nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

05.02.2018

Faculty technology beliefs and practices in teacher preparation through a TPaCK lens

verfasst von: Barbara Martin

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Due to the importance of technology to student learning, technology has become a vital part of teacher education programs across the country. In order to fully understand technology integration in teacher education, it is important to examine current faculty technology integration practices. This study examined how this faculty infused technology into their education courses in an effort to train teacher candidates to be successful digital educators.

Vorheriger Artikel Editorial for EAIT Issue 5, 2018

Nächster Artikel Analyzing on-line video club discussions focused on formative assessment

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154–168.CrossRef

Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160.CrossRef

Brantley-Dias, L., Kinuthia, W., Shoffner, M. B., De Castro, C., & Rigole, N. J. (2007). Developing pedagogical technology integration content knowledge in preservice teachers: A case study approach. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(4), 143–150.

Clark, C., Zhang, S., & Strudler, N. (2015). Teacher candidate technology integration: For student learning or instruction? Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 31(3), 93–106.CrossRef

Cohen, M., & Tally, B. (2004). New maps for technology in teacher education: After standards, then what? Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(1), 5–9.

Cox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPCK in practice: Using and elaborated model of the TPCK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends, 53(5), 60.CrossRef

De Vaus, D. (2013). Surveys in social research. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435.CrossRef

Frazier, L., Sadera, W., & Robinson, D. (2012). Teacher candidate technology use: The what and the why. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 2012(1), 1781–1783.

Gagne, R. M. (2013). Instructional technology: Foundations. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.CrossRef

Glasgow, Y., & Keim, M. C. (2005). Community college psychology faculty uses and attitudes toward computer-assisted instruction. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 29(7), 547–555.CrossRef

Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPaCK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953–1960.CrossRef

Hersh, E. C. (2013). Change and challenge: The influence of technology integration in teacher preparation programs. (Published doctoral dissertation). Manhattanville College, NY.

Holland, J., & Holland, J. (2014). Implications of shifting technology in education. TechTrends, 58(3), 16–25.CrossRef

Hsu, P. (2012). Examining the impact of educational technology courses on pre-service teachers' development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching Education, 23(2), 195–213.CrossRef

Hu, C., & Fyfe, V. (2010). Impact of a new curriculum on pre-service teachers’ Technical, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPaCK). In C.H. Steel, M.J. Keppell, P. Gerbic & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future. Proceedings ascilite Sydney, 185-189.

International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). The national educational technology standards and performance indicators for students. Eugene, OR: Author.

Jackowski, M. B., & Akroyd, D. (2010). Technology usage among community college faculty. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 34(8), 624–644.CrossRef

Jones, A., Buntting, C., & de Vries, M. J. (2013). The developing field of technology education: A review to look forward. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 191–212.CrossRef

Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPaCK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.

Kyei-Blankson, L., Keengwe, J., & Blankson, J. (2009). Faculty use and integration of technology in higher education. AACE Journal, 17(3), 199–213.

Lambert, J., & Gong, Y. (2010). 21st Century paradigms for pre-service teacher technology preparation. Computers in the Schools, 27(1), 54–70.CrossRef

Mack, N., Woodsong, C., MacQueen, K. M., Guest, G., & Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative research methods: A data collector’s field guide. Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International.

Matherson, L. H., Wilson, E. K., & Wright, V. H. (2014). Need TPACK? embrace sustained professional development. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 81(1), 45–52.

Marzilli, C., Delello, J., Marmion, S., McWhorter, R., Roberts, P., & Marzilli, T. S. (2014). Faculty attitudes towards integrating technology and innovation. International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education, 3(1), 1–20.CrossRef

Mcdougall, A., & Jones, A. (2006). Theory and history, questions and methodology: Current and future issues in research into ICT in education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 15(3), 353–360.CrossRef

Roblyer, M. D., & Knezek, G. A. (2003). New millennium research for educational technology: A call for a national research agenda. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 60–71.CrossRef

Roblyer, M. D. (2005). Educational technology research that makes a difference: Series introduction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(2), 192–201.

Rogelberg, S., & Stanton, J. (2007). Understanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponse. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 195–209.CrossRef

Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Schmidt, D. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPaCK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of research on technology in education (International Society for Technology in Education), 42(2), 123.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRef

Valdez, G., McNabb, M., Foertsch, M., Anderson, M., Hawkes, M., & Raack, L. (2004). Computer-based technology and learning: Evolving uses and expectations. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.

Titel: Faculty technology beliefs and practices in teacher preparation through a TPaCK lens
verfasst von: Barbara Martin
Publikationsdatum: 05.02.2018
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9680-4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Virtual team development of a web-based recruitment system for an iD-lab

From a student perspective, what constitutes a good (or less good) use of ICT in teaching?

Editorial for EAIT Issue 5, 2018

Analyzing on-line video club discussions focused on formative assessment

Development of a model for explaining the learning outcomes when using 3D virtual environments in informal learning settings

Using machine learning to classify reviewer comments in research article drafts to enable students to focus on global revision