nach oben

Journal of Business Ethics

Erschienen in:

01.11.2013

Harmonizing IPRs on Software Piracy: Empirics of Trajectories in Africa

verfasst von: Simplice A. Asongu

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In the current efforts of harmonizing the standards and enforcement of IPRs protection worldwide, this paper explores software piracy trajectories and dynamics in Africa. Using a battery of estimation techniques that ignore as well as integrate short-run disturbances in time-dynamic fashion, we answer the big questions policy makers are most likely to ask before harmonizing IPRs regimes in the battle against software piracy. Three main findings are established. (1) African countries with low software piracy rates are catching-up their counterparts with higher rates; implying despite existing divergent IPRs systems, convergence in piracy rate could be a genuine standard-setting platform. (2) Legal origins do not play a very significant role in the convergence process. (3) A genuine timeframe for standardizing IPRs laws in the fight against piracy is most likely between a horizon of 4–8 years. In other words, full (100 %) convergence within the specified horizon will mean the enforcements of IPRs regimes without distinction of nationality and locality. Policy implications and caveats are discussed.

Vorheriger Artikel Understanding Pay Satisfaction: Effects of Supervisor Ethical Leadership on Job Motivating Potential Influence

Nächster Artikel Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?”

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

This stance has gained prominence in the debate over if ‘permission’ should be granted to enable ‘copying’ of life-saving pharmaceuticals, especially those used in the management of HIV/AIDS in developing countries most affected and least likely to afford such treatments.

Additional support for the possibility that the changing strength of IPRs regimes is based on a nation’s level of development or current technological ability could be traced in the rapid growth witnessed by South-East Asia. Some evidence suggest that the ‘East Asian Miracle’ could have originated from weaker IPRs regimes at the early stages of these nations’ development in addition to their accumulation of capital. These nations’ capacity to absorb, replicate and duplicate foreign innovations might have contributed to their relatively high growth rates. Further evidence has suggested that, as these countries became significant producers of new technologies and innovations, their IPRs regimes tightened. While Nelson and Pack (1999) have postulated that the productive assimilation of existing (foreign) productive techniques and technologies ‘was a critical component of the success of these countries’, Maskus (2000) cautions that weaker protection of IPRs will not necessarily be beneficial for developing countries as it may cause them to remain dependent on older and less efficient outdated technologies.

The BSA data primarily measures the piracy of commercial software. We are unaware of any publicly available cross-national data on end-user software piracy. See Png (2008) for a discussion on the reliability of piracy data. Also, see Traphagan and Griffith (1998).

Among the many researchers who have used this data are Marron and Steel (2000), Banerjee et al. (2005), Andrés (2006), and Goel and Nelson (2009).

Piracy is strongly associated with poverty: faction of the population with low income. A stance that is valid from economic and cultural considerations (Moores and Esichaikul 2011, p. 1).

The rule of law and regulation quality have a correlation of 87 %. GDP growth and GDP per capita growth: 95 %. Money supply and liquid liabilities: 96 %. PC users and internet penetration: 84 %.

As emphasized by Bezmen and Depken (2004), studies assessing the piracy development nexus are subject to potential endogeneity problems because it is likely that a nation’s level of development is a crucial factor in its choice of or adherence to a particular IPRs regime. This confirms an earlier position by Ginarte and Park (1997) who found strong evidence that the level of economic development explains the strength of patent protection provided by individual countries.

‘We also demonstrate that more plausible results can be achieved using a system GMM estimator suggested by Arellano and Bover (1995) and Blundell and Bond (1998). The system estimator exploits an assumption about the initial conditions to obtain moment conditions that remain informative even for persistent series, and it has been shown to perform well in simulations. The necessary restrictions on the initial conditions are potentially consistent with standard growth frameworks, and appear to be both valid and highly informative in our empirical application. Hence we recommend this system GMM estimator for consideration in subsequent empirical growth research’. Bond et al. (2001, pp. 3–4).

While Narayan et al. (2011) have used Eq. (1) in the absence of fixed effects, this paper applies Eqs. (2) and (3) instead, in line with Fung (2009). The Fung (2009) approach has been used in recent African convergence literature (Asongu 2012a, b).

In the one-step, the residuals are assumed to be homoscedastic.

We have 6 two-year non-overlapping intervals: 2000; 2001–2002; 2003–2004; 2005–2006; 2007–2008; 2009–2010. There are also four three-year non-overlapping intervals: 2000–2001; 2002–2004; 2005–2007; 2008–2010. For both types of non-overlapping intervals, owing to the data and periodical constraints, the first interval is short of 1 year.

Note that the second vector of determinants entails the second set of control variables as presented in Table 4 (regulation quality, per capita GDP growth, liquid liabilities, internet penetration, trade and FDI).

This poses no issue because overall interpretations will not be based on the three-year NOI results. Their use enriches the analysis in providing trajectories and dynamics hitherto unexplored in convergence empirics.

World Trade Organization (WTO)/Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS).

WIPO: World Intellectual Property Organization.

Andrés, A. R. (2006). The relationship between copyright software protection and piracy: Evidence from Europe. European Journal of Law and Economics, 21, 29–51.CrossRef

Andrés, A. R., & Goel, R. K. (2011). Corruption and software piracy: A comparative perspective. Policy and Internet, 3(3), 1–24.CrossRef

Andrés, A. R., & Goel, R. K. (2012). Does software piracy affect economic growth? Evidence across countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 34, 284–295.CrossRef

Apergis, N., Christou, C., & Miller, S. M. (2010). Country and industry convergence in equity markets: International evidence from club convergence and clustering. Department of Banking and Financial Management, University of Piraeus, Greece.

Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.CrossRef

Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29–52.CrossRef

Asongu, S. A. (2012a). African stock market performance dynamics: a multidimensional convergence assessment. Journal of African Business. http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/pramprapa/36055.htm. Accessed 24 Oct 2012.

Asongu, S. A. (2012b). African financial development dynamics: big time convergence. African Journal of Economics and Management Studies. http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/pramprapa/36053.htm. Accessed 24 Oct 2012.

Banerjee, D., Khalid, A. M., & Sturm, J.-E. (2005). Socio-economic development and software piracy. An empirical assessment. Applied Economics, 37, 2091–2097.CrossRef

Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 407–443.CrossRef

Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 223–251.CrossRef

Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Baumol, W. J. (1986). Productivity, growth, convergence and welfare: What the long run data show. American Economic Review, 76, 1072–1085.

Bezmen, T. L., & Depken, C. A. (2004). The impact of software piracy on economic development, Working Paper. Florence, SC: Francis Marion University.

Bezmen, T. L., & Depken, C. A. (2006). Influences on software piracy: Evidence from the various United States. Economics Letters, 90, 356–361.CrossRef

Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.CrossRef

Bond, S., Hoeffler, A., & Tample, J. (2001). GMM estimation of empirical growth models. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bruno, G., De Bonis, R., & Silvestrini, A. (2012). Do financial systems converge? New evidence from financial assets in OECD countries. Journal of Comparative Economics, 40, 141–155.

Business Software Alliance. (2007). 2006 Piracy study. New York: BSA.

Business Software Alliance. (2009). What is software piracy? Retrieved May 19 2012 from http://www.bsa.org/Piracy%20Portal.aspx.

Caporale, G. M., Erdogan, B., & Kuzin, V. (2009). Testing for convergence in stock markets: a non-linear factor approach. Discussion paper no. 932. Berlin: Deutsches Institut fur Wirtschaftsforschung.

Costantini, M., & Lupi, C. (2005). Stochastic convergence among european economies. Economics Bulletin, 3(38), 1–17.

Depken, C. A., & Simmons, L. (2004). Social construct and the propensity for software piracy. Applied Economics Letters, 11, 97–100.CrossRef

Falvey, R., Foster, N., & Greenway, D. (2006). Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Review of Development Economics, 10, 700–719.CrossRef

Fredriksson, M. (2012). Piracy, globalization and the colonization of the Commons. Global Media Journal, 6(1), 1–10.

Fung, M. K. (2009). Financial development and economic growth: Convergence or divergence? Journal of International Money and Finance, 28, 56–67.CrossRef

Ginarte, J. C., & Park, W. G. (1997). Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study. Research Policy, 26(3), 283–301.CrossRef

Goel, R. K., & Nelson, M. A. (2009). Determinants of software piracy: Economics, institutions, and technology. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, 637–658.CrossRef

Gould, D. M., & Gruben, W. C. (1996). The Role of intellectual property rights in economic growth. Journal of Development Economics, 48, 323–350.CrossRef

Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Husted, B. W. (2000). The impact of national culture on software piracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 26, 197–211.CrossRef

Islam, N. (1995). Growth empirics: A panel data approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 1127–1170.CrossRef

Kim, L. (2004). The multifaceted evolution of Korean technological capabilities and its implications for contemporary policy. Oxford Development Studies, 32(3), 341–363.CrossRef

Kranenburg, H. L., & Hogenbirk, A.E. (2003). Determinants of multimedia, entertainment, and business software copyright piracy: A cross-national study. Mimeo: Department of Organization and Strategy, University of Maastricht.

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113–1155.CrossRef

Lee, J., & Mansfield, E. (1996). Intellectual property protection and U.S. foreign direct investment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(2), 181–186.CrossRef

Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 407–437.CrossRef

Mansfield, E. (1994). Intellectual property protection, foreign direct investment, and technology transfer. Washington, D.C.: International Finance Corporation.

Marron, D. B., & Steel, D. G. (2000). Which countries protect intellectual property? The case of software piracy. Economic Inquiry, 38(2), 147–174.

Maskus, E. K. (2000). Intellectual property rights and economic development. Boulder: University of Colorado.

Maskus, K. E., & Penubarti, M. (1995). How trade related are intellectual property rights? Journal of International Economics, 39, 227–248.CrossRef

Miller, S. M., & Upadhyay, M. P. (2002). Total factor productivity and the convergence hypothesis. Journal of Macroeconomics, 24, 267–286.CrossRef

Moores, T. T., & Esichaikul, V. (2011). Socialization and software piracy: A study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1–9. Retrieved 25 October, 2012 from http://iacis.org/jcis/articles/Moores_Esichaikul_51_3.pdf.

Narayan, P. K., Mishra, S., & Narayan, S. (2011). Do market capitalization and stocks traded converge? New global evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 2771–2781.CrossRef

Nelson, R. R., & Pack, H. (1999). The Asian miracle and modern growth theory. Economic Journal, 109, 416–436.CrossRef

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

North, D. C. (1994). Economic performance through time. American Economic Review, 84, 359–368.

Park, W., & Ginarte, J. (1997). Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 15, 51–61.CrossRef

Peitz, M., & Waelbroeck, P. (2006). Piracy of digital products: A critical review of the theoretical literature. Information Economics and Policy, 18, 449–476.CrossRef

Png, I. (2008). On the reliability of software piracy statistics. Mimeo: National University of Singapore.

Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous growth and technical change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71–102.CrossRef

Rushing, F. W., & Thompson, M. A. (1996). An empirical analysis of the impact of patent protection on economic growth. Journal of Economic Development, 21(2), 61–79.

Rushing, F. W., & Thompson, M. A. (1999). An empirical analysis of the impact of patent protection on economic growth: An extension. Journal of Economic Development, 24(1), 67–76.

Seyoum, B. (1996). The impact of intellectual property rights on foreign direct investment. Columbia Journal of World Business, 31(1), 50–59.CrossRef

SIIA. (2000). SIIA report on global software piracy 2000. Washington, DC: Software and Information Industry Association.

Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65–94.CrossRef

Swan, T. (1956). Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic Record, 32, 334–361.CrossRef

Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2003). Economic development (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.

Traphagan, M., & Griffith, A. (1998). Software piracy and global competitiveness: Report on global software piracy. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 12, 431–451.CrossRef

Yang, G., & Maskus, K. E. (2001). Intellectual property rights, licensing, and innovation in an endogenous product-cycle model. Journal of International Economics, 53, 169–187.CrossRef

Titel: Harmonizing IPRs on Software Piracy: Empirics of Trajectories in Africa
verfasst von: Simplice A. Asongu
Publikationsdatum: 01.11.2013
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1552-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Legitimacy-Seeking Organizational Strategies in Controversial Industries: A Case Study Analysis and a Bidimensional Model

Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?”

Will Women Lead the Way? Differences in Demand for Corporate Social Responsibility Information for Investment Decisions

How do Universities Make Progress? Stakeholder-Related Mechanisms Affecting Adoption of Sustainability in University Curricula

Reciprocity in Corporate Social Responsibility and Channel Performance: Do Birds of a Feather Flock Together?

W(h)ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting