Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
Erschienen in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 3/2016

29.10.2015 | RESEARCH PAPER

Global sensitivity analysis-enhanced surrogate (GSAS) modeling for reliability analysis

verfasst von: Zhen Hu, Sankaran Mahadevan

Erschienen in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

An essential issue in surrogate model-based reliability analysis is the selection of training points. Approaches such as efficient global reliability analysis (EGRA) and adaptive Kriging Monte Carlo simulation (AK-MCS) methods have been developed to adaptively select training points that are close to the limit state. Both the learning functions and convergence criteria of selecting training points in EGRA and AK-MCS are defined from the perspective of individual responses at Monte Carlo samples. This causes two problems: (1) some extra training points are selected after the reliability estimate already satisfies the accuracy target; and (2) the selected training points may not be the optimal ones for reliability analysis. This paper proposes a Global Sensitivity Analysis enhanced Surrogate (GSAS) modeling method for reliability analysis. Both the convergence criterion and strategy of selecting new training points are defined from the perspective of reliability estimate instead of individual responses of MCS samples. The new training points are identified according to their contribution to the uncertainty in the reliability estimate based on global sensitivity analysis. The selection of new training points stops when the accuracy of the reliability estimate reaches a specific target. Five examples are used to assess the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method. The results show that the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method are better than those of EGRA and AK-MCS.
Vorheriger Artikel Microstructure interpolation for macroscopic design
Nächster Artikel An incremental shifting vector approach for reliability-based design optimization

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Basudhar A, Missoum S (2008) Adaptive explicit decision functions for probabilistic design and optimization using support vector machines. Comput Struct 86(19):1904–1917CrossRef
Basudhar A, Missoum S, Harrison Sanchez A (2008) Limit state function identification using support vector machines for discontinuous responses and disjoint failure domains. Probabilistic Eng Mech 23(1):1–11CrossRef
Bichon BJ, Eldred MS, Swiler LP, Mahadevan S, McFarland JM (2008) Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions. AIAA J 46(10):2459–2468CrossRef
Blatman G, Sudret B (2010) An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis. Probabilistic Eng Mech 25(2):183–197CrossRef
Borgonovo E (2007) A new uncertainty importance measure. Reliability Eng System Safety 92(6):771–784CrossRef
Bourinet J-M, Deheeger F, Lemaire M (2011) Assessing small failure probabilities by combined subset simulation and support vector machines. Struct Saf 33(6):343–353CrossRef
Du X, Hu Z (2012) First order reliability method with truncated random variables. J Mech Des 134(9):091005CrossRef
Dubourg V, Sudret B (2014) Meta-model-based importance sampling for reliability sensitivity analysis. Struct Saf 49:27–36CrossRef
Dubourg V, Sudret B, Deheeger F (2013) Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis. Probabilistic Eng Mech 33:47–57CrossRef
Echard B, Gayton N, Lemaire M (2011) AK-MCS: an active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo simulation. Struct Saf 33(2):145–154CrossRef
Echard B, Gayton N, Lemaire M, Relun N (2013) A combined importance sampling and kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 111:232–240CrossRef
Faravelli L (1989) Response-surface approach for reliability analysis. J Eng Mech 115(12):2763–2781CrossRef
Gayton N, Bourinet J, Lemaire M (2003) CQ2RS: a new statistical approach to the response surface method for reliability analysis. Struct Saf 25(1):99–121CrossRef
Gomes HM, Awruch AM (2004) Comparison of response surface and neural network with other methods for structural reliability analysis. Struct Saf 26(1):49–67CrossRef
Haldar A, Mahadevan S (2000) Probability, reliability, and statistical methods in engineering design, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated
Jacques J, Lavergne C, Devictor N (2006) Sensitivity analysis in presence of model uncertainty and correlated inputs. Reliability Eng System Safety 91(10):1126–1134CrossRef
Kaymaz I (2005) Application of kriging method to structural reliability problems. Struct Saf 27(2):133–151CrossRef
Kbiob D (1951) A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand, Jnl Chem Met Min Soc S Afr
Kiureghian AD, Stefano MD (1991) Efficient algorithm for second-order reliability analysis. J Eng Mech 117(12):2904–2923CrossRef
Li G, Rabitz H, Yelvington PE, Oluwole OO, Bacon F, Kolb CE, Schoendorf J (2010) Global sensitivity analysis for systems with independent and/or correlated inputs. J Phys Chem A 114(19):6022–6032CrossRef
Lophaven SN, Nielsen HB, Søndergaard J (2002) DACE-A Matlab Kriging toolbox, version 2.0. Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby
Mara TA, Tarantola S (2012) Variance-based sensitivity indices for models with dependent inputs. Reliability Eng System Safety 107:115–121CrossRef
McRae GJ, Tilden JW, Seinfeld JH (1982) Global sensitivity analysis—a computational implementation of the Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST). Comput Chem Eng 6(1):15–25CrossRef
Rajashekhar MR, Ellingwood BR (1993) A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis. Struct Saf 12(3):205–220CrossRef
Rasmussen CE (2006) Gaussian processes for machine learning, The MIT Press
Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Chan K-S (1999) A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output. Technometrics 41(1):39–56CrossRef
Santner TJ, Williams BJ, Notz W (2003) The design and analysis of computer experiments. Springer, New YorkCrossRefMATH
Schueremans L, Van Gemert D (2005) Benefit of splines and neural networks in simulation based structural reliability analysis. Struct Saf 27(3):246–261CrossRef
Simpson TW, Mauery TM, Korte JJ, Mistree F (2001) Kriging models for global approximation in simulation-based multidisciplinary design optimization. AIAA J 39(12):2233–2241CrossRef
Sobol’ IM (2001) Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Math Comput Simul 55(1–3):271–280MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Song S, Lu Z, Qiao H (2009) Subset simulation for structural reliability sensitivity analysis. Reliability Eng System Safety 94(2):658–665CrossRef
Stein ML (1999) Interpolation of spatial data: some theory for kriging, Springer
Sudret B (2008) Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions. Reliability Eng System Safety 93(7):964–979CrossRef
Sudret B, Der Kiureghian A (2000) Stochastic finite element methods and reliability: a state-of-the-art report, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California
Vinh NX, Chetty M, Coppel R, Wangikar PP (2011) GlobalMIT: learning globally optimal dynamic bayesian network with the mutual information test criterion. Bioinformatics 27(19):2765–2766CrossRef
Wand MP, Jones MC (1994) Kernel smoothing, Crc Press
Xiong Y, Chen W, Apley D, Ding X (2007) A non‐stationary covariance‐based Kriging method for metamodelling in engineering design. Int J Numer Methods Eng 71(6):733–756CrossRefMATH
Xiu D, Karniadakis GE (2002) The Wiener--Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM J Sci Comput 24(2):619–644MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Xiu D, Karniadakis GE (2003) Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos. J Comput Phys 187(1):137–167MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Xu C, Gertner G (2007) Extending a global sensitivity analysis technique to models with correlated parameters. Comput Statistics Data Analys 51(12):5579–5590MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zhao H, Yue Z, Liu Y, Gao Z, Zhang Y (2014) An efficient reliability method combining adaptive importance sampling and Kriging metamodel, Applied Mathematical Modelling
Metadaten
Titel
Global sensitivity analysis-enhanced surrogate (GSAS) modeling for reliability analysis
verfasst von
Zhen Hu
Sankaran Mahadevan
Publikationsdatum
29.10.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1615-147X
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-1488
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1347-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe

RESEARCH PAPER

Topology optimization of plate structures subject to initial excitations for minimum dynamic performance index

RESEARCH PAPER

Minimizing the vibrational response of a lightweight building by topology and volume optimization of a base plate for excitatory machinery

RESEARCH PAPER

Optimal design of dome truss structures with dynamic frequency constraints

RESEARCH PAPER

Microstructure interpolation for macroscopic design

RESEARCH PAPER

A piezoelectric model based multi-objective optimization of robot gripper design

RESEARCH PAPER

Structural design using multi-objective metaheuristics. Comparative study and application to a real-world problem

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise