nach oben

Public Organization Review

Erschienen in:

05.11.2014

Governance Mechanisms in Multi-Party Non-Profit Collaboration

verfasst von: Kaisa Henttonen, Katja Lahikainen, Tiina Jauhiainen

Erschienen in: Public Organization Review | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Despite considerable progress in research related to network organizations in recent years, current understanding seems to be more concerned with the reasons why the network mode may be a superior mode of governance, but there is limited understanding of how networks are governed. This study contributes to narrowing this knowledge gap. Moreover, the article contributes to the debate over how networks are governed by identifying governance mechanisms for multi-party collaboration of public organizations. A qualitative methodology based on conversational interviews is used in the cross-case setting consisting of six non-profit multi-party networks including governmental, university and private organizations.

Nächster Artikel Legal-Administrative Responses and Democratic Deconsolidation

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Alter, C., & Hage, J. (1993). Organizations working together. Newbury Park: Sage.

Anderson, T. S., Michael, E. K., & Peirce, J. J. (2012). Innovative approaches for managing public-private academic partnerships in big science and engineering. Public Organization Review, 12, 1–22.CrossRef

Benson, J. K. (1975). The interorganisational network as a political economy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(2), 229–249.CrossRef

Beyerlein, M. M., Johnson, D. A., & Beyerlein, S. T. (2004). Complex collaboration: Building the capabilities for working across boundaries. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams. UK: Elsevier Ltd.

Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: a multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 795–817.CrossRef

Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2005). A leadership framework for cross-sector collaboration. Public Management Review, 7(2), 177–201.CrossRef

Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (1998). Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491–512.

Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31–41.CrossRef

Grabher, G., & Powell, W. W. (2004). Introduction. In G. Grabher & W. W. Powell (Eds.), Networks, Volume One: xi–xxxi. Cheltenham: Elgar.

Head, B. W. (2008). Assessing network-based collaborations. Public Management Review, 10(6), 733–749.CrossRef

Herranz, J. (2009). Endogenous development dynamics of multisectoral network management. International Public Management Journal, 12(3), 370–397.CrossRef

Hoflund, B. A. (2013). Designing a decision-making process for a network administrative organisation: a case study of the national quality forum’s consensus development process. Public Organization Review, 13, 89–105.CrossRef

Hudson, B. (2004). Analysing network partnerships: Benson re-visited. Public Management Review, 6(1), 75–94.CrossRef

Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate. London: Routledge.

Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A general theory of network governance: exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911–945.

Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. London: Sage Press.

King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of the text. In S. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. London: Sage Publications.

Klijn, E. H. (2008). Governance and governance networks in Europe. Public Management Review, 10(4), 505–525.CrossRef

Levine, S., & White, P. E. (1962). Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of interorganizational relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5(4), 583–601.CrossRef

Lorange, P. (2004). Complex Collaborations: The case of a business school and its complex network of relationships. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Complex collaboration: Building the capabilities for working across boundaries. Advances in inter-disciplinary studies of work teams (pp. 109–124). UK: Elsevier Ltd.CrossRef

Mankin, D., Cohen, S., & Fitzgerald, S. P. (2004). Developing complex collaborations: Basic principles to guide design and implementation. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Complex collaboration: Building the capabilities for working across boundaries: Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams. UK: Elsevier Ltd.

O’Toole, L. J. (1997). Treating networks seriously: practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57, 45–52.CrossRef

Oliver, A. L. (2004). On the duality of competition and collaboration: network-based knowledge relations in the biotechnology industry. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 20, 151–171.CrossRef

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield/London: Pitman Bublishin inc./Pitman Books Limited.

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.

Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. N. (2007). Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 229–252.CrossRef

Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: a comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 1–33.CrossRef

Sullivan, H., Barnes, M., & Matka, E. (2007). Building collaborative capacity for collaborative control: Health action zones in England. In T. Gössling, L. Oerlemans, & R. Jansen (Eds.), Inside networks: A process view on multi-organisational partnerships, alliances and networks. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Thompson, G., Frances, J., Levacic, R., & Mitchell, J. (1998). Markets, hierarchies and networks: The coordination of social life. UK: Sage Publications, Biddles Ltd., Guilford and King’s Lynn.

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

Titel: Governance Mechanisms in Multi-Party Non-Profit Collaboration
verfasst von: Kaisa Henttonen
Katja Lahikainen
Tiina Jauhiainen
Publikationsdatum: 05.11.2014
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Public Organization Review / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1566-7170
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7098
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-014-0293-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

An Assessment of the Impact of Local Government Fragmentation in Ghana

An Examination of Public Private Academic Partnerships: Does Program Success Enhance University Performance Outcomes?

Legal-Administrative Responses and Democratic Deconsolidation

Bureaucratic Autonomy in the U.S. Separation of Powers: Evidence from Cabinet Departments

The Failure of Theory to Predict the Way Public Sector Organisation Responds to its Organisational Environment and the Need for a Mosaic-View of Organisational Theory

A Manager is a Manager is a Manager? Race and Managerial Impact on Organizational Performance

Premium Partner