Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

1. From Dignity in Organizations to Dignity Between Organizations

verfasst von : Maria Luisa Mendes Teixeira

Erschienen in: Organizational Dignity and Evidence-Based Management

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This work aims to present an organizational dignity (OD) theory and discuss its usefulness in guiding the relationships between organizations, stakeholders and B2B relationships. The main question that drove the construction of OD theory was “what do stakeholders review when they evaluate the consequences of the actions that organizations for the stakeholders’ dignity carried out?” Then the answer to this main question is that stakeholders evaluate the consequences of the actions that are carried out by organizations for their dignity in terms of cultural elements (practices supported by values); ethics orientation (deontological or teleological); focus more personal or social-oriented focus (stakeholders focus), and classifying the OD of an organization from high to low, as moral, legal, or pragmatic. Stakeholders evaluate the dignity of a firm according to its practices toward them. It is in this sense that organizational dignity means the dignity of a firm is evaluated by stakeholders. The evaluation results of each element address the stage in which the organizations can be allocated and receive the degree of dignity for their relations with the stakeholders.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Nächstes Kapitel Organizational Dignity, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Business Ethics
Literatur
Abbagnano, N. (2007). Dicionário de Filosofia. Martins Fontes.
Allinson, R. (1998). Ethical values as part of the definition of business enterprise and part of the internal structure of the business organization. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(9/10), 1015–1028.CrossRef
Bal, P. M., & Jong, S. D. (2016). From human resource management to human dignity development: A dignity perspective on HRM and the role of workplace democracy. In M. Costera & M. Pirson (Eds.), Dignity and organizations (pp. 173–1950). Palgrave McMillan.
Bilsky, W., & Jehn, K. A. (2008). Cultura organizacional e valores individuais: evidências de uma estrutura comum. In M. L. M Teixeira (Ed.), Valores humanos e gestão: novas perspectivas. São Paulo: Senac.
Bilsky, W. (2003). A Teoria das Facetas: Noções básicas [Facet Theory: Basic notions]. Estudos De Psicologia, 8(3), 357–365.CrossRef
Bourne, H., & Jenkins, M. (2013). Organizational values: A dynamic perspective. Organization Studies, 34, 495–514.CrossRef
Carrol, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.
Chakrabarty, S., & Bass, A. E. (2015). Comparing virtue, consequentialist, and deontological ethics-based corporate social responsibility: Mitigating microfinance risk in institutional voids. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3), 487–512.CrossRef
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.CrossRef
Collier, J., & Roberts, R. (2001). Introduction: An ethic for corporate governance? Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(1), 67–71.CrossRef
Crowley. M. (2013, May). Gender, the labor process and dignity at work. Social Forces, 91, 1209–1238.
Davidson, P., & Griffin, R. W. (2000), Management: Australia in a global context. Brisbane: Wiley.
Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. (1999). Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.CrossRef
Fassin, Y. (2009). The stakeholder model refined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, (1), 113–135.
Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholders approach. Boston: Pitman.
Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gosdal, T. C. (2007). Dignidade do trabalhador: Um conceito construído sob o paradigma do trabalho decente e da honra. São Paulo: LTr.
Guardani, F., Teixeira, M. L. M., Bido, D. S., & Mazzon, J. A. (2013). A relação entre valores, práticas organizacionais e confiança de clientes no setor de serviços. Produção, 23(4), 806–817.
Guttman, R., & Greenbaum, C. W. (1998). Facet theory: Its development and current status. European Psychologist, 3, 13–36.CrossRef
Healy & Wilkowska. (2017). Marx, alienation and the denial of dignity of work. In M. Costera & M. Pirson (Eds.), Dignity and organizations (pp. 173–1950). Palgrave McMillan.
Hendry, J. (2001). Economic contracts versus social relationships as a foundation for normative stakeholder theory. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(3), 223.CrossRef
Hodson, R., & Roscino, V. (2004). Organizational success and worker dignity: Complementary or contradictory? The American Journal of Sociology, 110(3), 672.CrossRef
Hodgkiss. (2013, August). A moral vision: human dignity in the eyes of the founders of sociology. The sociological review, 61(3), 417–439.
Hodson, R. (2001). Dignity at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1).
Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D. D., & Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 286–316.
Jacobson, N. (2009). A taxonomy of dignity: A grounded theory study. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 9, 1–9.
Jones, J. (2012). Human dignity in the EU charter of fundamental rights and its interpretation before the European Court of justice. Liverpool Law Review, 33, 281–300.CrossRef
King, B. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2010). Finding the organization in organizational theory: A meta-­-Theory of the organization as a social actor. Organization Science, 21(1), 290–305.CrossRef
Margolis, J. (1997). Dignity in balance: Philosophical and practical dimensions of promoting ethics in organizations (p. 307p). Massachusetts: Harvard University.
Maslow, A. H., Frager, R., & Cox, R. (1970). Motivation and personality (Vol. 2). In: J. Fadiman, & C. McReynolds (Eds.) New York: Harper & Rowa.
Mattson, J. D., & Clark, S. (2011). Human dignity in concept and practice. Policy Sciences, 44, 303–319.CrossRef
Mitchell, L. (2017). Dingity and membership: A route to the heart of how dignity is done in everyday interaction. In M. Costera & M. Pirson (Eds.), Dignity and organizations (pp. 173–1950). Palgrave McMillan.
Okoye, A. (2009). Theorising corporate social responsibility as an essentially contested concept: Is a definition necessary? Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 613–627.CrossRef
Parandeh, A., Khaghanizade, M., Mohammadi, E., & Mokhtari-Nouri, J. (2016). Nurses’ human dignity in education and practice: An integrated literature review. Iranian Journal of Nursing Midwifery, 21, 1–8.CrossRef
Rosen, C. (2012). Dignity: Its history and meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef
Ross, R. J. S. (2013, March). Women workers and the struggle for dignity and respect. The Journal of Labor & Society, 16, 59–68.
Sarlet, I. W. (2012). Dignidade da pessoa humana e direitos fundamentais na Constituição Federal de 1988. 9. Ed – Livraria do advogado. Porto Alegre.
Sarlet, I. W. (2009). A eficácia dos direitos fundamentais: Uma teoria geral dos direitos fundamentais na perspectiva constitucional (10th ed.). Porto Alegre: Livraria doAdvogado.
Sayer, A. (2007). Dignity at work: Broadening the agenda. Organization, 14, 565–581.CrossRef
Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Les valeurs de base de la personne: Théorie, mesures et applications [Basic human values: Theory, measurement, and applications]. Revue Française De Sociologie, 42, 249–288.
Seery, J. (2014). George Katteb: Dignity, morality, individuality. London: Routledge Innovators and Political Theory.CrossRef
Shye, S. (Ed.). (1978). Theory construction and data analysis in the behavioral sciences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Spiegelber, H. (1970). Intention and ‘Intentionality’ in the scholastics; Brentano and Husserl. In L. L. McAlister (Ed.) (pp. 108–28).
Tadd, W., Vanlaere, L., & Gastmans, C. (2010). Clarifying the concept of human dignity in the care of the elderly. Ethical Perspectives, 17(2), 253–281.CrossRef
Teixeira, M. L. M., Dias, S. M. R. C., Araujo, B. F. B., Paz, M. G. T., & Oliveira, L. M. B. (2010). O conceito de empresa digna na percepção de trabalhadores brasileiros. In Anais do Congreso de la asociación latinoamericana de sociología del trabajo, Anais ALAST, Ciudad do México, México.
Teixeira, M. L. M., & Bilsky, W. (2015). Faceting organizational dignity. International Facet Theory Conference. Presentation, not published.
Verbek, W. (2000). A revision of Hofstede et al.’ s (1990) organizational practices scale. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5), 587–602.
Yalden & Mccormack. (2010). Constructions of dignity: A pre-requisite for flourishing in the workplace? International Journal of Older People Nursing, 5(2), 137–147.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
From Dignity in Organizations to Dignity Between Organizations
verfasst von
Maria Luisa Mendes Teixeira
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Buch
Organizational Dignity and Evidence-Based Management

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68559-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-68560-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68560-7_1

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise