Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Water Resources Management 10/2012

01.08.2012

Factors Driving Water Utility Rate Structure Choice: Evidence from Four Southern U.S. States

verfasst von: Christopher N. Boyer, Damian C. Adams, Tatiana Borisova, Christopher D. Clark

Erschienen in: Water Resources Management | Ausgabe 10/2012

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Water utilities typically set residential water prices using one of three rate structures: increasing block rate (IBR), uniform rate (UR), or decreasing block rate (DBR). Historically, DBR has been the most widely used residential rate structure, but water utilities are increasingly switching to a UR or IBR structure. The literature suggests several possible motivations for rate structure decisions, but provides little empirical evidence to support these suggestions and largely ignores the role of water managers’ attitudes and perceptions in the rate structure decision. The objective of this study is to statistically assess factors that drive rate structure changes, specifically toward UR or IBR, in the southern US. We designed and implemented a survey of water utility managers in Arkansas, Florida, Oklahoma, and Tennessee, including rural to urban water utilities. Survey questions were selected based on water utility manager input and literature review and included rate structure changes, system characteristics, and attitudes and perceptions about factors likely to influence rate structure changes. The rate structure adoption decision is modeled using both multinomial logit and Heckman probit specifications. Our results suggest that different factors drive the adoption of UR and IBR, including fair prices for end-users, qualifying for government grants/loans, revenue concerns, treatment cost increases, and infrastructure investment needs.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Agthe DE, Billings RB (1987) Equity, price elasticity, and household income under increasing block rates for water. Am J Econ Sociol 46(5):273–286CrossRef Agthe DE, Billings RB (1987) Equity, price elasticity, and household income under increasing block rates for water. Am J Econ Sociol 46(5):273–286CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arbués F, Garcia-Valinas MA, Martinez-Espineria R (2003) Estimation of residential water demand: a state-of-the-art review. J Socio-Econ 32(1):81–102CrossRef Arbués F, Garcia-Valinas MA, Martinez-Espineria R (2003) Estimation of residential water demand: a state-of-the-art review. J Socio-Econ 32(1):81–102CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Marketing Res 43:427–439 Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Marketing Res 43:427–439
Zurück zum Zitat Barberán R, Arbués F (2009) Equity in domestic water rates design. Water Resour Manage 23:2101–2118CrossRef Barberán R, Arbués F (2009) Equity in domestic water rates design. Water Resour Manage 23:2101–2118CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Billings R, Agthe DE (1980) Price elasticities for water: a case of increasing block rates. Land Econ 56(1):73–84CrossRef Billings R, Agthe DE (1980) Price elasticities for water: a case of increasing block rates. Land Econ 56(1):73–84CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boland JJ, Whittington D (2000) The political economy of water tariff design in developing countries: Increasing block tariffs versus uniform price with rebates. In: Dinar A (ed) The political economy of water pricing reforms. Oxford University Press, New York Boland JJ, Whittington D (2000) The political economy of water tariff design in developing countries: Increasing block tariffs versus uniform price with rebates. In: Dinar A (ed) The political economy of water pricing reforms. Oxford University Press, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Brookshire DS, Burness HS, Chermak JM, Krause K (2002) Western urban water demand. Nat Resour J 2(4):873–898 Brookshire DS, Burness HS, Chermak JM, Krause K (2002) Western urban water demand. Nat Resour J 2(4):873–898
Zurück zum Zitat Dalhuisen JM, Florax RJGM, de Groot HLF, Nijkamp P (2003) Price and income elasticities of residential water demand: a meta-analysis. Land Econ 79(2):292–308CrossRef Dalhuisen JM, Florax RJGM, de Groot HLF, Nijkamp P (2003) Price and income elasticities of residential water demand: a meta-analysis. Land Econ 79(2):292–308CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dickinson MA, Maddaus LA, Madduas WO (2003) Benefits of United States nationwide plumbing efficiency standards. Water Sci Technol Water Suppl 3(3):231–237 Dickinson MA, Maddaus LA, Madduas WO (2003) Benefits of United States nationwide plumbing efficiency standards. Water Sci Technol Water Suppl 3(3):231–237
Zurück zum Zitat Dillman DA, Smith J, Christian L (2008) Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the taylor design method, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York Dillman DA, Smith J, Christian L (2008) Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the taylor design method, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Espey M, Espey J, Shaw WD (1997) Price elasticity of residential demand for water: a meta-analysis. Water Resour Res 33(6):1369–1374CrossRef Espey M, Espey J, Shaw WD (1997) Price elasticity of residential demand for water: a meta-analysis. Water Resour Res 33(6):1369–1374CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greene WH (2008) Econometric analysis, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River Greene WH (2008) Econometric analysis, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Zurück zum Zitat Griffin RC (2001) Effective water pricing. J Am Water Resour Association 37(5):1335–1347CrossRef Griffin RC (2001) Effective water pricing. J Am Water Resour Association 37(5):1335–1347CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Griffin RC (2006) Water resource economics: the analysis of scarcity, policies, and projects. The MIT Press, Cambridge Griffin RC (2006) Water resource economics: the analysis of scarcity, policies, and projects. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Zurück zum Zitat Hewitt JA, Hanemann WM (1995) A discrete/continuous choice approach to residential water demand under block rate pricing. Land Econ 71:173–192CrossRef Hewitt JA, Hanemann WM (1995) A discrete/continuous choice approach to residential water demand under block rate pricing. Land Econ 71:173–192CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kenney DS, Goemans C, Klein RA, Lowery J, Reidy K (2008) Residential water demand management: lessons from Aurora, Colorado. J Am Water Resour Assoc 44(1):192–207CrossRef Kenney DS, Goemans C, Klein RA, Lowery J, Reidy K (2008) Residential water demand management: lessons from Aurora, Colorado. J Am Water Resour Assoc 44(1):192–207CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Montginoul M (2007) Analyzing the diversity of water pricing structures: the case of France. Water Resour Manage 21:861–871CrossRef Montginoul M (2007) Analyzing the diversity of water pricing structures: the case of France. Water Resour Manage 21:861–871CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McNulty SC, Sun G, Cohen EC, Moore Myers JA (2008) Change in the Southern U.S. water demand and supply over the next forty years. Wetl Water Resour Modeling Assess 43–57 McNulty SC, Sun G, Cohen EC, Moore Myers JA (2008) Change in the Southern U.S. water demand and supply over the next forty years. Wetl Water Resour Modeling Assess 43–57
Zurück zum Zitat Nieswiadomy ML (1992) Estimating urban residential water demand: effects of price structure, conservation and education. Water Resour Res 28(3):609–615CrossRef Nieswiadomy ML (1992) Estimating urban residential water demand: effects of price structure, conservation and education. Water Resour Res 28(3):609–615CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nieswiadomy ML, Molina DJ (1991) A note on price perception in water demand models. Land Econ 67(3):352–359CrossRef Nieswiadomy ML, Molina DJ (1991) A note on price perception in water demand models. Land Econ 67(3):352–359CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nieswiadomy ML, Molina DJ (1989) Comparing residential water demand estimates under decreasing and increasing block rates using household data. Land Econ 65(3):280–289CrossRef Nieswiadomy ML, Molina DJ (1989) Comparing residential water demand estimates under decreasing and increasing block rates using household data. Land Econ 65(3):280–289CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Olmstead SM (2010) The economics of managing scarce water resources. Rev Environ Econ Policy 4(2):179–198CrossRef Olmstead SM (2010) The economics of managing scarce water resources. Rev Environ Econ Policy 4(2):179–198CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Olmstead SM, Hanemann WM, Stavins RN (2007) Water demand under alternative price structures. J Environ Econ Manage 54(2):181–198CrossRef Olmstead SM, Hanemann WM, Stavins RN (2007) Water demand under alternative price structures. J Environ Econ Manage 54(2):181–198CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (1999) The price of water: trends in OECD Countries. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (1999) The price of water: trends in OECD Countries. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris
Zurück zum Zitat Pint EM (1999) Household responses to increased water rates during the California drought. Land Econ 75:246–266CrossRef Pint EM (1999) Household responses to increased water rates during the California drought. Land Econ 75:246–266CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Renwick ME, Archibald SO (1998) Demand side management policies for residential water use: who bears the conservation burden? Land Econ 74(3):343–359CrossRef Renwick ME, Archibald SO (1998) Demand side management policies for residential water use: who bears the conservation burden? Land Econ 74(3):343–359CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers P, de Silva R, Bhatia R (2002) Water is an economic good: how to use prices to promote equity, efficiency, and sustainability. Water Policy 4:1–17CrossRef Rogers P, de Silva R, Bhatia R (2002) Water is an economic good: how to use prices to promote equity, efficiency, and sustainability. Water Policy 4:1–17CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenberg DE (2010) Residential water demand under alternative rate structures: simulation approach. J Water Resour Plan Manage 136(3):395–402CrossRef Rosenberg DE (2010) Residential water demand under alternative rate structures: simulation approach. J Water Resour Plan Manage 136(3):395–402CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seager R, Tzanova A, Nakamura J (2009) Drought in the Southeastern United States: causes, variability over the last millennium, and the potential for future hydroclimate change. J Climate 22:5021–5045CrossRef Seager R, Tzanova A, Nakamura J (2009) Drought in the Southeastern United States: causes, variability over the last millennium, and the potential for future hydroclimate change. J Climate 22:5021–5045CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stevens TH, Miller J, Willis C (1992) Effect of price structure on residential water demand. Water Resour Bull 28(4):681–685CrossRef Stevens TH, Miller J, Willis C (1992) Effect of price structure on residential water demand. Water Resour Bull 28(4):681–685CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor RG, McKean JR, Young RA (2004) Alternate price specifications for estimating residential water demand with fixed fees. Land Econ 80(3):463–475CrossRef Taylor RG, McKean JR, Young RA (2004) Alternate price specifications for estimating residential water demand with fixed fees. Land Econ 80(3):463–475CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Teodoro MP (2009) Contingent professionalism: bureaucratic mobility and the adoption of water conservation rates. J Public Adm Res Theory 20:437–459CrossRef Teodoro MP (2009) Contingent professionalism: bureaucratic mobility and the adoption of water conservation rates. J Public Adm Res Theory 20:437–459CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Timmins C (2003) Demand-side technology standards under inefficient pricing regimes, are they effective water conservation tools in the long run? Environ Resour Econ 26:107–124CrossRef Timmins C (2003) Demand-side technology standards under inefficient pricing regimes, are they effective water conservation tools in the long run? Environ Resour Econ 26:107–124CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van de Ven WPMM, van Praag BMS (1981) The demand for deductibles in private health insurance: a probit model with sample selection. J Econometr 17:229–252CrossRef van de Ven WPMM, van Praag BMS (1981) The demand for deductibles in private health insurance: a probit model with sample selection. J Econometr 17:229–252CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Factors Driving Water Utility Rate Structure Choice: Evidence from Four Southern U.S. States
verfasst von
Christopher N. Boyer
Damian C. Adams
Tatiana Borisova
Christopher D. Clark
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2012
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Water Resources Management / Ausgabe 10/2012
Print ISSN: 0920-4741
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1650
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0043-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2012

Water Resources Management 10/2012 Zur Ausgabe