Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Happiness Studies
Erschienen in: Journal of Happiness Studies 5/2010

01.10.2010 | Research Paper

Happiness on the Political Agenda? PROS and CONS

verfasst von: Valérie De Prycker

Erschienen in: Journal of Happiness Studies | Ausgabe 5/2010

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper provides a critical analysis of the application of happiness research into policy domains. An overview of the current debate on the politics of happiness is elaborated by focusing on its promising perspectives as well as the potential problems it raises. Arguments of proponents and opponents are confronted with each other in discussing the following central issues in the debate: (1) the state of progress of the happiness research; (2) the value of happiness and its promotion by political means; (3) the possibility of promoting happiness; (4) paternalism versus autonomy and (5) a fair distribution of happiness. It is concluded from this that pragmatic issues do not pose insurmountable obstacles for the realization of a politics of happiness, although further research is definitely recommendable. The ideological or ethical issues however require further debate and research before the actual realization of a politics of happiness is possible. More specifically, the science of happiness needs to give more attention to analyzing the value of happiness and the desirability of increasing happiness by political means. Also the weighing of the value of happiness against other values and goals is an important issue to be put on the agenda. This paper thus explicates the moral choices and challenges that politicians would be confronted with if they want to put the increase of happiness on the political agenda.
Vorheriger Artikel Happiness, morality, and politics
Nächster Artikel Greater Happiness for a Greater Number

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
These indicators have been constructed by the New Economics Foundation, using data from the 2006 to 2007 European Social Survey. The two crucial aspects of how people experience their lives were used as headline measures, being personal well-being and social well-being. Each headline indicator was broken down into component indicators (and in places also subcomponent indicators) which reflect the different aspects which together comprise experienced well-being. The indicator of social well-being was constructed as having two component indicators: (1) supportive relationships and (2) trust and belonging. Personal well-being has five component indicators: (1) emotional well-being with subcomponents positive feelings and absence of negative feelings; (2) life satisfaction; (3) vitality; (4) resilience, optimism, self-esteem; and (5) positive functioning which consists of the subcomponents autonomy, competence, engagement, meaning and purpose. In addition, a summary measure or “combined well-being indicator” was created by bringing together the personal well-being and social well-being indicators. More information on http://​www.​europeansocialsu​rvey.​org/​ and http://​www.​nationalaccounts​ofwellbeing.​org/​.
 
2
A more elaborate discussion on these two traditions can be found in Sect. 3.1.2.
 
3
An additional reason is the fact that in colloquial terms happiness is the most frequently used notion.
 
4
The enormous interest in subjective well-being in the 1960s and 1970s originated from the so called ‘social indicators movement’. This movement emerged in the late 1960s as a reaction against the widespread use of economical indicators—such as gross national product—to measure quality of life (Campbell 1976). The members of the ‘social indicators movement’ countered this by suggesting to gather objective data about quality of life such as levels of education, housing, et cetera. But some even considered these objective indicators to be limited as measures for quality of life. Campbell et al. (1976: 3) state that they “are taken as surrogates for the subjective experience of life”. Due to this, the idea developed that, apart from economical and other objective indicators, subjective well-being could also be used as an indicator for quality of life on a large scale.
 
5
The term ‘sustainable development’ was introduced in the United Nations report ‘Our Common Future’ or so called ‘Brundlandt Report’ (World Commission on Environment and Development 1987). In this report sustainable development is defined as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (http://​www.​ourcommonfuture.​org/​).
 
6
The ecological footprint of an individual is a measure of the amount of land required to provide for all their resource requirements plus the amount of vegetated land required to sequester (absorb) all their CO2 emissions and the CO2 emissions embodied in the products they consume. This definition was retrieved from http://​www.​happyplanetindex​.​org/​learn/​calculating/​global.​html#footprint.
 
7
By the promotion of happiness I mean the increase or maximization of happiness to the highest level possible. I do not mean that policy makers should strive for perfect happiness, but only that we try to attain the highest level possible.
 
8
Most frequently happiness is measured with single direct questions such as “Taking all together, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you currently with your life as a whole?”. Answers can be formulated on a scale from 0 (completely dissatisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied).
 
9
The ‘Experience Sampling Method’ registers behavior, thoughts and emotions as they occur in real time, which does not require a post hoc evaluation about how one feels (Larson and Csikszentmihalyi 1983).
 
10
The ‘Day Reconstruction Method’ assesses how people spend their time and how they experience the various activities and settings of their lives, combining features of time-budget measurement and experience sampling. Participants reconstruct their activities and experiences of the preceding day with procedures designed to reduce recall biases (Kahneman et al. 2004).
 
11
The ‘Anamnestic Comparitive Self-Assessment’ method is based on the question to evaluate one’s life in accordance to the best and worst periods of one’s life. This extremely personal scale avoids trivial answers (comparable with the answer “Fine.” to the question “How are you doing?”) and is less sensitive to bias due to cultural relativity (Bernheim et al. 2006).
 
12
Research has shown that they are more tolerant, more benevolent, more altruistic, less suspicious, more long term oriented, more productive, more creative and more inquisitive (Lyubomirsky 2007; Diener and Biswas-Diener 2008;Veenhoven 1997; Zeleski et al. 2008; Estrada et al. 1994).
 
13
Above the limiting value of 15,000 US dollars per capita per year, the added material growth has no effect on the national happiness levels (Easterlin 1974).
 
14
Different arguments for this might be brought up. Firstly, there is the hedonistic paradox which refers to the idea that happiness is not directly attainable since striving for happiness tends to make it harder to attain. Happiness is not attainable by putting it up front as a main goal but it rather is a by-product of other activities. This idea was very alive with the likes of Aristotle and John Stuart Mill. Secondly, one can refer to the limitations due to adaptation. People very quickly adapt to—both negative and positive—new circumstances which makes them adjust to their aspirations. This limits the possibility of increasing individual happiness. This is often referred to this as the hedonic tredmill. And thirdly, our genes play a significant role in putting a natural limit to the increase of individual happiness (Lykken 1999). In spite of these limitations, it has been shown there are many strategies to increase happiness on the individual level that actually work (Lyubomirsky 2007; Lyubomirsky et al. 2005).
 
Literatur
Argyle, M. (2001). The psychology of happiness: Second edition. Hove/East Sussex: Routledge.
Aristotle. (1995). Nicomachean ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (translated by Ross, W.D.).
Bentham, J. (1789/1965), An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. New York: Hafner.
Bernheim, J., Theuns, P., Mazaheri, M., Hofmans, J., Fliege, H., & Rose, M. (2006). The potential of Anamnestic Comparative Self-Assessment (ACSA) to reduce bias in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(2), 227–250.CrossRef
Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the U.S.A. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359–1386.CrossRef
Bruckner, P. (2000). L’euphorie perpétuelle. Essai sur le devoir de bonheur. Paris: Editions Grasset et Fasquelle.
Brülde, B. (2007). Happiness and the good life. Introduction and conceptual framework. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(1), 1–14.CrossRef
Bruni, L., & Porta, P. L. (2005). Economics and happiness. Framing the analysis. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Buss, D. M. (2000). The evolution of happiness. American Psychologist, 55(1), 15–23.CrossRef
Campbell, A. (1976). Subjective measures of well-being. American Psychologist, 31, 117–124.CrossRef
Campbell, A., Converse, P., & Rodgers, W. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Chekola, M. (2007). Happiness, rationality, autonomy and the good life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(1), 51–78.CrossRef
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (1998). Introduction to part IV. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 251–265). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.CrossRef
Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(2), 151–157.CrossRef
Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2008). Happiness: Unlocking the mysteries of psychological wealth. Malden/Oxford/Victoria: Wiley-Blackwell.
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. F. (2009). Well-being for public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. (2004). Beyond money. Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31.CrossRef
Dolan, P., & Peasgood, T. (2006). Review of research on the influences on personal well-being and application to policy making, DEFRA-report, UK-government, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
Duncan, G. (2010). Should happiness-maximization be the goal of government? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(2), 163–178.CrossRef
Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. David & M. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). New York/London: Academic Press.
Elchardus, M., & Smits, W. (2007). Het grootste geluk. Leuven: Lannoo Campus.
Estrada, C., Isen, A. M., & Young, M. J. (1994). Positive affect improves creative problem solving and reported source of practice satisfaction is physicians. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 285–299.CrossRef
Gilbert, D. (2006). Stumbling on happiness. New York: Alfred Knopf.
Götz, I. (1995). Conceptions of happiness. Lanham: University Press of America.
Habel, U., Klein, M., Kellermann, T., Shah, N. J., & Schneider, F. (2005). Same or different? Neural correlates of happy and sad mood in healthy males. NeuroImage, 26(1), 206–214.CrossRef
Haybron, D. (2008). The pursuit of unhappiness. The elusive psychology of happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Helliwell, J., & Huang, H. (2006). How’s your government? International evidence linking good government and well-being, NBER Working Paper Series 11988, National Bureau of Economic Research Inc. USA.
Heylighen, F. (2009). Stimuleren van geluk en sociale vooruitgang. Een libertair paternalistische benadering. Ethiek & Maatschappij, 12(1), 147–167.
Hirata, J. (2005). How should happiness guide policy? Why gross national happiness is not opposed to democracy, Paper at the Second international conference on gross national happiness. Local pathways to global well-being, Antigonish/Nova Scotia, Canada. http://​www.​gpiatlantic.​org. Accessed 22 February 2007.
Huppert, F., Marks, N., & Vitterso, J. (2006). Developing national indicators of well-being for Europe, Paper at the Third European conference on positive psychology, Portugal, Braga.
Inglehart, R., Welzel, C., Foa, R. (2009). Happiness trends in 24 countries, 1946–2006, Internet appendix to Inglehart, R., Welzel, C., Foa, R., Social change, freedom and rising happiness, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. http://​www.​worldvaluessurve​y.​org/​. Accessed 3 September 2009.
Johns, H., & Ormerod, P. (2007). Happiness, economics and public policy. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.
Kahneman, D. (2000). Experienced utility and objective happiness. In D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values and frames (pp. 673–692). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRef
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5702), 1776–1780.CrossRef
Lane, R. D., Reiman, E. M., Ahern, G. L., Schwarz, G. E., & Davidson, R. J. (1997). Neuroanatomical correlates of happiness, sadness, and disgust. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 926–933.
Larsen, R. J., & Frederickson, B. L. (1999). Measurement issues in emotion research. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 40–60). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1983). The experience sampling method. New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science, 15, 41–56.
Layard, R. (2005). Happiness. Lessons from a new science. New York: The Penguin Press.
Lykken, D. (1999). Happiness: What studies on twins show us about nature, nurture and the happiness set-point. New York: Golden Books.
Lyubomirksy, S. (2007). The how of happiness. A new approach to getting the life you want. New York: Penguin Books.
Lyubomirsky, S., Schkade, D., & Sheldon, K. M. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 111–131.CrossRef
Marks, N. (2004). Towards evidence based public policy: The power and potential of using well-being indicators in a political context. In K. Ura & K. Galay (Eds.), Gross national happiness and development, Proceedings of the first international seminar on the operationalization of gross national happiness. http://​www.​bhutanstudies.​org.​bt/​publications/​publications.​htm. Accessed 28 January 2007.
Marks, N. (2005). The science of well-being: Its potential to inspire political change at many levels in the UK and beyond, paper at the Second international conference on gross national happiness—Local pathways to global well-being, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada. http://​www.​gpiatlantic.​org/​. Accessed 22 February 2007.
Marks, N., & Shah, H. (2005). A well-being manifesto for a flourishing society. In F. Huppert, N. Baylis, & B. Keverne (Eds.), The science of well-being (pp. 503–531). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
McMahon, D. (2005). Happiness: A history. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.
Mill, J. S. (1861/1975). Considerations on representative government. In R. Wollheim (Ed.), John Stuart Mill: Three essays, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10–19.CrossRef
Nettle, D. (2005). Happiness. The science behind your smile. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oswald, A. J. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. The Economic Journal, 107, 1815–1831.CrossRef
Persaud, R. (2006). The motivated mind. London: Bantam Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.CrossRef
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1–11.CrossRef
Ryff, C. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081.CrossRef
Schoch, R. (2006a). The secrets of happiness. Three thousand years of searching for the good life. London: Profile Books.
Schumaker, J. F. (2007). In search of happiness: Understanding an endangered state of mind. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84). New York: Russell Sage.
Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. (2005). Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tännsjö, T. (2007). Narrow hedonism. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(1), 79–98.CrossRef
Telfer, E. (1980). Happiness: An examination of a hedonistic and a eudaimonistic concept of happiness and of the relations between them, with a consideration of how far and in what sense either kind of happiness may be said to be the goal of human life. London: Macmillan.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Caravan Books.
Thompson, S., Abdallah, S., Marks, N., Simms, A., & Johnson, V. (2007), The European (un)happy planet index. An index of carbon efficiency and well-being in the EU, New Economics Foundation. http://​www.​happyplanetindex​.​org/​. Accessed 12 May 2009.
Van Ootegem, L., & Spillemaeckers, S. (2009). Well-being, capabilities en geluk in België. Informatie uit focus groep discussies. Ethiek & Maatschappij, 12(1), 121–146.
Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Veenhoven, R. (1993). Happiness in nations: Subjective appreciation of life in 56 nations: 1946–1992, Studies in Sociale en Culturele Verandering, 2, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Veenhoven, R. (1996). Happy life-expectancy: A comprehensive measure of quality-of-life in nations. Social Indicators Research, 39, 1–58.CrossRef
Veenhoven, R. (1997). Advances in understanding happiness. Revue Québécoise de Psychologie, 182, 29–74.
Veenhoven, R. (2002). Why social policy needs subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 58, 33–45.CrossRef
Veenhoven, R. (2004b). Happiness as an aim in public policy. The greatest happiness principle. In A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 658–678). Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
Veenhoven, R. (2008). Healthy happiness: Effects of happiness on physical health and the consequences for preventive health care. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(3), 449–464.CrossRef
Veenhoven, R. (2009a). Groter geluk voor een groter aantal? Is dat mogelijk en wenselijk? Ethiek & Maatschappij, 12(1), 25–50.
Veenhoven, R. (2009b). Kan Nederland gelukkiger?, Presentation at the symposium Geluk!, University of Amsterdam, 31 January 2009.
Vittersø, J. (2003). Flow versus life satisfaction: A projective use of cartoons to illustrate the difference between the evaluation approach and the intrinsic motivation approach to subjective quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4(2), 141–167.CrossRef
Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678–691.CrossRef
Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., & Conti, R. (2008). The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 41–79.CrossRef
Wilkinson, W. (2007). The quest for scientific politics of happiness. In Are we happy yet? Happiness in an age of abundance, Blog archive Cato Institute. http://​www.​cato-unbound.​org. Accessed 15 November 2007.
Zeleski, J. M., Murphy, S. A., & Jenkins, D. A. (2008). The happy-productive worker thesis revisited. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(4), 521–537.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Happiness on the Political Agenda? PROS and CONS
verfasst von
Valérie De Prycker
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2010
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Happiness Studies / Ausgabe 5/2010
Print ISSN: 1389-4978
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7780
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9205-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2010

Journal of Happiness Studies 5/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Book Review

Can Movies Enhance Happiness?

Research Paper

Happiness, morality, and politics

Research Paper

Happiness in a Flux? The Instability Problem

Research Paper

Greater Happiness for a Greater Number: Some Non-controversial Options for Governments

Book review

The State of the Art in Happiness Advice; Can We Escape the Dodo-Verdict?

Book Review

Samuel S. Franklin: The Psychology of Happiness; a Good Human Life