Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Personal Communications
Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications 4/2019

22.04.2019

Feature Extraction Methods in Language Identification: A Survey

verfasst von: Deepti Deshwal, Pardeep Sangwan, Divya Kumar

Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Language Identification (LI) is one of the widely emerging field in the areas of speech processing to accurately identify the language from the data base based on some features of the speech signal. LI technologies have a wide set of applications in different spheres due to the growing advancement in the field of artificial intelligence and machine learning. Feature extraction is one of the fundamental and significant process performed in LI. This review presents main paradigms of research in Feature Extraction methods that will provide a deep insight to the researchers about the feature extraction techniques for future studies in LI. Broadly, this review summarizes and compare various feature extraction approaches with and without noise compensation techniques as the current trend is towards robust universal Language Identification framework. This paper categorizes the different feature extraction approaches on the basis of different features, human speech production system/peripheral auditory system, spectral or cepstral analysis, and lastly on the basis of transform. Moreover, the different noise compensation-based feature extraction techniques are also covered in the review. This paper also presents, that Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs) are the most popular approach. Results indicates that MFCC fused with other feature vectors and cleansing approaches gives improved performance as compared to the pure MFCC based Feature Extraction approaches. This study also describes the different categories at the front end of the LI system from research point of view.
Vorheriger Artikel Design of Nature Inspired Computing Approach for Estimation of Channel Coefficients in MIMO Networks
Nächster Artikel An Algorithm to Identify Syllable from a Visual Speech Recognition System

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Aggarwal, G., & Singh, L. (2018). Classification of intellectual disability using LPC, LPCC, and WLPCC parameterization techniques. International Journal of Computers and Applications, 1–10.
2.
Agrawal, P., & Ganapathy, S. (2017). Speech representation learning using unsupervised data-driven modulation filtering for robust ASR. In Proceedings of the Interspeech (pp. 2446–2450).
3.
Al-Ali, A. K. H., Dean, D., Senadji, B., Chandran, V., & Naik, G. R. (2017). Enhanced forensic speaker verification using a combination of DWT and MFCC feature warping in the presence of noise and reverberation conditions. IEEE Access, 5, 15400–15413.CrossRef
4.
Alonso, J. B., et al. (2017). Automatic anuran identification using noise removal and audio activity detection. Expert Systems with Applications, 73, 83–92.CrossRef
5.
Ambikairajah, E., et al. (2011). Language identification: A tutorial. IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, 11(2), 82–108.CrossRef
6.
Atal, B. S. (1976). Automatic recognition of speakers from their voices. Proceedings of the IEEE, 64(4), 460–475.CrossRef
7.
Besacier, L., Barnard, E., Karpov, A., & Schultz, T. (2014). Automatic speech recognition for under resourced languages: A survey. Speech Communication, 56, 85–100.CrossRef
8.
Bharali, S. S., & Kalita, S. K. (2015). A comparative study of different features for isolated spoken word recognition using HMM with reference to Assamese language. International Journal of Speech Technology, 18(4), 673–684.CrossRef
9.
Bharali, S. S., & Kalita, S. K. (2018). Speech recognition with reference to Assamese language using novel fusion technique. International Journal of Speech Technology, 21, 1–13.CrossRef
10.
Bharti, S. S., Gupta, M., & Agarwal, S. (2018). Background noise identification system based on random forest for speech. In International conference on intelligent computing and applications (pp. 323–332). Springer, Singapore.
11.
Bielefeld, B. (1994). Language identification using shifted delta cepstrum. In Fourteenth annual speech research symposium.
12.
Boll, S. (1979). Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 27(2), 113–120.CrossRef
13.
Borde, P., Varpe, A., Manza, R., & Yannawar, P. (2015). Recognition of isolated words using Zernike and MFCC features for audio visual speech recognition. International Journal of Speech Technology, 18(2), 167–175.CrossRef
14.
Botha, G. R., & Etienne, B. (2012). Factors that affect the accuracy of text based language identification. Computer Speech and Language, 26, 302–320.CrossRef
15.
Clemente, I. A., Heckmann, M., & Wrede, B. (2012). Incremental word learning: Efficient hmm initialization and large margin discriminative adaptation. Speech Communication, 54(9), 1029–1048.CrossRef
16.
Das, R. K., & Prasanna, S. M. (2018). Speaker verification from short utterance perspective: a review. IETE Technical Review, 35(6), 599–617.CrossRef
17.
Dehak, N., et al. (2011). Front end factor analysis for speaker verification. IEEE Transactions Audio, Speech, Language Processing, 19(4), 788–798.CrossRef
18.
Dehak, N., Torres-Carrasquillo, P. A., Reynolds, D., & Dehak, R. (2011). Language recognition via i-vectors and dimensionality reduction. In Twelfth annual conference of the international speech communication association.
19.
Dey, S., Rajan, R., Padmanabhan, R., & Murthy, H. A. (2011). Feature diversity for emotion, language and speaker verification. In National conference on communications (NCC), IEEE (pp. 1–5).
20.
Dişken, G., et al. (2017). A review on feature extraction for speaker recognition under degraded conditions. IETE Technical Review, 3(34), 321–332.CrossRef
21.
Dustor, A., & Szwarc, P. (2010). Spoken language identification based on GMM models. In International conference in signals and electronic systems (ICSES), IEEE (pp. 105–108).
22.
Dutta, S. K., & Singh, L. J. (2018). A comparison of three spectral features for phone recognition in sub-optimal environments. International Journal of Applied Pattern Recognition, 5(2), 137–148.CrossRef
23.
Echeverry-Correa, J., et al. (2015). Topic identification techniques applied to dynamic language model adaptation for automatic speech recognition. Expert System with Applications, 42(1), 101–112.CrossRef
24.
El-Fattah, M. A. A., et al. (2014). Speech enhancement with an adaptive Wiener filter. International Journal of Speech Technology, 17(1), 53–64.CrossRef
25.
Ephraim, Y., & Malah, D. (1984). Speech enhancement using a minimum-mean square error short-time spectral amplitude estimator. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 32(6), 1109–1121.CrossRef
26.
Fernando, S., Sethu, V., Ambikairajah, E., & Epps, J. (2017). Bidirectional modelling for short duration language identification. In Interspeech (pp. 2809–2813).
27.
Ferrer, L., Lei, Y., McLaren, M., & Scheffer, N. (2016). Study of senone-based deep neural network approaches for spoken language recognition. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 24(1), 105–116.CrossRef
28.
Fer, R., et al. (2017). Multilingually trained bottleneck features in spoken language recognition. Computer Speech and Language, 46, 252–267.CrossRef
29.
Gehring, J., Miao, Y., Metze, F., & Waibel, A. (2013). Extracting deep bottleneck features using stacked auto-encoders. In IEEE international conference in acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), IEEE (pp. 3377–3381).
30.
Gelly, G., Gauvain, J. L., Le, V. B., & Messaoudi, A. (2016). A divide-and-conquer approach for language identification based on recurrent neural networks. In INTERSPEECH (pp. 3231–3235).
31.
Giwa, O., & Davel, M. H. (2014). Language identification of individual words with joint sequence models. In Fifteenth annual conference of the international speech communication association (pp. 14–18).
32.
Giwa, O., & Davel, M. H. (2015). Text-based language identification of multilingual names. In Pattern recognition association of South Africa and robotics and mechatronics international conference (PRASA-RobMech) (pp. 166–171). IEEE.
33.
Gonzalez-Dominguez, J., Lopez-Moreno, I., Moreno, P. J., & Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J. (2015). Frame-by-frame language identification in short utterances using deep neural networks. Neural Networks, 64, 49–58.CrossRef
34.
Gonzalez, D. R., & de Lara, J. R. C. (2009). Speaker verification with shifted delta cepstral features: Its pseudo-prosodic behaviour. In Proceedings of the I Iberian SLTech.
35.
Goodman, F. J., Martin, A. F., & Wohlford, R. E. (1989). Improved automatic language identification in noisy speech. In International conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing ICASSP-89 (pp. 528–531). IEEE.
36.
Gupta, K., & Gupta, D. (2016). An analysis on LPC, RASTA and MFCC techniques in automatic speech recognition system. In 6th international conference in cloud system and big data engineering (confluence) (pp. 493–497). IEEE.
37.
Heigold, G. et al. (2013). Multilingual acoustic models using distributed deep neural networks. In IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP) (pp. 8619–8623). IEEE.
38.
Hermansky, H. (1990). Perceptual linear predictive (PLP) analysis of speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87(4), 1738–1752.CrossRef
39.
Hinton, G., et al. (2012). Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition: The shared views of four research groups. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 29(6), 82–97.CrossRef
40.
Hu, Y., & Loizou, P. C. (2007). Subjective comparison and evaluation of speech enhancement algorithms. Speech Communication, 49(7–8), 588–601.CrossRef
41.
Hwang, I., Park, H. M., & Chang, J. H. (2016). Ensemble of deep neural networks using acoustic environment classification for statistical model-based voice activity detection. Computer Speech and Language, 38, 1–12.CrossRef
42.
Hynek, H., & Nelson, M. (1994). Rasta processing of speech. IEEE Transactions on Speech Audio Processing, 2(4), 578–589.CrossRef
43.
Itrat, M., et al. (2017). Automatic language identification for languages of Pakistan. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 17(2), 161–169.
44.
Joudaki, S., et al. (2014). Vision-based sign language classification: A directional review. IETE Technical Review, 5(31), 383–391.CrossRef
45.
Jin, M., et al. (2018). LID-senones and their statistics for language identification. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing (TASLP), 26(1), 171–183.CrossRef
46.
Komatsu, M. (2007). Reviewing human language identification. In Speaker classification II (pp. 206–228). Springer, Berlin.
47.
Koolagudi, S. G., & Rao, K. S. (2012). Emotion recognition from speech using source, system, and prosodic features. International Journal of Speech Technology, 15(2), 265–289.CrossRef
48.
Lehner, B., Sonnleitner, R., & Widmer, G. (2013). Towards light-weight, real-time-capable singing voice detection. In ISMIR (pp. 53–58).
49.
Li, H., Ma, B., & Lee, C. H. (2007). A vector space modeling approach to spoken language identification. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 15(1), 271–284.CrossRef
50.
Li, H., Ma, B., & Lee, K. A. (2013). Spoken language recognition: From fundamentals to practice. Proceedings of IEEE, 101(5), 1136–1159.CrossRef
51.
Li, K. P. (1997). Automatic language identification/verification system. U.S. Patent 5,689,616 (Google Patents).
52.
Li, M., & Narayanan, S. (2014). Simplified supervised i-vector modeling with application to robust and efficient language identification and speaker verification. Computer Speech and Language, 28(4), 940–958.CrossRef
53.
Loizou, P. C. (2007). Speech enhancement: Theory and practice. Boca Raton: CRC press.CrossRef
54.
Lopez-Moreno, I., Gonzalez-Dominguez, J., Plchot, O., Martinez, D., Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J., & Moreno, P. (2014). Automatic language identification using deep neural networks. In 2014 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP) (pp. 5337–5341). IEEE.
55.
Lopez-Moreno, I., et al. (2016). On the use of deep feed forward neural networks for automatic language identification. Computer Speech and Language, 40, 46–59.CrossRef
56.
Lyu, D. C., Chng, E. S., & Li, H. (2013). Language diarization for conversational code-switch speech with pronunciation dictionary adaptation. In IEEE China summit and international conference on signal and information processing (pp. 147–150). IEEE.
57.
Malmasi, S., & Cahill, A. (2015). Measuring feature diversity in native language identification. In Proceedings of the tenth workshop on innovative use of NLP for building educational applications (pp. 49–55).
58.
Malmasi, S., Refaee, E., & Dras, M. (2015). Arabic dialect identification using a parallel multidialectal corpus. In International conference of the pacific association for computational linguistics (pp. 35–53). Springer, Singapore.
59.
Martinez, D., Burget, L., Ferrer, L., & Scheffer, N. (2012). iVector-based prosodic system for language identification. In IEEE international conference in acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP) (pp. 4861–48640.
60.
Matejka, P., Burget, L., Schwarz, P., & Cernocky, J. (2006). Speaker and language recognition workshop in Brno university of technology system for nist 2005 language recognition evaluation. In Odyssey 2006 (pp. 1–7). IEEE.
61.
Matejka, P., et al. (2014). Neural network bottleneck features for language identification. In Proceedings of Odyssey 2014 speaker and language recognition workshop (pp. 299–304).
62.
Mehrabani, M., & Hansen, J. H. (2015). Automatic analysis of dialect/language sets. International Journal of Speech Technology, 18(3), 277–286.CrossRef
63.
Mohamed, A. R., Dahl, G. E., & Hinton, G. (2012). Acoustic modeling using deep belief networks. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 20(1), 14–22.CrossRef
64.
Moritz, N., Adiloğlu, K., Anemüller, J., Goetze, S., & Kollmeier, B. (2017). Multi-channel speech enhancement and amplitude modulation analysis for noise robust automatic speech recognition. Computer Speech & Language, 46, 558–573.CrossRef
65.
Mun, S., Shon, S., Kim, W., & Ko, H. (2016). Deep neural network bottleneck features for acoustic event recognition. In INTERSPEECH (pp. 2954–2957).
66.
Nayana, P., Mathew, D., & Thomas, A. (2017). Performance comparison of speaker recognition systems using GMM and i-vector methods with PNCC and RASTA PLP features. In International conference on intelligent computing, instrumentation and control technologies(ICICICT) (pp. 438–443).
67.
Nercessian, S., Torres-Carrasquillo, P., & Martinez-Montes, G. (2016). Approaches for language identification in mismatched environments. Spoken language technology workshop (SLT) (pp. 335–340). IEEE.
68.
Ng, T., et al. (2012). Developing a speech activity detection system for the DARPA RATS program. In Thirteenth annual conference of the international speech communication association (pp. 1969–1972).
69.
Olvera, M. M., Sánchez, A., & Escobar, L. H. (2016). Web-based automatic language identification system. International Journal of Information and Electronics Engineering, 6(5), 304–307.
70.
Padmanabhan, J., & Johnson Premkumar, M. J. (2015). Machine learning in automatic speech recognition: A survey. IETE Technical Review, 32(4), 240–251.CrossRef
71.
Palo, H. K., Chandra, M., & Mohanty, M. N. (2017). Emotion recognition using MLP and GMM for Oriya language. International Journal of Computational Vision and Robotics, 7(4), 426–442.CrossRef
72.
Phadikar, S., et al. (2017). Bengali phonetics identification using wavelet based signal feature. In International conference on computational intelligence, communications, and business analytics (pp. 253–265). Springer, Singapore.
73.
Poonkuzhali, C., Karthiprakash, R., Valarmathy, S., & Kalamani, M. (2013). An approach to feature selection algorithm based on ant colony optimization for automatic speech recognition. Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, 2(11), 5671–5678.
74.
Qawaqneh, Z., Mallouh, A. A., & Barkana, B. D. (2017). Age and gender classification from speech and face images by jointly fine-tuned deep neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 85, 76–86.CrossRef
75.
Qi, J., Wang, D., Xu, J., & Tejedor Noguerales, J. (2013). Bottleneck features based on gammatone frequency cepstral coefficients. In Interspeech.
76.
Rajput, N., & Verma, S. K. (2014). Back propagation feed forward neural network approach for speech recognition. In 2014 3rd international conference on reliability, Infocom technologies and optimization (ICRITO) (trends and future directions) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
77.
Rao, K. S., Maity, S., & Reddy, V. R. (2013). Pitch synchronous and glottal closure based speech analysis for language recognition. International Journal of Speech Technology, 16(4), 413–430.CrossRef
78.
Rao, K. S., Reddy, V. R., & Maity, S. (2015). Language identification using spectral and prosodic features. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
79.
Revathi, A., Jeyalakshmi, C., & Muruganantham, T. (2018). Perceptual features based rapid and robust language identification system for various indian classical languages. Computational vision and bio inspired computing (pp. 291–305). Cham: Springer.
80.
Richardson, F., Reynolds, D., & Dehak, N. (2015). A unified deep neural network for speaker and language recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:​1504.​00923.
81.
Richardson, F., Reynolds, D., & Dehak, N. (2015). Deep neural network approaches to speaker and language recognition. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 22(10), 1671–1675.CrossRef
82.
Sadjadi, S. O., & Hansen, J. H. (2015). Mean Hilbert envelope coefficients (MHEC) for Robust speaker and language identification. Speech Communication, 72, 138–148.CrossRef
83.
Sahidullah, M., & Saha, G. (2012). Design, analysis and experimental evaluation of block based transformation in MFCC computation for speaker recognition. Speech Communication, 54(4), 543–565.CrossRef
84.
Sangwan, P. (2017). Feature Extraction for Speaker Recognition: A Systematic Study. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System, 9(4), 19–26.
85.
Sangwan, P., & Bhardwaj, S. (2017). A structured approach towards robust database collection for speaker recognition. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System, 9(3), 53–58.CrossRef
86.
Sarma, B. D., & Prasanna, S. M. (2018). Acoustic–phonetic analysis for speech recognition: A review. IETE Technical Review, 35(3), 305–327.CrossRef
87.
Segbroeck, V., Travadi, M. R., & Narayanan, S. S. (2015). Rapid language identification. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 7, 1118–1129.CrossRef
88.
Sharma, D. P., & Atkins, J. (2014). Automatic speech recognition systems: Challenges and recent implementation trends. International Journal of Signal and Imaging Systems Engineering, 7(4), 220–234.CrossRef
89.
Sheikhan, M., Gharavian, D., & Ashoftedel, F. (2012). Using DTW neural–based MFCC warping to improve emotional speech recognition. Neural Computer and Application, 21, 1765–1773.CrossRef
90.
Sim, K. C., & Li, H. (2008). On acoustic diversification front-end for spoken language identification. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 16(5), 1029–1037.CrossRef
91.
Singer, E., et al. (2003). Acoustic phonetic and discriminative approaches to automatic language recognition. In Proceedings of the Eurospeech (pp. 1345–1348).
92.
Sivaraman, G., et al. (2016). Vocal tract length normalization for speaker independent acoustic-to-articulatory speech inversion. In INTERSPEECH (pp. 455–459).
93.
Song, Y., et al. (2015). Improved language identification using deep bottleneck network. In IEEE international conference in acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP) (pp. 4200–4204). IEEE.
94.
Sundermeyer, M., Schlüter, R., & Ney, H. (2012). LSTM neural networks for language modeling. In Thirteenth annual conference of the international speech communication association, USA (pp. 194–197).
95.
Sun, Y., Wen, G., & Wang, J. (2015). Weighted spectral features based on local Hu moments for speech emotion recognition. Journal of Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 18, 80–90.CrossRef
96.
Takçı, Hidayet, & Güngör, T. (2012). A high performance centroid-based classification approach for language identification. Pattern Recognition Letters, 33(16), 2077–2084.CrossRef
97.
Tang, Z., et al. (2018). Phonetic temporal neural model for language identification. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 26(1), 134–144.CrossRef
98.
Thirumuru, R., & Vuppala, A. K. (2018). Automatic detection of retroflex approximants in a continuous tamil speech. Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, 37(7), 2837–2851.MathSciNetCrossRef
99.
Torres-Carrasquillo, P. A., et al. (2002). Approaches to language identification using Gaussian mixture models and shifted delta cepstral features. In Seventh international conference on spoken language processing.
100.
Upadhyay, N., & Karmakar, A. (2015). Speech enhancement using spectral subtraction-type algorithms: A comparison and simulation study. Procedia Computer Science, 54, 574–584.CrossRef
101.
Verma, P., & Das, P. K. (2015). i-Vectors in speech processing applications: A survey. International Journal of Speech Technology, 18(4), 529–546.CrossRef
102.
Viana, H. O., & Mello, C. A. (2014). Speech description through MINERS: Model invariant to noise and environment robust for speech. In 2014 IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernatics (SMC) (pp. 489–494). IEEE.
103.
Vu, N., Imseng, D., Povey, D., & Molicek, P., Schultz, T., & Bourlard, H. (2014). Multilingual deep neural network based acoustic modelling for rapid language adaptation. In 2014 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP) (pp. 7639–7643). IEEE.
104.
Wang, H., et al. (2013). Shifted-delta mlp features for spoken language recognition. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 20(1), 15–18.CrossRef
105.
Wang, H., Xu, Y., & Li, M. (2011). Study on the MFCC similarity-based voice activity detection algorithm. In 2nd international conference in artificial intelligence, management science and electronic commerce (AIMSEC) (pp. 4391–4394). IEEE.
106.
Weninger, F., et al. (2014). Feature enhancement by deep LSTM networks for ASR in reverberant multisource environments. Computer Speech and Language (Elsevier), 28(4), 888–902.CrossRef
107.
Williamson, D. S., & Wang, D. (2017). Speech dereverberation and denoising using complex ratio masks. In 2017 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP) (pp. 5590–5594). IEEE.
108.
Wong, K. Y. E. (2004). Automatic spoken language identification utilizing acoustic and phonetic speech information. Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology.
109.
Yapanel, U., & Hansen, J. (2008). A new perceptually motivated MVDR-based acoustic front-end (PMVDR) for robust automatic speech recognition. Journal of Speech Communication, 50, 142–152.CrossRef
110.
Yilmaz, E., McLaren, M., van den Heuvel, H., & van Leeuwen, D. A. (2017). Language diarization for semi-supervised bilingual acoustic model training. Automatic speech recognition and understanding workshop (ASRU). 2017 IEEE (pp. 91–96). IEEE.
111.
Zazo, R., et al. (2016). Language identification in short utterances using long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural networks. PloS One, 11(1), e0146917.CrossRef
112.
Zhang, X. L., & Wu, J. (2013). Deep belief networks based voice activity detection. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 21(4), 697–710.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Feature Extraction Methods in Language Identification: A Survey
verfasst von
Deepti Deshwal
Pardeep Sangwan
Divya Kumar
Publikationsdatum
22.04.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Personal Communications / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0929-6212
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-834X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06373-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

Wireless Personal Communications 4/2019 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Scalable Models for Redundant Data Flow Analysis in Online Social Networks

OriginalPaper

Finding a Pareto Optimal Solution for a Multi-Objective Problem of Managing Radio Resources in LTE-A Systems: A QoS Aware Algorithm

OriginalPaper

Secure and Trust-Aware Routing Scheme in Wireless Sensor Networks

OriginalPaper

Novel Approach for Mobile Based App Development Incorporating MAAF

OriginalPaper

Cost and Sub-Epoch Based Stable Energy-Efficient Clustering Algorithm for Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks

OriginalPaper

Energy Efficiency Trade-Off Between Duty-Cycling and Wake-Up Radio Techniques in IoT Networks

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise