jeon, I.S.: Research about factor affecting the continuous use of cloud storage service: user factor, system factor, psychological switching cost factor. J. Soc. e-Bus. Stud. 19(1), 15–42 (2014)CrossRef
30.
Seo, K.K.: Factor analysis of the cloud service adoption intension of Korean firms: applying the TAM and VAM. J. Digit Policy Manag. 11(12), 155–160 (2013)
31.
Park, C.S.: Study on security considerations in the cloud computing. J Korea Acad.-Ind. Co-op. Soc. 12(3), 1408–1416 (2011)
32.
Siani, P., Azzedine, B.: Privacy, security and trust issues arising from cloud computing. In: 2nd IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science, pp. 693–702 (2010)
33.
Heiser, J., Nicolett, M.: Assessing the Security Risks of Cloud Computing. Gartner (2008)
34.
Almond, C.: A Practical Guide to Cloud Computing Security What You Need to Know Now About Your Business and Cloud Security, pp. 6–27. Avanade Inc. (2009)
35.
Zissis, D., Lekkas, D.: Addressing cloud computing security issues. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 28(3), 583–592 (2012)CrossRef
36.
Foster, T., Zhao, Y., Lu, S.: Cloud computing resource management through a grid middleware: a case study with diet and eucalyptus. Cloud computing. In: IEEE International Conference, pp. 151–154 (2009). Accessed 25 August (2015)
37.
38.
Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D.: An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20(3), 709–734 (1995)
39.
Liu, C., Marchewka, J.T., Lu, J., Yu, C.S.: Beyond concern—a privacy-trust-behavioral intention model of electronic commerce. Inf. Manag. 42, 289–304 (2005)CrossRef
40.
Eastlick, M.A., Lotz, S.L., Warrington, P.: Understanding online B-to-C relationships: an integrated model of privacy concerns, trust, and commitment. J. Bus. Res. 59, 877–886 (2006)CrossRef
41.
Liao, C., Liu, C.C., Chen, K.: Examining the impact of privacy, trust and risk perceptions beyond monetary transactions: an integrated model. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 10, 702–715 (2011)CrossRef
42.
Rho, M.J., Kim, H.S., Chung, K.Y., Choi, I.Y.: Factors influencing the acceptance of telemedicine for diabetes management. Clust. Comput. 18, 321–331 (2015)CrossRef
43.
Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Org. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50, 179–211 (1991)CrossRef
44.
Barnes, S., Bohringer, M.: Modeling user continuance behavior in microblogging services: the case of Twitter. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 51(4), 1–10 (2011)
45.
Burtescu, E.: Reliability and security—convergence or divergence. Inf. Econ. 14(4), 68–77 (2010)
46.
Weber, R.: Ontological Foundations of Information Systems. Buscombe Vicprint, Blackburn, Victoria (1997)
47.
Rotter, J.B.: A new scale for measurement of interpersonal trust. J. Personal. 35(4), 651–665 (1967)CrossRef
48.
Wiliamson, M.: Invaders, weeds and the risk from genetically modified organisms. Experientia 49, 219–224 (1993)CrossRef
49.
Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R., Camerer, C.: Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(3), 393–404 (1998)CrossRef
50.
Pavlou, P.A.: Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 7(3), 101–134 (2003)
51.
Grazioli, S., Jarvenpaa, S.: Perils of Internet fraud: an empirical investigation of deception and trust with experienced Internet consumers. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 30(4), 395–410 (2000)
52.
John, W.R., James, F.R.: Cloud Computing: Implementation, Management and Security. CRC Press (2010)
53.
54.
Davis, F.D.: Perceived Usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRef
55.
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 45(2), 186–204 (2000)CrossRef
56.
57.
Hulland, J.: Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strateg. Manag. J. 20(2), 195–204 (1999)CrossRef
58.
Fornell, C., Cha, J.: Partial least squares. In: Bagozzi, R.P. (ed.) Advanced Methods in Marketing Research, pp. 52–78. Blackwell, Cambridge (1994)
59.
Fornell, C., Larcker, D.: Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18(1), 39–50 (1981)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Factors affecting the continuous use of cloud service: focused on security risks
verfasst von
Seong-Taek Park
Eun-Mi Park
Joung-Hae Seo
Guozhong Li
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Cluster Computing / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1386-7857
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7543
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-015-0516-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Cluster Computing 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Demographic variables and risk factors in computer-crime: an empirical assessment

OriginalPaper

An energy-efficient load balancing scheme to extend lifetime in wireless sensor networks

OriginalPaper

Face recognition from a single image per person using deep architecture neural networks

OriginalPaper

A decentralized fault tolerance model based on level of performance for grid environment

OriginalPaper

Monte Carlo simulations of settlement dynamics in GPUs

OriginalPaper

Consistency maintenance of Do and Undo/Redo operations in real-time collaborative bitmap editing systems

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise