Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 1/2013

01.11.2013

Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?”

verfasst von: Jasmin Joecks, Kerstin Pull, Karin Vetter

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The under-representation of women on boards is a heavily discussed topic—not only in Germany. Based on critical mass theory and with the help of a hand-collected panel dataset of 151 listed German firms for the years 2000–2005, we explore whether the link between gender diversity and firm performance follows a U-shape. Controlling for reversed causality, we find evidence for gender diversity to at first negatively affect firm performance and—only after a “critical mass” of about 30 % women has been reached—to be associated with higher firm performance than completely male boards. Given our sample firms, the critical mass of 30 % women translates into an absolute number of about three women on the board and hence supports recent studies on a corresponding “magic number” of women in the boardroom.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
The DAX reflects the segment of blue chips admitted to the Prime Standard segment and comprises the 30 largest and most actively traded companies which are listed at the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. The index portfolio of the MDAX comprises 50 mid-cap issues from traditional sectors which, in terms of market capitalization and trading volume, rank below the DAX. These companies are selected from the continuously traded companies in the Prime Standard segment. The SDAX comprises the next 50 issues from the traditional sectors within the Prime Standard segment that are ranked below the MDAX. The TecDAX tracks the 30 largest issues, in terms of market capitalization and trading volume, from the various technology sectors of the Prime Standard segment beneath the DAX.
 
2
Owing to the internationalization of the German stock market, more and more German firms switched their financial reporting from the local German accounting standard HGB to the IFRS or U.S. GAAP during our period of observation.
 
3
Outliners were defined as having an ROE of either more than 100 or less than −100.
 
4
According to the Stock Cooperation Act (Aktiengesetz 2010), German supervisory boards have a minimum size of three and a maximum of 21 seats depending on statutory equity capital. A supervisory board consisting of only two members hints at a temporary vacancy.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94, 291–309.CrossRef Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94, 291–309.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ahern, K. R., & Dittmar, A. K. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127, 137–197.CrossRef Ahern, K. R., & Dittmar, A. K. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127, 137–197.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Alexander, J., Nuchols, B., Bloom, J., & Lee, S.-Y. D. (1995). Organizational demography and turnover: An examination of multiform and non-linear heterogeneity. Human Relations, 48(12), 1455–1480.CrossRef Alexander, J., Nuchols, B., Bloom, J., & Lee, S.-Y. D. (1995). Organizational demography and turnover: An examination of multiform and non-linear heterogeneity. Human Relations, 48(12), 1455–1480.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Apesteguia, J., Azmat, G., & Iriberri, N. (2012). The impact of gender composition on team performance and decision-making: Evidence from the field. Management Science, 58, 78–93.CrossRef Apesteguia, J., Azmat, G., & Iriberri, N. (2012). The impact of gender composition on team performance and decision-making: Evidence from the field. Management Science, 58, 78–93.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arnegger, M., Hofmann, C., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2010). Unterschiede in der fachlichen und demographischen Zusammensetzung deutscher Aufsichtsräte: Eine empirische Bestandsaufnahme für HDAX- und SDAX Unternehmen. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 70(3), 239–257. Arnegger, M., Hofmann, C., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2010). Unterschiede in der fachlichen und demographischen Zusammensetzung deutscher Aufsichtsräte: Eine empirische Bestandsaufnahme für HDAX- und SDAX Unternehmen. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 70(3), 239–257.
Zurück zum Zitat Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221.CrossRef Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bermig, A., & Frick, B. (2010). Who is the better monitor? The impact of female board directors. Board composition, and board size on earnings management. XI. In Symposium zur Ökonomischen Analyse der Unternehmung GEABA Conference, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt, pp. 1–28. Bermig, A., & Frick, B. (2010). Who is the better monitor? The impact of female board directors. Board composition, and board size on earnings management. XI. In Symposium zur Ökonomischen Analyse der Unternehmung GEABA Conference, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt, pp. 1–28.
Zurück zum Zitat Bermig, A., & Frick, B. (2011a). Determinanten der ‘Übergröße’ deutscher Aufsichtsräte’. Journal of Applied Social Science, 131(1), 169–194. Bermig, A., & Frick, B. (2011a). Determinanten der ‘Übergröße’ deutscher Aufsichtsräte’. Journal of Applied Social Science, 131(1), 169–194.
Zurück zum Zitat Bermig, A., & Frick, B. (2011b). Mitbestimmung und Unternehmensperformance: Der Einfluss von Arbeitnehmervertretern im Aufsichtsrat auf den Unternehmenswert. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 71(3), 281–304. Bermig, A., & Frick, B. (2011b). Mitbestimmung und Unternehmensperformance: Der Einfluss von Arbeitnehmervertretern im Aufsichtsrat auf den Unternehmenswert. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 71(3), 281–304.
Zurück zum Zitat Blau, P. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press. Blau, P. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Böhren, Ö., & Ström, R. Ö. (2010). Governance and politics: Regulating independence and diversity in the board room. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 37(9), 1281–1308.CrossRef Böhren, Ö., & Ström, R. Ö. (2010). Governance and politics: Regulating independence and diversity in the board room. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 37(9), 1281–1308.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Pavelin, S. (2009). Corporate reputation and women on the board. British Journal of Management, 20, 17–29.CrossRef Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Pavelin, S. (2009). Corporate reputation and women on the board. British Journal of Management, 20, 17–29.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Burgess, Z., & Tharenou, P. (2002). Women board directors: Characteristics of the few. Journal of Business Ethics, 37, 39–49.CrossRef Burgess, Z., & Tharenou, P. (2002). Women board directors: Characteristics of the few. Journal of Business Ethics, 37, 39–49.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Burke, R. J. (1997). Women on corporate boards of directors: A needed resource. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 909–915.CrossRef Burke, R. J. (1997). Women on corporate boards of directors: A needed resource. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 909–915.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451.CrossRef Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2010). Female board appointments and firm valuation: Short and long-term effects. Journal of Management and Governance, 14, 37–59.CrossRef Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2010). Female board appointments and firm valuation: Short and long-term effects. Journal of Management and Governance, 14, 37–59.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity and firm value. The Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53.CrossRef Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity and firm value. The Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Celis, K., Childs, S., Kantola, J., & Krook, M. L. (2008). Rethinking women’s substantive representation. Representation, 44, 99–110.CrossRef Celis, K., Childs, S., Kantola, J., & Krook, M. L. (2008). Rethinking women’s substantive representation. Representation, 44, 99–110.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83, 50–58.CrossRef Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83, 50–58.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Childs, S., & Krook, M. L. (2006). Should feminists give up on critical mass? A contingent yes. Pol Gender, 2(4), 522–530.CrossRef Childs, S., & Krook, M. L. (2006). Should feminists give up on critical mass? A contingent yes. Pol Gender, 2(4), 522–530.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Childs, S., & Krook, M. L. (2008). Critical mass theory and women’s political representation. Political Studies, 56, 725–736.CrossRef Childs, S., & Krook, M. L. (2008). Critical mass theory and women’s political representation. Political Studies, 56, 725–736.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Childs, S., & Krook, M. L. (2009). Analysing women’s substantive representation: From critical mass to critical actors. Government and Opposition, 44(2), 125–145.CrossRef Childs, S., & Krook, M. L. (2009). Analysing women’s substantive representation: From critical mass to critical actors. Government and Opposition, 44(2), 125–145.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 1–27.CrossRef Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 1–27.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dittmann, I., Maug, E., & Schneider, C. (2010). Bankers on the boards of german firms: What they do, what they are worth, and why they are (still) there. Review of Finance, 14(1), 35–71.CrossRef Dittmann, I., Maug, E., & Schneider, C. (2010). Bankers on the boards of german firms: What they do, what they are worth, and why they are (still) there. Review of Finance, 14(1), 35–71.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance, 11(2), 102–111.CrossRef Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance, 11(2), 102–111.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 85–106.CrossRef Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 85–106.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fauver, L., & Fuerst, M. E. (2006). Does good corporate governance include employee representation? Evidence from German corporate boards. Journal of Financial Economics, 82(3), 673–710.CrossRef Fauver, L., & Fuerst, M. E. (2006). Does good corporate governance include employee representation? Evidence from German corporate boards. Journal of Financial Economics, 82(3), 673–710.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fenwick, G. D., & Neal, D. J. (2001). Effect of gender composition on group performance. Gender, Work and Organization, 8(2), 205–225.CrossRef Fenwick, G. D., & Neal, D. J. (2001). Effect of gender composition on group performance. Gender, Work and Organization, 8(2), 205–225.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fich, E. M., & Shivdasani, A. (2006). Are busy boards effective monitors? Journal of Finance, 61(2), 689–724.CrossRef Fich, E. M., & Shivdasani, A. (2006). Are busy boards effective monitors? Journal of Finance, 61(2), 689–724.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grey, S. (2006). Numbers and beyond: The relevance of critical mass in gender research. Politics & Gender, 2(4), 491–530.CrossRef Grey, S. (2006). Numbers and beyond: The relevance of critical mass in gender research. Politics & Gender, 2(4), 491–530.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grosvold, J., Brammer, S., & Rayton, B. (2007). Board diversity in the United Kingdom and Norway: An exploratory analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(4), 344–357.CrossRef Grosvold, J., Brammer, S., & Rayton, B. (2007). Board diversity in the United Kingdom and Norway: An exploratory analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(4), 344–357.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 659–684.CrossRef Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 659–684.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Kulich, C., Trojanowski, G., & Atkins, C. (2010). Investing with prejudice: The relationship between women’s presence on company boards and objective and subjective measures of company performance. British Journal of Management, 21, 484–497. Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Kulich, C., Trojanowski, G., & Atkins, C. (2010). Investing with prejudice: The relationship between women’s presence on company boards and objective and subjective measures of company performance. British Journal of Management, 21, 484–497.
Zurück zum Zitat He, J., & Huang, Z. (2011). Board informal hierarchy and firm financial performance: Exploring a tacit structure guiding boardroom interactions. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1119–1139.CrossRef He, J., & Huang, Z. (2011). Board informal hierarchy and firm financial performance: Exploring a tacit structure guiding boardroom interactions. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1119–1139.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Holst, E., & Schimeta, J. (2011). 29 von 906: Weiterhin kaum Frauen in Top-Gremien großer Unternehmen. Wochenbericht des DIW, 3, 2–10. Holst, E., & Schimeta, J. (2011). 29 von 906: Weiterhin kaum Frauen in Top-Gremien großer Unternehmen. Wochenbericht des DIW, 3, 2–10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are women more risk averse? Economic Inquiry, 36, 620–630.CrossRef Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are women more risk averse? Economic Inquiry, 36, 620–630.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kanter, R. (1977a). Men and women of the organization (pp. 206–242). New York: Basic Books. Kanter, R. (1977a). Men and women of the organization (pp. 206–242). New York: Basic Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanter, R. (1977b). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965–990.CrossRef Kanter, R. (1977b). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965–990.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Konrad, A. M., & Kramer, V. (2006). How many women do boards need? Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 22. Konrad, A. M., & Kramer, V. (2006). How many women do boards need? Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 22.
Zurück zum Zitat Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164.CrossRef Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lindstaedt, H., Wolff, M., & Fehre, K. (2011). Frauen in Führungspositionen-Auswirkungen auf den Unternehmenserfolg. German Federal Ministry of Family, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth, Aug 2011. Lindstaedt, H., Wolff, M., & Fehre, K. (2011). Frauen in Führungspositionen-Auswirkungen auf den Unternehmenserfolg. German Federal Ministry of Family, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth, Aug 2011.
Zurück zum Zitat Magjuka, R. J., & Baldwin, T. T. (1991). Team-based employee involvement programs: Effects of design and administration. Personnel Psychology, 44(4), 793–812.CrossRef Magjuka, R. J., & Baldwin, T. T. (1991). Team-based employee involvement programs: Effects of design and administration. Personnel Psychology, 44(4), 793–812.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mahadeo, J. D., Soobaroyen, T., & Hanuman, V. O. (2012). Board composition and financial performance: Uncovering the effects of diversity in an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 375–388.CrossRef Mahadeo, J. D., Soobaroyen, T., & Hanuman, V. O. (2012). Board composition and financial performance: Uncovering the effects of diversity in an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 375–388.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Miller, T., & del Carmen Triana, M. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 755–786.CrossRef Miller, T., & del Carmen Triana, M. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 755–786.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1067–1101.CrossRef Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1067–1101.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oehmichen, J., Rapp, M. S., & Wolff, M. (2010). Der Einfluss der Aufsichtsratszusammensetzung auf die Präsenz von Frauen in Aufsichtsräten. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung (ZFBF), 32, 503–532. Oehmichen, J., Rapp, M. S., & Wolff, M. (2010). Der Einfluss der Aufsichtsratszusammensetzung auf die Präsenz von Frauen in Aufsichtsräten. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung (ZFBF), 32, 503–532.
Zurück zum Zitat Randöy, T., Oxelheim, L., & Thomsen, S. (2006). A Nordic perspective on corporate board diversity. working paper, Nordic Innovation Centre, pp. 1–32. Randöy, T., Oxelheim, L., & Thomsen, S. (2006). A Nordic perspective on corporate board diversity. working paper, Nordic Innovation Centre, pp. 1–32.
Zurück zum Zitat Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance, 15(2), 404–413.CrossRef Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance, 15(2), 404–413.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sarkar, J., & Sarkar, S. (2009). Multiple board appointments and firm performance in emerging economies: Evidence from India. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 17(2), 271–293.CrossRef Sarkar, J., & Sarkar, S. (2009). Multiple board appointments and firm performance in emerging economies: Evidence from India. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 17(2), 271–293.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shrader, C. B., Blackburn, V. B., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9(3), 355–376. Shrader, C. B., Blackburn, V. B., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9(3), 355–376.
Zurück zum Zitat Siciliano, J. I. (1996). The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1313–1320.CrossRef Siciliano, J. I. (1996). The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1313–1320.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7), 569–593.CrossRef Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7), 569–593.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Spangler, E., Gordon, M. A., & Pipkin, R. M. (1978). Token women: An empirical test of kantar’s hypothesis. American Journal of Sociology, 84(1), 160–170.CrossRef Spangler, E., Gordon, M. A., & Pipkin, R. M. (1978). Token women: An empirical test of kantar’s hypothesis. American Journal of Sociology, 84(1), 160–170.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317.CrossRef Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tsui, A. S. T., Egan, D., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549–579.CrossRef Tsui, A. S. T., Egan, D., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549–579.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Webber, S. S., & Donahue, L. M. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27(2), 141–163. Webber, S. S., & Donahue, L. M. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27(2), 141–163.
Metadaten
Titel
Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?”
verfasst von
Jasmin Joecks
Kerstin Pull
Karin Vetter
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2013
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1553-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Journal of Business Ethics 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner