Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Networks
Erschienen in: Wireless Networks 5/2020

27.01.2020

Hierarchical routing protocols for wireless sensor network: a compressive survey

verfasst von: Louie Chan, Karina Gomez Chavez, Heiko Rudolph, Akram Hourani

Erschienen in: Wireless Networks | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are one of the key enabling technologies for the internet of things (IoT). WSNs play a major role in data communications in applications such as home, health care, environmental monitoring, smart grids, and transportation. WSNs are used in IoT applications and should be secured and energy efficient in order to provide highly reliable data communications. Because of the constraints of energy, memory and computational power of the WSN nodes, clustering algorithms are considered as energy efficient approaches for resource-constrained WSNs. In this paper, we present a survey of the state-of-the-art routing techniques in WSNs. We first present the most relevant previous work in routing protocols surveys then highlight our contribution. Next, we outline the background, robustness criteria, and constraints of WSNs. This is followed by a survey of different WSN routing techniques. Routing techniques are generally classified as flat, hierarchical, and location-based routing. This survey focuses on the deep analysis of WSN hierarchical routing protocols. We further classify hierarchical protocols based on their routing techniques. We carefully choose the most relevant state-of-the-art protocols in order to compare and highlight the advantages, disadvantage and performance issues of each routing technique. Finally, we conclude this survey by presenting a comprehensive survey of the recent improvements of low-energy adaptive clustering hierarchy routing protocols and a comparison of the different versions presented in the literature.
Vorheriger Artikel On covert throughput performance of two-way relay covert wireless communications
Nächster Artikel Simultaneous wireless information and power transfer in heterogeneous cellular networks with underlay D2D communication

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Kumar, A., Ovsthus, K., & Kristensen, L. (2014). An industrial perspective on wireless sensor networks: A survey of requirements, protocols, and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 16(3), 1391–1412.CrossRef
2.
Aldeer, M. M. N. (2013). A summary survey on recent applications of wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (pp. 485–490).
3.
Gungor, V. C., Lu, B., & Hancke, G. P. (2010). Opportunities and challenges of wireless sensor networks in smart grid. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 57(10), 3557–3564.CrossRef
4.
Erol-Kantarci, M., & Mouftah, H. T. (2011). Wireless sensor networks for cost-efficient residential energy management in the smart grid. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2(2), 314–325.CrossRef
5.
Prathap, U., Shenoy, P., Venugopal, K., & Patnaik, L. (2012). Wireless sensor networks applications and routing protocols: Survey and research challenges. In IEEE Symposium on Cloud and Services Computing (pp. 49–56).
6.
Gkikopouli, A., Nikolakopoulos, G., & Manesis, S. (2012). A survey on underwater wireless sensor networks and applications. In IEEE Conference on Control Automation (MED) (pp. 1147–1154).
7.
Blanckenstein, J., Klaue, J., & Karl, H. (2015). A survey of low-power transceivers and their applications. IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, 15(3), 6–17. thirdquarter.CrossRef
8.
Miorandi, D., Lowe, D., & Gomez, K. M. (2010). Activation-inhibition-based data highways for wireless sensor networks. In E. Altman, I. Carrera, R. El-Azouzi, E. Hart, & Y. Hayel (Eds.), Bioinspired models of network. Information, and computing systems (pp. 95–102). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
9.
Chang, J.-H., & Tassiulas, L. (2004). Maximum lifetime routing in wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 12(4), 609–619.CrossRef
10.
Liu, X. (2015). Atypical hierarchical routing protocols for wireless sensor networks: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 15(10), 5372–5383.CrossRef
11.
Ali, A., & Parmanand. (2015). Energy efficieny in routing protocol and data collection approaches for WSN: A survey. In IEEE Conference on Computing, Communication Automation (pp. 540–545).
12.
Chatap, A., & Sirsikar, S. (2017). Review on various routing protocols for heterogeneous wireless sensor network. In Conference on IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud (pp. 440–444).
13.
Singh, S., Kumar, P., & Singh, J. (2017). A survey on successors of LEACH protocol. IEEE Access, 5, 4298–4328.CrossRef
14.
Yassen, M. B., Aljawaerneh, S., & Abdulraziq, R. (2016). Secure low energy adaptive clustering hierarchal based on internet of things for wireless sensor network (WSN): Survey. In Conference on Engineering MIS (pp. 1–9).
15.
Agarwal, A., Gupta, K., & Yadav, K. P. (2016). A novel energy efficiency protocol for WSN based on optimal chain routing. In IEEE Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom) (pp. 368–373).
16.
Kumari, J., & Prachi. (2015). A comprehensive survey of routing protocols in wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (pp. 325–330).
17.
Hao, J., Zhang, B., & Mouftah, H. T. (2012). Routing protocols for duty cycled wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(12), 116–123.CrossRef
18.
Yamunadevi, S. P., Vairam, T., Kalaiarasan, C., & Vidya, G. (2012). Efficient comparison of multipath routing protocols in WSN. In IEEE Conference on Computing, Electronics and Electrical Technologies (pp. 807–811).
19.
Goyal, D., & Tripathy, M. (2012). Routing protocols in wireless sensor networks: A survey. In IEEE Conference on Advanced Computing Communication Technologies (pp. 474–480).
20.
Baghyalakshmi, D., Ebenezer, J., & Satyamurty, S. (2010). Low latency and energy efficient routing protocols for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Conference on Wireless Communication and Sensor Computing (pp. 1–6).
21.
Watteyne, T., Molinaro, A., Richichi, M. G., & Dohler, M. (2011). From MANET To IETF ROLL standardization: A paradigm shift in WSN routing protocols. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 13(4), 688–707. Fourth.CrossRef
22.
Heinzelman, W. B., Chandrakasan, A. P., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(4), 660–670.CrossRef
23.
Kocakulak, M., & Butun, I. (2017). An overview of wireless sensor networks towards internet of things. In IEEE Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) (pp. 1–6).
24.
Sinha, A., & Chandrakasan, A. (2001). Dynamic power management in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Design Test of Computers, 18(2), 62–74.CrossRef
25.
Schurgers, C., Tsiatsis, V., Ganeriwal, S., & Srivastava, M. (2002). Optimizing sensor networks in the energy-latency-density design space. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 1(1), 70–80.CrossRef
26.
Ye, W., Heidemann, J., & Estrin, D. (2004). Medium access control with coordinated adaptive sleeping for wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 12(3), 493–506.CrossRef
27.
Saghar, K., Henderson, W., Kendall, D., & Bouridane, A. (2010). Formal modelling of a robust wireless sensor network routing protocol. In IEEE Conference on Adaptive Hardware and Systems (pp. 281–288).
28.
Alazzawi, L. K., Elkateeb, A. M., Ramesh, A., & Aljuhar, W. (2008). Scalability analysis for wireless sensor networks routing protocols. In IEEE Advanced Information Networking and Applications—Workshops (pp. 139–144).
29.
Horjaturapittaporn, T., & Suntiamorntut, W. (2011). Scalable routing protocol in wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Conference on Communication Software and Networks (pp. 623–627).
30.
Mahmood, M. A., Seah, W. K., & Welch, I. (2015). Reliability in wireless sensor networks: A survey and challenges ahead. Computer Networks, 79(Supplement C), 166–187.CrossRef
31.
Sohrabi, K., Gao, J., Ailawadhi, V., & Pottie, G. (2000). Protocols for self-organization of a wireless sensor network. IEEE Personal Communications, 7(5), 16–27.CrossRef
32.
Sirsikar, S., Chunawale, A., & Chandak, M. (2014). Self-organization architecture and model for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE International Conference on Electronic Systems, Signal Processing and Computing Technologies (pp. 204–208).
33.
Spadoni, I. M. B., Araujo, R. B., & Marconde, C. (2009). Improving QoS in wireless sensor networks through adaptable mobile agents. In IEEE INFOCOM Workshops 2009 (pp. 1–2).
34.
Patel, M., & Aggarwal, A. (2013) Security attacks in wireless sensor networks: A survey. In IEEE Conference on Intelligent Systems and Signal Processing (pp. 329–333).
35.
Gaware, A., & Dhonde, S. (2016). A survey on security attacks in wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (pp. 536–539).
36.
Sarode, S., Bakal, J., & Malik, L. (2015). Performance analysis of QoS parameters for constraint based WSNs. In IEEE Advance Computing Conference (pp. 877–882).
37.
Rao, G. S., & Kumari, V. V. (2012). A study on various deployment schemes for wireless sensor networks (pp. 495–505). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
38.
Zhang, R., & Gorce, J. M. (2007). Connectivity of wireless sensor networks with unreliable links. In IEEE Conference on Communications and Networking in China (pp. 866–870).
39.
Lindsey, S., Raghavendra, C., & Sivalingam, K. M. (2002). Data gathering algorithms in sensor networks using energy metrics. IEEE Transactions Parallel Distributed System., 13(9), 924–935.CrossRef
40.
Jung, S. M., Han, Y. J., & Chung, T. M. (2007). The concentric clustering scheme for efficient energy consumption in the PEGASIS. IEEE Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, 1, 260–265.CrossRef
41.
Xi-rong, B., Shi, Z., Ding-yu, X., & Zhi-tao, Q. (2010). An energy-balanced chain-cluster routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Conference on Networks, Security Wireless Communications and Trusted Computing, 2, 79–84.
42.
Chen, K.-H., Huang, J.-M., & Hsiao, C.-C. (2009). CHIRON: an energy-efficient chain-based hierarchical routing protocol in wireless sensor networks. In ACM-IEEE Conference on Wireless Telecommunications Symposium (pp. 183–187). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
43.
Ding, M., Cheng, X., & Xue, G. (2003). Aggregation tree construction in sensor networks. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 4, 2168–2172. Vol.4.
44.
Kim, H. S., & Han, K. J. (2005). A power efficient routing protocol based on balanced tree in wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Conference on Distributed Frameworks for Multimedia Applications (pp. 138–143).
45.
Tan, H. O., & Körpeoǧlu, I. (2003). Power efficient data gathering and aggregation in wireless sensor networks. ACM SIGMOD Record, 32(4), 66–71.CrossRef
46.
Qiu, W., Skafidas, E., & Hao, P. (2009). Enhanced tree routing for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 7(3), 638–650.CrossRef
47.
Buttyan, L., & Schaffer, P. (2007). PANEL: Position-based aggregator node election in wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems (pp. 1–9).
48.
Luo, H., Ye, F., Cheng, J., Lu, S., & Zhang, L. (2005). TTDD: Two-tier data dissemination in large-scale wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 11(1), 161–175.CrossRef
49.
Koutsonikolas, D., Das, S., Hu, Y. C., Stojmenovic, I. (2007). Hierarchical geographic multicast routing for wireless sensor networks. In Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications (pp. 347–354).
50.
Banimelhem, O., & Khasawneh, S. (2012). GMCAR: Grid-based multipath with congestion avoidance routing protocol in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(7), 1346–1361.CrossRef
51.
Hamida, E., & Chelius, G. (2008) A line-based data dissemination protocol for wireless sensor networks with mobile sink. In IEEE Conference on Communications (pp. 2201–2205).
52.
Tunca, C., Isik, S., Donmez, M. Y., & Ersoy, C. (2015). Ring routing: An energy-efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor networks with a mobile sink. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 14(9), 1947–1960.CrossRef
53.
Shin, J.-H., Kim, J., Park, K., & Park, D. (2005). Railroad: Virtual infrastructure for data dissemination in wireless sensor networks. In ACM Workshop on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Networks, New York, NY (pp. 168–174).
54.
Mo, H., Lee, E., Park, S., & Kim, S. (2013). Virtual line-based data dissemination for mobile sink groups in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 17(9), 1864–1867.CrossRef
55.
Mishra, A. K., Rahman, R. U., Bharadwaj, R., & Sharma, R. (2015). An enhancement of PEGASIS protocol with improved network lifetime for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Power, Communication and Information Technology Conference (pp. 142–147).
56.
Dutta, R., & Gupta, S. (2016). Energy aware modified PEGASIS through packet transmission in wireless sensor network. In IEEE Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (pp. 443–446).
57.
Tan, N. D., & Viet, N. D. (2015) SSTBC: Sleep scheduled and tree-based clustering routing protocol for energy-efficient in wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Conference on Computing Communication Technologies (pp. 180–185).
58.
Kareem, H., & Jameel, H. (2018). Maintain load balancing in wireless sensor networks using virtual grid based routing protocol. In IEEE Conference on Advanced Science and Engineering (ICOASE) (pp. 227–232).
59.
Bhatti, R., Kaur, G. (2017). Virtual grid based energy efficient mobile sink routing algorithm for WSN. In IEEE Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control (ISCO) (pp. 30–33).
60.
Singh, B., Singh, T., & Sachdeva, H. S. (2017). Evaluating the performance of density grid-based clustering using ABC technique for efficient routing in WSNs. In IEEE Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS) (pp. 1–7).
61.
Ali, M., Dey, T., & Biswas, R. (2008). ALEACH: advanced LEACH routing protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In IEEE Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (pp. 909–914).
62.
Tong, M., & Tang, M. (2010). Leach-b: An improved leach protocol for wireless sensor network. In IEEE Conference on Wireless Communications Networking and Mobile Computing (pp. 1–4).
63.
Mehta, R., Pandey, A., & Kapadia, P. (2012). Reforming clusters using C-LEACH in wireless sensor networks. In International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (pp. 1–4).
64.
Tripathi, M., Battula, R. B., Gaur, M. S., & Laxmi, V. (2013). Energy efficient clustered routing for wireless sensor network. In IEEE Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Networks (pp. 330–335).
65.
Handy, M., Haase, M., & Timmermann, D. (2002). Low energy adaptive clustering hierarchy with deterministic cluster-head selection. In IEEE Workshop on Mobile and Wireless Communications Network (pp. 368–372).
66.
Xu, J., Jin, N., Lou, X., Peng, T., Zhou, Q., & Chen, Y. (2012). Improvement of leach protocol for WSN. In IEEE Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (pp. 2174–2177).
67.
Azim, A., & Islam, M. (2009). Hybrid LEACH: A relay node based low energy adaptive clustering hierarchy for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Conference on Communications (pp. 911–916).
68.
Beiranvand, Z., Patooghy, A., & Fazeli, M. (2013). I-LEACH: An efficient routing algorithm to improve performance amp; to reduce energy consumption in wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Conference on Information and Knowledge Technology (pp. 13–18).
69.
Udompongsuk, K., So-In, C., Phaudphut, C., Rujirakul, K., Soomlek, C., & Waikham, B. (2014). MAP: An optimized energy-efficient cluster header selection technique for wireless sensor networks. In H. Jeong, M. S. Obaidat, N. Yen, & J. Park (Eds.), Springer advances in computer science and its applications (pp. 191–199). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
70.
Li, Y., Ding, L., & Liu, F. (2011). The improvement of LEACH protocol in wsn. IEEE Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology, 2, 1345–1348.
71.
Jin, K., Zhang, Y., & Tian, D. (2012). Based on the improvement of LEACH protocol for wireless sensor network routing algorithm. IEEE Conference on Intelligent System Design and Engineering Application (pp. 1525–1528).
72.
Manzoor, B., Javaid, N., Rehman, O., Akbar, M., Nadeem, Q., Iqbal, A., et al. (2013). Q-LEACH: A new routing protocol for WSNs. Procedia Computer Science, 19, 926–931.CrossRef
73.
Wang, A., Yang, D., & Sun, D. (2012). A clustering algorithm based on energy information and cluster heads expectation for wireless sensor networks. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 38, 662–671.CrossRef
74.
Thein, M., & Thein, T. (2010). An energy efficient cluster-head selection for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation (pp. 287–291).
75.
Hou, R., Ren, W., & Zhang, Y. (2009). A wireless sensor network clustering algorithm based on energy and distance. IEEE Workshop on Computer Science and Engineering, 1, 439–442.
76.
Ren, P., Qian, J., Li, L., Zhao, Z., & Li, X. (2010). Unequal clustering scheme based leach for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computing (pp. 90–93).
77.
So-In, C., Udompongsuk, K., Phudphut, C., Rujirakul, K., & Khunboa, C. (2013). Performance evaluation of LEACH on cluster head selection techniques in wireless sensor networks. In Springer Conference on Computing and Information Technology (pp. 51–61). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
78.
Angurala, M., & Bharti. (2016). A comparative study between leach and pegasis—A review. In IEEE Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (pp. 3271–3274).
79.
Misra, S., & Kumar, R. (2017). An analytical study of leach and pegasis protocol in wireless sensor network. In IEEE Conference on Innovations in Information, Embedded and Communication Systems (pp. 1–5).
80.
Sharma, I., Singh, R., & Khurana, M. (2015). Comparative study of leach, leach-c and pegasis routing protocols for wireless sensor network. In IEEE Conference on Advances in Computer Engineering and Applications (pp. 842–846).
81.
Miorandi, D., Sicari, S., Pellegrini, F. D., & Chlamtac, I. (2012). Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges. Elseiver Ad Hoc Networks, 10(7), 1497–1516.CrossRef
82.
Patel, N., & Kumar, S. (2018) Wireless sensor networks—Challenges and future prospects. In IEEE Conference on System Modeling Advancement in Research Trends (SMART) (pp. 60–65).
83.
Ninikrishna, T., Sarkar, S., Tengshe, R., Jha, M., Sharma, L., Daliya, V., et al. (2017). Software defined iot: Issues and challenges. In IEEE Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC) (pp. 723–726).
84.
Lu, Y., & Xu, L. (2019). Internet of things (iot) cybersecurity research: A review of current research topics. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(2), 2103–2115.CrossRef
85.
Alagar, V., Alsaig, A., Ormandjiva, O., & Wan, K. (2018). Context-based security and privacy for healthcare iot. In IEEE Conference on Smart Internet of Things (pp. 122–128).
86.
Afolabi, D., Man, K. L., Liang, H.-N., Lim, E. G., Shen, Z., Lei, C.-U., et al. (2013). A WSN approach to unmanned aerial surveillance of traffic anomalies: Some challenges and potential solutions. In IEEE East-West Design Test Symposium (pp. 1–4).
87.
Bera, S., Misra, S., Roy, S. K., & Obaidat, M. S. (2018). Soft-WSN: Software-defined WSN management system for IoT applications. IEEE Systems Journal, 12(3), 2074–2081.CrossRef
88.
Zhang, Y., Sun, L., Song, H., & Cao, X. (2014). Ubiquitous wsn for healthcare: Recent advances and future prospects. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1(4), 311–318.CrossRef
89.
Mir, A., & Khachane, A. (2018). Sensing harmful gases in industries using IoT and WSN. In IEEE Conference on Computing Communication Control and Automation (pp. 1–3).
90.
Seah, W. K. G., Eu, Z. A., & Tan, H. (2018). Wireless sensor networks powered by ambient energy harvesting (WSN-heap)—Survey and challenges. IEEE Conference on Wireless Communication, Information Theory and Aerospace Electronic Systems Technology: Vehicular Technology (pp. 1–5).
Metadaten
Titel
Hierarchical routing protocols for wireless sensor network: a compressive survey
verfasst von
Louie Chan
Karina Gomez Chavez
Heiko Rudolph
Akram Hourani
Publikationsdatum
27.01.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Networks / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1022-0038
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8196
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02260-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

Wireless Networks 5/2020 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

User-assisted bearer split control for dual connectivity in multi-RAT 5G networks

OriginalPaper

Measurement and analysis of Wi-MAX channel in 3.3 GHz using minimal-ray fading model

OriginalPaper

An analytical framework for reliability evaluation of d-dimensional IEEE 802.11 broadcast wireless networks

OriginalPaper

Inter-slice handover management in a V2X slicing environment using bargaining games

OriginalPaper

Simultaneous wireless information and power transfer in heterogeneous cellular networks with underlay D2D communication

OriginalPaper

Adaptive directed evolved NSGA2 based node placement optimization for wireless sensor networks

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise