Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Comparative Analysis of Quasi-Differential Approaches in Inverse Kinematics Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

FEX a Fingers Extending eXoskeleton for Rehabilitation and Regaining Mobility

verfasst von : Patrizio Sale, Giovanni Stellin, Stefano Masiero, Francesco Becchi, Wiktor Sieklicki

Erschienen in: Advances in Service and Industrial Robotics

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper presents the design process of an exoskeleton for executing human fingers’ extension movement for the rehabilitation procedures and as an active orthosis purposes. The Fingers Extending eXoskeleton (FEX) is a serial, under-actuated mechanism capable of executing fingers’ extension. The proposed solution is easily adaptable to any finger length or position of the joints. FEX is based on the state-of-art FingerSpine serial system. Straightening force is transmitted from a DC motor to the exoskeleton structures with use of pulled tendons. In trial tests the device showed good usability and functionality. The final prototype is a result of almost half a year of the development process described in this paper.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Assistive Strategies for a Back Support Exoskeleton: Experimental Evaluation
Nächstes Kapitel Ankle Prosthesis with an Active Control of the Pitch and the Release of the Energy
Literatur
1.
Sale P, Lombardi V, Franceschini M (2012) Hand robotics rehabilitation: feasibility and preliminary results of a robotic treatment in patients with hemiparesis. Stroke Res Treat 2012:820931 Epub 26 December 2012
2.
Franceschini M et al (2012) Clinical relevance of action observation in upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: a possible role in recovery of functional dexterity: a randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 26(5):456–462CrossRef
3.
Berger RA, Weiss A-PC (2003) Hand surgery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
4.
Buryanov A, Kotiuk V (2010) Proportions of hand segments. Int J Morphol 28(3):755–758CrossRef
5.
Christopher JH (1995) Force-reflecting anthropomorphic hand masters. Armstrong laboratory internal report, crew systems directorate biodynamics and biocommunications division human systems center, Air force materiel command, July 1995
6.
Garrett JW (1970) Anthropometry of the hands of female air force flight personnel. Technical report AMRL-TR-69-26, USAF aerospace medical research laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB OH
7.
8.
Sale P, Bovolenta F, Agosti M, Clerici P, Franceschini M (2014) Short-term and long-term outcomes of serial robotic training for improving upper limb function in chronic stroke. Int J Rehabil Res 37(1):67–73CrossRef
9.
An KN, Askew LJ, Chao EY (1986) Biomechanics and functional assessment of upper extremities, trends in ergonomics/human factors III. In: Karwowski W (ed) Elsevier Science Publishers BV, North-Holland, pp 573–580
10.
Darling WG, Cole KJ (1990) Muscle activation patterns and kinetics of human index finger movements. J Neurophysiol 63(5):1098–1108
11.
Yamaura H, Matsushita K, Kato R, Yokoi H (2009) Development of hand rehabilitation system for paralysis patient – universal design using wire-driven mechanism. In: 31st annual international conference of the IEEE EMBS, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 2–6 September 2009
12.
Fontana M, Bergamasco M, Salsedo F (2009) Mechanical design and experimental characterization of a novel hand exoskeleton. In: Proceedings of the AIMETA 2009, Ancona, Italy, 14–17 September 2009
13.
Wege A, Hommel G (2005) Development and control of a hand exoskeleton for rehabilitation of hand injuries. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Berlin, Germany, pp 3461–3466
14.
Mulas M, Folgheraiter M, Gini G: An EMG-controlled exoskeleton for hand rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 9th international conference on rehabilitation robotics, Chicago, 28 June–1 July 2005, pp 371–374
15.
16.
Kawasaki H, Ito S, Ishigure Y, Nishimoto Y, Aoki T, Mouri T, Sakaeda H, Abe M (2007) Development of a hand motion assist robot for rehabilitation therapy by patient self-motion control. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 10th international conference on rehabilitation robotics, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 12–15 June 2007, pp 234–240
17.
Hirose S (1985) Connected differential mechanism and its applications. In: Proceedings of 1985 international conference on advanced robotics, Tokyo, Japan, September, pp 319–325
18.
Hirose S (1993) Biologically inspired robotics. Oxford University Press, Oxford Translated by Cave P, Goulden C
19.
Montambault S, Gosselin CM (2001) Analysis of under actuated mechanical grippers. ASME J Mech Des 123(3):367–374CrossRef
20.
Ryan RM (1982) Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: an extension of cognitive evaluation theory. J Pers Soc Psychol 43(3):450–461CrossRefMathSciNet
21.
McAuley E, Duncan T, Tammen V (1989) Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport 60(1):48–58CrossRef
22.
Brooke J (1996) SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan PW, Weerdmeester B, Thomas A, Mclelland IL (eds) Usability evaluation in industry. Taylor & Francis, London
23.
Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J (2009) Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J Usability Stud 4(3):114–123
24.
Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J (2008) An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int J Hum Comput Interact 24(6):574–594CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
FEX a Fingers Extending eXoskeleton for Rehabilitation and Regaining Mobility
verfasst von
Patrizio Sale
Giovanni Stellin
Stefano Masiero
Francesco Becchi
Wiktor Sieklicki
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Advances in Service and Industrial Robotics

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61275-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-61276-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61276-8_86

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise