nach oben

Erschienen in:

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Factors Influencing Cybercrime Reporting Behaviour in South African State-Owned Entities

verfasst von : Karabo Pilane, Zainab Ruhwanya, Irwin Brown

Erschienen in: Human Aspects of Information Security and Assurance

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Cybercrime may destabilise organisations and society due to the social, financial, emotional, psychological, and physical impacts. The purpose of this paper was to investigate cybercrime reporting behaviour and the factors that influence it. South African state-owned entities were the focus of attention given their strategic role, which requires that attention be given to improving their cybersecurity practices, such as cybercrime reporting in an increasingly digital society. The conceptual framework was developed using themes from the cybercrime literature, and the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) as a lens. The study used a quantitative method, and data was collected online using a questionnaire survey. One hundred and three complete responses were received from employees working in South African state-owned entities. Factors that were identified as influencing cybercrime reporting behaviour were self-efficacy and facilitating conditions.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Security Fatigue: A Case Study of Data Specialists

Nächstes Kapitel Online Security Attack Experience and Worries of Young Adults in the United Kingdom

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abdullah, A.T.M., Jahan, I.: Causes of cybercrime victimization: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Res. Rev. 7(5), 89–98 (2020)

Ahmad, A., Ahmad, R., Hashim, K.F.: Innovation traits for business intelligence successful deployment. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 89(1), 96 (2016)

Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991)CrossRef

Al-Khater, W.A., Al-Maadeed, S., Ahmed, A.A., Sadiq, A.S., Khan, M.K.: Comprehensive review of cybercrime detection techniques. IEEE Access 8, 137293–137311 (2020)CrossRef

Almazkyzy, K., Esteusizov, Y.N.: The essence and content of cybercrime in modern times. J. Adv. Res. Law Econ. 9, 834 (2018)CrossRef

Alotaibi, N.B.: Cyberbullying and the expected consequences on the students’ academic achievement. IEEE Access 7, 153417–153431 (2019)CrossRef

Alrwais, O., Alhodaib, E.: What derives people to use reporting functions on social networks? Int. J. Appl. Inf. Syst. 12(25), 10–16 (2019)

Apau, R., Koranteng, F.N.: Impact of cybercrime and trust on the use of ecommerce technologies: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Int. J. Cyber Criminol. 13(2), 228–254 (2019)

Baror, S.O., Ikuesan, R.A., Venter, H.S.: A defined digital forensic criteria for cybercrime reporting. In: International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, pp. 617 626. Academic Conferences International Limited (2020). https://doi.org/10.34190/ICCWS.20.056

10.

Bell, A.J.C., Rogers, M.B., Pearce, J.M.: The insider threat: Behavioral indicators and factors influencing likelihood of intervention. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 24, 166–176 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2018.12.001CrossRef

11.

Bhattacherjee, A.: Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices. University of South Florida (2012)

12.

Bidgoli, M., Grossklags, J.: End-user cybercrime reporting: what we know and what we can do to improve it. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Cybercrime and Computer Forensic (ICCCF), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2016)

13.

Burns, S., Roberts, L.: Applying the theory of planned behaviour to predicting online safety behaviour. Crime Prev. Community Saf. 15(1), 48–64 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/cpcs.2012.13CrossRef

14.

Cheng, C., Chan, L., Chau, C.L.: Individual differences in susceptibility to cyber-crime victimization and its psychological aftermath. Comput. Hum. Behav. 108, 106311 (2020)CrossRef

15.

Christou, G.: The challenges of cybercrime governance in the European Union. Eur. Polit. Soc. 19(3), 355–375 (2018)CrossRef

16.

Collier, B., Thomas, D.R., Clayton, R., Hutchings, A., Chua, Y.T.: Influence, infrastructure, and recentering cybercrime policing: evaluating emerging approaches to online law enforcement through a market for cybercrime services. Policing Soc. 32(1), 103–124 (2021)CrossRef

17.

Cross, C.: Expectations vs reality: responding to online fraud across the fraud justice network. Int. J. Law Crime Justice 55, 1–12 (2018)CrossRef

18.

DeKimpe, L., Ponnet, K., Walrave, M., Snaphaan, T., Pauwels, L., Hardyns, W.: Help, I need somebody: examining the antecedents of social support seeking among cybercrime victims. Comput. Hum. Behav. 108, 106310 (2020)CrossRef

19.

Dlamini, S., Mbambo, C.: Understanding policing of cybercrime in South Africa: the phenomena, challenges and effective responses. Cogent Soc. Sci. 5(1), 1675404 (2019)

20.

Dremliuga, R.I., Korobeev, A.I., Mamychev, A.Y., Miroshnichenko, O.I.: Trends and methods of fighting cybercrime in the Russian Federation in terms of the transition to a digital economy. Laplage em Rev. 7(2), 191–200 (2021)CrossRef

21.

Eboibi, F.E.: Concerns of cybercriminality in South Africa, Ghana, Ethiopia and Nigeria: rethinking cybercrime policy implementation and institutional accountability. Commonw. Law Bull. 46(1), 78–109 (2020)CrossRef

22.

FBI IC3: Internet Crime Report 2021. Technical report I, FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) (2021)

23.

Fissel, E.R.: The reporting and help-seeking behaviors of cyberstalking victims. J. Interpers. Violence 36(11–12), 5075–5100 (2021)CrossRef

24.

Hadlington, L.: Human factors in cybersecurity; examining the link between Internet addiction, impulsivity, attitudes towards cybersecurity, and risky cybersecurity behaviours. Heliyon 3(7), e00346 (2017)CrossRef

25.

Hall, T., Sanders, B., Bah, M., King, O., Wigley, E.: Economic geographies of the illegal: the multiscalar production of cybercrime. Trends Organized Crime 24(2), 282–307 (2021)CrossRef

26.

Hite, D.M., Voelker, T., Robertson, A.: Measuring perceived anonymity: the development of a context-independent instrument. J. Methods Meas. Soc. Sci. 5(1), 22–39 (2014)

27.

Humaidi, N., Balakrishnan, V.: Indirect effect of management support on users’ compliance behaviour towards information security policies. Health Inf. Manag. J. 47(1), 17–27 (2018)

28.

Ibrahim, S.: Social and contextual taxonomy of cybercrime: socioeconomic theory of Nigerian cybercriminals. Int. J. Law Crime Justice 47, 44–57 (2016)CrossRef

29.

Internet live stats: internet live stats-internet usage social media statistics (2020)

30.

Jadoon, A.K., Iqbal, W., Amjad, M.F., Afzal, H., Bangash, Y.A.: Forensic analysis of Tor browser: a case study for privacy and anonymity on the web. Forensic Sci. Int. 299, 59–73 (2019)CrossRef

31.

Jerome, B.: Criminal investigation and criminal intelligence: example of adaptation in the prevention and repression of cybercrime. Risks 8(3), 99 (2020)CrossRef

32.

Jhaveri, M.H., Cetin, O., Gaiian, C., Moore, T., Eeten, M.V.: Abuse reporting and the fight against cybercrime. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 49(4), 1–27 (2017)CrossRef

33.

Kemp, S.: Fraud reporting in Catalonia in the Internet era: determinants and motives. Eur. J. Criminol. 1477370820941405 (2020)

34.

Kshetri, N.: The simple economics of cybercrimes. IEEE Secur. Priv. 4(1), 33–39 (2006)CrossRef

35.

Kwak, Y., Lee, S., Damiano, A., Vishwanath, A.: Why do users not report spear-phishing emails? Telematics Inform. 48, 101343 (2020)CrossRef

36.

Lagazio, M., Sherif, N., Cushman, M.: A multi-level approach to understanding the impact of cybercrime on the financial sector. Comput. Secur. 45, 58–74 (2014)CrossRef

37.

MacDermott, A., Baker, T., Buck, P., Iqbal, F., Shi, Q.: The Internet of Things: challenges and considerations for cybercrime investigations and digital forensics. Int. J. Digital Crime Forensics 12(1), 1–13 (2020)CrossRef

38.

Mcanyana, W., Brindley, C., Seedat, Y.: Insight into the cyberthreat landscape in South Africa. Technical report (2020). https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/PDF-125/Accenture-Insight-Into-The-Threat-Landscape-Of-South-Africa-V5.pdf

39.

Monteith, S., Bauer, M., Alda, M., Geddes, J., Whybrow, P.C., Glenn, T.: Increasing cybercrime since the pandemic: concerns for psychiatry. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 23(4), 1–9 (2021)CrossRef

40.

Riek, M., Bohme, R.: The costs of consumer-facing cybercrime: an empirical exploration of measurement issues and estimates. J. Cybersecurity 4(1), tyy004 (2018)CrossRef

41.

Robinson, M., Jones, K., Janicke, H., Maglaras, L.: Developing cyber-peacekeeping: observation, monitoring and reporting. Gov. Inf. Q. 36(2), 276–293 (2019)CrossRef

42.

RSA National Treasury: Public Institutions Listed in Pfma Schedule 1 , 2 , 3a, 3B , 3C and 3D As At 30 April 2015. Technical report May, RSA National Treasury (2015). http://www.treasury.gov.za/legislation/pfma/publicentities/2015-04-30PublicinstitutionsSch1-3D.pdf

43.

Saunders, M.: Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson (2014)

44.

Stratton, G., Powell, A., Cameron, R.: Crime and justice in digital society: towards a ‘digital criminology’? Int. J. Crime Justice Soc. Democr. 6(2), 17 (2017)CrossRef

45.

Straub, D., Boudreau, M.C., Gefen, D.: Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13(1), 24 (2004)

46.

Tan, M.T., Teo, T.S.: Factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 1(1), 5 (2000)

47.

Touhill, G.: New study reveals cybercrime may be widely underreported even when laws mandate disclosure (2019)

48.

Umlauf, M.G., Mochizuki, Y.: Predatory publishing and cybercrime targeting academics. Int. J. Nurs. Pract. 24, e12656 (2018)CrossRef

49.

Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A., Bala, H.: Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in infomation systems. MIS Quart. Manag. Inf. Syst. 37(1), 21–54 (2013). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02CrossRef

50.

Wang, H., He, D., Liu, Z., Guo, R.: Blockchain-based anonymous reporting scheme with anonymous rewarding. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 67(4), 1514–1524 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2909529CrossRef

51.

Van de Weijer, S., Leukfeldt, R., Van der Zee, S.: Reporting cybercrime victimization: determinants, motives, and previous experiences. Policing 43(1), 17–34 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-07-2019-0122/FULL/XMLCrossRef

52.

Van de Weijer, S.G., Leukfeldt, R., Bernasco, W.: Determinants of reporting cybercrime: a comparison between identity theft, consumer fraud, and hacking. Eur. J. Criminol. 16(4), 486–508 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370818773610CrossRef

53.

Srirama, S.N., Lin, J.-W., Bhatnagar, R., Agarwal, S., Reddy, P.K. (eds.): BDA 2021. LNCS, vol. 13147. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93620-4CrossRef

Titel: Factors Influencing Cybercrime Reporting Behaviour in South African State-Owned Entities
verfasst von: Karabo Pilane
Zainab Ruhwanya
Irwin Brown
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Human Aspects of Information Security and Assurance
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-12171-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-12172-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12172-2_23

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner