Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Social Justice Research 3/2023

25.07.2023

Focusing on the “Social” in Social Justice Research

Erschienen in: Social Justice Research | Ausgabe 3/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

I describe what I see as a very strong connection between fairness perceptions and reactions that show engagement with social entities and social relationships. A brief review of studies on perceived fairness and the fair process effects illustrates how very social is the reaction to fair or unfair treatment—that is, how perceptions of fairness have a strong impact on how people view their inclusion and safety in the social group or relationship in which the treatment occurs. I suggest that this much-observed connection between fairness and group engagement raises some interesting questions about how perceived fairness affects some traditional group process phenomena. I discuss research questions that arise with respect to fairness and social identity process, fairness and obedience to authority, and fairness and conformity. Investigations of these questions, I argue, would give the field a stronger foundation in the basic social psychology of fairness and it would re-invigorate the groups aspect of social psychology as a discipline.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422–436.CrossRef Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422–436.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). Academic Press. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). Academic Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Adler, P., Hensler, D., & Nelson, C.E. (1983). Simple justice: How litigants fare in the Pittsburgh Court Arbitration Program. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. Adler, P., Hensler, D., & Nelson, C.E. (1983). Simple justice: How litigants fare in the Pittsburgh Court Arbitration Program. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Zurück zum Zitat Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research, 1, 177–198.CrossRef Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research, 1, 177–198.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ambrose, M. L., Wo, D. X. H., & Griffith, M. D. (2015). Overall justice: Past, present, and future. In R. S. Cropanzano & M. L. Ambrose (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace (pp. 109–135). Oxford University Press. Ambrose, M. L., Wo, D. X. H., & Griffith, M. D. (2015). Overall justice: Past, present, and future. In R. S. Cropanzano & M. L. Ambrose (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace (pp. 109–135). Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 177–190). Carnegie Press. Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 177–190). Carnegie Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31–35.CrossRef Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31–35.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70, 1–70.CrossRef Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70, 1–70.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bekoff, M. (2001). Social play behavior: Cooperation, fairness, trust, and the evolution of morality. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(2), 81–90. Bekoff, M. (2001). Social play behavior: Cooperation, fairness, trust, and the evolution of morality. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(2), 81–90.
Zurück zum Zitat Bekoff, M. (2004). Wild justice, cooperation, and fair play: Minding manners, being nice, and feeling good. In R. Sussman & A. Chapman (Eds.), The origins and nature of sociality (pp. 53–79). Aldine. Bekoff, M. (2004). Wild justice, cooperation, and fair play: Minding manners, being nice, and feeling good. In R. Sussman & A. Chapman (Eds.), The origins and nature of sociality (pp. 53–79). Aldine.
Zurück zum Zitat Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). JAI Press. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). JAI Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Blader, S., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Testing and expanding the group engagement model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 445–464.PubMedCrossRef Blader, S., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Testing and expanding the group engagement model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 445–464.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bobocel, D. R., & Gosse, L. (2015). Procedural justice: A historical review and critical analysis. In R. S. Cropanzano & M. L. Ambrose (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace (pp. 51–87). Oxford University Press. Bobocel, D. R., & Gosse, L. (2015). Procedural justice: A historical review and critical analysis. In R. S. Cropanzano & M. L. Ambrose (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace (pp. 51–87). Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bos, K. V. D., Lind, E. A., Bommelé, J., & VandeVondele, S. D. (2015). Reminders of behavioral disinhibition increase public conformity in the Asch paradigm and behavioral affiliation with ingroup members. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 837.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bos, K. V. D., Lind, E. A., Bommelé, J., & VandeVondele, S. D. (2015). Reminders of behavioral disinhibition increase public conformity in the Asch paradigm and behavioral affiliation with ingroup members. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 837.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brosnan, S. F. (2006). Nonhuman species’ reactions to inequity and their implications for fairness. Social Justice Research, 19, 153–185.CrossRef Brosnan, S. F. (2006). Nonhuman species’ reactions to inequity and their implications for fairness. Social Justice Research, 19, 153–185.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.CrossRef Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement of experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108–119.CrossRef Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement of experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108–119.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J., & Corkran, L. (1979). Effects of “voice” and peer opinions on responses to inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(12), 2253–2261.CrossRef Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J., & Corkran, L. (1979). Effects of “voice” and peer opinions on responses to inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(12), 2253–2261.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Friedland, N., Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1973). Some determinants of the violation of rules. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 103–118.CrossRef Friedland, N., Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1973). Some determinants of the violation of rules. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 103–118.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hellwig, P., Buchholz, V., Kopp, S., & Maier, G. W. (2023). Let the user have a say—Voice in automated decision-making. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107446.CrossRef Hellwig, P., Buchholz, V., Kopp, S., & Maier, G. W. (2023). Let the user have a say—Voice in automated decision-making. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107446.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hogg, M. A. (2004). Uncertainty and extremism: Identification with high entitativity groups under conditions of uncertainty. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 401–418). Psychology Press. Hogg, M. A. (2004). Uncertainty and extremism: Identification with high entitativity groups under conditions of uncertainty. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 401–418). Psychology Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Hogg, M. A. (2005). Uncertainty, social identity and ideology. In S. R. Thye & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 22, pp. 203–230). Elsevier. Hogg, M. A. (2005). Uncertainty, social identity and ideology. In S. R. Thye & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 22, pp. 203–230). Elsevier.
Zurück zum Zitat Hulst, L., Van den Bos, K., Akkermans, A. J., & Lind, E. A. (2017a). On why procedural justice matters in court hearings: Experimental evidence that behavioral disinhibition weakens the association between procedural justice and evaluations of judges. Utrecht Law Review, 13(3), 114–129.CrossRef Hulst, L., Van den Bos, K., Akkermans, A. J., & Lind, E. A. (2017a). On why procedural justice matters in court hearings: Experimental evidence that behavioral disinhibition weakens the association between procedural justice and evaluations of judges. Utrecht Law Review, 13(3), 114–129.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hulst, L., Van den Bos, K., Akkermans, A. J., & Lind, E. A. (2017b). On the psychology of perceived procedural justice: Experimental evidence that behavioral inhibition strengthens reactions to voice and no-voice procedures. Frontiers in Psychological and Behavioral Science, 6, 1–12. Hulst, L., Van den Bos, K., Akkermans, A. J., & Lind, E. A. (2017b). On the psychology of perceived procedural justice: Experimental evidence that behavioral inhibition strengthens reactions to voice and no-voice procedures. Frontiers in Psychological and Behavioral Science, 6, 1–12.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson, J. (2018). Norms, normativity and the legitimacy of legal authorities: International perspectives. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 14, 145–165.CrossRef Jackson, J. (2018). Norms, normativity and the legitimacy of legal authorities: International perspectives. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 14, 145–165.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley-Interscience. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung, K., Tong, K., & Lind, E. A. (2007). Realpolitik versus fair process: Moderating effects of group identification on acceptance of political decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 476–489.PubMedCrossRef Leung, K., Tong, K., & Lind, E. A. (2007). Realpolitik versus fair process: Moderating effects of group identification on acceptance of political decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 476–489.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lin, X., & Leung, K. (2014). What signals does procedural justice climate convey? The roles of group status, and organizational benevolence and integrity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(4), 464–488.CrossRef Lin, X., & Leung, K. (2014). What signals does procedural justice climate convey? The roles of group status, and organizational benevolence and integrity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(4), 464–488.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lind, E.A., & Arndt, C. (2016). Perceived fairness and regulatory policy: A behavioural science perspective on government–citizen interactions. OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers, No. 6, OECD Publishing, Paris. Lind, E.A., & Arndt, C. (2016). Perceived fairness and regulatory policy: A behavioural science perspective on government–citizen interactions. OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers, No. 6, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Zurück zum Zitat Lind, E.A. & Arndt, C. (2017). Regulations, fairness, and trust. In Trust and public policy: How better governance can help rebuild public trust. OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris. Lind, E.A. & Arndt, C. (2017). Regulations, fairness, and trust. In Trust and public policy: How better governance can help rebuild public trust. OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Zurück zum Zitat Lind, E. A. (1995). Social conflict and social justice: Some lessons from the social psychology of justice. Leiden UniversityPress. Lind, E. A. (1995). Social conflict and social justice: Some lessons from the social psychology of justice. Leiden UniversityPress.
Zurück zum Zitat Lind, E. A. (1997). Social conflict and the fairness heuristic. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 21, 6–22. Lind, E. A. (1997). Social conflict and the fairness heuristic. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 21, 6–22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 56–88). Stanford University Press. Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 56–88). Stanford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Lind, E. A. (2020). Exclusion, exploitation, and the psychology of justice. In E. Lind (Ed.), Social psychology and Justice (pp. 75–92). Routledge. Lind, E. A. (2020). Exclusion, exploitation, and the psychology of justice. In E. Lind (Ed.), Social psychology and Justice (pp. 75–92). Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Lind, E. A., Erickson, B. E., Friedland, N., & Dickenberger, M. (1978). Reactions to procedural models for adjudicative conflict resolution: A cross-national study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 22, 318–341.CrossRef Lind, E. A., Erickson, B. E., Friedland, N., & Dickenberger, M. (1978). Reactions to procedural models for adjudicative conflict resolution: A cross-national study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 22, 318–341.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lind, E. A., Greenberg, J., Scott, K. S., & Welchans, T. D. (2000). The winding road from employee to complainant: Situational and psychological determinants of wrongful termination lawsuits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 557–590.CrossRef Lind, E. A., Greenberg, J., Scott, K. S., & Welchans, T. D. (2000). The winding road from employee to complainant: Situational and psychological determinants of wrongful termination lawsuits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 557–590.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990a). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952–959.CrossRef Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990a). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952–959.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lind, E. A., Kray, L. J., & Thompson, L. (2001). Primacy effects in justice judgments: Testing predictions from fairness heuristic theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 189–210.PubMedCrossRef Lind, E. A., Kray, L. J., & Thompson, L. (2001). Primacy effects in justice judgments: Testing predictions from fairness heuristic theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 189–210.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lind, E. A., Kulik, C., Ambrose, M., & Park, M. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 224–251.CrossRef Lind, E. A., Kulik, C., Ambrose, M., & Park, M. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 224–251.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lind, E. A., MacCoun, R. J., Ebener, P. E., Felstiner, W. L. F., Hensler, D. R., Resnik, J., & Tyler, T. R. (1990b). In the eye of the beholder: Tort litigants’ evaluations of their experiences in the civil justice system. Law & Society Review, 24, 953–996.CrossRef Lind, E. A., MacCoun, R. J., Ebener, P. E., Felstiner, W. L. F., Hensler, D. R., Resnik, J., & Tyler, T. R. (1990b). In the eye of the beholder: Tort litigants’ evaluations of their experiences in the civil justice system. Law & Society Review, 24, 953–996.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lind, E. A., & Shapard, J. E. (1981). Evaluation of court-annexed arbitration in three federal district courts. Federal Judicial Center. Lind, E. A., & Shapard, J. E. (1981). Evaluation of court-annexed arbitration in three federal district courts. Federal Judicial Center.
Zurück zum Zitat Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum Press.CrossRef Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McEwen, C. A., & Maiman, R. J. (1981). Small claims mediation in Maine: An empirical assessment. Maine Law Review, 33, 237–268. McEwen, C. A., & Maiman, R. J. (1981). Small claims mediation in Maine: An empirical assessment. Maine Law Review, 33, 237–268.
Zurück zum Zitat Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371–378.CrossRef Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371–378.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845–855.CrossRef Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845–855.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mossholder, K. W., Bennett, N., & Martin, C. L. (1998). A multilevel analysis of procedural justice context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 131–141.CrossRef Mossholder, K. W., Bennett, N., & Martin, C. L. (1998). A multilevel analysis of procedural justice context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 131–141.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Murray, S. L. (2005). Regulating the risks of closeness: A relationship specific sense of felt security. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 74–78.CrossRef Murray, S. L. (2005). Regulating the risks of closeness: A relationship specific sense of felt security. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 74–78.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., MacDonald, G., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1998). Through the looking glass darkly? When self-doubts turn into relationship insecurities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1459–1480.PubMedCrossRef Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., MacDonald, G., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1998). Through the looking glass darkly? When self-doubts turn into relationship insecurities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1459–1480.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 1–20.CrossRef Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 1–20.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Opotow, S. (2008). “Not so much as place to lay our head...”: Moral inclusion and exclusion in the American civil war reconstruction. Social Justice Research, 21(1), 26–49.CrossRef Opotow, S. (2008). “Not so much as place to lay our head...”: Moral inclusion and exclusion in the American civil war reconstruction. Social Justice Research, 21(1), 26–49.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 43–72). JAI Press. Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 43–72). JAI Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Organ, D. W., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Fairness and organizational citizenship behavior: What are the connections? Social Justice Research, 6, 5–18.CrossRef Organ, D. W., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Fairness and organizational citizenship behavior: What are the connections? Social Justice Research, 6, 5–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ötting, S. K., & Maier, G. W. (2018). The importance of procedural justice in human–machine interactions: Intelligent systems as new decision agents in organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 27–39.CrossRef Ötting, S. K., & Maier, G. W. (2018). The importance of procedural justice in human–machine interactions: Intelligent systems as new decision agents in organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 27–39.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Perez-Arechaederra, D., Briones, E., Lind, A., & García, L. (2014). Perceived organizational justice in care services: Creation and multi-sample validation of a measure. Social Science and Medicine, 102, 26–32.PubMedCrossRef Perez-Arechaederra, D., Briones, E., Lind, A., & García, L. (2014). Perceived organizational justice in care services: Creation and multi-sample validation of a measure. Social Science and Medicine, 102, 26–32.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robbers cave experiment. The University Book Exchange. Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robbers cave experiment. The University Book Exchange.
Zurück zum Zitat Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Starr, S. A., & Williams, R. M. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustment to army life (Vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Starr, S. A., & Williams, R. M. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustment to army life (Vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. L. Erlbaum Associates. Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. L. Erlbaum Associates.
Zurück zum Zitat Thibaut, J. W., Friedland, N., & Walker, L. (1974). Compliance with rules: Some social determinants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(6), 792–801.CrossRef Thibaut, J. W., Friedland, N., & Walker, L. (1974). Compliance with rules: Some social determinants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(6), 792–801.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. Wiley. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyler, T. R. (1984). Public support for increases in police authority. Law and Policy, 6, 329–338.CrossRef Tyler, T. R. (1984). Public support for increases in police authority. Law and Policy, 6, 329–338.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 333–344.CrossRef Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 333–344.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. Yale University Press. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyler, T. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 323–345.PubMedCrossRef Tyler, T. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 323–345.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Psychology Press. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Psychology Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. (2003). Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349–361.PubMedCrossRef Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. (2003). Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349–361.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tyler, T. R., & Caine, A. (1981). The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4), 642–655.CrossRef Tyler, T. R., & Caine, A. (1981). The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4), 642–655.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tyler, T. R., & Folger, R. (1980). Distributional and procedural aspects of satisfaction with citizen-police encounters. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 281–292.CrossRef Tyler, T. R., & Folger, R. (1980). Distributional and procedural aspects of satisfaction with citizen-police encounters. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 281–292.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115–192). Academic Press. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115–192). Academic Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K., & Spodick, N. (1985). The influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 72–81.CrossRef Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K., & Spodick, N. (1985). The influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 72–81.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Bos, K. (2001). Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 931–941.PubMedCrossRef Van den Bos, K. (2001). Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 931–941.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Bos, K. (2013). Meaning making following activation of the behavioral inhibition system: How caring less about what others think may help to make sense of what is going on. In K. D. Markman, T. Proulx, & M. J. Lindberg (Eds.), The psychology of meaning (pp. 359–380). American Psychological Association. Van den Bos, K. (2013). Meaning making following activation of the behavioral inhibition system: How caring less about what others think may help to make sense of what is going on. In K. D. Markman, T. Proulx, & M. J. Lindberg (Eds.), The psychology of meaning (pp. 359–380). American Psychological Association.
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Bos, K. (2018). Why people radicalize: How unfairness judgments are used to fuel radical beliefs, extremist behaviors, and terrorism. Oxford University Press. Van den Bos, K. (2018). Why people radicalize: How unfairness judgments are used to fuel radical beliefs, extremist behaviors, and terrorism. Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Bos, K., Ham, J., Lind, E. A., Simonis, M., Van Essen, W. J., & Rijpkema, M. (2008). Justice and the human alarm system: The impact of exclamation points and flashing lights on the justice judgment process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 201–219.CrossRef Van den Bos, K., Ham, J., Lind, E. A., Simonis, M., Van Essen, W. J., & Rijpkema, M. (2008). Justice and the human alarm system: The impact of exclamation points and flashing lights on the justice judgment process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 201–219.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2009). The social psychology of fairness and the regulation of personal uncertainty. In R. M. Arkin, K. C. Oleson, & P. J. Carroll (Eds.), Handbook of the uncertain self (pp. 122–141). Psychology Press. Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2009). The social psychology of fairness and the regulation of personal uncertainty. In R. M. Arkin, K. C. Oleson, & P. J. Carroll (Eds.), Handbook of the uncertain self (pp. 122–141). Psychology Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2013). On sense-making reactions and public inhibition of benign social motives: An appraisal model of prosocial behavior. In J. Olson & M. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 48, pp. 1–58). Academic Press. Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2013). On sense-making reactions and public inhibition of benign social motives: An appraisal model of prosocial behavior. In J. Olson & M. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 48, pp. 1–58). Academic Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., & Wilke, H. (2001). The psychology of procedural justice and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Volume II—From theory to practice (pp. 49–66). Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates. Van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., & Wilke, H. (2001). The psychology of procedural justice and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Volume II—From theory to practice (pp. 49–66). Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Bos, K., Van der Velden, L., & Lind, E. A. (2014). On the role of perceived justice in citizens’ reactions to government decisions and the handling of conflicts. Utrecht Law Review, 10, 1–26.CrossRef Van den Bos, K., Van der Velden, L., & Lind, E. A. (2014). On the role of perceived justice in citizens’ reactions to government decisions and the handling of conflicts. Utrecht Law Review, 10, 1–26.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat VandenBos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 1–60). Academic Press. VandenBos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 1–60). Academic Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker, L., LaTour, S., Lind, E. A., & Thibaut, J. (1974). Reactions of participants and observers to modes of adjudication. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 295–310.CrossRef Walker, L., LaTour, S., Lind, E. A., & Thibaut, J. (1974). Reactions of participants and observers to modes of adjudication. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 295–310.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Focusing on the “Social” in Social Justice Research
Publikationsdatum
25.07.2023
Erschienen in
Social Justice Research / Ausgabe 3/2023
Print ISSN: 0885-7466
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6725
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-023-00418-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2023

Social Justice Research 3/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner