nach oben

Information Systems Frontiers

Erschienen in:

28.06.2022

From the “rush to ethics” to the “race for governance” in Artificial Intelligence

verfasst von: Vasiliki Koniakou

Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers | Ausgabe 1/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper engages with the emerging field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) governance wishing to contribute to the relevant literature from three angles grounded in international human rights law, Law and Technology, Science and Technology Studies (STS) and theories of technology. Focusing on the shift from ethics to governance, it offers a bird-eye overview of the developments in AI governance, focusing on the comparison between ethical principles and binding rules for the governance of AI, and critically reviewing the latest regulatory developments. Secondly, focusing on the role of human rights, it takes the argument that human rights offer a more robust and effective framework a step further, arguing for the necessity to extend human rights obligations to also directly apply to private actors in the context of AI governance. Finally, it offers insights for AI governance borrowing from the Internet Governance history and the broader technology governance field.

Vorheriger Artikel The Recursive Theory of Knowledge Augmentation: Integrating human intuition and knowledge in Artificial Intelligence to augment organizational knowledge

Nächster Artikel Co-Shaping an Ecosystem for Responsible AI: Five Types of Expectation Work in Response to a Technological Frame

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

The terms AI and AI systems are used interchangeably, under the definition offered in Section 2.

The term “human rights” is used here as a synonym to “fundamental rights” as this is the more common and familiar locution employed in international law. For the source of the “human rights gap” as a concept see Zalnieriute, M., & Milan, S. (2019). Internet Architecture and Human Rights: Beyond the Human Rights Gap. Policy and Internet, 11(1), 6–15.

According to the UN there are 195 sovereign states in the world, 193 of which are members of the UN.

See Maastricht Principle No. 6, as cited in the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (n 35) 15.

Codified in Codified in Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Jan. 27, 1980, 1155 U.N.T.S. 331.

On the growing literature suggesting human rights as a source of principles for human rights see also (Latonero, 2018; Leslie et al., 2022; McGregor et al., 2019; Risse, 2018; Taddeo & Floridi, 2018).

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights art. 2, Dec. 16, 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 171.

For more details see for example Mueller, M. (2002). Ruling the Root: IG and the Taming of Cyberspace. MIT Press, Zittrain, J. L. (2008). The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It The Harvard community has made this article openly Please share how this access benefits you. Your story. 10.1086/261502.

See for example RFC 8280, (Internet Research Task Force (IRTF), RFC 8280, by. N. Ten Oever and C, Cathy, Research into Human Rights Protocol Considerations, October 2017, available at https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8280.txt) and the human rights check lists developed by the.

Agrawal, A., Gans, J. & Goldfarb, A. (2019). Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and Work. In The Economics of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 197–236). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226613475.003.0008

Aizenberg, E. & van den Hoven, J. (2020). Designing for human rights in AI. Big Data and Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720949566

Algorithm Watch. (2020). AI Ethics Guidelines Global Inventory. Algorithm Watch. https://inventory.algorithmwatch.org/?sfid=172&_sf_s=urban&sort_order=_sfm_i_date+desc+alpha%0Ahttps://inventory.algorithmwatch.org/%0Ahttps://algorithmwatch.org/en/project/ai-ethics-guidelines-global-inventory/

Allen, J. R., & Massolo, G. (2020). AI in the Age of Cyber-Disorder | ISPI. https://www.ispionline.it/en/pubblicazione/ai-age-cyber-disorder-28309

Alston, P. (2005). Non-State Actors and Human Rights. Oxford University Press.

Alston, P. Report of the Special rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, United Nations UN Doc. A/74/493 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2534341

Alston, P., & Quinn, G. (2017). The nature and scope of states parties’ obligations under the international covenant on economic, social and cultural rights. In Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (pp. 3–76). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315257044-2

Aragão, D. M., & Roland, M. C. (2017). The need for a treaty: Expectations on counter-hegemony and the role of civil society. In Building a Treaty on Business and Human Rights (pp. 131–153). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108183031.007

Article19. (2019). Governance with teeth: How human rights can strengthen FAT and ethics initiatives on artificial intelligence -. https://www.article19.org/resources/governance-with-teeth-how-human-rights-can-strengthen-fat-and-ethics-initiatives-on-artificial-intelligence/

Asaro, P. M. (2019a). A Review of Private Sector AI Principles: A Report Prepared for UNIDIR.

Asaro, P. M. (2019b). AI ethics in predictive policing: From models of threat to an ethics of care. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 38(2), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2019.2915154CrossRef

Bachelet. (2021). Urgent action needed over artificial intelligence risks to human rights | | UN News. In UN News (pp. 5–9). https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/09/1099972

Bairaktarova, D., & Woodcock, A. (2017). Engineering Student’s Ethical Awareness and Behavior: A New Motivational Model. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(4), 1129–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9814-xCrossRef

Balkin, J. M. (2017). Free Speech in the Algorithmic Society: Big Data, Private Governance, and New School Speech Regulation. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1149–1210. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3038939

Balkin, J. M. (2018). Free speech is a triangle. In Columbia Law Review.

Basart, J. M., & Serra, M. (2013). Engineering Ethics Beyond Engineers’ Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9293-zCrossRef

Bayamlioglu, E. (2018). Contesting Automated Decisions. European Data Protection Law Review, 4(4), 433–446. https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2018/4/6

Bednar, K., Spiekermann, S., & Langheinrich, M. (2019). Engineering Privacy by Design: Are engineers ready to live up to the challenge? Information Society, 35(3), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2019.1583296CrossRef

Belli, L., Francisco, P. A., & Zingales, N. (2017). Law of the land or law of the platform? Beware of the privatisation of regulation and police. In Platform regulations: How platforms are regulated and how to they regulate us, (Issue December, pp. 41–64).

Benedek, W., Kettemann, M. C., & Senges, M. (2017). The Humanization of IG: A Roadmap Towards a Comprehensive Global (Human) Rights Architecture for the Internet. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2798361CrossRef

Bhatnagar, S., Alexandrova, A., Avin, S., Cave, S., Cheke, L., Crosby, M., Feyereisl, J., Halina, M., Loe, B. S., Ó hÉigeartaigh, S., Martínez-Plumed, F., Price, H., Shevlin, H., Weller, A., Winfield, A., & Hernández-Orallo, J. (2018). Mapping intelligence: Requirements and possibilities. In Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics (Vol. 44, pp. 117–135). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96448-5_13

Bietti, E. (2019). From Ethics Washing to Ethics Bashing: A View on Tech Ethics from Within Moral Philosophy. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3513182

Bilchitz, D. (2016a). Corporations and the limits of state-based models for protecting fundamental rights in international law. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 23(1), 143–170. https://doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.23.1.143CrossRef

Bilchitz, D. (2016b). The Necessity for a Business and Human Rights Treaty. Business and Human Rights Journal, 1(2), 203–227. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2016.13CrossRef

Bilchitz, D. (2017). Corporate Obligations and a Treaty on Business and Human Rights. In S. Deva, & D. Bilchitz (Eds.), Building a treaty on business and human rights: Context and contours (pp. 185–215). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108183031

Binns, R. (2017). Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy. Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and. Transparency, 1–11. http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.03586

Black, J. & Murray, A. (2019). Regulating AI and machine learning: setting the regulatory agenda (complementar). European Journal of Law and Technology, 10(3), 1–17. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/102953/4/722_3282_1_PB.pdf

Blitt, R. C. (2012). Beyond Ruggie’s Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Charting an Embracive Approach to Corporate Human Rights Compliance. SSRN Electronic Journal, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1907778

Boddington, P. (2020). Normative modes: Codes and standards. In M. D. Dubber, F. Pasquale, & S. Das (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of ethics of AI (Issue July, pp. 123–140). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.013.7

Borgesius, F. Z. (2018). Discrimination, artificial intelligence, and algorithmic decision-making. In Council of Europe. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/blogs/business-blog/2020/04/using-artificial-intelligence-algorithms

Brownlie, I. (2019). Principles of Public International Law. In Verfassung in Recht und Übersee (Vol. 14, Issue 1). Oxford University Press.

Brownsword, R. (2017). From Erewhon to AlphaGo: For the Sake of Human Dignity, Should We Destroy the Machines? Law, Innovation and Technology, 9(1), 117–153.CrossRef

Brownsword, R. (2019). Law Technology And Society: Re-Imagining The Regulatory Environment. Routledge.

Brundage, M., Avin, S., Clark, J., Toner, H., Eckersley, P., Garfinkel, B., Dafoe, A., Scharre, P., Zeitzoff, T., Filar, B., Anderson, H., Roff, H., Allen, G. C., Steinhardt, J., Flynn, C., hÉigeartaigh, S. Ó., Beard, S., Belfield, H., Farquhar, S., … Amodei, D. (2018). The malicious use of artificial intelligence: Forecasting, prevention, and mitigation. ArXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07228

Bryson, J. (2019). The past decade and the future of AI’s impact on society. In Towards a new enlightenment? A transcendent decade (Vol. 11, pp. 1–34). https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/wp-

Bryson, J. (2020). The Artificial Intelligence of the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: An Introductory Overview for Law and Regulation. In The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI. www.oxfordhandbooks.com

Bryson, J. J. & Theodorou, A. (2019). How Society Can Maintain Human-Centric Artificial Intelligence. In M. Toivonen & E. Saari (Eds.), Human-Centered Digitalization and Services (pp. 305–323). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7725-9_16

Bucchi, M. (2009). Beyond technocracy: Science, politics and citizens. In Beyond Technocracy: Science, Politics and Citizens. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89522-2

Buergenthal, T. (2006). The Evolving Human Rights System. The American Journal of International Law, 100(4), 783–807.CrossRef

Busacca, A., & Monaca, M. A. (2020). Processing of Personal Data and AI: GDPR Guarantees and Limits (Between Individual Data and BIG DATA). Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 288, 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45340-4_6CrossRef

Butcher, J., & Beridze, I. (2019). What is the State of Artificial Intelligence Governance Globally? RUSI Journal, 164(5–6), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2019.1694260CrossRef

Cadwalladr, C. (2020). Fresh Cambridge Analytica leaks’shows global manipulation is out of control. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jan/04/cambridge-analytica-data-leak-global-election-manipulation?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Slack

Cannarsa, M. (2021). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. In The Cambridge handbook of lawyering in the digital age (pp. 283–297). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108936040.022

Castells, M. (2003). The Internet Galaxy Reflections on the Internet. Oxford University Press.

Cath, C. (2018). Governing artificial intelligence: Ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133), 20180080. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0080

Chander, A. & Pasquale, F. (2016). The Racist Algorithm? Michigan Law Review, 498. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2795203

Chenou, J. M. (2014). From Cyber-Libertarianism to Neoliberalism: Internet Exceptionalism, Multi-stakeholderism, and the Institutionalisation of IG in the 1990s. Globalizations, 11(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2014.887387CrossRef

Chenou, J. M., & Radu, R. (2019). The “Right to Be Forgotten”: Negotiating Public and Private Ordering in the European Union. Business and Society, 58(1), 74–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317717720CrossRef

Cherednychenko, O. O. (2007). Fundamental Rights and Private Law: A Relationship of Subordination or Complementarity? Utrecht Law Review, 3(2), 1–25.CrossRef

Cihon, P., Maas, M. M., & Kemp, L. (2020). Fragmentation and the Future: Investigating Architectures for International AI Governance. Global Policy, 11(5), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12890CrossRef

Cihon, P., Maas, M. M., & Kemp, L. (2021). Should Artificial Intelligence Governance be Centralised?: Design Lessons from History. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3761636CrossRef

Clapham, A. (2006). Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors. Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Collins, C., Dennehy, D., Conboy, K. & Mikalef, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in information systems research: A systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102383

Cowls, J., Tsamados, A., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2021). The AI Gambit — Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Combat Climate Change: Opportunities, Challenges, and Recommendations. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3804983CrossRef

Crawford, K. (2021). Time to regulate AI that interprets human emotions. Nature, 592(7853), 167. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00868-5CrossRef

Crootof, R. & Ard, B. (2020). Structuring Techlaw. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3664124

Curran, J., Fenton, N., & Freedman, D. (2016). Misunderstanding the internet. In Misunderstanding the Internet (Routledge).

Dafoe, A. (2018). AI Governance: A Research Agenda. www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/govaiagenda

Daly, A., Hagendorff, T., Li, H., Mann, M., Marda, V., Wagner, B. & Wang, W. W. (2020). AI, Governance and Ethics: Global Perspectives. In SSRN Electronic Journal (Issue June). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3684406

Danaher, J. (2018). Toward an Ethics of AI Assistants: An Initial Framework. Philosophy and Technology, 31(4), 629–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0317-3CrossRef

Dawn, O. & Fedtke, J. (2008). Human Rights and the Private Sphere. UCL Human Rights Review.

de Almeida, P. G. R., dos Santos, C. D., & Farias, J. S. (2021). Artificial Intelligence Regulation: A framework for governance. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(3), 505–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09593-zCrossRef

de Witte, B. (2009). The crumbling public/private divide: Horizontality in European anti-discrimination law. Citizenship Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020903174670CrossRef

DeNardis, L. (2014). The Global War for IG. Yale University Press.

Deva, S. (2017). Conclusion: Connecting the dots: How to capitalize on the current high tide for a business and human rights treaty. In Building a treaty on business and human rights (pp. 472–494). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108183031.019

Diver, L. (2021). Interpreting the Rule ( s ) of Code : Performance , Performativity , and Production. MIT Computational Law Report.

Doorn, N. (2012). Responsibility Ascriptions in Technology Development and Engineering: Three Perspectives. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9189-3CrossRef

Doppelt, G. (2001). What sort of ethics does technology require? Journal of Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011956206973CrossRef

Dotson, T. (2015). Technological Determinism and Permissionless Innovation as Technocratic Governing Mentalities: Psychocultural Barriers to the Democratization of Technology. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 1, 98–120. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2015.009

Drake, W. (2004). Reframing IG discourse: Fifteen baseline propositions. IG: Toward a Grand Collaboration.

Dubber, M. D., Pasquale, F., & Das, S. (2020). The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.001.0001CrossRef

Dutton, T. (2018). An Overview of National AI Strategies. In Medium. https://medium.com/politics-ai/an-overview-of-national-ai-strategies-2a70ec6edfd

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., … Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002

Ebers, M., Hoch, V. R. S., Rosenkranz, F., Ruschemeier, H. & Steinrötter, B. (2021). The European Commission’s Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act—A Critical Assessment by Members of the Robotics and AI Law Society (RAILS). J, 4(4), 589–603. https://doi.org/10.3390/j4040043

Edwards, L. & Veale, M. (2017). Slave to the Algorithm? Why a “right to an explanation” is probably not the remedy you are looking for. Duke Law & Technology Review, 16(18). https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/97upg

Elshafei, G., & Negm, A. (2017). AI Technologies in Green Architecture Field: Statistical Comparative Analysis. Procedia Engineering, 181, 480–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.419CrossRef

Erdélyi, O. J. & Goldsmith, J. (2018). Regulating Artificial Intelligence Proposal for a Global Solution. AIES 2018 - Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1145/3278721.3278731

Ertel, W. (2017). Introduction to Artificial Intelligence. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58487-4CrossRef

Etinson, A. (2018). Human Rights. Oxford University Press.

European Commission. (2020). White paper on artificial intelligence: A European approach to excellence and trust. In European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/commission-white-paper-artificial-intelligence-feb2020_en.pdf

Ezrahi, Y. (2012). Imagined democracies: Necessary political fictions. In Imagined democracies: Necessary political fictions. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198769

Facebook. (2020). Facebook’s five pillars of Responsible AI. Retrieved October 27, 2021, from https://ai.facebook.com/blog/facebooks-five-pillars-of-responsible-ai/

Feenberg, A. (1994). The technocracy thesis revisited: On the critique of power. Inquiry (united Kingdom), 37(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201749408602341CrossRef

Feldstein, S. (2019a). The Global Expansion of AI Surveillance. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/WP-Feldstein-AISurveillance_final1.pdf

Feldstein, S. (2019b). The Road to Digital Unfreedom: How Artificial Intelligence is Reshaping Repression. Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 40–52.CrossRef

Fjeld, J., Achten, N., Hilligoss, H., Nagy, A., & Srikumar, M. (2020). Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3518482CrossRef

Floridi, L. (2016). Faultless responsibility: On the nature and allocation of moral responsibility for distributed moral actions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2083). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0112

Floridi, L. (2018). Soft Ethics and the Governance of the Digital. Philosophy and Technology, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0303-9

Floridi, L. & Cowls, J. (2019). A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608F92.8CD550D1

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People-An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities. Risks, Principles, and Recommendations., 28, 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5CrossRef

Fukuda-Parr, S., & Gibbons, E. (2021). Emerging Consensus on ‘Ethical AI’: Human Rights Critique of Stakeholder Guidelines. Global Policy, 12(S6), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12965CrossRef

Gasser, U., & Almeida, V. A. F. (2017). A Layered Model for AI Governance. IEEE Internet Computing, 21(6), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2017.4180835CrossRef

George, E. R., & Laplante, L. J. (2017). Access to remedy: Treaty talks and the terms of a new accountability accord. In Building a treaty on business and human rights (pp. 377–407). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108183031.016

Gerards, J. (2019). The fundamental rights challenges of algorithms. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 37(3), 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0924051919861773CrossRef

Gibbons, E. D. (2021). Toward a More Equal World: The Human Rights Approach to Extending the Benefits of Artificial Intelligence. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2021.3056295CrossRef

Gibson, G. (2017). Net neutrality repeal gives Democrats fresh way to reach millennials | Reuters. Reuters Online. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-internet-election-analysis-idUSKBN1E901R

Gillespie, T. (2014). The Relevance of Algorithms. In Media Technologies (pp. 167–194). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.003.0009

Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. In Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.

Gillespie, T. (2020). Content moderation, AI, and the question of scale. Big Data and Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720943234

Giovanola, B. & Tiribelli, S. (2022). Weapons of moral construction? On the value of fairness in algorithmic decision-making. Ethics and Information TechnologyEthics and Information Technology, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09622-5

Godfrey, C. (2020). Legislating Big Tech: The Effects Amazon Rekognition Technology Has on Privacy Rights. Intellectual Property and Technology Law Journal, 25. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/iprop25&id=175&div=&collection=

Goldman, E. (2009). The Third Wave of Internet Exceptionalism. 497, 1–3. http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2009/03/the_third_wave.htm

Gorwa, R., Binns, R., & Katzenbach, C. (2020). Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719897945CrossRef

Greenstein, S. M. (2015). How the Internet became commercial: innovation, privatization, and the birth of a new network. In The Kauffman foundation series on innovation and entrepreneurship.

Grimes, S., & Feenberg, A. (2013). Critical theory of technology. In S. Price, C. Jewitt, & B. Brown (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of digital technology research. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Gruetzemacher, R. & Whittlestone, J. (2022). The transformative potential of artificial intelligence. Futures, 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102884

Guihot, M., Matthew, A. & Suzor, N. P. (2017). Nudging Robots: Innovative Solutions to Regulate Artificial Intelligence. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 20(2), 385. https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/5at2f

Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619864925CrossRef

Hagendorff, T. (2020). The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines. Minds and Machines, 30(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8CrossRef

Hamdani, K. & Ruffing, L. (2017). Lessons from the UN Centre on transnational corporations for the current treaty initiative. In S. Deva & D. Bilchitz (Eds.), Building a Treaty on Business and Human Rights: Context and Contours (pp. 27–47). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108183031.003

Hamon, R., Junklewitz, H., Malgieri, G., Hert, P. De, Beslay, L. & Sanchez, I. (2021). Impossible explanations?: Beyond explainable AI in the GDPR from a COVID-19 use case scenario. FAccT 2021 - Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445917

Hamon, R., Junklewitz, H., Sanchez, I., Malgieri, G., & De Hert, P. (2022). Bridging the Gap Between AI and Explainability in the GDPR: Towards Trustworthiness-by-Design in Automated Decision-Making. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 17(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/mci.2021.3129960CrossRef

Hao, K. (2019). In 2020, Let’s Stop AI Ethics-washing and Actually do Something. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/614992/ai-ethics-washing-time-to-act/

Hazenberg, J. L. J. (2016). Transnational Corporations and Human Rights Duties: Perfect and Imperfect. Human Rights Review, 17(4), 479–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-016-0417-3CrossRef

Hess, D. (2015). Power, ideology, and technological determinism. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 1, 121–125. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2015.010

High-Level Independent Group on Artificial Intelligence (AI HLEG). (2019a). A Definition of AI: Main Capabilities and Disciplines. In European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-%0A10.1145/3301275.3302317-

High-Level Independent Group on Artificial Intelligence (AI HLEG). (2019b). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI (Issue December). https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai

Hildebrandt, M. (2008). Legal and Technological Normativity: More (and less) than twin sisters. Techne: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 12(3), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne20081232

Hildebrandt, M. (2011a). Law at a Crossroads: Losing the Thread or Regaining Control? The Collapse of Distance in Real Time Computing. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1331963

Hildebrandt, M. (2011b). Legal Protection by Design: Objections and Refutations. Legisprudence, 5(2), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.5235/175214611797885693CrossRef

Hildebrandt, M. (2015). Smart Technologies and the End(s) of Law: Novel Entanglements of Law and Technology. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Hildebrandt, M. (2016). Law as Information in the Era of Data-Driven Agency. Modern Law Review, 79(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12165CrossRef

Hildebrandt, M. (2017). Saved by Design? The Case of Legal Protection by Design. NanoEthics, 11(3), 307–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-017-0299-0CrossRef

Hildebrandt, M. (2018). Algorithmic regulation and the rule of law. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2128). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0355

Hildebrandt, M. (2019). Law for Computer Scientists • Law for Computer Scientists 10. “Legal by Design” or “Legal Protection by Design”?

Hogenhout, L. (2021). A Framework for Ethical AI at the United Nations. Unite Paper, 1–23. https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/16/tech/emotion-recognition-ai-education-spc-intl-

Hopgood, S. (2018). The Endtimes of Human Rights. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801469305CrossRef

Horner, J. (2003). Morality, ethics, and law: Introductory concepts. Seminars in Speech and Language, 24(4), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-815580CrossRef

IBM. (2020). AI Ethics | IBM. IBM Cloud Learn Hub. https://www.ibm.com/cloud/learn/ai-ethics

Jang, E. (2017). What Companies Are Winning The Race For Artificial Intelligence? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2017/02/24/what-companies-are-winning-the-race-for-artificial-intelligence/#7f04527ef5cd

Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2.CrossRef

Johnson, D. R., & Post, D. (1996). Law and Borders - The Rise of Law in Cyberspace. Stanford Law Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229390CrossRef

Jørgensen, R. F., & Zuleta, L. (2020). Private Governance of Freedom of Expression on Social Media Platforms. Nordicom Review, 41(1), 51–67.CrossRef

Kambatla, K., Kollias, G., Kumar, V., & Grama, A. (2014). Trends in big data analytics. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 74(7), 2561–2573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2014.01.003CrossRef

Kampourakis, I. (2019). CSR and Social Rights: Juxtaposing Societal Constitutionalism and Rights-Based Approaches Imposing Human Rights Obligations on Corporations. Goettingen Journal of International Law, 9(3), 537–569.

Kanalan, I. (2014). Horizontal Effect of Human Rights in the Era of Transnational Constellations: On the Accountability of Private Actors for Human Rights Violations. In SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2539110

Kemp, L., Cihon, P., Maas, M. M., Belfield, H., Seán, D., Leung, J., & Cremer, Z. (2019). UN High-level Panel on Digital Cooperation: A Proposal for International AI Governance. In UN High-Level Panel on Digital Cooperation, pp. 1–4.

Kennedy, R. (2021). The Ethical Implications of Lawtech. In D. Dennehy, A. Griva, N. Pouloudi, Y. K. Dwivedi, I. Pappas & M. Mäntymäki (Eds.), Responsible AI and Analytics for an Ethical and Inclusive Digitized Society (Vol. 12896). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85447-8

Klonick, K. (2018). The new governors: The people, rules, and processes governing online speech. Harvard Law Review, 131(6), 1599–1670.

Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. In Governing as Governance. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446215012

Koops, B. J. & Leenes, R. (2014). Privacy regulation cannot be hardcoded. A critical comment on the “privacy by design” provision in data-protection law. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 28(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2013.801589

Krishnamurthy, V. (2019). Are Internet Protocols the New Human Rights Protocols? Understanding “RFC 8280 - Research into Human Rights Protocol Considerations.” In Business and Human Rights Journal. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2018.30

Kunz, M. & Ó hÉigeartaigh, S. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Robotization. In R. Geiß & N. Melzer (Eds.), Oxford Handbook on the International Law of Global Security. Oxford University Press.

Kuziemski, M., & Misuraca, G. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications Policy, 44, 6 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELPOL.2020.101976CrossRef

LaGrandeur, K. (2021). How safe is our reliance on AI, and should we regulate it? AI and Ethics, 1(2), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00010-7CrossRef

Laitinen, A. & Sahlgren, O. (2021). AI Systems and Respect for Human Autonomy. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.705164

Lambrecht, A. & Tucker, C. E. (2018). Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study into Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2852260

Lane, L. (2018a). The Horizontal Effect of International Human Rights Law: Towards a multi-level governance approach. https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/publications/the-horizontal-effect-of-international-human-rights-law(d6becf0f-de98-45cd-a6ed-39cb4687cd23).html)

Lane, L. (2018b). The horizontal effect of international human rights law in practice: A comparative analysis of the general comments and jurisprudence of selected united nations human rights treaty monitoring bodies. In European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance (Vol. 5, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-00501001

Lane, L. (2018c). The Horizontal Effect of International Human Rights Law in Practice. In European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance (Vol. 5, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-00501001

Larsson, S. (2013a). Conceptions, categories and embodiment: Why metaphors are of fundamental importance for understanding norms. In M. Baier (Ed.), Social and Legal Norms: Towards a Socio-Legal Understanding of Normativity (pp. 121–139). Ashgate.

Larsson, S. (2013b). Copy Me Happy: The Metaphoric Expansion of Copyright in a Digital Society. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-012-9297-2CrossRef

Larsson, S. (2013c). Metaphors, law and digital phenomena: The Swedish pirate bay court case. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 21(4), 354–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eat009CrossRef

Larsson, S. (2019). The Socio-Legal Relevance of Artificial Intelligence. Droit et Société, N°103(3). https://doi.org/10.3917/DRS1.103.0573

Larsson, S. (2020). On the Governance of Artificial Intelligence through Ethics Guidelines. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 7(3), 437–451. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2020.19CrossRef

Latonero, M. (2018). Governing artificial intelligence: upholding human rights & dignity. Data & Society. In Data & Society (pp. 1–37). https://datasociety.net/library/governing-artificial-intelligence/

Leenes, R., Palmerini, E., Koops, B. J., Bertolini, A., Salvini, P., & Lucivero, F. (2017). Regulatory challenges of robotics: Some guidelines for addressing legal and ethical issues. Law, Innovation and Technology, 9(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2017.1304921CrossRef

Leslie, D., Burr, C., Aitken, M., Katell, M., Briggs, M. & Rincon, C. (2022). Human rights, democracy, and the rule of law assurance framework for AI systems: A proposal. 10.5281/zenodo.5981676

Lessig, L. (1999). Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace. Basic Books.

Levy, K., Chasalow, K. E., & Riley, S. (2021). Algorithms and Decision-Making in the Public Sector. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 17, 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-041221-023808CrossRef

Liu, H. Y., & Maas, M. M. (2021). ‘Solving for X?’ Towards a problem-finding framework to ground long-term governance strategies for artificial intelligence. Futures, 126,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102672

Lloyd, P. (2009). Ethical imagination and design. Design Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.12.004CrossRef

Lyytinen, K., & Rose, G. M. (2003). Disruptive information system innovation: The case of internet computing. Information Systems Journal, 13(4), 301–330. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1365-2575.2003.00155.XCrossRef

Maas, M. M. (2022). Aligning AI Regulation to Sociotechnical Change. In J. Bullock, B. Zhang, Y.-C. Chen, J. Himmelreich, M. Young, A. Korinek & V. Hudson (Eds.), Oxford Handbook on AI Governance. Oxford University Press.

MacChi, C. (2018). A treaty on business and human rights: Problems and prospects. In The Future of Business and Human Rights (Issue November 2015, pp. 63–86). Intersentia. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780686455.005

Maguire James. (2021). Top Performing Artificial Intelligence (AI) Companies of 2021. Datamation. https://www.datamation.com/artificial-intelligence/ai-companies/

Martin, D. A., Conlon, E., & Bowe, B. (2021). A Multi-level Review of Engineering Ethics Education: Towards a Socio-technical Orientation of Engineering Education for Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(5), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00333-6CrossRef

McCarthy, J. (2018). What is Artificial Intelligence? http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/whatisai.pdf

McGregor, L., Murray, D., & Ng, V. (2019). International human rights law as a framework for algorithmic accountability. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 68(2), 309–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589319000046CrossRef

McNamara, A., Smith, J. & Murphy-Hill, E. (2018). Does ACM’s code of ethics change ethical decision making in software development? Proceedings of the 2018 26th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, 729–733. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236024.3264833

Metzinger, T. (2019). EU guidelines: Ethics washing made in Europe. Der Tagesspiegel. https://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/eu-guidelines-ethics-washing-made-in-europe/24195496.html

Microsoft. (2017). Responsible AI principles from Microsoft. Our Approach. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/ai/responsible-ai?activetab=pivot1%3Aprimaryr6

Microsoft. (2020). Microsoft Global Human Rights Statement. https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE4JIiU

Mijatović, D. (2018). Safeguarding human rights in the era of artificial intelligence. In Human Rights Comments. https://www.coe.int/en/web/commissioner/-/safeguarding-human-rights-in-the-era-of-artificial-intelligence

Miller, H. T. (2012). Governing Narratives : Symbolic Politics and Policy Change. University of Alabama Press.

Miller, K. (2020a). A Matter of Perspective: Discrimination, Bias, and Inequality in AI. In Legal regulations, implications, and issues surrounding digital data (pp. 182–202). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3130-3.ch010

Miller, K. (2020b). A Matter of Perspective. 182–202. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3130-3.CH010

Minkkinen, M., Zimmer, M. P., & Mäntymäki, M. (2021). Towards Ecosystems for Responsible AI: Expectations on Sociotechnical Systems, Agendas, and Networks in EU Documents. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 12896 LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85447-8_20

Mishra, K. S., Polkowski, Z., Borah, S. & Dash, R. (2021). AI in Manufacturing and Green Technology: Methods and Applications. Routledge.

Mitrou, L. (2019). Data Protection, Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Services: Is the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) ‘Artificial Intelligence-Proof’? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3386914CrossRef

MSI-NET. (2017). Algorithms and Human Rights : Study on the Human Rights Dimensions of Automated Data Processing Techniques (in particular Algorthims) and Possible Regulatory Implications. Council of Europe Study DGI. https://edoc.coe.int/en/internet/7589-algorithms-and-human-rights-study-on-the-human-rights-dimensions-of-automated-data-processing-techniques-and-possible-regulatory-implications.html

Mueller, M. L. (2013). Networks and States : the Global Politics of IG. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014595.001.0001

Mueller, M. L., & Badiei, F. (2019). Requiem for a Dream: On Advancing Human Rights via Internet Architecture. Policy and Internet. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.190CrossRef

Muller, C. (2020a). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law. www.coe.int/cahai

Muller, V. (2020b). Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-ai/

Murray, A. (2007). The Regulation of Cyberspace: Control in the Online Environment. Routledge.

Murray, S., Wachter, R. & Blog, R. C. (2020). Discrimination By Artificial Intelligence in a Commercial Electronic Health Record—a Case Study. Healthaffairs. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/https://doi.org/10.1377/hblog20200128.626576/full

Mylly, T. (2009). Intellectual property and European economic constitutional law: The trouble with private informational Power. Edward Elgar Publishing. IPR University Center.

Nemitz, P. (2018). Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of artificial intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0089

Niederman, F., & Baker, E. W. (2021). Ethics and AI Issues: Old Container with New Wine? In D. Dennehy, A. Griva, N. Pouloudi, Y. K. Dwivedi, I. Pappas, & M. Mäntymäki (Eds.), Responsible AI and analytics for an ethical and inclusive digitized society (Vol. 12896, pp. 161–172). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85447-8

O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction:How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown Publishers.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). Artificial intelligence in society. In Artificial intelligence in society. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/eedfee77-en

Papagiannidis, E., Enholm, I. M., Dremel, C., Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2021). Deploying AI Governance Practices: A Revelatory Case Study. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 12896 LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85447-8_19

Partnership on AI. (2020). Partnership on AI. https://partnershiponai.org/

Pedemonte, V. (2020). AI for Sustainability: An overview of AI and the SDGs to contribute to the European policy-making. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/vincent-pedemonte_ai-for-sustainability_0.pdf

Perritt, H. H. (1997). Cyberspace Self-Government: Townhall Democracy or Rediscovered Royalism? Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 12(2), 413–482.

Perry, B., & Uuk, R. (2019). Ai governance and the policymaking process: Key considerations for reducing ai risk. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 3(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc3020026CrossRef

Pery, A., Rafiei, M., Simon, M. & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2021). Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence and Process Mining: Challenges and Opportunities. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2110.02707. http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.02707

Pesenti, J. (2021). Facebook’s five pillars of Responsible AI. In Facebook Meta. https://ai.facebook.com/blog/facebooks-five-pillars-of-responsible-ai/

Petit, N. (2017). Law and Regulation of Artificial Intelligence and Robots - Conceptual Framework and Normative Implications. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2931339CrossRef

Pichay, S. (2018). Our Principles – Google AI. https://ai.google/principles/

Pillay, R. G., & Curiae, A. (2014). The limits to self-regulation and voluntarism : From corporate social responsibility to corporate accountability. Amicus Curiae, 99, 10–13.

Pinjušić, T. (2022). The Atos blueprint for responsible AI - Atos. ATOS. https://atos.net/en/lp/cybersecurity-magazine-ai-and-cybersecurity/the-atos-blueprint-for-responsible-ai

Pizzi, M., Romanoff, M., & Engelhardt, T. (2020). AI for humanitarian action: Human rights and ethics. International Review of the Red Cross, 102(913), 145–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383121000011CrossRef

Popkin, H., Pratap, A. & Wolpow, N. (2020). AI 50: America’s Most Promising Artificial Intelligence Companies. In Forbes.com. http://proxy-tu.researchport.umd.edu/login?ins=tu&url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=138673512&site=eds-live&scope=site

Rachovitsa, A., & Johann, N. (2022). The human rights implications of the use of AI in the digital welfare state: Lessons learned from the Dutch SyRI case. Human Rights Law Review, 22(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngac010CrossRef

Radu, R. (2019). Negotiating Internet Governance. In Negotiating internet governance. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198833079.001.0001

Radu, R. (2021). Steering the governance of artificial intelligence: national strategies in perspective. Policy and Society, 40(2), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1929728

Rai, A., Constantinides, P., & Sarker, S. (2019). Next-generation digital platforms: Towards human-AI hybrids. MS Quarterly, 43, 3–8.

Ramasastry, A. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility Versus Business and Human Rights: Bridging the Gap Between Responsibility and Accountability. In Journal of Human Rights (Vol. 14, Issue 2, pp. 237–259). https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2015.1037953

Raso, F., Hilligoss, H., Krishnamurthy, V., Bavitz, C. & Kim, L. (2018a). Artificial Intelligence & Human Rights: Opportunities & Risks. The Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Publication Series No. 2018a-6, 7641, 63. https://cyber.harvard.edu/publication/2018a/artificial-intelligence-human-rights

Raso, F., Hilligoss, H., Krishnamurthy, V., Bavitz, C., & Kim, L. Y. (2018b). Artificial Intelligence & Human Rights: Opportunities & Risks. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3259344CrossRef

Ray, K. (2021). Quest for I (Intelligence) in AI (Artificial Intelligence): A non-elusive attempt. In E. Osaba (Ed.), Artificial intelligence: Latest advances, new paradigms and novel applications. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96324

Redeker, D., Gill, L., & Gasser, U. (2018). Towards digital constitutionalism? Mapping attempts to craft an Internet Bill of Rights. International Communication Gazette, 80(4), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518757121CrossRef

Reed, C. (2004). Internet Law. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Reed, C. (2018). How should we regulate artificial intelligence? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2128). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0360

Reidenberg, J. R. (1997). Lex informatica: The formulation of information policy rules through technology. Texas Law Review, 553, 553–593.

Rességuier, A., & Rodrigues, R. (2020). AI ethics should not remain toothless! A call to bring back the teeth of ethics. Big Data and Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720942541

Rights, H., & Look, T. (2021). Introduction : Putting Flesh on the Bone. In S. Deva & D. Bilchitz (Eds.), Building a Treaty on Business and Human Rights: Context and Contours (pp. 1–24). Cambridge University Press.

Risse, M. (2018). Human Rights and Artificial Intelligence: An Urgently Needed Agenda. Revista Publicum, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.12957/publicum.2018.35098

Robbins, S. (2019). A misdirected principle with a catch: Explicability for AI. Minds and Machines, 29(4), 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-019-09509-3CrossRef

Russel, S. & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. In Choice Reviews Online (4th ed., Vol. 33, Issue 03). Prentice Hall.

Sætra, H. S. (2021). Challenging the Neo-Anthropocentric Relational Approach to Robot Rights. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8, 301. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.744426CrossRef

Sander, B. (2019). Freedom of Expression in the Age of Online Platforms: Operationalising a Human Rights-Based Approach to Content Moderation. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3434972CrossRef

Santoni de Sio, F., & Mecacci, G. (2021). Four Responsibility Gaps with Artificial Intelligence: Why they Matter and How to Address them. Philosophy and Technology, 34(4), 1057–1084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00450-xCrossRef

Sartor, G. & Lagioia, F. (2020). The impact of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on artificial intelligence. European Union, 100. https://doi.org/10.2861/293

Saslow, K., & Lorenz, P. (2019). Artificial Intelligence Needs Human Rights. Think Tank at the Intersection of Technology and Society.

Scantamburlo, T., Cortés, A. & Schacht, M. (2020). Progressing Towards Responsible AI. ArXiv:2008.07326v1. http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.07326.

Scherer, M. U. (2016). Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 29(353). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2609777

Slee, T. (2020). The incompatible incentives of private-sector AI. In M. D. Dubber, F. Pasquale, & S. Das (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI (pp. 106–123). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.013.6

Smith, M. & Miller, S. (2021). Facial Recognition and Privacy. In Biometric Identification, Law and Ethics (pp. 21–38). http://www.cdt.org/blogs/harley-geiger/612facial-recognition-and-privacy

Smuha, N. A. (2021a). Beyond a Human Rights-Based Approach to AI Governance: Promise, Pitfalls, Plea. Philosophy and Technology, 34, 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00403-wCrossRef

Smuha, N. A. (2021b). From a ‘race to AI’ to a ‘race to AI regulation’: Regulatory competition for artificial intelligence. Law, Innovation and Technology, 13(1), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2021.1898300CrossRef

Smuha, N. A., Ahmed-Rengers, E., Harkens, A., Li, W., MacLaren, J., Piselli, R., & Yeung, K. (2021). How the EU Can Achieve Legally Trustworthy AI: A Response to the European Commission’s Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3899991CrossRef

Stahl, B. C., Andreou, A., Brey, P., Hatzakis, T., Kirichenko, A., Macnish, K., LaulhéShaelou, S., Patel, A., Ryan, M., & Wright, D. (2021a). Artificial intelligence for human flourishing – Beyond principles for machine learning. Journal of Business Research, 124(2), 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.030CrossRef

Stahl, Bernd C., Antoniou, J., Ryan, M., Macnish, K. & Jiya, T. (2021b). Organisational responses to the ethical issues of artificial intelligence. AI and Society, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01148-6

Stahl, B. C. (2021). Artificial intelligence for a better future: An ecosystem perspective on the ethics of AI and emerging digital technologies. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69978-9

Stahl, B. C., Timmermans, J., & Flick, C. (2017). Ethics of emerging information and communication technologies: On the implementation of responsible research and innovation. Science and Public Policy, 44(3), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw069CrossRef

Stark, L., & Hoffmann, A. L. (2019). Data Is the New What? Popular Metaphors & Professional Ethics in Emerging Data Culture. Journal of Cultural Analytics., 10(22148/16), 036.

Strobel, J., & Tillberg-Webb, H. (2009). Applying a critical and humanizing framework of instructional technologies to educational practice. In Learning and Instructional Technologies for the 21st Century (pp. 1–19). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09667-4_5

Surden, H. (2020). Ethics of AI in law. In M. D. Dubber, F. Pasquale, & S. Das (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI (pp. 718–736). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.013.46

Suzor, N. (2019). Lawless: The Secret Rules That Govern Our Digital Lives. Cambridge University Press.

Szczepański, M. (2019). Economic impacts of artificial intelligence (AI). In EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service (Issue July). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/637967/EPRS_BRI(2019)637967_EN.pdf

Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). How AI can be a force for good. Science, 361(6404), 751–752.CrossRef

Taeihagh, A. (2021). Governance of artificial intelligence. Policy and Society, 40(2), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1928377

Taeihagh, A., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2021). Assessing the regulatory challenges of emerging disruptive technologies. Regulation and Governance, 15(4), 1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12392CrossRef

Tasioulas, J. (2013). Human Dignity and the Foundations of Human Rights. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2557649CrossRef

Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Knopf.

Tharoor, S. (2000). Are Human Rights Universal? World Policy Journal, 16(4), 1–6. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40209657?seq=1

The IEEE Global Initiative. (2017). Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems. In IEEE. https://standards.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/import/documents/other/ead_v2.pdf

Tirosh, N. (2017). Reconsidering the ‘Right to be Forgotten’ – memory rights and the right to memory in the new media era. Media, Culture and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716674361CrossRef

Trajtenberg, M. (2018). AI as the Next Gpt: A Political-Economy Perspective. Ssrn. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24245CrossRef

Troxell, G., & Troxell, W. (2017). A reflective analysis on professional codes of ethics. 2017 ASEE annual conference & exposition proceedings, 2017-June. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--27506

Tushnet, M. (2015). Internet Exceptionalism: An Overview from General Constitutional Law. William and Mary Law Review, 56(4), 1637.

Ufert, F. (2020). AI Regulation Through the Lens of Fundamental Rights: How Well Does the GDPR Address the Challenges Posed by AI? European Papers, 5(2), 1087–1097.

UK Government. (2021). National AI Strategy. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-ai-strategy

Umbrello, S. (2022). The role of engineers in harmonising human values for AI systems design. Journal of Responsible Technology, 10, 100031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2022.100031

Ruggie, J. (2011). Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” framework. In United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf

van Veen, C. & Cath, C. (2018). Artificial Intelligence: What’s Human Rights Got To Do With It? Data & Society: Points. https://points.datasociety.net/artificial-intelligence-whats-human-rights-got-to-do-with-it-4622ec1566d5

Veale, M., & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. (2021). Demystifying the draft EU artificial intelligence act: Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach. Computer Law Review International, 22(4), 97–112.CrossRef

Vesnic-Alujevic, L., Nascimento, S. & Pólvora, A. (2020). Societal and ethical impacts of artificial intelligence: Critical notes on European policy frameworks. Telecommunications Policy, 44(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101961

Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., Felländer, A., Langhans, S. D., Tegmark, M., & Fuso Nerini, F. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Communications, 11(1), 233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y

Vochozka, M., Kliestik, T., Kliestikova, J. & Sion, G. (2018). Participating in a highly automated society: How artificial intelligence disrupts the job market. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 13(4), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.22381/EMFM13420185

Wagner, B. (2018). Ethics as an escape from regulation. In Being rofiled: Cogitas Ergo Sum (pp. 84–89). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvhrd092.18

Wyatt, S. (2004). Danger! Metaphors at Work in Economics, Geophysiology, and the Internet. Science Technology and Human Values, 29(2), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243903261947CrossRef

Wettstein, F. (2012). CSR and the Debate on Business and Human Rights: Bridging the Great Divide. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(4), 739–770. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201222446CrossRef

Whittlestone, J., Nyrup, R., Alexandrova, A., & Cave, S. (2019). The Role and Limits of Principles in AI Ethics: Towards a Focus on Tensions. Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314289

Winfield, A. F., Michael, K., Pitt, J., & Evers, V. (2019). Machine ethics: The design and governance of ethical ai and autonomous systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(3), 509–517. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2019.2900622CrossRef

Winfield, A. & Jirotka, M. (2018). Ethical governance is essential to building trust in robotics and artificial intelligence systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0085

Winner, L. (1977). Autonomous Technology: Technics-Out-Of-Control As A Theme In Political Thought. MIT Press.

Wu, T. (2010). Is Internet Exceptionalism Dead? In B. Szoka & A. Marcus (Eds.), The Next Digital Decade: Essays on the Future of the Internet. TechFreedom.

Yavar Bathaee. (2018). The artificial intelligence black box and the failure of intent and causation. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2(4), 31–40. https://www.theverge.com/

Yeung, K., Howes, A. & Pogrebna, G. (2019). AI Governance by Human Rights-Centred Design, Deliberation and Oversight: An End to Ethics Washing. In M. D. Dubber & F. Pasquale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of AI Ethics. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3435011

Zalnieriute, M. (2019). From Human Rights Aspirations to Enforceable Obligations by Non-State Actors in the Digital Age: The Example of IG and ICANN. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 21, 278–336. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3333532CrossRef

Zalnieriute, M., & Milan, S. (2019). Internet Architecture and Human Rights: Beyond the Human Rights Gap. Policy and Internet, 11(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.200CrossRef

Zamani, E. D. (2022). The Bitcoin protocol as a system of power. Ethics and Information Technology, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09626-1

Zamfir, I. (2018). Towards a binding international treaty on business and human rights. In EPRS | European Parliament Research Service (Issue November). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2018/620229/EPRS_BRI(2018)620229_EN.pdf

Završnik, A. (2020). Criminal justice, artificial intelligence systems, and human rights. ERA Forum, 20(4), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-020-00602-0CrossRef

Ziemele, I. (2009). Human Rights Violations by Private Persons and Entities: The Case-Law of International Human Rights Courts and Monitoring Bodies. In EUI Working Papers (Issue 8). http://hdl.handle.net/1814/11409

Zittrain, J. (2006). A History of Online Gatekeeping. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology.

Titel: From the “rush to ethics” to the “race for governance” in Artificial Intelligence
verfasst von: Vasiliki Koniakou
Publikationsdatum: 28.06.2022
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 1387-3326
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9419
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10300-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

Co-Shaping an Ecosystem for Responsible AI: Five Types of Expectation Work in Response to a Technological Frame

Are we Nearly There Yet? A Desires & Realities Framework for Europe’s AI Strategy

Exploring the use of IoT Data for Heightened Situational Awareness in Centralised Monitoring Control Rooms

Estimation Method for Roof‐damaged Buildings from Aero-Photo Images During Earthquakes Using Deep Learning

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Information Systems: Perspectives to Responsible AI

Laboratory Forensics for Open Science Readiness: an Investigative Approach to Research Data Management