Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Hydrogeology Journal 5/2012

01.08.2012 | Paper

Groundwater pumping by heterogeneous users

verfasst von: Alexander E. Saak, Jeffrey M. Peterson

Erschienen in: Hydrogeology Journal | Ausgabe 5/2012

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Farm size is a significant determinant of both groundwater-irrigated farm acreage and groundwater-irrigation-application rates per unit land area. This paper analyzes the patterns of groundwater exploitation when resource users in the area overlying a common aquifer are heterogeneous. In the presence of user heterogeneity, the common resource problem consists of inefficient dynamic and spatial allocation of groundwater because it impacts income distribution not only across periods but also across farmers. Under competitive allocation, smaller farmers pump groundwater faster if farmers have a constant marginal periodic utility of income. However, it is possible that larger farmers pump faster if the Arrow-Pratt coefficient of relative risk-aversion is sufficiently decreasing in income. A greater farm-size inequality may either moderate or amplify income inequality among farmers. Its effect on welfare depends on the curvature properties of the agricultural output function and the farmer utility of income. Also, it is shown that a flat-rate quota policy that limits the quantity of groundwater extraction per unit land area may have unintended consequences for the income distribution among farmers.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Antle J (1983) Testing the stochastic structure of production: a flexible moment-based approach. J Bus Econ Stat 1:192–201 Antle J (1983) Testing the stochastic structure of production: a flexible moment-based approach. J Bus Econ Stat 1:192–201
Zurück zum Zitat Antle J (1987) Econometric estimation of producers’ risk attitudes. Am J Agric Econ 69:509–522CrossRef Antle J (1987) Econometric estimation of producers’ risk attitudes. Am J Agric Econ 69:509–522CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brozovic N, Sunding D, Zilberman D (2003) Optimal management of groundwater over space and time. In: Berga D, Goetz R (eds) Frontiers in water resource economics. Kluwer, New York Brozovic N, Sunding D, Zilberman D (2003) Optimal management of groundwater over space and time. In: Berga D, Goetz R (eds) Frontiers in water resource economics. Kluwer, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Brozovic N, Sunding D, Zilberman D (2010) On the spatial nature of the groundwater pumping externality. Resour Energ Econ 32(2010):154–164CrossRef Brozovic N, Sunding D, Zilberman D (2010) On the spatial nature of the groundwater pumping externality. Resour Energ Econ 32(2010):154–164CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feinerman E (1988) Groundwater management: efficiency and equity considerations. Agric Econ 2:1–18CrossRef Feinerman E (1988) Groundwater management: efficiency and equity considerations. Agric Econ 2:1–18CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feinerman E, Knapp K (1983) Benefits from groundwater management: magnitude, sensitivity, and distribution. Am J Agric Econ 65:703–710CrossRef Feinerman E, Knapp K (1983) Benefits from groundwater management: magnitude, sensitivity, and distribution. Am J Agric Econ 65:703–710CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Foster A, Rosenzweig M (2008) Inequality and the sustainability of agricultural productivity growth: groundwater and the green revolution in rural India, presented at the India Policy Conference at Stanford University, California, June 1–3, 2005 Foster A, Rosenzweig M (2008) Inequality and the sustainability of agricultural productivity growth: groundwater and the green revolution in rural India, presented at the India Policy Conference at Stanford University, California, June 1–3, 2005
Zurück zum Zitat Gaudet G, Moreaux M, Salant S (2001) Intertemporal depletion of resource sites by spatially distributed users. Am Econ Rev 91:1149–1159CrossRef Gaudet G, Moreaux M, Salant S (2001) Intertemporal depletion of resource sites by spatially distributed users. Am Econ Rev 91:1149–1159CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gisser M (1983) Groundwater: focusing on the real issue. J Polit Econ 91:1001–1027CrossRef Gisser M (1983) Groundwater: focusing on the real issue. J Polit Econ 91:1001–1027CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gisser M, Sanchez D (1980) Competition versus optimal control in groundwater pumping. Water Resour Res 16:638–642CrossRef Gisser M, Sanchez D (1980) Competition versus optimal control in groundwater pumping. Water Resour Res 16:638–642CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Groom B, Koundouri P, Nauges C, Thomas A (2006) Stochastic technology and risk attitudes in agricultural production. Appl Econ 40:315–326CrossRef Groom B, Koundouri P, Nauges C, Thomas A (2006) Stochastic technology and risk attitudes in agricultural production. Appl Econ 40:315–326CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hoppe R, MacDonald J, Korb P (2010) Small farms in the United States: persistence under pressure. Economic Research Service, EIB-63, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC Hoppe R, MacDonald J, Korb P (2010) Small farms in the United States: persistence under pressure. Economic Research Service, EIB-63, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
Zurück zum Zitat Knapp K, Vaux H (1982) Barriers to effective groundwater management: the California case. Ground Water 20:61–66CrossRef Knapp K, Vaux H (1982) Barriers to effective groundwater management: the California case. Ground Water 20:61–66CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Koundouri P (2004) Current issues in the economics of groundwater resource management. J Econ Surv 18(5):703–740CrossRef Koundouri P (2004) Current issues in the economics of groundwater resource management. J Econ Surv 18(5):703–740CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Koundouri P, Nauges C, Tsouvelekas V (2006) Technology adoption under production risk: theory and application to irrigation technology. Am J Agric Econ 88:657–670CrossRef Koundouri P, Nauges C, Tsouvelekas V (2006) Technology adoption under production risk: theory and application to irrigation technology. Am J Agric Econ 88:657–670CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Marshall A, Olkin I (1979) Inequalities: theory of majorization and its applications. Academic, New York Marshall A, Olkin I (1979) Inequalities: theory of majorization and its applications. Academic, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Negri D (1989) The common property aquifer as a differential game. Water Resour Res 29:9–15CrossRef Negri D (1989) The common property aquifer as a differential game. Water Resour Res 29:9–15CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Provencher B, Burt O (1993) The externalities associated with the common property exploitation of groundwater. J Environ Econ Manage 24:139–158CrossRef Provencher B, Burt O (1993) The externalities associated with the common property exploitation of groundwater. J Environ Econ Manage 24:139–158CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Provencher B, Burt O (1994) A private property rights regime for the commons: the case of groundwater. Am J Agric Econ (76 November): 875–888 Provencher B, Burt O (1994) A private property rights regime for the commons: the case of groundwater. Am J Agric Econ (76 November): 875–888
Zurück zum Zitat Saak A, Peterson J (2007) Groundwater use under incomplete information. J Environ Econ Manage 54:214–228CrossRef Saak A, Peterson J (2007) Groundwater use under incomplete information. J Environ Econ Manage 54:214–228CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schaible G (2004) Irrigation, water conservation, and farm size in the western United States. Amber Waves (8 June): 8 Schaible G (2004) Irrigation, water conservation, and farm size in the western United States. Amber Waves (8 June): 8
Zurück zum Zitat Sekhri S (2011) Public provision and protection of natural resources: groundwater rirrigation in rural India. Am Econ JAppl Econ (3 October): 29–55 Sekhri S (2011) Public provision and protection of natural resources: groundwater rirrigation in rural India. Am Econ JAppl Econ (3 October): 29–55
Zurück zum Zitat Xabadia A, Goetz R, Zilberman D (2004) Optimal dynamic pricing of water in the presence of waterlogging and spatial heterogeneity of land. Water Resour Res 40:W07S02. doi:10.1029/2003WR002215 Xabadia A, Goetz R, Zilberman D (2004) Optimal dynamic pricing of water in the presence of waterlogging and spatial heterogeneity of land. Water Resour Res 40:W07S02. doi:10.​1029/​2003WR002215
Metadaten
Titel
Groundwater pumping by heterogeneous users
verfasst von
Alexander E. Saak
Jeffrey M. Peterson
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Hydrogeology Journal / Ausgabe 5/2012
Print ISSN: 1431-2174
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-0157
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-012-0854-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2012

Hydrogeology Journal 5/2012 Zur Ausgabe