nach oben

Earth Science Informatics

Erschienen in:

15.01.2024 | Research

Flood susceptibility mapping through geoinformatics and ensemble learning methods, with an emphasis on the AdaBoost-Decision Tree algorithm, in Mazandaran, Iran

verfasst von: Maryam Jahanbani, Mohammad H. Vahidnia, Hossein Aghamohammadi, Zahra Azizi

Erschienen in: Earth Science Informatics | Ausgabe 2/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Floods, as natural disasters, impose significant human and financial burdens, necessitating stringent mitigation measures. The recurrent annual incidence of floods precipitates considerable economic setbacks and tragic human casualties. In the realm of disaster management, flood susceptibility mapping has evolved into an indispensable instrument for preemptive intervention. In recent years, the amalgamation of machine learning (ML) methodologies and geographic information systems (GIS) has demonstrated remarkable promise in the realm of flood susceptibility mapping. Nonetheless, the inherent limitations of standalone ML models have constrained their predictive efficacy. Several shortcomings are evident in prior research. These include the failure to utilize contemporary ensemble approaches capable of enhancing performance and the limited exploration of diverse classifier combinations, which are instrumental in augmenting reliability. Simultaneously, there is an absence of current and up-to-date flood susceptibility maps on recent floods within the study area. Hence, this study endeavors to enhance the precision of flood susceptibility mapping, within the Haraz-Neka River basin across Mazandaran province, by harnessing an ensemble of ML models. The research methodology encompassed several pivotal phases. Initially, data about 240 flood sites were meticulously compiled. Subsequently, 70% of this dataset was allocated for training and cartographic elucidations, whereas the remaining 30%, selected at random, served to validate the resultant maps. The analytical framework incorporated a spectrum of influential parameters, encompassing Elevation, Slope, Aspect, Rainfall, land use, Vegetation Differentiation Index (NDVI), Soil Hydrology Groups, Proximity to the River, Distance from Landslides, Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), Stream Power Index (SPI), and Sediment Transport Index (STI) for spatial modeling. The results undeniably highlight the superior performance of the ensemble model compared to its individual counterparts. Validation exercises, leveraging historical flood data, prominently endorsed the AdaBoost algorithm integrated with the Decision Tree classifier as the most efficacious. Garnering an Area Under ROC curve surpassing 0.96, accompanied by an accuracy of 0.93%, a sensitivity of 0.95%, and a specificity of 0.92%, this amalgamation substantiates its prowess. The proposed framework stands poised to empower decision-makers in identifying vulnerable regions and devising efficacious flood risk mitigation strategies.

Vorheriger Artikel Multifractal Scaling characteristics of lineament networks of a fractured sandstone aquifer system

Nächster Artikel Comparison of tree-based ensemble learning algorithms for landslide susceptibility mapping in Murgul (Artvin), Turkey

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abdullah MF, Siraj S, Hodgett RE (2021) An overview of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) application in managing water-related disaster events: analyzing 20 years of literature for flood and drought events. Water 13:1358. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13101358CrossRef

Aerts JCJH et al (2018) Integrating human behaviour dynamics into flood disaster risk assessment. Nat Clim Change 8(3):193–199. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0085-1ADSCrossRef

Akay H (2021) Flood hazards susceptibility mapping using statistical, fuzzy logic, and MCDM methods. Soft Comput 25(14):9325–9346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05903-1CrossRef

Ali SA et al (2020) GIS-based comparative assessment of flood susceptibility mapping using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach, naïve Bayes tree, bivariate statistics and logistic regression: a case of Topľa basin, Slovakia. Ecol Indic 117(106620):106620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106620CrossRef

Anand AK, Pradhan SP (2023) Evaluation of bivariate statistical and hybrid models for the preparation of Flood hazard susceptibility maps in the Brahmani River Basin, India. Environ Earth Sci 82(16). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11069-w

Arabameri A et al (2020) Modeling spatial Flood using novel ensemble artificial intelligence approaches in northern Iran. Remote Sens 12(20):3423. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12203423ADSCrossRef

Bentivoglio R et al (2022) Deep learning methods for Flood mapping: a review of existing applications and future research directions. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 26(16):4345–4378. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4345-2022ADSCrossRef

Bui DT et al (2019) Flash Flood susceptibility modeling using an optimized fuzzy rule based on feature selection technique and tree based on ensemble methods. Sci Total Environ 668:1038–1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.422ADSCrossRefPubMed

Bui DT et al (2020a) A novel deep learning neural network approach for predicting flash Flood susceptibility: a case study at a high frequency tropical Storm area. Sci Total Environ 701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134413

Bui QT et al (2020b) Verification of novel integrations of swarm intelligence algorithms into deep learning neural network for Flood susceptibility mapping. J Hydrol 581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124379

Bui QD et al (2023) Flood risk mapping and analysis using an integrated framework of machine learning models and analytic hierarchy process. Risk Anal 43(7):1478–1495. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14018CrossRef

Cao Q et al (2019) The role of hydrological initial conditions on atmospheric river floods in the Russian River basin. J Hydrometeorol 20(8):1667–1686ADSCrossRef

Chen J et al (2020a) A machine learning ensemble approach based on random forest and radial basis function neural network for risk evaluation of regional flood disaster: a case study of the Yangtze River Delta, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010049

Chen W et al (2019) Flood susceptibility modelling using novel hybrid approach of reduced-error pruning trees with bagging and random subspace ensembles. J Hydrol 575:864–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.089CrossRef

Chen W et al (2020b) Modeling Flood susceptibility using data-driven approaches of naïve Bayes tree, alternating decision tree, and random forest methods. Sci Total Environ 701(134979):134979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134979ADSCrossRefPubMed

Chu H, Wu W, Wang QJ, Nathan R, Wei J (2020) An ANN-based emulation modelling framework for Flood inundation modelling: application, challenges and future directions. Environ Model Softw 124:104587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104587CrossRef

Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn Volume 20:273–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018CrossRef

Costache R et al (2020) Using GIS, remote sensing, and machine learning to highlight the correlation between the land-use/land-cover changes and flash-flood potential. Remote Sens 12(9):1422. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091422ADSCrossRef

Costache R et al (2023) Using fuzzy and machine learning iterative optimized models to generate the Flood susceptibility maps: case study of Prahova River basin, Romania. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2023.2281241

Dano U et al (2019) Flood susceptibility mapping using GIS-based analytic network process: a case study of Perlis, Malaysia. Water 11(3):615. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030615CrossRef

Dodangeh E et al (2020) Integrated machine learning methods with resampling algorithms for Flood susceptibility prediction. Sci Total Environ 705(135983):135983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135983ADSCrossRefPubMed

Dutta M et al (2023) Application of bivariate approaches for Flood susceptibility mapping: a district level study in Eastern India. HydroResearch 6:108–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydres.2023.02.004CrossRef

Freund Y, Schapire RE (1997) A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J Comput Syst Sci 55:119–139MathSciNetCrossRef

Ganaie MA et al (2022) Ensemble deep learning: a review. Eng Appl Artif Intell 115(105151):105151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105151CrossRef

Gharakhanlou N, Perez L (2023) Flood susceptible prediction through the use of geospatial variables and machine learning methods. J Hydrol 617(129121):129121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129121CrossRef

Habibi A et al (2023) A hybrid of ensemble machine learning models with RFE and Boruta wrapper-based algorithms for flash Flood susceptibility assessment. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf: ITC J 122(103401):103401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2023.103401CrossRef

Hasanuzzaman M et al (2022) A comparison of performance measures of three machine learning algorithms for Flood susceptibility mapping of river Silabati (tropical river, India). Phys Chem Earth 127(103198):103198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2022.103198CrossRef

Hayder IM et al (2023) An intelligent early Flood forecasting and prediction leveraging machine and deep learning algorithms with advanced alert system. Processes (Basel Switzerland) 11(2):481. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020481CrossRef

Hong H et al (2018a) Application of fuzzy weight of evidence and data mining techniques in construction of Flood susceptibility map of Poyang County, China. China Sci Total Environ 625:575–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.256ADSCrossRefPubMed

Hong H et al (2018b) Flood susceptibility assessment in Hengfeng area coupling adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with genetic algorithm and differential evolution. Sci Total Environ 621:1124–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.114ADSCrossRefPubMed

Hosseini FS et al (2020) Flash-flood hazard assessment using ensembles and bayesian-based machine learning models: application of the simulated annealing feature selection method. Sci Total Environ 711(135161):135161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135161ADSCrossRefPubMed

Ilia I et al (2022) Flash Flood susceptibility mapping using stacking ensemble machine learning models. Geocarto Int 37(27):15010–15036. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2093990ADSCrossRef

Islam AR et al (2021) Flood susceptibility modelling using advanced ensemble machine learning models. Geosci Front 12(3):101075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.006CrossRef

Jaafari A et al (2019) Meta optimization of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with grey wolf optimizer and biogeography-based optimization algorithms for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility. Catena 175:430–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.033CrossRef

Janizadeh S et al (2019) Prediction success of machine learning methods for flash Flood susceptibility mapping in the Tafresh watershed, Iran. Sustainability 11(19):5426. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195426CrossRef

Kaur H, Gupta S, Parkash S, Thapa R, Mandal R (2017) Geospatial modelling of Flood susceptibility pattern in a subtropical area of West Bengal, India. Environ Earth Sci 76:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6667-9CrossRef

Khosravi K, Melesse AM et al (2019) Flood susceptibility mapping at Ningdu catchment, China using bivariate and data mining techniques. In: Extreme Hydrology and Climate Variability. Elsevier, pp 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815998-9.00033-6

Lee S, Kim JC, Jung HS, Lee MJ, Lee S (2017) Spatial prediction of Flood susceptibility using random-forest and boosted-tree models in Seoul metropolitan city, Korea. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk 8(2):1185–1203CrossRef

Lin B, Wu J (2016) The impact of landslides on downstream Flood peaks. J Hydrol 541:748–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1308971CrossRef

Liu G et al (2022) Short-term runoff prediction using deep learning multi-dimensional ensemble method. J Hydrol 609:127762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127762CrossRef

Mia MU et al (2023) Flood susceptibility modeling using an advanced deep learning-based iterative classifier optimizer. Land 12(4):810. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12040810CrossRef

Mishra K, Sinha R (2020) Flood risk assessment in the Kosi megafan using multi-criteria decision analysis: a hydro-geomorphic approach. Geomorphology (Amsterdam Netherlands) 350(106861):106861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106861CrossRef

Mohajane M et al (2021) Application of remote sensing and machine learning algorithms for forest Fire mapping in a Mediterranean area. Ecol Ind 129(107869):107869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107869CrossRef

Moore ID, Wilson JP (1992) Length-slope factors for the revised Universal Soil loss equation: simplified method of estimation. J Soil Water Conserv 47(5):423–428

Nachappa T et al (2020) Flood susceptibility mapping with machine learning, multi-criteria decision analysis and ensemble using Dempster Shafer Theory. J Hydrol 590(125275):125275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125275

Nguyen HD (2023) Spatial modeling of Flood hazard using machine learning and GIS in Ha Tinh province, Vietnam. J Water Clim Change 14(1):200–222. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2022.257MathSciNetCrossRef

Paul G et al (2019) Application of the GIS-based probabilistic models for mapping the Flood susceptibility in Bansloi sub-basin of Ganga Bhagirathi River and their comparison. Remote Sens Earth Syst Sci 2:120–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41976-019-00018-6ADSCrossRef

Pham BT, Van Phong T et al (2020) A comparative study of Kernel Logistic regression, radial basis function classifier, Multinomial Naïve Bayes, and logistic model tree for flash Flood susceptibility mapping. Water 12(1):239. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010239CrossRef

Plataridis K, Mallios Z (2023) Flood susceptibility mapping using hybrid models optimized with Artificial Bee colony. J Hydrol 624(129961):129961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129961CrossRef

Polykretis C, Chalkias C, Ferentinou M (2019) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) modeling for landslide susceptibility assessment in a Mediterranean hilly area. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78(2):1173–1187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1125-1CrossRef

Pourghasemi H, Razavi-Termeh S, Kariminejad N, Hong H, Chen W (2020) An assessment of metaheuristic approaches for Flood assessment. J Hydrol 582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124536

Powell SJ, Jakeman A, Croke B (2014) Can NDVI response indicate the effective Flood extent in macrophyte dominated floodplain wetlands. Ecol Ind 45:486–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.05.009CrossRef

Prasad P et al (2022) Novel ensemble machine learning models in Flood susceptibility mapping. Geocarto Int 37(16):4571–4593. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1892209ADSCrossRef

Prăvălie R et al (2017) Spatio-temporal trends of mean air temperature during 1961–2009 and impacts on crop (maize) yields in the most important agricultural region of Romania. Stoch Environ Res risk Assess: Res J 31(8):1923–1939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-016-1278-7CrossRef

Rafiei-Sardooi E et al (2021) Evaluating urban Flood risk using hybrid method of TOPSIS and machine learning. Int J Disaster risk Reduction: IJDRR 66(102614):102614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102614CrossRef

Rahmati O, Pourghasemi HR (2017) Identification of critical flood prone areas in data-scarce and ungauged regions: A comparison of three data mining models. Water Resour Manage 31(5):1473–1487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1589-6CrossRef

Rouse JW, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW (1974) Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS. Third ERTS-1 Symposium NASA, NASA SP-351, Washington DC, 309–317

Saha S, Gayen A, Bayen B (2022) Deep learning algorithms to develop Flood susceptibility map in Data-Scarce and Ungauged River Basin in India. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess: Res J 36(10):3295–3310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02195-1CrossRef

Sahana M, Patel PP (2019) A comparison of frequency ratio and fuzzy logic models for Flood susceptibility assessment of the lower Kosi River Basin in India. Environ Earth Sci 78(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8285-1

Sahana M et al (2020) Exploring effectiveness of frequency ratio and support vector machine models in Storm surge Flood susceptibility assessment: a study of Sundarban Biosphere Reserve, India. Catena 189(104450):104450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104450CrossRef

Saikh NI, Mondal P (2023) Gis-based machine learning algorithm for Flood susceptibility analysis in the Pagla river basin, Eastern India. Nat Hazards Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nhres.2023.05.004CrossRef

Salman R, Alzaatreh A, Sulieman H, Faisal S (2021) A bootstrap Framework for aggregating within and between feature selection methods. Entropy (Basel Switzerland) 23(2):200. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23020200ADSMathSciNetCrossRefPubMed

Samanta S, Pal DK, Palsamanta B (2018) Flood susceptibility analysis through remote sensing, GIS and frequency ratio model. Appl Water Sci 8(2):66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0710-1ADSCrossRef

Sarkar D, Mondal P (2020) Flood vulnerability mapping using frequency ratio (FR) model: a case study on Kulik river basin, Indo-Bangladesh Barind region. Appl Water Sci 10(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1102-xADSCrossRef

Seydi ST et al (2022) Comparison of machine learning algorithms for Flood susceptibility mapping. Remote Sens 15(1):192. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010192ADSCrossRef

Shahiri Tabarestani E, Afzalimehr H (2021) Artificial neural network and multi-criteria decision-making models for Flood simulation in GIS: Mazandaran Province, Iran. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-01997-z

Shirzadi A et al (2018) Novel GIS based machine learning algorithms for shallow landslide susceptibility mapping. Sensors 18(11):3777. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113777ADSMathSciNetCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Slinker BK, Glantz SA (1985) Multiple regression for physiological data analysis: the problem of multicollinearity. Am J Physiol 249(1 Pt 2):R1-12. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.1985.249.1.1CrossRefPubMed

Sørensen R, Zinko U, Seibert J (2006) On the calculation of the topographic wetness index: evaluation of different methods based on field observations. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10(1):101–112. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-101-2006ADSCrossRef

Sturzenegger M et al (2019) Semi-automated regional scale debris-flow and debris-flood susceptibility mapping based on digital elevation model metrics and Flow-R software. Mountain Scholar. https://doi.org/10.25676/11124/173134CrossRef

Su J et al (2019) Evaluating the hydrological utility of latest IMERG products over the Upper Huaihe River Basin, China. Atmos Res 225:17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.03.025CrossRef

Upreti A (2022) Machine learning application in GIS and remote sensing: an overview. Int J Multidiscip Res Growth Evaluation 546–553. https://doi.org/10.54660/anfo.2022.3.4.20

Wang Y et al (2020) Flood susceptibility mapping using convolutional neural network frameworks. J Hydrol 582(124482):124482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124482CrossRef

Wijayarathne DB, Coulibaly P (2020) Identification of hydrological models for operational Flood forecasting in St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada. J Hydrology Reg Stud 27(100646):100646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.100646CrossRef

Winterfeldt D, Edwards W (1986) Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–89

Wu Y, Ke Y, Chen Z, Liang S, Zhao H, Hong H (2020) Application of alternating decision tree with AdaBoost and bagging ensembles for landslide susceptibility mapping. Catena 187:104396CrossRef

Xie H et al (2019) Intra- and inter-event characteristics and controlling factors of agricultural nonpoint source pollution under different types of rainfall-runoff events. Catena 182(104105):104105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104105CrossRef

Yariyan P et al (2020) Improvement of best first decision trees using bagging and dagging ensembles for Flood probability mapping. Water Resour Manage 34(9):3037–3053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02603-7CrossRef

Zeng Z et al (2017) Development of an NRCS curve number global dataset using the latest geospatial remote sensing data for worldwide hydrologic applications. Remote Sens Lett 8(6):528–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704x.2017.1297544CrossRef

Zhao G et al (2018) Mapping Flood susceptibility in mountainous areas on a national scale in China. Sci Total Environ 615:1133–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.037ADSCrossRefPubMed

Titel: Flood susceptibility mapping through geoinformatics and ensemble learning methods, with an emphasis on the AdaBoost-Decision Tree algorithm, in Mazandaran, Iran
verfasst von: Maryam Jahanbani
Mohammad H. Vahidnia
Hossein Aghamohammadi
Zahra Azizi
Publikationsdatum: 15.01.2024
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Earth Science Informatics / Ausgabe 2/2024
Print ISSN: 1865-0473
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-0481
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-01213-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2024

OpenEOcubes: an open-source and lightweight R-based RESTful web service for analyzing earth observation data cubes

Positioning and detection of rigid pavement cracks using GNSS data and image processing

Random Forest and Multilayer Perceptron hybrid models integrated with the genetic algorithm for predicting pan evaporation of target site using a limited set of neighboring reference station data

Application of hybrid model-based machine learning for groundwater potential prediction in the north central of Vietnam

Classification and detection of natural disasters using machine learning and deep learning techniques: A review

Fuzzy Swin transformer for Land Use/ Land Cover change detection using LISS-III Satellite data

Premium Partner